Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 15(11): 1758-1767.e11, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28625816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: On the basis of the Next Accreditation System, trainee assessment should occur on a continuous basis with individualized feedback. We aimed to validate endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) learning curves among advanced endoscopy trainees (AETs) by using a large national sample of training programs and to develop a centralized database that allows assessment of performance in relation to peers. METHODS: ASGE recognized training programs were invited to participate, and AETs were graded on ERCP and EUS exams by using a validated competency assessment tool that assesses technical and cognitive competence in a continuous fashion. Grading for each skill was done by using a 4-point scoring system, and a comprehensive data collection and reporting system was built to create learning curves by using cumulative sum analysis. Individual results and benchmarking to peers were shared with AETs and trainers quarterly. RESULTS: Of the 62 programs invited, 20 programs and 22 AETs participated in this study. At the end of training, median number of EUS and ERCP performed/AET was 300 (range, 155-650) and 350 (125-500), respectively. Overall, 3786 exams were graded (EUS, 1137; ERCP-biliary, 2280; ERCP-pancreatic, 369). Learning curves for individual end points and overall technical/cognitive aspects in EUS and ERCP demonstrated substantial variability and were successfully shared with all programs. The majority of trainees achieved overall technical (EUS, 82%; ERCP, 60%) and cognitive (EUS, 76%; ERCP, 100%) competence at conclusion of training. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the feasibility of establishing a centralized database to report individualized learning curves and confirm the substantial variability in time to achieve competence among AETs in EUS and ERCP. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02509416.


Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods , Clinical Competence , Endosonography/methods , Gastroenterology/education , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Learning Curve , Humans , Program Evaluation , Prospective Studies
3.
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) ; 74(3): 185-92, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27620540

ABSTRACT

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic immunemediated inflammatory conditions involving the gastrointestinal system with potential to adversely affect the musculoskeletal system as well. The numerous overlapping immunogenic and pathophysiologic disease mechanisms of the gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal systems have led to the concept of the "Joint-Gut Axis," illustrating an intimate link between the two organ systems. A solid understanding of the Joint-Gut Axis is necessary for the rheumatologist as well as the orthopaedic surgeon, as concomitant musculoskeletal disease may impart a profoundly negative impact on the quality of life of patients with IBD. Furthermore, a significant subset of patients initially present with secondary musculoskeletal symptoms resulting from an underlying, undiagnosed IBD. Additional non-inflammatory musculoskeletal sequelae of IBD that are not typically attributed to the Joint-Gut Axis should also be recognized by rheumatologists and orthopaedic surgeons in order that the proper preventative and supportive interdisciplinary management may be employed, maximizing patient outcomes and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Tract , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Joint Diseases/etiology , Joints , Rheumatic Diseases/etiology , Gastrointestinal Tract/immunology , Gastrointestinal Tract/physiopathology , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/immunology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/physiopathology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/therapy , Joint Diseases/immunology , Joint Diseases/physiopathology , Joint Diseases/therapy , Joints/immunology , Joints/physiopathology , Prognosis , Quality of Life , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , Rheumatic Diseases/physiopathology , Rheumatic Diseases/therapy
5.
World J Gastroenterol ; 22(2): 600-17, 2016 Jan 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26811610

ABSTRACT

Duodenal polyps or lesions are uncommonly found on upper endoscopy. Duodenal lesions can be categorized as subepithelial or mucosally-based, and the type of lesion often dictates the work-up and possible therapeutic options. Subepithelial lesions that can arise in the duodenum include lipomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and carcinoids. Endoscopic ultrasonography with fine needle aspiration is useful in the characterization and diagnosis of subepithelial lesions. Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors and large or multifocal carcinoids are best managed by surgical resection. Brunner's gland tumors, solitary Peutz-Jeghers polyps, and non-ampullary and ampullary adenomas are mucosally-based duodenal lesions, which can require removal and are typically amenable to endoscopic resection. Several anatomic characteristics of the duodenum make endoscopic resection of duodenal lesions challenging. However, advanced endoscopic techniques exist that enable the resection of large mucosally-based duodenal lesions. Endoscopic papillectomy is not without risk, but this procedure can effectively resect ampullary adenomas and allows patients to avoid surgery, which typically involves pancreaticoduodenectomy. Endoscopic mucosal resection and its variations (such as cap-assisted, cap-band-assisted, and underwater techniques) enable the safe and effective resection of most duodenal adenomas. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is possible but very difficult to safely perform in the duodenum.


Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyps/surgery , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery , Duodenoscopy , Intestinal Mucosa/surgery , Intestinal Polyps/surgery , Adenomatous Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Adenomatous Polyps/pathology , Ampulla of Vater/diagnostic imaging , Ampulla of Vater/pathology , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Biopsy , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Duodenal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Duodenal Neoplasms/pathology , Duodenoscopes , Duodenoscopy/adverse effects , Duodenoscopy/instrumentation , Endosonography , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Intestinal Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Polyps/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic , Treatment Outcome
6.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 83(4): 720-9, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26548849

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The need for transpapillary drainage (TPD) in patients undergoing transmural drainage (TMD) of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) remains unclear. The aims of this study were to compare treatment outcomes between patients with pancreatic pseudocysts undergoing TMD versus combined (TMD and TPD) drainage (CD) and to identify predictors of symptomatic and radiologic resolution. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 375 consecutive patients with PFCs who underwent EUS-guided TMD from 2008 to 2014 at 15 academic centers in the United States. Main outcome measures included TMD and CD technical success, treatment outcomes (symptomatic and radiologic resolution) at follow-up, and predictors of treatment outcomes on logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 375 patients underwent EUS-guided TMD of PFCs, of which 174 were pseudocysts. TMD alone was performed in 95 (55%) and CD in 79 (45%) pseudocysts. Technical success was as follows: TMD, 92 (97%) versus CD, 35 (44%) (P = .0001). There was no difference in adverse events between the TMD (15%) and CD (14%) cohorts (P = .23). Median long-term (LT) follow-up after transmural stent removal was 324 days (interquartile range, 72-493 days) for TMD and 201 days (interquartile range, 150-493 days) (P = .37). There was no difference in LT symptomatic resolution (TMD, 69% vs CD, 62%; P = .61) or LT radiologic resolution (TMD, 71% vs CD, 67%; P = .79). TPD attempt was negatively associated with LT radiologic resolution of pseudocyst (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.8; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: TPD has no benefit on treatment outcomes in patients undergoing EUS-guided TMD of pancreatic pseudocysts and negatively affects LT resolution of PFCs.


Subject(s)
Drainage/methods , Pancreatic Pseudocyst/surgery , Adult , Aged , Ampulla of Vater , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Drainage/adverse effects , Endosonography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Pseudocyst/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Stents/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Interventional/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...