Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
HNO ; 68(10): 763-772, 2020 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32221628

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although vestibular symptoms are amongst the most frequent reasons for seeking emergency medical help, many patients remain undiagnosed. OBJECTIVE: In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the spectrum of vertigo and dizziness in a tertiary ear, nose, and throat (ENT) emergency department (ED). Furthermore, we investigated the attendant symptoms, clinical signs, and the diagnostic tests performed. METHODS: We screened all ED reports from 01/2013 to 12/2013 for adult patients with vestibular symptoms referred to the ENT department. RESULTS: In total, we found 2596 cases with reported vestibular symptoms in the ED as a main or accompanying complaint. Of these, 286 were referred to the ENT specialist directly (n = 98) or via other major medical specialties (n = 188). Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) was the most frequent diagnosis in our study (n = 46, 16.1%), followed by vestibular neuritis (n = 44, 15.4%), otitis media (n = 20, 7%), and 9 patients (3.1%) had an ischemic stroke or a transient ischemic attack. In 70 (24.5%) cases, dizziness was not further specified. CONCLUSION: BPPV is the most frequent diagnosis seen in the ED; however, physicians need to document nystagmus more precisely and perform diagnostic tests systematically, in order to make an accurate diagnosis. To avoid misdiagnoses, ED physicians and ENT specialists should be able to recognize central signs in patients with an acute vestibular syndrome. Every fourth patient does not receive a definitive diagnosis. Diagnostic ED workup for patients with dizziness needs further improvement.


Subject(s)
Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo , Dizziness , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pharynx , Adult , Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo/diagnosis , Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dizziness/diagnosis , Dizziness/etiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans
2.
Am Surg ; 62(4): 308-10, 1996 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8600854

ABSTRACT

An association between carotid and coronary artery disease is well recognized. Routine preoperative duplex carotid screening of all coronary surgery patients is common, but may delay surgery and increase cost. To evaluate such a policy: A retrospective review of the records of 308 consecutive patients undergoing coronary surgery at one hospital was performed. Duplex studies were done on 210. A history of TIA/RIND, CVA, AS-PVD, AAA, neck bruit, or prior carotid surgery was considered suggestive for carotid disease. The history and/or physical exam (HPE) suggested carotid disease in 114; 37 of these (32%) had a positive scan. Of 96 patients without +HPE, three (3%) had a significant stenosis. A prospective study of cardiac surgery patients was done, categorized into "carotid" (n = 33) or "no-carotid" (n = 50) disease by two independent observers, based on +HPE. Positive scans were found in 27 per cent of the "carotid disease" group; No positive scans were found in the "no-carotid disease" group. We conclude that coronary surgery patients with peripheral or cerebral vascular disease or a neck bruit should have preoperative carotid studies. Duplex carotid screening of all cardiac patients is neither medically efficient nor cost-effective.


Subject(s)
Carotid Stenosis/complications , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Disease/complications , Coronary Disease/surgery , Mass Screening , Preoperative Care/methods , Aged , Coronary Artery Bypass , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/methods , Preoperative Care/economics , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...