ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: The open ductus arteriosus (ODA) is the vessel through which the pathological communication between the aorta and the pulmonary artery persists after birth. Clinical manifestations depend on the size of the duct and the stage of hemodynamic disorders. The course of the defect varies from asymptomatic to extremely severe. With large duct sizes, the latter manifests itself from the first week of life with signs of heart failure. The current research is devoted to the choice of the optimal method of medical and surgical treatment in premature newborns with an unaffected ductus arteriosus. Drug therapy for pulmonary hypertension is recommended only for those patients who have irreversible pulmonary hypertension. Surgical closure of the ODA is recommended for overloads of the left heart or signs of pulmonary hypertension in the presence of blood discharge from left to right and after previously suffered endocarditis. The article analyzes current information about the treatment of premature infants with ODA.
Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/therapy , Hypertension, Pulmonary/therapy , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Infant, Premature , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Clinical Decision-Making , Coronary Circulation , Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/complications , Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/physiopathology , Female , Gestational Age , Hemodynamics , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/etiology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/physiopathology , Ibuprofen/adverse effects , Infant, Newborn , Ligation , Male , Pulmonary Circulation , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, LeftABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Allergen molecule-based diagnosis has been suggested to facilitate the identification of disease-causing allergen sources and the prescription of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). The aim of the current study was to compare allergen molecule-based IgE serology with allergen extract-based skin testing for the identification of the disease-causing allergen sources. The study was conducted in an area where patients are exposed to pollen from multiple sources (trees, grasses, and weeds) at the same time to compare the diagnostic efficiency of the 2 forms of diagnosis. METHODS: Patients from Astana, Kazakhstan, who suffered from pollen-induced allergy (n = 95) were subjected to skin prick testing (SPT) with a local panel of tree pollen, grass pollen, and weed pollen allergen extracts and IgE antibodies specific for marker allergen molecules (nArt v 1, nArt v 3, rAmb a 1, rPhl p 1, rPhl p 5, rBet v 1) were measured by ImmunoCAP. Direct and indirect costs for diagnosis based on SPT and marker allergen-based IgE serology as well as direct costs for immunotherapy depending on SPT and serological test results were calculated. RESULTS: The costs for SPT-based diagnosis per patient were lower than the costs for allergen molecule-based IgE serology. However, allergen molecule-based serology was more precise in detecting the disease-causing allergen sources. A lower number of immunotherapy treatments (n = 119) was needed according to molecular diagnosis as compared to extract-based diagnosis (n = 275), which considerably reduced the total costs for diagnosis and for a 3-year treatment from EUR 1,112.30 to 521.77 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this real-life study show that SPT is less expensive than allergen molecule-based diagnostic testing, but molecular diagnosis allowed more precise prescription of immunotherapy which substantially reduced treatment costs and combined costs for diagnosis and treatment.
