Seroconversion in liver and intestine transplant patients after one, two or three doses of adenoviral vector vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Single center experience in Argentina.

BACKGROUND: The capacity of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines to elicit immune response is not equivalent in the healthy population compared to chronically immunosuppressed patients. Most of the reports available to assess the effects of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) were performed using mRNA-based vaccines. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the seroconversion rate in a cohort of liver and liver- intestinal transplant patients after vaccination with the non-replicative vector-based vaccines after transplantation used in our country, Argentina (rAd26-rAd5 (Sputnik V) and ChAdOx11 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) (Astra Zeneca-Oxford). METHODS: One hundred and three (103) liver and liver-intestinal transplant recipients were enrolled. Patients with previous PCR-confirmed COVID19 were excluded, therefore 77 were finally included for analysis; 75 were liver transplant recipients, 1 was a combined liver-intestine and 1 a multivisceral transplant. All received their first vaccine dose between March and June 2021; 66,2% males, and the mean age was 56,3 years. All patients have a post-transplant follow up longer than 1 year (mean 6.6 years, median 5 years, range 1-23 years). Immune response after first, second and third doses were determined using three different spike (S)-S commercial ELISA kits and an in-house made anti nucleocapsid-protein (N) ELISA. RESULTS: Following the three doses, 57.1 % (44/77) of the patients seroconverted, while 33/77 (42.9 %) did not present anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The seroconversion rate was different for each dose. We found that 5/27 (18.5 %) of transplant patients seroconverted after a single dose; 18/29 pts (62.0 %) had anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies after the second doses; and 18/21 pts (85.7 %) reached the seroconversion after the third doses. The proportion of seroconversion was significantly increased in the second doses regardless the response observed after the first doses (p = 0.012, Fisher's exact test), particularly when two doses of ChAdOx11 vaccine was administrated (p = 0.040, Chi-square). However, the comparisons of seroconversion rate between Sputnik V and ChAdOx11 vaccines showed no differences after the different vaccination doses. No significant statistical difference in patient́s gender, age, comorbidities, type of vaccine, post-transplant, or maintenance immunosuppressive therapy was found between responders and non-responders. CONCLUSION: Despite having a lower seroconversion rate compared to the general population, viral-vector vaccines benefit SOTR patients increasing the seroconversion rate using at least two doses of vaccine. These results support the concept of developing tailor-made vaccination guidelines for this specific population. This analysis provides further support to safety and efficacy of viral-vector vaccines in liver and liver-intestine transplant patients.