Prevalence of triangular fibrocartilage complex abnormalities on MRI scans of asymptomatic wrists.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the wrist is increasingly used in the diagnosis of ulnar-sided wrist pain; however, its efficacy in this setting still needs clarification. The purposes of this study were to investigate the prevalence of abnormal MRI findings in the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) in asymptomatic volunteers and to provide the clinician with comparative data when interpreting MRI results. METHODS: A total of 103 asymptomatic volunteers underwent imaging of the wrist using a 1.9-T MR scanner and a send-receive birdcage quadrature coil. The images were evaluated by 3 independent interpreters, 2 musculoskeletal radiologists, and 1 orthopedic hand surgeon. We noted details regarding the TFCC morphology and the presence, characteristics, and location of any TFCC abnormality. RESULTS: The TFCC was considered abnormal in 39 wrists. The scans were abnormal in 31 subjects younger than 50 years of age, in 5 subjects 50 to 59 years of age, and in all subjects older than 60 years of age (3 subjects). We diagnosed a complete tear of the TFCC in 23 wrists. An increase in age was correlated with an abnormal TFCC (r(pb) = 0.23; P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of incidental TFCC findings in MRI scans of asymptomatic subjects is high. The presence of an abnormal TFCC on MRI may be of questionable clinical meaning, because there is a high incidence of TFCC abnormalities in asymptomatic subjects, particularly those over the age of 50. Imaging results must be viewed in the context of the clinical history and physical examination. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic III.

A synthetic radiological study of brain treatment in ancient Egyptian mummies.

Variability in brain treatment, as a part of the Egyptian mummification process, is poorly appreciated in the literature, as variability in the details of excerebration have not been addressed comprehensively nor with respect to social, geographic, and temporal variation. The description of Egyptian mummification commonly used in the popular and academic literature is derived largely from accounts by Herodotus and Diodorus Siculus. However, this normative description does not acknowledge the existence of a wide range of mummification techniques practiced and so stifles the study of geographic and chronological changes in the practice and their causes. Therefore, the goal of this study is to use the classical description as a hypothesis for empirical testing, using published literature and primary radiographic data, with a specific focus on the practice of excerebration. Three primary treatments of the brain in mummification, and their variation over time and across social strata, are discussed in relation to their treatment in the literature, their radiological indicators, and their technical considerations. In order to examine Egyptian mummy excerebration, this study makes use of two samples: (1) a literature-based sample of 125 mummies, and (2) a sample of 6 mummies examined directly using computed tomography. In spite of an apparent high degree of variability, the literature continues to focus on modern and classical stereotypes rather than the rich variability in the Egyptian mummification tradition. Detailed, large-scale examination of this and other mummification traditions, and their meanings, is required to further our understanding of this important early complex society.

Comparison of sagittal computed tomography and plain film radiography in a scaphoid fracture model.

PURPOSE: To compare computed tomography (CT) in the sagittal plane and plain film radiography in the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture and displacement. METHODS: Three groups of scaphoids (no fracture, undisplaced fractures, fractures with displacement > 1 mm) from 11 cadaver wrists were prepared. Each wrist then was imaged by using sagittal plane CT scans in the long axis of the scaphoid and plain film imaging using 6 standard scaphoid views. Eight readers from 3 specialties read each group of images. The sensitivity and specificity for the presence of fracture and fracture displacement were calculated in addition to interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities for each. RESULTS: Both x-ray and CT scans showed a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting the presence of a fracture with no interspecialty differences. The sensitivity for displacement greater than 1 mm was lower for both modalities with no inter-specialty differences. The specificities for x-ray and CT for detecting displacement greater than 1 mm were 84% and 89%, respectively. The poor sensitivity for detecting displacement was explained by the low sensitivity of CT in the diagnosis of radial/ulnar displacement compared with x-ray and the low sensitivity of x-ray in the diagnosis of volar/dorsal displacement compared with CT scans. When fellowship-trained hand surgeons reviewed CT scans and plain films together the sensitivity and specificity for fracture displacement increased significantly. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for both x-ray and CT scans was excellent except for the reading of CT scans among emergency physicians and for the reading of plain x-rays among senior house staff, representing moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results both CT scans in the sagittal plane and plain films accurately detect fractures with a high degree of interobserver and intraobserver reliability, but they fall short in detecting displacement greater than 1 mm.

Reliability and comparison of acromion assessment techniques on X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (reliability of acromion assessment techniques).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability and correlation of plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of acromion morphology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acromion morphology was assessed using the lateral acromion angle (LAA) and the acromion-humeral interval (AHI). Thirty patients who had X-rays and MRI for impingement syndrome were included. Six blinded observers assessed the acromion morphology subjectively and objectively. RESULTS: Neither acromion assessment technique demonstrated a positive correlation (kappa and intraclass coefficient < 0.55) between X-ray and MRI. Both techniques were reliable (kappa and intraclass coefficient > 0.55) when measured objectively by experienced observers. CONCLUSION: The LAA and the AHI are both reliable acromion assessment techniques on X-ray and MRI when measured objectively and by experienced observers.