Progressive Resistance Training or Neuromuscular Exercise for Hip Osteoarthritis : A Multicenter Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Exercise is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). However, randomized controlled trials providing evidence for the optimal exercise type are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether progressive resistance training (PRT) is superior to neuromuscular exercise (NEMEX) for improving functional performance in patients with hip OA. DESIGN: Multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, superiority trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04714047). SETTING: Hospitals and physiotherapy clinics. PARTICIPANTS: 160 participants with clinically diagnosed hip OA were enrolled from 18 January 2021 to 28 April 2023 and randomly assigned to PRT (n = 82) or NEMEX (n = 78). INTERVENTION: Twelve weeks of PRT or NEMEX with 2 supervised 60-minute group sessions each week. The PRT intervention consisted of 5 high-intensity resistance training exercises targeting muscles at the hip and knee joints. The NEMEX intervention included 10 exercises and emphasized sensorimotor control and functional stability. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was change in the 30-second chair stand test (30s-CST). Key secondary outcomes were changes in scores on the pain and hip-related quality of life (QoL) subscales of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). RESULTS: The mean changes from baseline to 12-week follow-up in the 30s-CST were 1.5 (95% CI, 0.9 to 2.1) chair stands with PRT and 1.5 (CI, 0.9 to 2.1) chair stands with NEMEX (difference, 0.0 [CI, -0.8 to 0.8] chair stands). For the HOOS pain subscale, mean changes were 8.6 (CI, 5.3 to 11.8) points with PRT and 9.3 (CI, 5.9 to 12.6) points with NEMEX (difference, -0.7 [CI, -5.3 to 4.0] points). For the HOOS QoL subscale, mean changes were 8.0 (CI, 4.3 to 11.7) points with PRT and 5.7 (CI, 1.9 to 9.5) points with NEMEX (difference, 2.3 [CI, -3.0 to 7.6] points). LIMITATION: Participants and physiotherapists were not blinded. CONCLUSION: In patients with hip OA, PRT is not superior to NEMEX for improving functional performance, hip pain, or hip-related QoL. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Independent Research Fund Denmark.

Prognostic factors of knee pain and function 12 months after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study of 798 patients.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) do not experience long-term improvements. Our aim was to identify prognostic factors of knee pain and function 12 months after TKA. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, 1026 patients underwent primary TKA between 2018 and 2020. Main outcome was measured by the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) categorized in five categories (0-9, 10-19, 20-29, 30-39 and 40-48). Potential prognostic factors obtained at baseline included sex, age, baseline OKS, pain catastrophizing scale, EuroQol 5 dimensions, previous surgery, BMI, ASA classification, opioid consumption, living and employment conditions as well as educational level. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors of OKS. RESULTS: A total of 915 patients completed follow up (89%), and patients with complete data were included (n = 798). Patients with a baseline OKS between 10-19 and 20-29 had 2.5 (CI 1.6;4.0) and 1.6 (CI 1.1;2.4) higher odds, respectively, of no improvement or deterioration to a lower post-operative OKS category, compared with patients with a baseline score between 30 and 39. Female patients had 1.5 (CI 1.1;2.0) and patients receiving social benefits compared with retired patients had 2.0 (CI 1.1;3.5) higher odds of no improvement or deterioration to a lower OKS category. CONCLUSION: Baseline level of pain and function, sex and employment status were significant prognostic factors of OKS 12 months after TKA. Overall, the regression analysis only explained 4% of the outcome, indicating that it is difficult to predict 12-month TKA outcome prior to surgery.

Physiotherapists' prognosis of 1-year outcome after lumbar spinal fusion - A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Physiotherapists (PTs) have an essential role in the facilitation of patients' mobilization after lumbar spinal fusion (LSF). The aim of this study is to investigate whether PTs can predict one-year post-surgery outcome based on their first meeting with the patient immediately after LSF. METHOD: A prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up was conducted. In the first days after surgery, the PTs from hospital wards were asked to predict the patients' overall LSF outcome one year after surgery. One year after surgery, the patients received a questionnaire including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scales (VAS) for leg and back pain, quality of life survey (EQ-5D-3 L), global perceived effect (GPA), and satisfaction with surgery outcome (SSO). Univariate and logistic regression were used to calculate the associations between the prognosis and predictive values. RESULTS: The study included 170 patients. The analyses showed a significant association between the PTs' prognosis and the primary outcome ODI (p < .01), VAS leg and back, EQ-5D-3 L, and GPE one-year post-surgery (p ≤ .04). However, the predictive value of the PTs' prognosis was low (R2 ≤ 0.09). There was no significant association between the PTs' prognosis and the patients' SSO (p = .17; R2 = 0.01). CONCLUSION: There were significant associations between the PTs' prognosis and disability, pain, health-related quality of life and global perceived effect one-year post-surgery, although the associations had low predictive values. There was no significant association between the PTs' prognosis and patients' SSO after one year. The PTs' prognosis should not be used as a single component in further rehabilitation planning.

Feasibility, safety, and patient-reported outcomes 90 days after same-day total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite increased attention to and acceptance of fast-track procedures, there is a lack of studies concerning discharge on the day of surgery (DOS) following total knee arthroplasty (SD-TKA). We evaluated the feasibility of SD-TKA, and compared safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients undergoing SD-TKA and patients undergoing standard TKA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A SD-TKA group (n = 101) was matched 1:1 to a standard TKA group (n = 101) on age, sex, and ASA score. Feasibility (being discharged on DOS), safety (unplanned contacts and complications evaluated by telephone calls (2 weeks), outpatient visits (2 weeks), and readmission (90 days)) were assessed. Further, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (pain at rest and activity) were reported (90 days). RESULTS: 89 of 101 SD-TKA patients were discharged on DOS. The number of telephone calls (≤ 83) and outpatient visits (12) were similar in the 2 groups. The number of readmissions was ≤ 3 in both groups, and only 1 of the readmissions was related to TKA surgery. No differences were found at 90-day follow-up in terms of OKS (34 in both groups) or VAS (rest: SD-TKA = 7 and standard TKA = 8; activity: SD-TKA = 17 and standard TKA = 15). INTERPRETATION: SD-TKA is feasible in a selected group of patients, and safety and PROs are comparable to patients undergoing standard TKA.

Early Surgery or Exercise and Education for Meniscal Tears in Young Adults.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is commonly used to treat meniscal tears; however, to our knowledge, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared surgery with nonsurgical alternatives in young adults. We hypothesized that early meniscal surgery would be superior to a strategy of exercise and education with the option of surgery later if needed. METHODS: In this pragmatic parallel-group RCT, we enrolled young adults (18-40 years of age) with magnetic resonance imaging­verified meniscal tears eligible for surgery from seven Danish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to surgery (partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair) or 12-week supervised exercise therapy and education with the option of surgery later if needed. The primary outcome was the difference in change from baseline to 12 months in the mean score of four Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4) subscales covering pain, symptoms, function in sport and recreation, and quality of life, ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). RESULTS: We enrolled 121 young adults (mean age, 29.7 years; 28% were female). In total, 107 participants (88%) completed the 12-month follow-up; 16 participants (26%) from the exercise group crossed over to surgery, while 8 (13%) from the surgery group did not undergo surgery. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no statistically significant difference in change between groups from baseline to 12 months in KOOS4 scores (19.2 vs. 16.4 in the surgery vs. exercise groups; adjusted mean difference, 5.4 [95% confidence interval, −0.7 to 11.4]). No difference in serious adverse events was observed (four vs. seven in the surgery and exercise groups, respectively; P=0.40). Per-protocol and as-treated analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that among young, active adults with meniscal tears, a strategy of early meniscal surgery is not superior to a strategy of exercise and education with the option of later surgery. Both groups experienced clinically relevant improvements in pain, function, and quality of life at 12 months, and one of four from the exercise group eventually had surgery. (Funded by the Danish Council for Independent Research, IMK Almene Fond, Lundbeck Foundation, Spar Nord Foundation, Danish Rheumatism Association, Association of Danish Physiotherapists Research Fund, Research Council at Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, and Region Zealand; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02995551.)

Improving the referral pattern of patients with knee osteoarthritis to the orthopaedic surgeon: Development and evaluation of a new screening algorithm based on patient-reported data and radiographs.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with knee osteoarthritis referred to orthopaedic surgeons are not eligible for surgery and might benefit from being examined by other healthcare professionals. The objective of this study was to develop and test a screening algorithm to define relevant referral to the OS. METHODS: Prior to clinical examination, 173 consecutive patients referred to the orthopaedic outpatient clinic completed questionnaires, and radiographic osteoarthritis severity was graded. The gold standard for relevant referral to an orthopaedic surgeon was based on actual treatment. The performance of the algorithm in predicting relevant referrals and total knee replacement (TKR) was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: Referral to an orthopaedic surgeon was considered relevant in 65% (113/173) of patients. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for predicting relevant referral to an orthopaedic surgeon were 0.70, 0.56, 0.76 and 0.48, respectively. The corresponding estimates for predicting TKR surgery were 0.92, 0.56, 0.55 and 0.92. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm was able to identify most patients relevant for referral to an orthopaedic surgeon, but less suitable for identifying those not relevant. The algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in predicting TKR surgery. With further development, this screening algorithm might contribute to improvement of the referral pattern in the orthopaedic outpatient clinic.