Does the presence of thrombus seen on a coronary angiogram affect the outcome after percutaneous coronary angioplasty? An Angiographic Trials Pool data experience.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether pre-existing angiographic thrombus was associated with adverse in-hospital and six-month outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions. BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data about whether pre-existing thrombus is an independent predictor of adverse in-hospital and short-term outcome after coronary interventions. METHODS: The Angiographic Trials Pool, a data set derived from eight prospective randomized trials, was analyzed. The study population consisted of 7,917 patients who underwent coronary interventions between 1986 and 1995. Two trials were excluded because they did not collect information regarding thrombus. Patients from the other six trials were divided on the basis of the presence or absence of thrombus. RESULTS: In patients with (n = 2,752) and without (5,165) thrombus, in-hospital mortality following angioplasty was low (0.8 vs. 0.6%, p = 0.207). Several adverse outcomes were higher in patients with thrombus: death/myocardial infarction (8.4 vs. 5.5%, p < or = 0.001), in-hospital abrupt closure (5.9 vs. 3.9%, p < or = 0.001) and an in-hospital composite of death, myocardial infarction and/or repeat revascularization (15.4 vs. 11.2%, p < or = 0.001). Six-month mortality was low and comparable between the two groups (2.1 vs. 1.8%, p = 0.34), but the incidence of six-month death/myocardial infarction was higher in patients with thrombus (11.7 vs. 8.7%, p < or = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous coronary angioplasty can be performed with low mortality in patients with pre-existing thrombus, although these patients are at higher risk of in-hospital and six-month death/myocardial infarction. Continued efforts are required to optimize the outcome in these high risk patients.

Primary percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with acute myocardial infarction and prior coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is unclear. We sought to assess the outcome of patients with prior CABG undergoing primary PCI for the treatment of AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1991 and 1997, 1072 patients with AMI underwent primary PCI without antecedent thrombolytic therapy at the Mayo Clinic. There were 128 patients with previous CABG and 944 without previous CABG. Patients with previous CABG were further subdivided according to the treated vessel: native vessels (n = 65) and bypass graft (n = 63). Clinical and angiographic characteristics and 30-day and 1-year outcomes were evaluated. Patients with previous CABG were significantly older and had a higher incidence of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. They had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction and were also more likely to have congestive heart failure. After 1 year of follow-up, adverse cardiac events (death, MI, CABG, or repeat PCI) were significantly greater in patients with prior CABG (49.2% vs 35.9%, P =.04). With use of multivariate logistic regression analysis to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics, the treatment of vein graft was independently associated with adverse cardiac events (relative risk 1.48 [95% confidence interval 1.07-2.03], P =.02), but a history of prior CABG itself was not (relative risk 1.22 [95% confidence interval 0.96-1.56], P =.11). CONCLUSIONS: Primary PCI for AMI in patients with previous CABG is associated with higher adverse events largely attributable to adverse baseline clinical characteristics and the treatment of a vein graft.

Optimisation of the management of patients with coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a prevalent disease in Westernised society, and more than 50% of individuals with diabetes mellitus die from cardiovascular causes. The underlying metabolic defect of type 2 diabetes mellitus is a combination of insulin resistance and decreased secretion of insulin by pancreatic beta-cells. Insulin resistance commonly precedes the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is usually associated with a metabolic syndrome including hypertension, dyslipidaemia and obesity. Treatment of known cardiovascular risk factors, including hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and smoking, plays a key role in delaying the onset and progression of coronary heart disease (CHD) and other forms of atherosclerosis in patients with diabetes mellitus. Sulphonylureas should be used with caution in patients with CHD but aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors play an important role in the medical management of patients with established coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Patients with diabetes mellitus represent a higher risk group of patients after both percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularisation and the decision regarding the choice of revascularisation procedure should take into account angiographic characteristics, clinical status and patient preference. Patients presenting with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction should be considered for reperfusion therapy with either urgent thrombolytic therapy or primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Glycemic control and outcome of diabetic patients after successful percutaneous coronary revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine whether the outcome of diabetic patients after successful percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCR) is influenced by the degree of control of hyperglycemia at the time of revascularization. BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients have a worse outcome after PCR. METHODS: We examined whether the degree of glycemic control (HbA(1c) levels) affected the occurrence of all-cause death and death/myocardial infarction among diabetic patients after successful PCR from October 1979 through December 1998. HbA(1c) was analyzed both as a continuous and a categorical variable (good [HbA(1c) <8.0%, n = 700], moderate [8.0% < or = HbA(1c) < or =10%, n = 442], or poor [HbA(1c) >10%, n = 231] control). RESULTS: HbA(1c) levels were determined at a median (25th, 75th interquartiles) of 3 (1, 10) days after the index procedure for patients with good control, 2 (1, 7) days for moderate control, and 2 (1, 6) days for poor control. Median follow-up after successful PCR was 3.2 (1.2, 6.1) years, 3.9 (1.7,6.3) years, and 4.7 (2.1, 7.1) years, respectively. HbA(1c) as a continuous variable did not have an impact on either death (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.04 [0.98-1.10]) or death/myocardial infarction (1.02 [0.98-1.07]). As a categorical variable, patients with moderate and poor control had a similar hazard of death (0.99 [0.78-1.26] and 1. 14 [0.86-1.52], respectively) and death/myocardial infarction (1.01 [0.82-1.24] and 1.12 [0.87-1.45], respectively) relative to those with good control. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of glycemic control among diabetic patients at the time of their index intervention did not have an impact on long-term outcomes after successful PCR.

Clinical and angiographic outcome in the laser angioplasty for restenotic stents (LARS) multicenter registry.

In-stent restenosis (ISR), when treated with balloon angioplasty (PTCA) alone, has an angiographic recurrence rate of 30%-85%. Ablating the hypertrophic neointimal tissue prior to PTCA is an attractive alternative, yet the late outcomes of such treatment have not been fully determined. This multicenter case control study assessed the angiographic and clinical outcomes of 157 consecutive procedures in 146 patients with ISR at nine institutions treated with either PTCA alone (n = 64) or excimer laser assisted coronary angioplasty (ELCA, n = 93)) for ISR. Demographics were similar except more unstable angina at presentation in ELCA-treated patients (74.5% vs. 63.5%; P = 0.141). Lesions selected for ELCA were longer (16.8 +/- 11.2 mm vs. 11.2 +/- 8.6 mm; P < 0.001), more complex (ACC/AHA type C: 35.1% vs. 13.6%; P < 0.001), and with compromised antegrade flow (TIMI flow < 3: 18.9% vs. 4.5%; P = 0.008) compared to PTCA-treated patients. ELCA-treated patients had similar rate of procedural success [93 (98.9% vs. 62 (98.4%); P = 1.0] and major clinical complications [1 (1.1%) vs. 1 (1.6%); P = 1.0]. At 30 days, repeat target site coronary intervention was lower in ELCA-treated patients (1.1% vs. 6.4% in PTCA-treated patients; P = 0.158), but not significantly so. At 1 year, ELCA-treated patients had similar rate of major cardiac events (39.1% vs. 45.2%; P = 0.456) and target lesion revascularization (30.0% vs. 32.3%; P = 0.646). These data suggest that ELCA in patients with complex in-stent restenosis is as safe and effective as balloon angioplasty alone. Despite higher lesion complexity in ELCA-treated patients, no increase in event rates was observed. Future studies should evaluate the relative benefit of ELCA over PTCA alone for the prevention of symptom recurrence specifically in patients with complex in-stent restenosis.

Immediate and one-year outcome of intracoronary stent implantation in small coronary arteries with 2.5-mm stents.

BACKGROUND: The role of coronary stenting in the treatment of stenoses in small coronary arteries with use of 2.5-mm stents is not well defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 1995 and August 1999, 651 patients with stenoses in small coronary arteries were treated with 2.5-mm stents (n = 108) or 2.5-mm conventional balloon angioplasty (BA) (n = 543). Patients who received treatment with both 2.5-mm and > or =3.0-mm stent placement or balloons were excluded. Procedural success and complication rates as well as 1-year follow-up outcomes were examined. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups, except patients in the stent group were more likely to have hypertension and a family history of coronary artery disease and less likely to have prior myocardial infarction. Angiographic success rates were higher in the stent group (97.2% vs 90.2%, P =.02). In-hospital complication rates were comparable between the two groups. Among successfully treated patients, 1-year follow-up revealed no significant differences in the survival (96.2% vs 95.2%, P =.89) or the frequency of Q-wave myocardial infarction (0% vs 0.4%, P =.60) or coronary artery bypass grafting (8.4% vs 6.8%, P =.89) between the stent and BA groups, respectively. However, patients in the stent group were more likely to have adverse cardiac events (35.4% vs 22.1%, P =.05). Stent use after excluding GR II stent use, however, was not independently associated with reduced cardiac events at follow-up (relative risk 1. 3 [95% confidence interval 0.8-2.3], P =.30). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary stent implantation of stenoses in small coronary arteries with 2.5-mm stents can be carried out with high success and acceptable complication rates. However, compared with BA alone, stent use was not associated with improved outcome through 1 year of follow-up.

Asymptomatic occlusion of the left main coronary artery by an aortic pseudoaneurysm.

Extrinsic compression of the left main coronary artery is a rare cause of coronary ischemia. We describe a 35-year-old Asian woman with complete asymptomatic occlusion of the left main coronary artery by a large aortic pseudoaneurysm. She underwent repair of the pseudoaneurysm and coronary artery bypass grafting at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. The differential diagnosis is discussed. Based on this patient's age and associated vascular lesions, we conclude that Takayasu arteritis was the most likely cause of her condition.

Improving outcome over time of percutaneous coronary interventions in unstable angina.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the recent changes in the outcome of coronary interventions in patients with unstable angina (UA). BACKGROUND: An early invasive strategy has not been shown to be superior to conservative treatment in patients with UA. Earlier studies had utilized older technology. Interventional approaches have changed in the recent past, but to our knowledge, no large studies have addressed the impact of these changes on the outcome of coronary interventions. METHODS: We analyzed the in-hospital and intermediate-term outcome in 7,632 patients with UA who underwent coronary interventions in the last two decades. The study population was divided into three groups: group 1, n = 2,209 who had coronary intervention from 1979 to 1989; group 2, n = 2,212 with interventions from 1990 to 1993; and group 3, n = 3,211 treated from 1994 to 1998. RESULTS: Group 2 and 3 patients were older and sicker compared with group 1 patients. The clinical success improved significantly in group 3 (94.1%) compared with group 2 (87%) and group 1 (76.5%) (p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction and need for emergency bypass surgery in group 3 compared with the earlier groups. One-year event-free survival was also significantly higher in the recent group compared with the earlier groups: 77% in group 3, 70% in group 2 and 74% in group 1 (p < 0.001). With the use of multivariate models to adjust for clinical and angiographic variables, treatment during the most recent era was found to be independently associated with improved in-hospital and intermediate-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There has been significant improvement in the in-hospital and intermediate-term outcome of coronary interventions in patients with UA in recent years; newer trials comparing conservative and invasive strategies are therefore needed.

Application of the New York State PTCA mortality model in patients undergoing stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: This study applied the New York State conventional coronary angioplasty (PTCA) model of clinical outcomes to evaluate whether it has relevance in the current era of stent implantation. The model was developed in 62 670 patients treated with conventional PTCA from 1991 to 1994 to risk adjust mortality and bypass surgery after PTCA. Since then, stents have become the dominant form of intervention. Whether that model remains relevant is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients undergoing stenting at the Mayo Clinic from 1995 to 1998 were analyzed for in-hospital mortality, bypass surgery performed after attempted stenting, and longer-term mortality. No patients were excluded. The New York model was used to risk adjust and predict in-hospital and follow-up mortality. There were 3761 patients with 4063 procedural admissions for stenting; 6,472 target vessel segments were attempted, and 96.1% of procedures were successful. With the New York multivariable risk factor equation, 79 in-hospital deaths were expected (1.95%); 66 deaths (1.62%) were observed. The New York model risk score in a logistic regression model was the most significant factor associated with in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.86; P<0.001). During a mean follow-up of 1.2+/-1.0 years, there were 154 deaths. Multivariable analysis documented 6 factors associated with subsequent mortality; New York risk score was the most significant (chi(2)=16.64, P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the New York mortality model was developed in an era of conventional angioplasty, it remains relevant in patients undergoing stenting. The risk score derived from that model is the variable most significantly associated with not only in-hospital but also longer-term outcome.

Prediction of death after percutaneous coronary interventional procedures.

BACKGROUND: The prediction and comparison of procedural death after percutaneous coronary interventional procedures is inherently difficult because of variations in case mix and practice patterns. The impact of modern, expanded patient selection criteria, and newer technologic approaches is unknown. Our objective was to determine whether a risk equation based on patient-related variables and derived from an independent data set can accurately predict procedural death after percutaneous coronary intervention in the current era. METHODS AND RESULTS: An analysis was made of the Mayo Clinic Coronary Interventional Database January 1, 1995, to October 31, 1997. Expected mortality rate was calculated with the use of the New York State multivariate risk score. In 3387 patients, 3830 procedures (55.1% stents) were performed, with an expected mortality rate of 2.32% and observed mortality rate of 2.38% (P = not significant). The risk score derived from the New York multivariate model was highly predictive of death (chi-square = 213.8; P <.0001). The presence of a high-risk lesion characteristic such as calcium, thrombus, or type C lesion was modestly associated with death. CONCLUSIONS: The New York State multivariate model accurately predicted procedural death in our database.

Immediate and long-term outcome of intracoronary stent implantation for true bifurcation lesions.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate and long-term outcome of intracoronary stent implantation for the treatment of coronary artery bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Balloon angioplasty of true coronary bifurcation lesions is associated with a lower success and higher complication rate than most other lesion types. METHODS: We treated 131 patients with bifurcation lesions with > or =1 stent. Patients were divided into two groups; Group (Gp) 1 included 77 patients treated with a stent in one branch and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (with or without atherectomy) in the side branch, and Gp 2 included 54 patients who underwent stent deployment in both branches. The Gp 2 patients were subsequently divided into two subgroups depending on the technique of stent deployment. The Gp 2a included 19 patients who underwent Y-stenting, and Gp 2b included 33 patients who underwent T-stenting. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, frequency of prior myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or vessels treated. Procedural success rates were excellent (89.5 to 97.4%). After one-year follow-up, no significant differences were seen in the frequency of major adverse events (death, MI, or repeat revascularization) between Gp 1 and Gp 2. Adverse cardiac events were higher with Y-stenting compared with T-stenting (86.3% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Stenting of bifurcation lesions can be achieved with a high success rate. However, stenting of both branches offers no advantage over stenting one branch and performing balloon angioplasty of the other branch.

Immediate and late outcomes after direct stent implantation without balloon predilation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to compare the in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of direct coronary stenting with balloon predilation followed by stent placement. BACKGROUND: With improvement in stent designs, the practice of direct stenting without balloon predilation has become more widespread. METHODS: We analyzed the Mayo Clinic Coronary Intervention data base between January 1, 1995 and March 5, 1999 and identified 777 patients who were treated with direct stenting (DS) and 3,176 patients treated with balloon angioplasty plus stenting (BA+S). RESULTS: The procedural success rates between the DS and BA+S groups were not significantly different (96.3% vs. 96.4%). The ability to deliver the stent in a subgroup of patients who had DS was 95%, with 5% requiring crossover to predilation. Multivariate analysis showed no significant differences with respect to in-hospital death (odds ratio [OR] 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5 to 1.8), in-hospital myocardial infarction (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.2) or revascularization (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.5) in the DS compared with the BA+S group. Long-term outcomes were not significantly different between the DS and BA+S groups. The procedural duration was significantly shorter in the DS group, and there was a decreased utilization of contrast agent, balloons and wires. CONCLUSIONS: The in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing a coronary intervention are equivalent when comparing stenting without balloon predilation with balloon angioplasty followed by stenting. Direct stenting is associated with decreased utilization of contrast agent and equipment and shorter procedure times. A randomized study should be performed to better determine the impact of this technique on short- and long-term procedural outcomes.

Effect of age on the outcome of angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction among patients treated at the Mayo Clinic.

PURPOSE: Elderly patients, especially those 80 years of age and older, have been excluded from most studies of thrombolysis or primary coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. We compared the outcomes of elderly patients who underwent coronary angioplasty with the outcomes of younger patients and determined whether there were any temporal trends in survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the outcomes of 1,597 consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary angioplasty between 1979 and 1997, including 127 patients who were 80 years of age or older (mean [+/-SD] age, 83 +/- 3 years, 47% male). Their in-hospital and long-term outcomes were compared with those of 524 patients who were 70 to 79 years old, 527 patients who were 60 to 69 years old, and 419 patients who were 50 to 59 years old. The oldest group of patients was divided into two groups, based on whether they had intervention through the end of 1993 (n = 56) or between 1994 and 1997 (n = 71). The survival rate of the patients who had no complications and left the hospital was compared with expected survival based on age- and sex-adjusted data. RESULTS: Patients 80 years of age or older had more adverse baseline characteristics, including risk factors and comorbid conditions, than the younger patients. The clinical success rate of primary angioplasty in this group was lower than those in the other three groups (61% versus 74% in those aged 70 to 79 years, 73% in those aged 60 to 69 years, and 81% in those aged 50 to 59 years, P < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate among patients 80 years of age or older was significantly greater than among patients in the other three groups (21% in those aged 80 years or older, 13% in those aged 70 to 79 years, 9% in those aged 60 to 69 years, and 4% in those aged 50 to 59 years, P < 0.001 ). The clinical success rate of the angioplasty improved significantly in the more recent period (75% versus 45%, P = 0.0006) and in-hospital mortality declined (16% versus 29%, P = 0.07). During follow-up, mortality in the oldest age group in whom angioplasty was successful was significantly greater than in the three younger groups, but was similar to the expected survival in the general US population. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality associated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in octogenarians remains high, although there has been significant improvement in the clinical success rate. The long-term prognosis following a successful angioplasty is not different from that in an age- and sex-adjusted U.S. white population.

Staphylococcus lugdunensis endocarditis: a complication of vasectomy?

Three cases of Staphylococcus lugdunensis endocarditis have been reported in patients with a history of vasectomy preceding the development of endocarditis. We describe a new case of a 39-year-old man who developed infective endocarditis due to S. lugdunensis after vasectomy. He was successfully treated with a 7-week course of intravenous antibiotics and subsequently underwent mitral valve reconstruction for severe mitral regurgitation. The present case further supports an association between vasectomy and S. lugdunensis endocarditis.

Clinical outcome after multivessel coronary stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has been shown to be an effective therapy for multivessel coronary artery disease, although more frequent acute complications and an increased need to repeat revascularization than with single-vessel PTCA continue to be limitations. Intracoronary stent placement has been shown to reduce the rate of acute complications and the need for subsequent revascularization. We sought to evaluate the outcome among patients undergoing successful multivessel coronary intervention with stents. METHODS: The participants were 175 patients without coronary artery bypass grafts who underwent multivessel coronary revascularization in which stent placement was attempted in all treated segments from January 1992 through March 1998 at our institution. Clinical and angiographic characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Stent placement was attempted for 428 coronary lesions. The angiographic success rate was 100%. Modified American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association type B2 and C lesions accounted for 74.5% of the lesions. Three patients (1.7%) died in the hospital. No patient had Q-wave myocardial infarction or needed coronary artery bypass grafting. Procedural success was achieved for 172 patients (98.3%). The Kaplan-Meier probability of freedom from death or myocardial infarction at 12 months was 96.6%, of any revascularization was 81. 7%, and of death, myocardial infarction, and any revascularization combined was 79.8%. The use of long-acting nitrates at 12 months was reduced (34.3% versus 19.1%, P =.01). CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel coronary stent placement is associated with an excellent procedural success rate despite a high rate of adverse lesion characteristics and a high event-free survival rate during the follow-up period. The likelihood that revascularization will not have to be repeated during the first follow-up year is significantly better than that for historic controls of multivessel PTCA.

The influence of abciximab use on clinical outcome after aortocoronary vein graft interventions.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of abciximab use on clinical outcome in aortocoronary vein graft interventions. BACKGROUND: Although large randomized trials have demonstrated a significant benefit of abciximab use in the setting of percutaneous coronary interventions, there is relatively little data with respect to the use of this agent in percutaneous vein graft interventions. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-three patients were identified; 210 undergoing vein graft intervention without abciximab and 133 patients with abciximab. RESULTS: There were differences in baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics between the two groups; advanced age, unstable angina, older vein grafts and thrombus containing lesions were relatively common in both groups. Angiographic and procedural success rates were similar with or without the use of abciximab (89% vs. 92%, p = 0.15, and 85% vs. 91%, p = 0.12, respectively). The in-hospital composite end point of death/Q-wave myocardial infarction (QWMI)/repeat revascularization was similar between the two groups. Utilizing statistical modeling to adjust for baseline differences between the groups, abciximab use did not influence the cumulative long-term composite end point of death/MI/repeat revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that in this relatively high-risk population undergoing aortocoronary vein graft interventions, the administration of abciximab periprocedurally does not appear to reduce major adverse clinical events.

Baseline clinical and angiographic variables associated with long-term outcome after successful intracoronary stent implantation.

Although randomized studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with stents over balloon angioplasty in straightforward coronary narrowings in low-risk patients, this advantage is less clear for complex lesions and high-risk patients. This study was designed to identify clinical and angiographic variables that are associated with long-term outcome after stent implantation. We identified 1,709 patients undergoing successful stent placement without in-hospital major adverse events. We analyzed clinical, lesional, and procedural variables to determine their correlation with outcome. Mean duration of follow-up was 1.6 +/- 1.4 years. Cox proportional-hazards models and stepwise methods were used to assess which covariates were potentially related to each end point. The occurrence of death/myocardial infarction (MI) was associated with any history of congestive heart failure (relative risk [RR] 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3 to 4.7, p <0.0001), procedure within 24 hours of MI (RR 2.3, CI 1.3 to 4.1, p = 0.0048), vein graft intervention (RR 1.8, CI 1.3 to 2.6, p = 0.0007), and prior MI (RR 1.8, CI 1.2 to 2.6, p = 0.004). Repeat revascularization was associated with multivessel stent placement (RR 1.8, CI 1.2 to 2.8, p = 0.006) and stent for abrupt closure (RR 1.7, CF 1.1 to 2.7, p = 0.03), but was less frequent with de novo lesions and right coronary artery lesions (RR 0.6, CI 0.5 to 0.8, p = 0.0007, and RR 0.8, CI 0.6 to 1.0, p = 0.05, respectively). The cumulative end point of death/MI/repeat revascularization was associated with congestive heart failure (RR 1.7, CI 1.3 to 2.2, p <0.0001), multivessel stent placement (RR 1.6, Cl 1.1 to 2.3, p = 0.03), warfarin therapy (RR 1.4, CI 1.2 to 1.8, p = 0.001), and procedure within 24 hours of MI (RR 1.5, CI 1.1 to 2.1, p = 0.02), but was less frequent with complete revascularization and right coronary artery intervention (RR 0.8, CI 0.7 to 0.99, p = 0.04, and RR 0.7, CI 0.6 to 0.9, p = 0.009, respectively). Thus, this study demonstrates that there are readily identifiable characteristics in patients treated successfully with stents that are associated with long-term outcome.

Clinical, angiographic, and procedural correlates of abrupt vascular closure during coronary intervention: a 10-year experience at Mayo Clinic.

A large matched-cohort study was carried out to determine correlates of in-hospital abrupt vascular closure (AC). Univariate analysis identified current cigarette smoking (P = 0.021), myocardial infarction within 24 hr prior to procedure (P = 0.0035), emergency procedure (P = 0.02), lesion thrombus (P = 0.0001), and lesion angulation (P = 0.021) as significant clinical and angiographic variables. Relative to balloon angioplasty (PTCA), use of atherectomy (P = 0.015) and laser devices (P = 0.018) but not elective stent placement (P = 0.97) were associated with increased risk of AC. In the multivariate model, current cigarette smoking (P = 0.0474), lesion thrombus (P = 0.0001), lesion angulation (P = 0.0124), use of atherectomy devices (P = 0.001), and laser devices (P = 0.0037) remained as significant correlates of increased AC events. In conclusion, the risk of AC appears associated primarily with lesion characteristics and use of nonballoon devices other than stents. Elective stent placement did not appear to reduce AC risk over conventional PTCA; the small number of patients studied may have prevented any benefit from being observed.

Smoking status and outcome after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Because of the increased propensity of intracoronary thrombi to form in cigarette smokers, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may be less effective in smokers. We sought to determine the impact of smoking status on outcome after PTCA for AMI. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the GUSTO IIb Angioplasty Substudy were randomly assigned to receive PTCA or tissue-plasminogen activator (tPA) for AMI. The interaction of smoking status (nonsmokers = 344, former smokers = 294, current smokers = 490) and treatment strategy with the occurrence of death, nonfatal reinfarction, or nonfatal, disabling stroke at 30 days was analyzed. Procedural success (residual stenosis <50% and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 3) was also analyzed for patients who underwent PTCA (n = 444). RESULTS: Among patients who underwent PTCA, nonsmokers had worse percent stenosis of the culprit lesion before reperfusion (P =.03) and more often had TIMI flow grade 0 (P <.05). Procedural success was more common in smokers (65.6%) than in former smokers (53.3%) and nonsmokers (52. 4%; P =.02), reflecting a higher rate of postprocedure TIMI 3 flow. PTCA was associated with a better 30-day outcome than tPA for current smokers (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.41 [0.19 to 0.88]), with a similar trend for former smokers (0.73 [0.34 to 1. 58]) and nonsmokers (0.77 [0.42 to 1.40]). At 6 months, smokers randomly assigned to PTCA also had fewer deaths and reinfarction (0. 58 [0.31 to 1.07]). CONCLUSIONS: Although smoking status affects angiographic variables before and after PTCA for AMI, PTCA is associated with a better 30-day outcome than tPA regardless of smoking status and should be considered when readily available.