Differences in Community Members' and Academics' Perceptions of Factors Contributing to Food Insecurity and Obesity among Mexican Immigrants: An Application of Concept Mapping.

Community-based participatory research has been identified as an approach to research where community members, organizational representatives, and academic researchers all participate in the research process. As research partners, community members and academics may find some common ground in identification of problems, but frequently differ in their perception of the cause of those problems and struggle with arriving at a "shared interpretation" of the data. Failure to account for these differences ultimately leads to issues with the design of interventions. Group concept mapping is a rigorous mixed-methods approach that lends itself well to the conduct of community-based participatory research and the results can be used to systematically compare the conceptualized models of different groups of participants. Building from a previous study, where group concept mapping was used to describe the factors felt to contribute to weight gain and obesity among Mexican immigrant families, this study described and statistically evaluated the different conceptualizations between community members and academicians. Using a Procrustean comparison approach and permutation strategy, we assessed the spatial correspondence of concept maps generated by the two independent community members and academic groups. The results indicated the conceptualized patterns, represented by the two multidimensional scaling configurations (i.e., concept maps) produced by community and academic groups, were more similar than expected by chance, although meaningful differences existed. We describe how these differences in perspective have important implications for the cooperative development of an intervention addressing the multiple factors related to the perceived causes of obesity.

The Impact of Childhood Growth Stunting and Post-Migration Dysbiosis on the Development of Metabolic Syndrome Among Indigenous Immigrant Mexican Women.

While weight gain is common following migration to a new country and Mexican Americans have a disparate prevalence of overweight and obesity. In particular, Mexican American women have one of the world's highest rates of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), characterized by abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, all of which increase the risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although the etiology of this dilemma is not well understood, using the framework of allostatic load (AL), we posit that exposure to multiple physiologic, psychosocial and environmental stressors over the course of the lifespan may contribute to an increased risk of MetS among indigenous Mexican immigrant women. Two such frequently overlooked stressors are: 1) a history of childhood growth stunting (CGS) and 2) dietary changes post migration that result in decreased diversity of the gut microbiome (dysbiosis). To date, little is known about how migration experiences differentially affect the relationship between CGS and MetS in adulthood. The purpose of this theoretical article is to present a proposed model of how early life stressors (ELS), specifically CGS, may interact with insalubrious aspects of the immigration experience to promote an increased risk for MetS among indigenous Mexican immigrant women. This model may be used in a bi-national effort to guide intervention efforts to decrease CGS in Mexico and to prevent, monitor or delay the components of MetS post migration in the US.

Using Concept Mapping within a Community-Academic Partnership to Examine Obesity among Mexican Immigrants.

Background: Weight gain is common following migration to a new country. Mexican immigrants have a disparate prevalence of overweight/obesity and food insecurity. Social stressors, such as unemployment, discrimination, and the threat of deportation, may fuel both food insecurity and weight gain in this population. Objectives: We sought to (1) examine community-defined causes and correlates of obesity among Mexican-Americans; (2) determine how current social stressors, policies, and programs impact food insecurity and obesity; and (3) identify community-defined priorities for preventive interventions. Methods: Group concept mapping (GCM) was used in a community-academic partnership (CAP) to describe the factors contributing to weight gain and obesity among Mexican immigrant families. Activities included community brainstorming, sorting and rating, multivariate statistical analysis, and community interpretation of results. Results: Eighty statements were generated in the brainstorming sessions. These statements were sorted into nine clusters, which were organized into three regions: (1) intrapersonal factors; (2) community-level factors; and (3) social policy-related barriers. Statements reflecting the impact of immigration-related stressors were found in all three regions, addressing participants' fears of deportation, and the prioritization of resources away from healthy eating, resulting in food insecurity. Community members identified five priority areas for intervention planning: (1) lack of exercise; (2) lack of knowledge of a healthy diet; (3) expense of healthy foods; (4) "junk" food; and (5) stress management. Conclusions: Results suggest high levels of social stress are contributing to food insecurity and obesity among Mexican immigrant families. Areas identified for intervention planning reflect the need for a multifaceted approach toward obesity prevention.

Acculturation stress and allostatic load among Mexican immigrant women. / Estresse de aculturação e carga alostática entre mulheres imigrantes mexicanas.

OBJECTIVES: this case-control study compared levels of stress and allostatic load (AL) among Mexican women in the US ( n =19) and Mexico ( n = 40). METHOD: measures of stress included the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and the Hispanic Women's Social Stressor Scale (HWSSS). A composite measure of 8 indicators of AL (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio, total cholesterol, glycated hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1C), triglycerides and C-reactive protein) was calculated. RESULTS: there were no significant group differences in AL between Mexican and Mexican immigrant women ( t = 1.55, p = .126). A principal component factor analysis was conducted on the 8 AL indicators; a 2-factor solution explained 57% of the variance. Group differences in the two AL factors were analyzed using MANOVA. BMI and waist-to-hip ratios were lower, but blood pressure and triglycerides were higher in the US group and were mediated by time in the US. Greater acculturation stress was significantly related to increased waist-to-hip ratio ( r = .57, p = .02). FINAL REMARKS: findings suggest some measures of AL increased with time in the US, and acculturation stress may be a significant factor.

Estresse de aculturação e carga alostática entre mulheres imigrantes mexicanas / Acculturation stress and allostatic load among Mexican immigrant women / Estrés aculturativo y carga alostática en las mujeres inmigrantes mexicanas

Objetivos este estudo de caso-controle comparou os níveis de estresse e carga alostática (CA) entre mulheres mexicanas nos EUA ( n = 19) e no México ( n = 40). Método medidas de estresse incluíram a Escala de Estresse Percebido (EEP) e a Escala de Estresse Social das Mulheres Hispânicas (EESMH). Uma medida composta por 8 indicadores de CA (pressão arterial sistólica e diastólica, índice de massa corporal (IMC), relação cintura-quadril, colesterol total, hemoglobina glicada (hemoglobina A1C), triglicerídeos e proteína C-reativa) foi calculada. Resultados não houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos na CA entre mulheres mexicanas imigrantes e não imigrantes ( t = 1,55, p = 0,126). Uma análise fatorial de componentes principais foi realizada nos 8 indicadores de CA; uma solução de 2 fatores explicou 57% da variância. As diferenças entre grupo nos dois fatores CA foram analisadas usando MANOVA. O IMC e a relação cintura-quadril foram menores, mas a pressão arterial e os triglicerídeos foram maiores no grupo dos EUA e foram mediados pelo tempo nos EUA. O maior estresse de aculturação foi significativamente relacionado ao aumento da relação cintura-quadril ( r = 0,57, p = 0,02). Considerações finais os resultados sugerem que algumas medidas de CA aumentam com o tempo nos EUA e o estresse de aculturação pode ser um fator significativo.

Objectives this case-control study compared levels of stress and allostatic load (AL) among Mexican women in the US ( n =19) and Mexico ( n = 40). Method measures of stress included the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and the Hispanic Women's Social Stressor Scale (HWSSS). A composite measure of 8 indicators of AL (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio, total cholesterol, glycated hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1C), triglycerides and C-reactive protein) was calculated. Results there were no significant group differences in AL between Mexican and Mexican immigrant women ( t = 1.55, p = .126). A principal component factor analysis was conducted on the 8 AL indicators; a 2-factor solution explained 57% of the variance. Group differences in the two AL factors were analyzed using MANOVA. BMI and waist-to-hip ratios were lower, but blood pressure and triglycerides were higher in the US group and were mediated by time in the US. Greater acculturation stress was significantly related to increased waist-to-hip ratio ( r = .57, p = .02). Final remarks findings suggest some measures of AL increased with time in the US, and acculturation stress may be a significant factor.

Objetivos este estudio de casos y controles ha comparado los niveles de estrés y carga alostática (CA) en mujeres mexicanas en los EE.UU. ( n = 19) y México ( n = 40). Método las medidas de estrés incluyeron la Escala de Estrés Percibido (EEP) y la Escala de Estrés Social de las Mujeres Hispanas (HWSSS, por sus siglas en inglés). Se calculó una medida compuesta de 8 indicadores de CA (presión arterial sistólica, presión arterial diastólica, índice de masa corporal (IMC), relación cintura/cadera, colesterol total, hemoglobina glicosilada (HbA1c), triglicéridos, y proteína C reactiva). Resultados no hubo diferencias significativas de CA entre los grupos de mujeres mexicanas e inmigrantes mexicanas ( t = 1,55, p = 0,126). Se realizó un análisis factorial de componente principal de los 8 indicadores de CA; una solución de 2 factores explicó el 57% de la varianza. Las diferencias de grupo en los dos factores de CA se analizaron utilizando MANOVA. El IMC y la relación cintura/cadera disminuyeron, pero la presión arterial y los triglicéridos aumentaron en el grupo de los EE.UU. y estuvieron influenciados por el tiempo de residencia en los EE.UU. Un mayor estrés aculturativo se relacionó significativamente con el aumento de la relación cintura/cadera (r = 0,57, p = 0,02). Comentarios finales los hallazgos sugieren que algunas medidas de CA aumentan con el tiempo de residencia en los EE.UU. y el estrés aculturativo puede ser un factor importante.