IOP-lowering and drug-sparing effects of trabectome surgery with or without cyclodialysis ab interno.

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) after ab interno trabeculectomy (AIT; trabectome surgery) alone or combined with cyclodialysis ab interno (AITC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three eyes with insufficiently controlled open-angle glaucoma were included in this consecutive case series. All eyes received AIT, combined with phacoemulsification and IOL-implantation in phakic instances, with or without additional cyclodialysis ab interno. Postoperative visual acuity, IOP, number of IOP-lowering medications and complications were registered over 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 19 eyes (14 patients) received AIT and 24 (19 patients) received AITC. Both groups were comparable for baseline IOP (AIT: 19.7 ± 8.2 mmHg; AITC: 19.4 ± 6.8 mmHg; p = 0.96), there was a comparable IOP reduction after 6 months (AIT: - 3.8 ± 12.3, median (interquartile range (IQR)): - 3.8 (- 7.8-4.8) mmHg; AITC: - 4.9 ± 8.3, median (IQR): - 2.0 (- 10.8-2.0) mmHg; p = 0.95) and 12 months (AIT: - 4.3 ± 6.6, median (IQR): - 4.0 (- 8.0 to - 1.0) mmHg; AITC: - 3.7 ± 6.7, median (IQR): - 1.5 (- 5.5 to - 0.5) mmHg; p = 0.49). While final visual acuity was similar between the groups, they differed regarding topical IOP-lowering medications (baseline: AIT 2.9 ± 1.2 and AITC 2.9 ± 1.2; 1 year after surgery: AIT 2.6 ± 1.5 (p = 0.16) and AITC 1.3 ± 1.3; p < 0.001)). Depending on the definition, a complete or qualified success of 33.4-45.8% was achieved in AITC compared to 15.8-21.1% in AIT. CONCLUSION: The additional suprachoroidal outflow when AIT is combined with cyclodialysis ab interno (AITC) seems to result in an additional drug sparing effect for at least 1 year without critical safety signals. Thus, AITC might be further investigated prospectively prior to advocating its use in routine minimally invasive glaucoma surgery.

Continued anti-VEGF treatment does not prevent recurrences in eyes with stable neovascular age-related macular degeneration using a treat-and-extend regimen: a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: The continuation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment after achieving stability in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration has generally been advocated. In our own patients, we thought to assess whether continued anti-VEGF treatment is capable of preventing recurrences. METHODS: In this retrospective observational case series, patients with stable disease either opted to continue treatment every 12-14 weeks (Group 1) or stopped treatment with subsequent follow-up visits every 8-12 weeks (Group 2). RESULTS: Of the 103 eyes of 103 patients achieving stability, 49 eyes continued treatment (Group 1), whereas treatment was stopped in 54 eyes undergoing regular follow-up (Group 2). Recurrent disease was observed in 21 (42.9%) and 33 (61.1%) cases in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p = 0.08). Time between achieving stable disease and recurrence was comparable between Group 1 and Group 2 (11.1 ± 8.2 months vs. 9.2 ± 6.7 months; p = 0.43). The number of visits between achieving stability and disease recurrence was similar, but not the number of injections (3.5 ± 2.0 vs. 0.2 ± 0.4; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Continuing anti-VEGF therapy after achieving functional and morphological stability every 12-14 weeks does not prevent recurrences. Patients deserve to be informed of a potential lifetime risk of recurrences, even under continued therapy.