Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pain Med ; 21(10): 2271-2279, 2020 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32167540

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We investigated sex differences and the influence of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the descending pain modulatory system (DPMS), as measured by change on the numerical pain scale (NPS; 0-10) during conditioned pain modulation (CPM task; primary outcome) and by function of the corticospinal motor pathway and heat pain thresholds (HPTs; secondary outcomes). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included healthy volunteers ranging in age from 18 to 45 years (32 male and 24 female). Assessment included serum BDNF, HPT, change on the NPS (0-10) during the CPM task, and motor-evoked potential (MEP) using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). RESULTS: The MEP (Mv) amplitude was larger in male participants compared with female participants (mean [SE] = 1.55 [0.34] vs mean [SE] = 1.27 [0.27], respectively, P = 0.001). The mean NPS (0-10) during CPM task changed more substantially for female compared with male participants (mean [SE] = -3.25 [2.01] vs mean [SE] = -2.29 [1.34], respectively, P = 0.040). In addition, a higher serum BDNF (adjusted index for age) was associated with a larger decrease of the NPS during CPM task (P = 0.003), although further regression analyses by sex showed that this was only significant for females (P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Significant sex differences were identified in DPMS function and corticospinal motor pathway integrity. Nevertheless, BDNF was associated with the function of the DPMS in female but not male participants, indicating that sex and neuroplasticity state are crucial factors for pain perception in healthy subjects.


Subject(s)
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor , Pain , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Threshold , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Young Adult
2.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 9363, 2019 06 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31249322

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the circadian pattern of variation of the descending pain modulatory system (DPMS) using a conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm according to the variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) of the clock gene PER3 polymorphism. We assessed the relationship between the genotypes PER34/4 and PER35/5 and the temporal pattern of variation across the day using the following measures: the heat pain threshold (HPT), the cold pressure test (CPT), and the serum levels of BDNF and S100-B protein. The ∆-values (from afternoon to morning) of these measures were used for the analysis. The circadian phenotype was according to the mid-point sleep time established by the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ). We included 18 healthy volunteers (15 women) ages 18 to 30. A Generalized Linear Model (GLM) revealed a significant difference in the ∆-CPM-task between Per34/4 and Per35/5 genotypes, with means (SDs) of -0.41 (0.78) vs. 0.67 (0.90) (χ2 = 7.256; df = 1' P = 0.007), respectively. Both sleep deprivation of at least 2 h/day (B = -0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.86 to -0.11)) and the ∆-S100-B protein (-0.03, 95% CI = -0.06 to -0.02) were negatively correlated with the ∆-CPM-task, while the ∆-BDNF was positively correlated with the ∆-CPM-task (0.015, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.03). We observed a difference in the ∆-CPT between PER34/4 and PER35/5 (0.11 (4.51) vs. 4.00 (2.60), respectively) (χ2 = 22.251; df = 1 P = 0.001). These findings suggest that the polymorphism of PER35/5 is associated with a decrease in the inhibitory function of the DPMS over the course of the day. However, sleep deprivation is an independent factor that also reduces the inhibitory function of the DPMS, regardless of the PER3 VNTR polymorphism.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation , Minisatellite Repeats , Pain/genetics , Period Circadian Proteins/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic , Adult , Alleles , Biomarkers , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/blood , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/metabolism , Circadian Rhythm/genetics , Female , Gene Frequency , Genotype , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Pain/metabolism , Pain Measurement , S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit/blood , S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit/metabolism , Sleep , Sleep Deprivation/physiopathology , Young Adult
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(3): e13477, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30653087

ABSTRACT

Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by chronic widespread pain whose pathophysiological mechanism is related to central and peripheral nervous system dysfunction. Neuropathy of small nerve fibers has been implicated due to related pain descriptors, psychophysical pain, and neurophysiological testing, as well as skin biopsy studies. Nevertheless, this alteration alone has not been previously associated to the dysfunction in the descending pain modulatory system (DPMS) that is observed in FM. We hypothesize that they associated, thus, we conducted a cross-sectional exploratory study.To explore small fiber dysfunction using quantitative sensory testing (QST) is associated with the DPMS and other surrogates of nociceptive pathways alterations in FM.We run a cross-sectional study and recruited 41 women with FM, and 28 healthy female volunteers. We used the QST to measure the thermal heat threshold (HTT), heat pain threshold (HPT), heat pain tolerance (HPT), heat pain tolerance (HPTo), and conditional pain modulation task (CPM-task). Algometry was used to determine the pain pressure threshold (PPT). Scales to assess catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances were also applied. Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was measured as a marker of neuroplasticity. We run multivariate linear regression models by group to study their relationships.Samples differed in their psychophysical profile, where FM presented lower sensitivity and pain thresholds. In FM but not in the healthy subjects, regression models revealed that serum BDNF was related to HTT and CPM-Task (Hotelling Trace = 1.80, P < .001, power = 0.94, R = 0.64). HTT was directly related to CPM-Task (B = 0.98, P = .004, partial-η = 0.25), and to HPT (B = 1.61, P = .008, partial η = 0.21), but not to PPT. Meanwhile, BDNF relationship to CPM-Task was inverse (B = -0.04, P = .043, partial-η = 0.12), and to HPT was direct (B = -0.08, P = .03, partial-η = 0.14).These findings high spot that in FM the disinhibition of the DPMS is positively correlated with the dysfunction in peripheral sensory neurons assessed by QST and conversely with serum BDNF.


Subject(s)
Fibromyalgia/complications , Pain Threshold/physiology , Pain/physiopathology , Peripheral Nervous System/physiopathology , Adult , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/blood , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Fibromyalgia/physiopathology , Humans , Middle Aged , Neuralgia/physiopathology , Pain Measurement/methods
4.
J Vis Exp ; (137)2018 07 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30059026

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) method, which modulates the membrane potential of neurons in the cerebral cortex by a low-intensity direct current. tDCS is a low-cost technique with minimal adverse effects and easy application. This neurostimulation method has a promising future to improve pain therapy, treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, and physical rehabilitation. Current studies demonstrate the benefits of using tDCS over consecutive multiple sessions. However, the daily displacement to the specialized centers, travel costs, and disruptions to daily activities are some of the difficulties faced by patients. Thus, to be more comfortable, easy-to-use, and not disrupt daily commitments, a home-based tDCS was designed. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a portable tDCS device for home use in healthy subjects and fibromyalgia patients. Despite increased tDCS use and a reasonably large body of research on the effects across a range of clinical conditions, there is a limited amount of research on developing secure devices that guarantee the dose and contain a block system to avoid excessive use. Therefore, we used a tDCS device with a security system to permit daily use for 20 minutes with a minimal interval of 12 hours between sessions. A programmer preconfigures the equipment, which has a neoprene cap that allows the electrode positions in any assembly, according to individualized protocols for treatments or research. After, researchers can assess the effectiveness of treatment, and its adherence using information kept in the device software. Results suggest that the device is feasible for home use, with proper monitoring of adherence and contact impedance. There were reports of a few adverse effects, which do not differ from those reported in the literature in studies with the treatment under direct supervision.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Fibromyalgia/diagnostic imaging , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...