ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic represented a challenge in medical care. A tool would be very useful to establish the prognosis of in-hospital death that is reliable and can be applied to the Mexican population entitled to the IMSS. Objective: To propose a prognostic scale to stratify patients with viral pneumonia COVID-19 in the emergency services. Material and methods: A nested case-control study was conducted in a cohort of patients who were consecutively admitted to the emergency department with viral pneumonia COVID-19. The cases were those patients who died, and the controls were those who were discharged due to health improvement. An association analysis was performed between the variables with significant differences between groups. Subsequently, the association was adjusted using a multivariate logistic regression model, from which the prognostic scale was developed. Results: A total of 70 subjects with COVID-19 were included, 34 cases and 36 controls. Chronic diseases, smoking, severe pulmonary involvement diagnosed by tomography, leukocytosis, and pulse oximetry less than 80% with were associated with in-hospital mortality; Odds Ratio (OR) of >1.1. Vaccination was a protective factor (OR = 0.04, CI95%: 0.01-0.16). A score greater than 3 points on the prognostic scale predicts in-hospital mortality with a specificity of 0.86 and a sensitivity of 0.73. Conclusions: The proposed prognostic scale can be a useful tool in the classification of patients with COVID-19 viral pneumonia in the emergency room services of secondary care level Hospitals.
Introducción: la pandemia por COVID-19 representó un reto en la atención médica. Sería de gran utilidad una herramienta para establecer el pronóstico de muerte intrahospitalaria que sea confiable y pueda aplicarse a la población mexicana derechohabiente del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Objetivo: proponer una escala pronóstica para estratificar a los pacientes con neumonía viral por COVID-19 en los servicios de urgencias de los hospitales de segundo nivel. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio de casos y controles anidado en una cohorte de pacientes adultos que fueron admitidos consecutivamente en el servicio de Urgencias con diagnóstico de neumonía viral por COVID-19. Los casos fueron aquellos pacientes que fallecieron y los controles aquellos que fueron egresados de la unidad por mejoría. Se realizó un análisis de asociación ente las variables con diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos, se ajustó la asociación mediante un modelo de regresión logística multivariada a partir del cual se elaboró la escala pronóstica. Resultados: se incluyeron en total 70 personas con COVID-19, 34 casos y 36 controles. Se asociaron a la mortalidad intrahospitalaria: las enfermedades crónicas, el tabaquismo, la afectación pulmonar severa diagnosticada por tomografía, la leucocitosis y la oximetría de pulso menor a 80% con una razón de Momios (RM) de > 1.1. La vacunación fue un factor protector (RM: 0.29, IC95%: 0.11-0.80). Un puntaje mayor a 3 puntos en la escala pronóstica predice la mortalidad intrahospitalaria (sensibilidad: 0.73, especificidad: 0.86). Conclusiones: la escala pronóstica propuesta puede ser una herramienta útil en la clasificación de los pacientes con neumonía viral por COVID-19 en los servicios de urgencias de los hospitales de segundo nivel de atención.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia, Viral , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Case-Control Studies , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Translation, transculturation and validity of the self-administered questionnaire for functionality (Systemic Sclerosis Questionnaires [SySQ]) for use in Spanish patients with systemic sclerosis and its relationship to the severity of the disease and to quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational analytical study to perform a cross-cultural validation of the self-administered questionnaire on functionality in scleroderma. The validity of the form and content was evaluated by an expert panel. The method included: a) adaptation into Spanish of the construct for translation and back translation, and transculturation; b) internal consistency with the SySQ (Cronbach's alpha), and c) reproducibility was assessed taking into account all occasions in which the test was performed with Cohen's kappa. Additionally, we calculated the Spearman correlation coefficient with the Medsger severity scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire score and SF-36 score. RESULTS: We included 70 patients with systemic sclerosis: age 17-78 (51±12) years, 65 (93%) were women, diffuse/limited subtype 64/36%, disease duration of 0.5-40 years. Optimal internal consistency for all categories of the final version of SySQ (Cronbach's α of 0.961) and intraobserver reliability in 2 tests over a 2-week interval (Cohen's kappa coefficient 0.618) and optimal interobserver reliability in 2 tests on the same day (Cohen's kappa coefficient 0.911). Moderate correlation between functionality by SySQ and by Health Assessment Questionnaire (r=0.573, P<.0001). Inverse correlation between SySQ and quality of life mental health domain SF-36 (r=-0.435, P<.001) and physical domain SF-36 (r=-0.638, P<.001). Medsger severity scale (tendon, heart, lung, vascular) also showed significant correlation with SySQ. CONCLUSIONS: SySQ in this validated Spanish version is a suitable instrument to measure functional status in patients with systemic sclerosis. Reduced functionality is related to greater tendon and peripheral vascular involvement and to a poorer quality of life.