ABSTRACT
Introducción: La hipertensión es el factor de riesgo más importante para la muerte cardiovascular a nivel mundial. En Argentina cerca del 44% de las personas desconocen ser hipertensos, y posiblemente sea debido a que no se les mide de la presión arterial (PA) en la consulta médica. Nuestra hipótesis es que la medición y el registro de la PA (MRPA) es omitida durante la consulta médica en Argentina. Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia de MRPA en la consulta médica en Argentina. Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico, retrospectivo de punto de prevalencia. Se analizaron todas las consultas externas realizadas el 19/09/2019 en mayores de 18 años, en 9 instituciones sanitarias de Argentina y se evaluó la MRPA. Resultados: Se analizaron 2.982 consultas. La edad promedio fue de 52,1 años (18-103), 1.780 (59,7%) eran mujeres y 702 (36,1%) tenían antecedentes de hipertensión arterial (HTA). La PA se midió y registró en 420 consultas (14,1%; IC 95%: 12,8-15,4). En un modelo de regresión logística multivariado el antecedente de HTA (OR: 1,91; p<0,001) y de enfermedad cardiovascular (OR: 1,76; p<0,001) fueron las variables que más se asociaron a la MRPA. La presencia de cáncer se asoció un descenso de MRPA (OR: 0,51; p<0,01). Cardiología fue la especialidad que más midió la PA 49,5% (144/291 consultas), seguida por clínica médica 30% (152/507 consultas). Conclusión: La MRPA en la consulta médica ambulatoria es deficitaria y constituye una oportunidad perdida en salud. Se necesitan estrategias que mejoren la detección y el control de la HTA.
Introduction: Hypertension (HTN) is the leading cause of mortality and disability in the world. In Argentina, almost 44% of hypertensives do not know about their condition and this may be due to the low rate of blood pressure (BP) measurements during the office visit. Our hypothesis is that the measurement and electronic recording of BP (BPMR) is not a routine practice in Argentina. Objective: To describe the rate of office BP measurement in Argentina. Methods: This is a retrospective, multicentre, point prevalence study. We analysed all office visits on 9/19/2019 at 9 medical institutions in 6 provinces of Argentina. Results: Two thousand and eighty-two office visits were analysed. The patients mean age was 52.1 years (18-103), 1790 (59.7%) were female, and 702 (36.1%) were hypertensives. BP was measured in 420 visits (14.1%; 95% CI 12.8-15.4). In a multivariate logistic regression model, history of HTN (OR 1.91, P<.001) and previous cardiovascular event (OR 1.76, P<.001) were associated with more odds of BPMR. The presence of cancer was associated with fewer odds of BPMR (OR .51, P<.01). Cardiology measured BP up to 49.5% (144/291 visits), followed by internal medicine 30% (152/507 visits). Conclusion: BPMR during office visits is deficient in Argentina and represents a missed healthcare opportunity. Different strategies are needed to detect hypertensive patients and reduce cardiovascular events.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Arterial Pressure , Retrospective Studies , Records , Blood Pressure DeterminationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Hypertension (HTN) is the leading cause of mortality and disability in the world. In Argentina, almost 44% of hypertensives do not know about their condition and this may be due to the low rate of blood pressure (BP) measurements during the office visit. Our hypothesis is that the measurement and electronic recording of BP (BPMR) is not a routine practice in Argentina. OBJECTIVE: To describe the rate of office BP measurement in Argentina. METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicentre, point prevalence study. We analysed all office visits on 9/19/2019 at 9 medical institutions in 6 provinces of Argentina. RESULTS: Two thousand and eighty-two office visits were analysed. The patients' mean age was 52.1 years (18-103), 1790 (59.7%) were female, and 702 (36.1%) were hypertensives. BP was measured in 420 visits (14.1%; 95% CI 12.8-15.4). In a multivariate logistic regression model, history of HTN (OR 1.91, P<.001) and previous cardiovascular event (OR 1.76, P<.001) were associated with more odds of BPMR. The presence of cancer was associated with fewer odds of BPMR (OR .51, P<.01). Cardiology measured BP up to 49.5% (144/291 visits), followed by internal medicine 30% (152/507 visits). CONCLUSION: BPMR during office visits is deficient in Argentina and represents a missed healthcare opportunity. Different strategies are needed to detect hypertensive patients and reduce cardiovascular events.
