A placebo-controlled trial to evaluate immunomodulatory effects of paricalcitol.

Calcitriol has shown a benefit in various small uncontrolled studies of ex vivo immune function. We hypothesized that paricalcitol, a new vitamin D derivative, will have a positive effect on the immune system with minimal adverse effects on calcium homeostasis. Thirty-one hemodialysis patients not administered vitamin D because of low intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were randomized to placebo or 4 microg of paricalcitol intravenously with the hemodialysis session three times weekly for 12 weeks. Effects on in vivo and ex vivo assessments of immune function were evaluated. All patients achieved the target dose of paricalcitol. Twenty patients were anergic at the start of the study; 4 of 11 patients in the paricalcitol group and 0 of 9 patients in the placebo group converted to reactive (P = 0.09). The in vivo response to standard hepatitis B booster vaccine and in vitro proliferation and release of interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon-gamma from stimulated lymphocytes were not different between the groups. In contrast to clinical immune effects, paricalcitol increased serum calcium levels and decreased PTH and bone alkaline phosphatase levels (all P < 0.05). However, hypercalcemia was infrequent. In vitro experiments showed that paricalcitol led to greater dose-dependent thymidine uptake than calcitriol in lymphocytes isolated from either dialysis patients or control subjects. Paricalcitol has a tendency toward improving delayed hypersensitivity reactions, but did not have other proimmune effects. However, as expected, paricalcitol had significant effects on calcium homeostasis compared with placebo. Thus, patients with low PTH levels are unlikely to experience the proimmune effects of vitamin D therapy without more profound and potentially adverse oversuppression of PTH.

Safety and efficacy of pulse and daily calcitriol in patients on CAPD: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Calcitriol therapy is the mainstay of therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Oral administration of calcitriol is necessary in CAPD patients, but no studies have directly compared different routes of administration in this patient population. METHODS: To determine if the peak serum calcitriol level (pulse therapy) is more important than the total delivered dose, we randomized CAPD patients with mild to moderate secondary hyperparathyroidism to receive either pulse (3.0 microg twice a week, n = 10) or daily (0.75 microg a day, n = 8) oral calcitriol in comparable weekly doses. The main comparison was the rate of decline of serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels to reach the desired end-point of 100 pg/ml. The patients were dialysed with low-calcium dialysate and received only calcium-containing phosphate binders. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic analysis after a single dose of 3.0 microg (pulse) vs 0.75 microg (daily) revealed 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D levels to be higher in the pulse group at 3 and 6 h, but equivalent by 12 h. The area under the curve for 1 week of daily and 1 week of pulse therapy was equal. The patients in the 2 arms had equivalent basal serum levels of PTH (pulse = 562 +/- 291 vs daily = 454 +/- 113 pg/ml), calcium (pulse = 2.32 +/- 0.20 vs daily = 2.32 +/- 0.12 mmol/l) and phosphorus (pulse = 1.32 +/- 0.52 vs daily = 1.35 +/- 0.26 mmol/l). The time required for the PTH to decrease to 100 pg/ml and the rate of decline in PTH were similar (time: pulse = 14.2 +/- 6.8 weeks, daily = 12.2 +/- 7 weeks; rate: pulse = 7.4 +/- 4.2 vs daily = 8.4 +/- 4.2% PTH/week; P = NS). The serum calcium increased similarly in both groups. Hypercalcaemia (> 2.9 mmol/l) was rare (pulse = 3, daily = 2 episodes). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pulse and daily calcitriol are similarly effective and safe for the treatment of mild to moderate secondary hyperparathyroidism in CAPD patients despite higher peak levels of 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D with pulse therapy.