Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JSLS ; 9(3): 272-6, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16121871

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether advanced age or sex was predictive of adverse outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. METHODS: The Pennsylvania State Discharge Database was searched for records of morbidly obese patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The SASs MIXED Procedure was used to test whether mortality alone or adverse outcomes (postoperative complications, nonroutine hospital transfer and mortality) were significantly related to sex or advanced age (>50 years). The presence of comorbidities was used as a blocking variable. RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2001, 4,685 patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in Pennsylvania, of which 82% were female and 20% were older than 50 years of age. Comorbidities were present in 71% of patients. Twenty-eight deaths (0.6%) and 813 adverse outcomes (17.4%) occurred. Mortality was greater in males than in females (1.2% vs. 0.47%, P<0.05) without comorbid interaction. Mortality did not increase with age. Adverse outcomes were related to both sexes (24% male, 16% female, P<0.05) and age (< or = 50, 16% vs. > 50, 23%, P<0.05) with a small comorbid interaction. CONCLUSION: Adverse outcomes are more frequent among males and older patients and are influenced by comorbidities. Male patients have a higher mortality that was not affected by the presence of comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Gastric Bypass , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gastric Bypass/methods , Gastric Bypass/mortality , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 20(4): 334-9, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15857490

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study explores the alignment between physicians' confidence in their diagnoses and the "correctness" of these diagnoses, as a function of clinical experience, and whether subjects were prone to over-or underconfidence. DESIGN: Prospective, counterbalanced experimental design. SETTING: Laboratory study conducted under controlled conditions at three academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two senior medical students, 72 senior medical residents, and 72 faculty internists. INTERVENTION: We created highly detailed, 2-to 4-page synopses of 36 diagnostically challenging medical cases, each with a definitive correct diagnosis. Subjects generated a differential diagnosis for each of 9 assigned cases, and indicated their level of confidence in each diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A differential was considered "correct" if the clinically true diagnosis was listed in that subject's hypothesis list. To assess confidence, subjects rated the likelihood that they would, at the time they generated the differential, seek assistance in reaching a diagnosis. Subjects' confidence and correctness were "mildly" aligned (kappa=.314 for all subjects, .285 for faculty, .227 for residents, and .349 for students). Residents were overconfident in 41% of cases where their confidence and correctness were not aligned, whereas faculty were overconfident in 36% of such cases and students in 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Even experienced clinicians may be unaware of the correctness of their diagnoses at the time they make them. Medical decision support systems, and other interventions designed to reduce medical errors, cannot rely exclusively on clinicians' perceptions of their needs for such support.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Decision Support Techniques , Internal Medicine/standards , Judgment , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Humans , Internship and Residency , Linear Models , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Students, Medical
3.
Proc AMIA Symp ; : 275-9, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12463830

ABSTRACT

All clinical simulation designers face the problem of identifying the plausible diagnostic and management options to include in their simulation models. This study explores the number of plausible diagnoses that exist for a given case, and how many subjects must work up a case before all plausible diagnoses are identified. Data derive from 144 residents and faculty physicians from 3 medical centers, each of whom worked 9 diagnostically challenging cases selected from a set of 36. Each subject generated up to 6 diagnostic hypotheses for each case, and each hypothesis was rated for plausibility by a clinician panel. Of the 2091 diagnoses generated, 399 (19.1%), an average of 11 per case, were considered plausible by study criteria. The distribution of plausibility ratings was found to be statistically case dependent. Averaged across cases, the final plausible diagnosis was generated by the 28th clinician (sd = 8) who worked the case. The results illustrate the richness and diversity of human cognition and the challenges these pose for creation of realistic simulations in biomedical domains.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Diagnosis , Patient Simulation , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Faculty, Medical , Humans , Internal Medicine , Internship and Residency , Students, Medical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...