ABSTRACT
Antecedentes y objetivo: Estudiar la validez pronóstica de la resistencia a la salida de líquido cefalorraquídeo (Rout) obtenida en el test de infusión lumbar en el estudio de la hidrocefalia idiopática de presión normal (iNPH), al igual que de las amplitudes en los diferentes tramos del test y otras nuevas variables obtenidas con el software Neuropicture®.Materiales y métodosRevisamos retrospectivamente pacientes con «probable iNPH» a los que se les sometió a un test de infusión lumbar. Se determinó el valor predictivo positivo (VPP) del punto de corte con mayor precisión pronóstica de la Rout, la amplitud de pulso en reposo (AMP0), la amplitud en los primeros 10 min (AMP10min), la amplitud de meseta (AMPmes), la amplitud de Rout (AMPRout), el tiempo en alcanzar la meseta (T) y la pendiente de la curva hasta alcanzar la meseta (P). Se dividió a los pacientes en respondedores y no respondedores.ResultadosEl estudio incluyó a 64 pacientes respondedores y 16, no respondedores. El VPP de Rout >15mmHg/ml/min fue 91,7%; de la AMP0> 2,34mmHg, 91,3%; de la AMP10min> 4,34 mmHG, 83,3%; de AMPmes> 12,44mmHg, 84,6%; de AMPRout> 6,34 mmHG, 85%; de T<634 s, 86,7%, y de P> 0,040mmHg/s, 96,3%.ConclusionesLa Rout sigue siendo un criterio válido para indicar un shunt ventricular. Las amplitudes en diferentes tramos del test, junto a la T y la P son otras variables cuya positividad es indicativa de respuesta valvular y deberían formar parte del protocolo diagnóstico (AU)
Background and objective: To study the prognostic value of the resistance to the cerebrospinal fluid outflow (Rout) obtained in the lumbar infusion test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), as well as the pulse pressure amplitudes in the different periods of the test and other new variables extracted by Neuropicture® software.Material and methodsPatients with ́probable iNPH́ who underwent a lumbar infusion test were retrospectively revised. The positive predictive values (PPV) of the cutoff point of the best prognostic accuracy of the Rout, the basal pulse pressure amplitude (AMP0), the pulse pressure amplitude during the first 10minutes (AMP10min), the plateau pulse pressure amplitude (AMPmes), the Rout pulse pressure amplitude (AMPRout), the time to reach the plateau (T), and the slope until reaching the plateau were determined. Patients were categorized either as responders or non-responders.ResultsThe study included 64 responders patients and 16 non-responders patients. The PPV of Rout> 15mmHg/ml/min was 91.7%; AMP0> 2.34mmHg: 91.3%; AMP10min>4.34mmHg: 83.3%; AMPmes>12.44mmHg: 84.6%; AMPRout>6.34mmHg: 85%; T <634seconds: 86.7%; P>0.040mmHg/sec: 96.3%.ConclusionsRout is a valid criterion to indicate a ventricular shunt. Pulse pressure amplitudes in the different periods of the lumbar infusion test, in addition to T and P, are other variables whose positivity is indicative of shunt response and should be considered in the diagnostic protocol of the iNPH (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure/cerebrospinal fluid , Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure/diagnosis , Infusions, Intraventricular , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , Retrospective Studies , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To study the prognostic value of the resistance to the cerebrospinal fluid outflow (Rout) obtained in the lumbar infusion test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), as well as the pulse pressure amplitudes in the different periods of the test and other new variables extracted by Neuropicture® software. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with 'probable iNPH' who underwent a lumbar infusion test were retrospectively revised. The positive predictive values (PPV) of the cutoff point of the best prognostic accuracy of the Rout, the basal pulse pressure amplitude (AMPo), the pulse pressure amplitude during the first 10 min (AMP10min), the plateau pulse pressure amplitude (AMPmes), the Rout pulse pressure amplitude (AMPRout), the time to reach the plateau (T), and the slope until reaching the plateau were determined. Patients were categorized either as responders or non-responders. RESULTS: The study included 64 responders patients and 16 non-responders patients. The PPV of Rout > 15 mmHg/mL/min was 91.7%; AMPo > 2.34 mmHg: 91.3%; AMP10 min > 4.34 mmHg: 83.3%; AMPmes > 12.44 mmHg: 84.6%; AMPRout > 6.34 mmHg: 85%; T < 634 s: 86.7%; p > 0.040 mmHg/s: 96.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Rout is a valid criterion to indicate a ventricular shunt. Pulse pressure amplitudes in the different periods of the lumbar infusion test, in addition to T and P, are other variables whose positivity is indicative of shunt response and should be considered in the diagnostic protocol of the iNPH.
Subject(s)
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure , Adenosine Monophosphate , Blood Pressure , Humans , Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure/diagnosis , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Prognosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To study the prognostic value of the resistance to the cerebrospinal fluid outflow (Rout) obtained in the lumbar infusion test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), as well as the pulse pressure amplitudes in the different periods of the test and other new variables extracted by Neuropicture® software. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with Ìprobable iNPHÌ who underwent a lumbar infusion test were retrospectively revised. The positive predictive values (PPV) of the cutoff point of the best prognostic accuracy of the Rout, the basal pulse pressure amplitude (AMP0), the pulse pressure amplitude during the first 10minutes (AMP10min), the plateau pulse pressure amplitude (AMPmes), the Rout pulse pressure amplitude (AMPRout), the time to reach the plateau (T), and the slope until reaching the plateau were determined. Patients were categorized either as responders or non-responders. RESULTS: The study included 64 responders patients and 16 non-responders patients. The PPV of Rout> 15mmHg/ml/min was 91.7%; AMP0> 2.34mmHg: 91.3%; AMP10min>4.34mmHg: 83.3%; AMPmes>12.44mmHg: 84.6%; AMPRout>6.34mmHg: 85%; T <634seconds: 86.7%; P>0.040mmHg/sec: 96.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Rout is a valid criterion to indicate a ventricular shunt. Pulse pressure amplitudes in the different periods of the lumbar infusion test, in addition to T and P, are other variables whose positivity is indicative of shunt response and should be considered in the diagnostic protocol of the iNPH.