Daratumumab combined with dexamethasone and lenalidomide or bortezomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients: Report from the multiple myeloma GIMEMA Lazio group.

The multiple myeloma (MM) treatment has changed over the last years due to the introduction of novel drugs. Despite improvements in the MM outcome, MM remains an incurable disease. Daratumumab is a human IgGK monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 with tumor activity associated with immunomodulatory mechanism. In combination with standard of care regimens, including bortezomib (Vd) or lenalidomide (Rd), daratumumab prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and in new diagnosis MM. We report the data of the MM GIMEMA Lazio group in 171 heavily treated pts who received daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) or daratumumab, velcade and dexamethasone (DVd). The overall response rate was 80%, and the overall survival (OS) and PFS were 84% and 77%, respectively. In addition, pts treated with DRd showed a better median PFS compared to pts treated with DVd, at 12 and 24 months, respectively. The most common hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TAEs) were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. The most common nonhematologic TAEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy and infections. Our data confirmed that DRd or DVd therapy is effective and safe in RRMM pts, and our real-life analysis could support the physicians regarding the choice of optimal therapy in this setting of pts.

Treatment Decision-Making of Secondary Prevention After Venous Thromboembolism: Data From the Real-Life START2-POST-VTE Register.

Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) should receive a decision on the duration of anticoagulant treatment (AT) that is often not easy to make. Sixteen Italian clinical centers included patients with recent VTE in the START2-POST-VTE register and reported the decisions taken on duration of AT in each patient and the reasons for them. At the moment of this report, 472 (66.9%) of the 705 patients included in the registry were told to stop AT in 59.3% and to extend it in 40.7% of patients. Anticoagulant treatment lasted ≥3 months in >90% of patients and was extended in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis because considered at high risk of recurrence or had thrombophilic abnormalities. d-dimer testing, assessment of residual thrombus, and patient preference were also indicated among the criteria influencing the decision. In conclusion, Italian doctors stuck to the minimum 3 months AT after VTE, while the secondary or unprovoked nature of the event was not seen as the prevalent factor influencing AT duration which instead was the result of a complex and multifactorial evaluation of each patient.

The use and efficacy of empirical versus pre-emptive therapy in the management of fungal infections: the HEMA e-Chart Project.

BACKGROUND: Neutropenic patients with persistent fever despite antibiotic therapy are managed with empirical or pre-emptive antifungal therapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the current clinical use and efficacy of these two approaches in patients with high risk hematologic conditions. DESIGN AND METHODS: An electronic medical record system, the "Hema e-Chart", was designed and implemented to collect information prospectively on infectious complications, particularly on invasive fungal diseases, in patients with hematologic malignancies treated with chemotherapy and/or autologous or allogenic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. The patients were enrolled from Hematology units distributed widely across Italy. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-seven adults with hematologic malignancies treated with chemotherapy with persistent fever and suspected invasive fungal disease were evaluable for the study (190 treated had been treated with empirical antifungal therapy and 207 with preemptive antifungal therapy). There was a significantly lower incidence of proven/probable invasive fungal diseases in patients treated with empirical antifungal therapy (n=14, 7.4%) than in patients treated with pre-emptive therapy (n=49, 23.7%) (P<0.001). The rate of deaths attributable to invasive fungal diseases was significantly lower in subjects treated with empirical antifungal therapy (1 case; 7.1%) than in subjects treated with pre-emptive therapy (11 cases; 22.5%) (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that empirical antifungal treatment decreased the incidence of invasive fungal disease and of attributable mortality with respect to a pre-emptive antifungal approach in neutropenic febrile patients with hematologic malignancies. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01069887).

Periodic morphologic, cytogenetic and clonality evaluation after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) and clonal karyotypic abnormalities, have been recognized as relatively frequent and potentially serious complications of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) for Hodgkin's disease (HD), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM). DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed 66 patients, undergoing PBPCT for HD, NHL, MM or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients reported in this study had to be in continuous complete remission after transplantation without receiving chemo-radiotherapy or other biological response modifiers, had to show absence of cytogenetic abnormalities and myelodysplastic features at transplantation and had to have at least 12 months of follow-up. We evaluated the bone marrow, peripheral blood, cytogenetics and clonality (HUMARA) 12 months after the transplant and thereafter every 12 months or every 6 months if lineage dysplasia, clonal or cytogenetic abnormalities were detected. RESULTS: We did not observe MDS/sAML, according to the FAB classification, in 163 assessments of 66 patients over a median follow-up of 25 months (range 12-106) after PBPCT. Twelve patients showed lineage dysplasia: six patients had dyserythropoiesis, 2 patients dysgranulopoiesis, one dysmegakaryocytopoiesis, two patients showed double lineage dysplasia (erythroid and granulocytic), and one patient showed dysgranulopoiesis at the first control acquiring dyserythropoiesis at the next follow-up. We found three cytogenetic abnormalities in the absence of concomitant dysplastic features: transient -5q, -Y, fra(10)(q25). The female patient with the cytogenetic abnormality -5q showed transient unbalanced clonality by HUMARA assay; further controls documented normalization of both clonality and cytogenetics. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of MDS/sAML depends on a variety of risk factors such as the number and type of prior courses of chemo-radiotherapy, total body irradiation in conditioning regimen, cytogenetic and morphologic alterations prior to transplant. This may account for the difference in reporting MDS/sAML after transplantation. The lack of exposure to recognized risk factors for MDS/sAML in our patients may account for the absence of this complication in this study. We consider that the use of stringent morphologic criteria, especially during the first period after PBPCT, combined with cytogenetic, clonality and FISH analyses are necessary for a correct diagnosis of MDS and to overcome the limitations of the FAB and WHO classifications in this setting.