Down-regulation of TDT transcription in CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocytes by Ikaros proteins in direct competition with an Ets activator.

Ikaros is a unique regulator of lymphopoiesis that associates with pericentromeric heterochromatin and has been implicated in heritable gene inactivation. Binding and competition experiments demonstrate that Ikaros dimers compete with an Ets activator for occupancy of the lymphocyte-specific TdT promoter. Mutations that selectively disrupt Ikaros binding to an integrated TdT promoter had no effect on promoter function in a CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocyte line. However, these mutations abolished down-regulation on differentiation, providing evidence that Ikaros plays a direct role in repression. Reduced access to restriction enzyme cleavage suggested that chromatin alterations accompany down-regulation. The Ikaros-dependent down-regulation event and the observed chromatin alterations appear to precede pericentromeric repositioning. Current models propose that the functions of Ikaros should be disrupted by a small isoform that retains the dimerization domain and lacks the DNA-binding domain. Surprisingly, in the CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocyte line, overexpression of a small Ikaros isoform had no effect on differentiation or on the pericentromeric targeting and DNA-binding properties of Ikaros. Rather, the small isoform assembled into multimeric complexes with DNA-bound Ikaros at the pericentromeric foci. The capacity for in vivo multimer formation suggests that interactions between Ikaros dimers bound to the TdT promoter and those bound to pericentromeric repeat sequences may contribute to the pericentromeric repositioning of the inactive gene.

Transcription of the lymphocyte-specific terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase gene requires a specific core promoter structure.

The terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase (TdT) gene encodes a template-independent DNA polymerase that is expressed exclusively in immature lymphocytes. The TdT promoter lacks a TATA box, but an initiator element (Inr) overlaps the transcription start site. The Inr directs basal transcription and also mediates activated transcription in conjunction with an upstream element called D'. We have begun to address the fundamental question of why the TdT promoter contains an Inr rather than a TATA box. First, we tested the possibility that the TdT promoter lacks a TATA box because the -30 region is needed for the binding of an essential regulator. Mutations were introduced into the -30 region, and the mutants were tested in transient transfection and in vitro transcription assays. The mutations had only minor effects on promoter strength, suggesting that this first hypothesis is incorrect. Next, the effect of inserting a TATA box within the -30 region was tested. Although the TATA box enhanced promoter strength, appropriate regulation appeared to be maintained, as transcription in lymphocytes remained dependent on the D' element. Finally, a promoter variant containing a TATA box at -30, but a mutant Inr, was tested. Surprisingly, transcription from this variant, both in vitro and in vivo, was dramatically reduced. These results suggest that the TdT promoter, and possibly other natural promoters, contain an Inr element because one or more activator proteins that interact with surrounding control elements preferentially function in its presence.

Mechanism of initiator-mediated transcription: evidence for a functional interaction between the TATA-binding protein and DNA in the absence of a specific recognition sequence.

Promoters containing Sp1 binding sites and an initiator element but lacking a TATA box direct high levels of accurate transcription initiation by using a mechanism that requires the TATA-binding protein (TBP). We have begun to address the role of TBP during transcription from Sp1-initiator promoters by varying the nucleotide sequence between -14 and -33 relative to the start site. With each of several promoters containing different upstream sequences, we detected accurate transcription both in vitro and in vivo, but the promoter strengths varied widely, particularly with the in vitro assay. The variable promoter activities correlated with, but were not proportional to, the abilities of the upstream sequences to function as TATA boxes, as assessed by multiple criteria. These results confirm that accurate transcription can proceed in the presence of an initiator, regardless of the sequence present in the -30 region. However, the results reveal a role for this upstream region, most consistent with a model in which initiator-mediated transcription requires binding of TBP to the upstream DNA in the absence of a specific recognition sequence. Moreover, in vivo it appears that the promoter strength is modulated less severely by altering the -30 sequence, consistent with a previous suggestion that TBP is not rate limiting in vivo for TATA-less promoters. Taken together, these results suggest that variations in the structure of a core promoter might alter the rate-limiting step for transcription initiation and thereby alter the potential modes of transcriptional regulation, without severely changing the pathway used to assemble a functional preinitiation complex.