Radiographic and clinical comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: midterm results of a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid component loosening remains a significant issue after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Pegged glenoid components have shown better lucency rates than keeled components in the short term; however, midterm to long-term results have not fully been determined. We previously reported early outcomes of the current randomized controlled group of patients, with higher glenoid lucency rates in those with a keeled glenoid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of these components at minimum 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Fifty-nine total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized to receive either a pegged or keeled glenoid component. Three raters graded radiographic glenoid lucencies. Clinical outcome scores and active mobility outcomes were collected preoperatively and at yearly postoperative appointments. RESULTS: Of the 46 shoulders meeting the inclusion criteria, 38 (82.6%) were available for minimum 5-year radiographic follow-up. After an average of 7.9 years, radiographic lucency was present in 100% of pegged and 91% of keeled components (P = .617). Grade 4 or 5 lucency was present in 44% of pegged and 36% of keeled components (P = .743). There were no differences in clinical outcome scores or active mobility outcomes between shoulders with pegged and keeled components at last follow-up. Within the initial cohort, 20% of the keeled shoulders (6 of 30) and 7% of the pegged shoulders (2 of 29) underwent revision surgery (P = .263). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in survival rates between groups (P = .560). CONCLUSION: At an average 7.9-year follow-up, non-ingrowth, all-polyethylene pegged glenoid implants are equivalent to keeled implants with respect to radiolucency, clinical outcomes, and need for revision surgery.

Immediate and early complications of the open Latarjet procedure: a retrospective review of a large consecutive case series.

BACKGROUND: Immediate and early postoperative complications of the Latarjet procedure are not well documented in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report the procedure-related complications of our large consecutive case series of 3 surgeons at a single high-volume center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 416 Latarjet procedures performed on 400 patients (16 patients had bilateral procedures) who underwent surgery by the 3 senior authors from October 2002 to July 2015. Immediate and early complications included hardware problems, infection, and neurologic injury. In addition, the patient's age and history of prior instability surgery were noted and evaluated as risk factors for complication. RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 5.0% (21 complications in 19 procedures). Thirteen neurologic injuries (3.1%) occurred to the axillary (7), musculocutaneous (4), and suprascapular (2) nerves, including 2 patients with multiple nerves affected. All but 2 patients had complete resolution of symptoms at time of last follow-up. Six infections (1.4%) developed, including 3 superficial infections treated with oral antibiotics and 3 deep infections requiring irrigation and débridement with intravenous antibiotics. Two early hardware-related complications (0.05%) were also noted. Increased age was associated with a higher complication rate. History of prior surgery was not associated with increased complications in our series. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the procedural complications of the Latarjet procedure. Neurologic injury was the most common complication in our series, with complete or near-complete recovery in 11 of 13 patients.

Obesity Has Minimal Impact on Short-Term Functional Scores After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy.

The potential adverse effect of body mass index (BMI) on shoulder function scores after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has not been investigated. We conducted a study to examine outcomes of RSA performed for rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCTA) across BMI categories (normal weight, overweight, obese). We hypothesized that, compared with normal-weight patients, obese patients would have worse shoulder function scores, worse mobility, and more complications. Using a prospective shoulder arthroplasty registry, we identified 77 primary RSAs performed for RCTA with minimum 2-year follow-up. Thirty-four patients had normal weight (BMI <25 kg/m2), 21 were overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m2), and 22 were obese (BMI >30 kg/m2). Shoulder function scores, mobility, and satisfaction were evaluated before surgery and at final follow-up. The 3 BMI groups were not significantly different on demographic factors, preoperative shoulder function scores, or preoperative mobility (P > .05). For each group, shoulder function scores and mobility significantly improved between the preoperative and final follow-up assessments (P < .001). Patient satisfaction was similar between groups (P = .967). Improved shoulder function scores, mobility, and patient satisfaction can be expected after RSA for RCTA in patients regardless of BMI.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Management of Postinfectious Arthropathy With Rotator Cuff Deficiency.

Treatment of patients with rotator cuff deficiency and arthritis in the setting of a prior glenohumeral infection (postinfectious arthropathy) is complex, with little evidence to guide treatment. The current authors present their approach to management of these patients and clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). All primary RSAs performed for postinfectious arthropathy and rotator cuff deficiency with native glenohumeral joints were identified in a prospective shoulder arthroplasty registry. Eight patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were included in the analysis. Clinical outcomes, including the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder (WOOS) index, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and range of motion measurements, were assessed preoperatively and at final follow-up. At an average follow-up of 4.4 years, no patient had a clinically detectable recurrence of infection. Significant improvements were noted in all outcome scores from preoperative evaluation to final follow-up after RSA, including Constant score (P=.003), ASES score (P<.001), WOOS index (P=.002), SANE score (P=.025), forward flexion (P<.001), abduction (P<.001), and external rotation (P=.020). Seven of 8 patients reported they were satisfied or very satisfied at final follow-up. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be performed in patients without significant medical comorbidities in the setting of postinfectious arthropathy and rotator cuff deficiency with a low risk of recurrence of infection. Significant clinical improvements were noted at short-term follow-up.

Characteristics of clinical shoulder research over the last decade: a review of shoulder articles in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery from 2004 to 2014.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine characteristics and trends in published shoulder research over the last decade in a leading orthopaedic journal. METHODS: We examined all clinical shoulder articles published in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery from 2004 to 2014. The number of citations, authorship, academic degrees of the authors, country and institution of origin, topic, level of evidence, positive or nonpositive outcome, and inclusion of validated patient-reported outcome measures were assessed for each article. RESULTS: Shoulder articles that included an author with an advanced research degree (MD [Doctor of Medicine] with a PhD [Doctor of Philosophy] or other advanced degree) increased during the study period (p = 0.047). Level-I, II, and III studies were more likely to have an author with an advanced research degree, and Level-IV studies were more likely to have MDs only (p = 0.03). Overall, there was great variability of outcome measures, with at least thirty-nine different validated or nonvalidated outcome measures reported. CONCLUSIONS: Over the last decade, there was an improvement in the level of evidence of shoulder articles published in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery that corresponds with recent emphasis on evidence-based medicine. A consensus is needed in shoulder research for more consistent application of validated patient-reported outcome measurement tools.

Outcomes of staged bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasties for rotator cuff tear arthropathy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy after staged bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs) and to compare them with an age-, gender-, and diagnosis-matched control group with a unilateral RSA. METHODS: We identified 11 patients with bilateral RSAs for rotator cuff tear arthropathy with a minimum of 2-year follow-up in a prospective shoulder arthroplasty registry. The bilateral group was matched to a control group of 19 patients with a unilateral RSA. Shoulder function scores, mobility, patient satisfaction, and activities of daily living were assessed preoperatively and at final follow-up. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the first RSA or second RSA and the control group regarding age, gender, or follow-up. No group differences were noted preoperatively for shoulder function scores or mobility (P > .10). All groups significantly improved on all shoulder function scores (Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score) and mobility at final follow-up (all P < .01). There were no significant differences in shoulder function scores or mobility between the first and second RSA in the bilateral group or between either shoulder in the bilateral group and the unilateral group (all P > .10). Patient satisfaction improved and patients were successfully able to perform many important activities of daily living after bilateral RSAs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with bilateral rotator cuff tear arthropathy can be advised that staged bilateral RSAs can be successful when indicated. Improvements in shoulder function scores, patient satisfaction, and mobility are possible for both the first RSA and the second RSA.

Workers' compensation claims and outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The effect of workers' compensation claims on outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes after RSA in patients with a workers' compensation claim and to compare them with a control group without a workers' compensation claim. METHODS: We identified 14 primary RSAs completed in patients with a workers' compensation claim and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up in a prospective shoulder arthroplasty registry. Fourteen patients without a workers' compensation claim served as the age-, gender-, and diagnosis-matched control group. The Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, mobility, and the patient's satisfaction were assessed for both groups preoperatively and at final follow-up. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups regarding patient demographics, duration of follow-up, complications, preoperative shoulder function scores, or preoperative mobility (P > .05). Both groups significantly improved on all shoulder function scores and for mobility from preoperative to final follow-up (all P < .001); however, the workers' compensation group had significantly worse Constant (P = .002), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (P = .003), and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (P = .001) scores. Only 57% of the workers' compensation group reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied at final follow-up compared with 93% in the control group. The workers' compensation group had a lower return to work rate (14.2% vs 41.7%), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = .117). CONCLUSION: Patients with a workers' compensation claim had significant improvements after RSA, but they achieved significantly worse outcomes compared with the control group.

Risk factors for periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Management of periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) remains a challenge. Whereas the infection rate after RSA has improved, more information would be helpful to identify patient risk factors for infection after RSA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors for infection after RSA. METHODS: We identified 301 primary RSAs with a minimum of 1-year follow-up in a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty registry. We performed bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to assess the association between patient demographic and clinical characteristics (age, sex, smoking, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, body mass index, and history of prior failed hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty) and periprosthetic infection after RSA. RESULTS: There were 15 periprosthetic infections after RSA (5.0%). Patients with a history of RSA for failed arthroplasty (odds ratio, 5.75; 95% confidence interval, 2.01-16.43; P = .001) and patients younger than 65 years had an increased risk for development of an infection (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-15.35; P = .021). History of smoking, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, or obesity did not contribute to an increased risk of infection after RSA. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study evaluating risk factors for infection after RSA while controlling for confounding variables with multivariable analysis. The greatest risk factors for infection after RSA were history of a prior failed arthroplasty and age younger than 65 years. Patients with these clinical characteristics should be counseled preoperatively about the increased risk for development of infection after RSA.

Preoperative opioid use and outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The potential adverse effect of preoperative opioid use on outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes after RSA in patients with a history of preoperative opioid use and compare them with a control group without a history of preoperative opioid use. METHODS: Sixty-eight RSAs performed for rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were identified in a prospective shoulder arthroplasty registry. Thirty-two patients with a history of preoperative opioid use for shoulder pain were compared with a control group of 36 patients who did not use opioids preoperatively. Shoulder function scores and range of motion measurements were assessed preoperatively and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: No differences were noted between the 2 groups in age, gender, duration of follow-up, depression, smoking, chronic back pain, diabetes, heart disease, or body mass index. Preoperative opioid use was associated with significantly lower preoperative shoulder function scores. Both groups significantly improved on all shoulder function scores and for range of motion measurements from the preoperative to the final follow-up assessment; however, the nonopioid group had significantly better outcomes. The magnitude of change between the groups from preoperatively to the final follow-up was nearly identical. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements can be expected in patients with a history of preoperative opioid use; however, patients with preoperative opioid use have a lower preoperative baseline and should not expect to reach the same peak outcome scores after RSA as patients without a history of preoperative opioid use.

Financial impact of third-party reimbursement changes for CPT Code 29826: experience of a large group practice.

BACKGROUND: On January 1, 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services converted Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 29826 (arthroscopic acromioplasty) from a stand-alone code to an add-on code and reduced the relative value units from 19.58 to 5.24. The goal of this study was to quantify the financial impact of this change on a large single-specialty orthopaedic surgery practice. METHODS: Custom software was used to query the database that harbors billing data for a large single-specialty orthopaedic group. Data were independently generated based on patient identification data and insurance class, and compared between 2011 and 2012. Codes 29826, 29827 (shoulder arthroscopy, rotator cuff repair), 29822 (shoulder arthroscopy, debridement, limited), 29823 (shoulder arthroscopy, debridement, extensive), and 29824 (shoulder arthroscopy, distal claviculectomy) were all searched independently for each year and cross-referenced with each other and all other shoulder codes. Modifier codes for surgical assistants were analyzed separately and subsequently combined with primary surgeon data for financial analysis. This included assessment of surgeon reimbursement per occurrence of code 29826 and surgeon reimbursement by Medicare compared with non-Medicare payers. RESULTS: Code 29826 was used 1536 times in 2011 and 1410 times in 2012 (-2.59% after correcting for all shoulder arthroscopy cases per year). Code 29822 was used significantly more in 2012 both alone (1.45%, p = 0.001) and in total (2.45%), but the use of 29823 did not change (p = 0.17). A combination of three of the five selected codes was used significantly less in 2012 (p < 0.001), while the use of any combination of four codes was used significantly more in 2012 (p < 0.001). Assistant use did not appreciably change between years. Average reimbursement for code 29826 by all payers in 2011 was $456.84 and $441.64 in 2012. Average payment by Medicare was $268.58 in 2011 and $171.02 in 2012 (-36.3%). Medicare paid 54.3% of other payers per case in 2011 and 33.1% of other payers in 2012. CONCLUSIONS: Reimbursement for code 29826 by non-Medicare payers did not decrease dramatically between 2011 and 2012. However, Medicare reimbursement fell substantially.

What went wrong and what was done about it: pitfalls in the treatment of common shoulder surgery.

When performing revision shoulder surgery, it is important that the surgeon understands why the index procedure failed and has a clear plan to address problems in the revision procedure. The most common cause of failure after anterior instability shoulder surgery is a failure to treat the underlying glenoid bone loss. For most defects, a Latarjet transfer can effectively restore anterior glenoid bone stock and restore shoulder stability. Persistent anterior shoulder pain after rotator cuff surgery may be the result of missed biceps pathology. This can be effectively treated via a biceps tenodesis. The most difficult failures to treat after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction surgery are those involving fractures of either the coracoid or the clavicle. Clavicle hook plates can be used as supplemental fixation during the treatment of these fractures to help offload the fracture site and allow healing while restoring stability to the acromioclavicular articulation. A failed hemiarthroplasty for a proximal humeral fracture frequently results when the tuberosities fail to heal correctly. This complication can be avoided by paying close attention to the implant position and the tuberosity fixation. If hemiarthroplasty is unsuccessful, the patient is best treated with conversion to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Ultrasound and clinical evaluation of soft-tissue versus hardware biceps tenodesis: is hardware tenodesis worth the cost?

This study assesses the failure rate of soft-tissue versus hardware fixation of biceps tenodesis by ultrasound to determine if the expense of a hardware tenodesis technique is warranted. Seventy-two patients that underwent arthroscopic biceps tenodesis over a 3-year period were evaluated using postoperative ultrasonography and clinical examination. The tenodesis technique employed was either a soft-tissue technique with sutures or an interference screw technique using hardware based on surgeon preference. Patient age was 57.9 years on average with ultrasound and clinical examination done at an average of 9.3 months postoperatively. Thirty-one patients had a hardware technique and 41 a soft-tissue technique. Overall, 67.7% of biceps tenodesis done with hardware were intact, compared with 75.6% for the soft-tissue technique by ultrasound (P = .46). Clinical evaluation indicated that 80.7% of hardware techniques and 78% of soft-tissue techniques were intact. Average material cost to the hospital for the hardware technique was $514.32, compared with $32.05 for the soft-tissue technique. Biceps tenodesis success, as determined by clinical deformity and ultrasound, was not improved using hardware as compared to soft-tissue techniques. Soft-tissue techniques are equally efficacious and more cost effective than hardware techniques.

Glenoid perforation does not affect the short-term outcomes of pegged all-polyethylene implants in total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The glenoid vault can be perforated during pegged glenoid preparation in total shoulder arthroplasty. The clinical implications of glenoid vault perforation, however, are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of perforation of the glenoid during total shoulder arthroplasty on clinical and radiographic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with known intraoperative glenoid perforations were prospectively identified and compared with 34 patients matched by age, gender, diagnosis, and arm dominance during the same period. Patients were evaluated with multiple outcome scores. Radiographs were evaluated for glenoid lucency immediately postoperatively and at final follow-up. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 28.1 months for the perforated group and 31.2 months for the matched controls. Both groups had significant improvements in outcome scores postoperatively. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores increased from 39.8 to 91.0 (P < .001) in the perforated group and from 36.9 to 82.6 (P < .001) in the control group. Constant scores increased from 24.4 to 77.4 (P < .001) in the perforated group and from 36.9 to 75.6 (P < .001) in the control group. Ninety-four percent of the perforated group and 80% of the matched controls were satisfied or very satisfied with their result (P = .896). The presence and number of perforations were not related to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P = .549), Constant score (P = .154), or radiographic lucency grade (P = .584). CONCLUSIONS: Glenoid perforation during pegged glenoid preparation in total shoulder arthroplasty does not seem to have an adverse effect on clinical or radiographic outcomes at an average of 2 years of follow-up.

Ultrasound evaluation of arthroscopic full-thickness supraspinatus rotator cuff repair: single-row versus double-row suture bridge (transosseous equivalent) fixation. Results of a prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the structural outcomes of a single-row rotator cuff repair and double-row suture bridge fixation after arthroscopic repair of a full-thickness supraspinatus rotator cuff tear. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated with diagnostic ultrasound a consecutive series of ninety shoulders in ninety patients with full-thickness supraspinatus tears at an average of 10 months (range, 6-12) after operation. A single surgeon at a single hospital performed the repairs. Inclusion criteria were full-thickness supraspinatus tears less than 25 mm in their anterior to posterior dimension. Exclusion criteria were prior operations on the shoulder, partial thickness tears, subscapularis tears, infraspinatus tears, combined supraspinatus and infraspinatus repairs and irreparable supraspinatus tears. Forty-three shoulders were repaired with single-row technique and 47 shoulders with double-row suture bridge technique. Postoperative rehabilitation was identical for both groups. Ultrasound criteria for healed repair included visualization of a tendon with normal thickness and length, and a negative compression test. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were available for ultrasound examination (40 single-row and 43 suture-bridge). Thirty of 40 patients (75%) with single-row repair demonstrated a healed rotator cuff repair compared to 40/43 (93%) patients with suture-bridge repair (P = .024). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic double-row suture bridge repair (transosseous equivalent) of an isolated supraspinatus rotator cuff tear resulted in a significantly higher tendon healing rate (as determined by ultrasound examination) when compared to arthroscopic single-row repair.

Inferior tilt of the glenoid component does not decrease scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: results of a prospective randomized study.

HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine if inferior tilt of the glenoid component decreased the amount of radiographic scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. A secondary goal was to determine if inferior tilt had any effect on clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized trial of 52 consecutive reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed by 1 surgeon for cuff tear arthropathy was performed. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive a glenoid component with no inferior tilt (control group) or a glenoid component that was inferiorly tilted 10° to protect the inferior glenoid (inferior tilt group). All glenoid components were placed in 3 mm of inferior translation. Radiographic notching was graded at a minimum of 1 year after surgery. Clinical outcomes of the groups were recorded. RESULTS: Follow-up radiographs and data were available for 42 subjects, 20 in the inferior tilt group and 22 in the control group. The experimental groups did not differ significantly in the notch ratings or clinical outcomes. Notching occurred in 15 patients (75%) in the inferior tilt group and in 19 (86%) in the control group. Notching scores were 2 or greater in 10 patients (50%) in the inferior tilt group and in 11 (50%) in the control group. CONCLUSION: Placing the glenoid component with inferior tilt does not reduce the incidence or severity of radiographic scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. No clinical differences were observed between the groups.

Retrospective comparison of freehand and ultrasound-guided shoulder steroid injections.

The objective of this study was to assess the clinical benefits and financial feasibility of using ultrasound for steroid injections of the shoulder. A retrospective chart review and telephone survey of patients in a clinical shoulder practice were performed. ICD-9 codes and CPT codes identified patients who received shoulder injections without (2006) and with (2007) ultrasound guidance during 2 consecutive years. Results were assessed by patient assessment of relief and duration of that relief via telephone survey or from chart review. Financial data was assessed by reviewing the patients' accounts. One hundred fifty-seven injections were given in 2006 and 159 in 2007. In 2006, 126 unique patients were injected compared to 99 unique patients in 2007 (P<.001). Clinical data was collected on 272 patients (86.1%). Ultrasound had no significant effect on the amount of pain relief following injection (P=.468). One hundred thirty-six patients (50.0%) reported significant pain relief, 72 (26.5%) reported moderate, 39 (14.3%) reported mild, and 25 (9.2%) reported no pain relief following injection. During both years, 92.4% of patients had subacromial injections with no significant difference in injection sites (subacromial vs glenohumeral) between the 2 years (P=.252). Neither the injection site (subacromial or glenohumeral, P=.152) nor diagnosis (P=.540) had a significant effect on pain relief. Financial collections from injections increased as expected due to the use of ultrasound.Ultrasound guidance did not change the efficacy of steroid injections, the number of injections, or the type of injections. Steroid injections are useful for managing pain in several shoulder conditions and ultrasound guidance may not be necessary.

Subscapularis function following the latarjet coracoid transfer for recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

The Latarjet procedure may be performed with both subscapularis splitting and subscapularis transecting approaches. The subscapularis splitting approach may better preserve subscapularis function and anatomy. The goal of this study was to determine the functional status of the subscapularis after the Latarjet procedure with a subscapularis splitting approach using the quantified belly press test. Thirty patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent a Latarjet procedure through a subscapularis splitting approach. Both operative and nonoperative extremities were tested preoperatively with a belly press test using an Isobex muscle strength analyzer (Medical Device Solutions AG, Oberburg, Switzerland). Fifteen patients returned for postoperative Isobex belly press testing at a minimum of 6 months. Average patient age was 23.3 years, and average follow-up interval was 13 months. We detected no significant differences in pre- vs postoperative subscapularis strength in the surgical shoulder (decreased by 0.3 kg [95% CI, -1.0 to 1.7 kg; P=.630]). There was no difference in control vs surgical arm at preoperative (control +0.3 kg stronger; 95% CI, -0.8 to 0.1 kg; P=.124) vs postoperative (control +0.3 kg stronger; 95% CI, -1.1 to 0.5 kg; P=.444) measurements. Neither sex (P=.593) nor surgery in the dominant arm (P=.459) had an effect on recovery of subscapularis strength. Finally, the surgical arm at follow-up was not significantly different from reported height- and weight-based normative values for either men (P=.481) or women (P=.298). This study suggests that subscapularis strength is not significantly altered by the Latarjet procedure with a subscapularis splitting approach.

Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Modern cementing techniques have improved glenoid fixation, reduced glenoid lucency seen with keeled components, and may eliminate differences attributable to glenoid design. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of glenoid design on immediate and follow-up radiographic lucency of pegged and keeled glenoid components, using modern cementing techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-three total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized prospectively to receive either a pegged or keeled glenoid component. Three raters graded radiographic glenoid lucencies. RESULTS: On immediate radiographs, there was no significant difference in the rate of glenoid lucency between pegged (0%) and keeled (15%) glenoid components (P = .128). However, after an average of 26 months, the rate of glenoid lucency was significantly higher in patients with keeled components (46%) compared to patients with pegged components (15%) (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Even with modern cementing techniques, pegged glenoid components remain radiographically superior to keeled glenoid components.