Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Oncol ; 57(6): 807-812, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29265948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is an uncommon cancer with an unfavorable prognosis. Since 2010, the standard of care for patients with unresectable BTC is palliative treatment with gemcitabine plus cisplatin, based on the landmark phase III ABC-02 trial. This current study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer in daily practice that meet the criteria for the ABC-02 trial in comparison to patients who did not. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with unresectable BTC between 2010 and 2015 with an indication for gemcitabine and cisplatin were included. We divided these patients into three groups: (I) patients who received chemotherapy and met the criteria of the ABC-02 trial, (II) patients who received chemotherapy and did not meet these criteria and (III) patients who had an indication for chemotherapy, but received best supportive care without chemotherapy. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: We collected data of 208 patients, of which 138 (66.3%) patients received first line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Median OS of 69 patients in group I, 63 patients in group II and 65 patients in group III was 9.6 months (95%CI = 6.7-12.5), 9.5 months (95%CI = 7.7-11.3) and 7.6 months (95%CI = 5.0-10.2), respectively. Median PFS was 6.0 months (95%CI = 4.4-7.6) in group I and 5.1 months (95%CI = 3.7-6.5) in group II. Toxicity and number of dose reductions (p = .974) were comparable between the two chemotherapy groups. CONCLUSION: First-line gemcitabine and cisplatin is an effective and safe treatment for patients with unresectable BTC who do not meet the eligibility criteria for the ABC-02 trial. Median OS, PFS and treatment side effects were comparable between the patients who received chemotherapy (group I vs. group II).


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cholangiocarcinoma/drug therapy , Gallbladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Palliative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/mortality , Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Gallbladder Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Gemcitabine
2.
Br J Surg ; 104(12): 1695-1703, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28857134

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is a benign liver tumour that may be complicated by bleeding or malignant transformation. Present guidelines advise cessation of oral contraceptives and surgical resection if the lesion is still larger than 5 cm at 6 months after diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether this 6-month interval is sufficient to expect regression of a large HCA to 5 cm or smaller. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with an HCA larger than 5 cm diagnosed between 1999 and 2015 with follow-up of at least 6 months. Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, clinical presentation, lesion characteristics, management and complications. Differences in characteristics were assessed between patients kept under surveillance and those who underwent treatment for an HCA larger than 5 cm. RESULTS: Some 194 patients were included, of whom 192 were women. Eighty-six patients were kept under surveillance and 108 underwent HCA treatment. Patients in the surveillance group had a significantly higher BMI (P = 0·029), smaller baseline HCA diameter (P < 0·001), more centrally located lesions (P < 0·001) and were more likely to have multiple lesions (P = 0·001) than those in the treatment group. There were no significant differences in sex, age at diagnosis, symptoms, complication rates and HCA subtype distribution. Time-to-event analysis in patients managed conservatively and those still undergoing treatment more than 6 months after diagnosis showed that 69 of 118 HCAs (58·5 per cent) regressed to 5 cm or smaller after a median of 104 (95 per cent c.i. 80-128) weeks. Larger HCAs took longer to regress (P < 0·001). No complications were documented during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a 6-month cut-off point for assessment of regression of HCA larger than 5 cm to no more than 5 cm is too early. As no complications were documented during follow-up, the cut-off point in women with typical, non-ß-catenin-activated HCA could be prolonged to 12 months, irrespective of baseline diameter.


Subject(s)
Adenoma, Liver Cell/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Adenoma, Liver Cell/pathology , Adult , Body Mass Index , Contraceptives, Oral , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Withholding Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...