ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: EndoFaster perform gastric juice analysis providing real-time Helicobacter pylori (HP) diagnosis during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), based on ammonium level. We aimed to assess its accuracy in detecting HP infection compared to the paired histology and to establish the optimum ammonium concentration cut-off point (COP). METHODS: Consecutive adult outpatients referred for EGD were prospectively enrolled between December 2021 and March 2022. In-patients, those with surgically altered anatomy, suspected neoplasia, and bleeding were excluded. EndoFaster and histology were performed in all patients, with additional stool antigen test (SAT) reserved for discordant cases. EndoFaster diagnostic measures were calculated, and ammonium level COP established using AUROC curve analysis. RESULTS: 101 patients (64 female, mean age 56.7±16.1 years) were included. HP infection was diagnosed in 35 (34.6%) and 15 (14.8%) patients by EndoFaster and histology, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy in comparison with histology was 77.8% (95%CI 68.3% - 85.5%). After implementing SAT for gold standard assessment, EndoFaster accuracy increased to 81.6% (95%CI 72.5%-88.7%). AUROC curve (0.93±0.03, 95%CI 0.86-0.99) identified an ammonium COP of ≥67.5ppm. Using the new COP, EndoFaster accuracy further increased to 88.8% (95%CI 80.8%-94.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Endofaster showed high accuracy for HP detection, with moderate agreement to histology. An ammonium COP of 67.5 ppm seems to be the threshold with the highest accuracy for HP detection.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) using lumen apposing metal stent has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO). We aimed to compare EUS-GE with enteral stenting (ES) for the treatment of mGOO. METHODS: Patients who underwent EUS-GE or ES for mGOO between June 2017 and June 2023 at two Italian centers were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome was stent dysfunction. Secondary outcomes included technical success, clinical failure, safety, and hospital length of stay. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed using multiple covariates. RESULTS: Overall, 198 patients were included (66 EUS-GE and 132 ES). The stent dysfunction rate was 3.1% and 16.9% following EUS-GE and ES, respectively (p = 0.004). Using propensity score-matching, 45 patients were allocated to each group. The technical success rate was 100% for both groups. Stent dysfunction was higher in the ES group compared with the EUS-GE group (20% versus 4.4%, respectively; p = 0.022) without differences in clinical efficacy (p = 0.266) and safety (p = 0.085). A significantly shorter hospital stay was associated with EUS-GE compared with ES (7.5 ± 4.9 days vs. 12.5 ± 13.0 days, respectively; p = 0.018). Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed a higher stent dysfunction-free survival rate after EUS-GE compared with ES (log-rank test; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: EUS-GE offers lower rates of stent dysfunction, longer stent patency, and shorter hospital stay compared with ES.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is no clear evidence of a negative impact of biliary stents on the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing pancreatic head lesions. We aimed to evaluate the association between the presence of biliary stents and the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study including all jaundiced patients secondary to pancreatic head masses was performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of a biliary stent placed before EUS-FNB. Pathological results were classified according to the Papanicolaou classification and compared against the final diagnosis. Diagnostic measures in the two groups were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analyses including potential factors affecting EUS-FNB accuracy were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 842 patients were included, 495 (58.8%) without and 347 (41.2%) with biliary stent. A plastic or a metal stent was placed in 217 (62.5%) and 130 (37.5%) cases, respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy were significantly higher in patients without biliary stent than in those with stent (91.9% and 92.1% vs. 85.9% and 86.4%, P = 0.010 At multivariate analyses, lesion size (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.09, P = 0.01) and presence of biliary stent (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.32-0.89, P = 0.01) were independently associated with diagnostic accuracy. In the subgroup of patients with biliary stent, the type of stent (plastic vs. metal) did not impact EUS-FNB yield, whereas the use of larger bore needles enhanced diagnostic accuracy (OR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.28-4.12, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective study, an indwelling biliary stent negatively impacted the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB. Preferably, EUS-FNB should precede endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, especially in the case of small tumors.
