ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the shift to an asynchronous online approach for pedagogy instruction within a pharmacy resident teaching program offered by a dual-campus college. DESIGN: The pedagogy instruction component of the teaching program (Part I) was redesigned with a focus on the content, delivery, and coordination of the learning environment. Asynchronous online learning replaced distance technology or lecture capture. Using a pedagogical content knowledge framework, residents participated in self-paced online learning using faculty recordings, readings, and discussion board activities. A learning management system was used to assess achievement of learning objectives and participation prior to progressing to the teaching experiences component of the teaching program (Part II). ASSESSMENT: Evaluation of resident pedagogical knowledge development and participation in Part I of the teaching program was achieved through the learning management system. Participant surveys and written reflections showed general satisfaction with the online learning environment. Future considerations include addition of a live orientation session and increased faculty presence in the online learning environment. CONCLUSION: An online approach framed by educational theory can be an effective way to provide pedagogy instruction within a teaching program.
Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy/methods , Learning , Pharmacy Residencies , Students, Pharmacy/psychology , Teaching/methods , Certification , Computer-Assisted Instruction , Curriculum , Education, Pharmacy/standards , Humans , Internet , Pharmacy Residencies/standards , Program Evaluation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching/standardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Varenicline acts as a partial agonist/antagonist with affinity and selectivity for alpha(4) beta(2) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. This activity at the nicotine-receptor level may help patients achieve smoking cessation by reducing cravings/withdrawal symptoms and smoking satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the literature on the pharmacologic properties, therapeutic efficacy, and tolerability of varenicline for smoking cessation. METHODS: Pertinent controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses, meeting abstracts, case reports, and review articles published in English between 1966 and May 2008 were identified through searches of MEDLINE and OVID using the terms varenicline, smoking, tobacco cessation, and CP 526555. RESULTS: Eight clinical trials were identified that compared Subject(s)
Benzazepines/therapeutic use
, Nicotinic Agonists/therapeutic use
, Quinoxalines/therapeutic use
, Receptors, Nicotinic/drug effects
, Smoking Cessation/methods
, Smoking Prevention
, Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy
, Benzazepines/administration & dosage
, Benzazepines/adverse effects
, Benzazepines/economics
, Benzazepines/pharmacokinetics
, Bupropion/therapeutic use
, Cost-Benefit Analysis
, Drug Costs
, Drug Interactions
, Drug Partial Agonism
, Humans
, Nicotinic Agonists/administration & dosage
, Nicotinic Agonists/adverse effects
, Nicotinic Agonists/economics
, Nicotinic Agonists/pharmacokinetics
, Quinoxalines/administration & dosage
, Quinoxalines/adverse effects
, Quinoxalines/economics
, Quinoxalines/pharmacokinetics
, Receptors, Nicotinic/metabolism
, Recurrence
, Smoking/metabolism
, Smoking Cessation/economics
, Tobacco Use Disorder/metabolism
, Treatment Outcome
, Varenicline
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of natural products is increasing, but healthcare professionals may underestimate the use of these agents by patients. It is unknown whether natural product use differs between primary care and specialty clinic patients, such as those in a nephrology clinic. OBJECTIVE: To compare patterns of natural product use between primary care and nephrology clinic patients. METHODS: One thousand adult patients from each clinic were randomly mailed an anonymous questionnaire to determine current and past use of natural products. RESULTS: A total of 491 surveys were returned, for an overall response rate of 26% (25% primary care; 28% nephrology clinic). Current use of natural products was similar between the primary care and nephrology groups (34% vs 29%, respectively; p = NS). Primary care patients were more likely to have taken a natural product in the past (57% vs 45%; p < 0.05); Echinacea was the most common product taken by those patients (26%). Green tea was the most common natural product taken by nephrology clinic patients (18%). More primary care patients took Echinacea compared with nephrology clinic patients (26% vs 12%; p < 0.01). Adverse reactions led to discontinuation of the natural product in 7% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Active use of natural products was similar between the survey respondents. Documentation and monitoring of natural product use by healthcare professionals working with primary care and nephrology clinic patients are recommended.
Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Plant Preparations/administration & dosage , Primary Health Care , Urologic Diseases , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Drug Utilization , Female , Herb-Drug Interactions , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Plant Preparations/adverse effects , Self Medication , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urologic Diseases/chemically inducedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Emergence of drug-resistant bacteria has led to a recommendation to use high-dose (HD) amoxicillin (80-90 mg/kg/d) rather than standard-dose (SD) amoxicillin (40-45 mg/kg/d) to treat children with acute otitis media (AOM). OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of HD versus SD amoxicillin among children with AOM who were considered at low risk for infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, 3-year clinical trial was conducted using participants who met the following criteria: age >3 mo, weight =18 kg, diagnosed with AOM, and candidates for treatment with amoxicillin. The primary endpoint was treatment success at a 3- to 4-day follow-up visit based on the clinical decision to continue the prescribed antibiotic therapy for AOM. Other endpoints included duration of illness, number of office visits and telephone calls related to illness, total number of subsequent AOM episodes, and number of adverse effects. RESULTS: The absolute difference in antibiotic failure rate with SD versus HD amoxicillin at the follow-up visit was nonsignificant (95% CI -1.5% to 3.4%; p = 0.78). The mean duration of illness was similar for both doses of amoxicillin (3 +/- 2 d). The number of office visits and telephone calls related to illness and the number of subsequent AOM episodes did not differ between the 2 treatment groups. HD amoxicillin did not result in a greater incidence of adverse effects than SD amoxicillin. CONCLUSIONS: HD amoxicillin had neither benefit nor detriment compared with SD for AOM in children at low risk for infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.