Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Pharm Pract (Granada) ; 17(1): 1349, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31015870

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Optimisation of drug therapy is important in the older population and may be facilitated by medication assessment tools (MATs). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether appropriateness of drug therapy and clinical pharmacist intervention documentation improved following implementation of a previously developed MAT for the long-term management of atrial fibrillation (MAT-AF). METHODS: Adherence to MAT-AF review criteria and clinical pharmacist intervention documentation was assessed by the researcher pre-MAT implementation in 150 patients aged ≥60 years admitted to a rehabilitation hospital with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. MAT-AF was introduced as a clinical tool in the hospital for identification of pharmaceutical care issues in atrial fibrillation patients. Adherence to MAT-AF and pharmacist intervention documentation were assessed by the researcher post-MAT implementation for a further 150 patients with the same inclusion criteria. Logistic regression analysis and measurement of odds ratio was used to identify differences in adherence to MAT-AF pre- and post-MAT implementation. The differences between two population proportions z-test was used to compare pharmacist intervention documentation pre- and post-MAT implementation. RESULTS: Adherence to MAT-AF criteria increased from 70.9% pre-implementation to 89.6% post-implementation. MAT-AF implementation resulted in a significant improvement in prescription of anticoagulant therapy (OR 4.07, p<0.001) and monitoring of laboratory parameters for digoxin (OR 10.40, p<0.001). Clinical pharmacist intervention documentation improved significantly post-implementation of MAT-AF (z-score 20.249, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of MAT-AF within an interdisciplinary health care team significantly improved the appropriateness of drug therapy and pharmacist intervention documentation in older patients with atrial fibrillation.

2.
Pharm. pract. (Granada, Internet) ; 17(1): 0-0, ene.-mar. 2019. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-184606

ABSTRACT

Background: Optimisation of drug therapy is important in the older population and may be facilitated by medication assessment tools (MATs). Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether appropriateness of drug therapy and clinical pharmacist intervention documentation improved following implementation of a previously developed MAT for the long-term management of atrial fibrillation (MAT-AF). Methods: Adherence to MAT-AF review criteria and clinical pharmacist intervention documentation was assessed by the researcher pre-MAT implementation in 150 patients aged ≥60 years admitted to a rehabilitation hospital with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. MAT-AF was introduced as a clinical tool in the hospital for identification of pharmaceutical care issues in atrial fibrillation patients. Adherence to MAT-AF and pharmacist intervention documentation were assessed by the researcher post-MAT implementation for a further 150 patients with the same inclusion criteria. Logistic regression analysis and measurement of odds ratio was used to identify differences in adherence to MAT-AF pre- and post-MAT implementation. The differences between two population proportions z-test was used to compare pharmacist intervention documentation pre- and post-MAT implementation. Results: Adherence to MAT-AF criteria increased from 70.9% pre-implementation to 89.6% post-implementation. MAT-AF implementation resulted in a significant improvement in prescription of anticoagulant therapy (OR 4.07, p<0.001) and monitoring of laboratory parameters for digoxin (OR 10.40, p<0.001). Clinical pharmacist intervention documentation improved significantly post-implementation of MAT-AF (z-score 20.249, p<0.001). Conclusions: Implementation of MAT-AF within an interdisciplinary health care team significantly improved the appropriateness of drug therapy and pharmacist intervention documentation in older patients with atrial fibrillation


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Medication Therapy Management/organization & administration , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization Review/methods , Pharmaceutical Services/organization & administration , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Medication Reconciliation/methods , Clinical Audit/methods
3.
Pharm. pract. (Granada, Internet) ; 15(4): 0-0, oct.-dic. 2017. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-169519

ABSTRACT

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent in older persons and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Assessing appropriateness of drug therapy in AF may be facilitated by application of medication assessment tools (MATs). Objective: To develop, psychometrically evaluate and apply an innovative MAT for the long-term management of AF with particular relevance to older persons. Methods: Key recommendations from clinical practice guidelines for the long-term management of AF were selected and review criteria defining appropriate drug therapy were constructed as a "qualifying statement" followed by a "standard". The developed MAT was given the designation MAT-AF. An application guide was compiled where justifications for non-adherence were specified. Content validity was tested by an expert group using a three-round Delphi process. Inter- and intra-observer reliability testing was conducted with agreement expressed by Cohen's kappa and application time measured to assess feasibility. MAT-AF was applied to 150 patients with a diagnosis of AF admitted to a rehabilitation hospital. Results: MAT-AF consists of 15 criteria sectioned into antithrombotic, rate control and rhythm control therapy. Content validity was demonstrated for all criteria. Reliability was confirmed with kappa values of 0.84 and 0.91 for inter- and intra-observer agreements. Mean application time for the two observers was 3.9 and 2.4 minutes, which decreased significantly in the second application conducted after a four-week interval (p<0.001). Overall adherence to applicable criteria was 59.8%. Non-adherence was evident for prescription of anticoagulation in patients with a CHA2DS2VASc score ≥1 (29.5%). Monitoring of laboratory parameters for digoxin was suboptimal. Ophthalmic and pulmonary monitoring and patient counselling regarding amiodarone therapy could not be assessed since relevant records were not readily available. Conclusion: MAT-AF application highlighted key aspects which need to be addressed to improve patient care (AU)


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Polypharmacy , Pharmaceutical Services/methods , Indicators of Morbidity and Mortality , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/prevention & control , Drug Monitoring/methods , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control
4.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 39(5): 1008-1012, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28756578

ABSTRACT

Background Optimisation of drug therapy is essential in the care of older persons and may be facilitated by application of medication assessment tools (MATs). Objective To design, psychometrically evaluate and apply an innovative MAT for secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke with particular relevance to older persons. Method Review criteria were selected from clinical practice guidelines and MAT-CVA was developed, validated and tested for reliability and feasibility. MAT-CVA was applied to 150 patients with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack admitted to a rehabilitation hospital. Results MAT-CVA consists of 17 criteria sectioned into antithrombotic, lipid lowering, antihypertensive and glycaemic therapy. Content validity was demonstrated for all criteria. Reliability was confirmed with kappa values of 0.80 for both inter- and intraobserver agreements. Mean application time for the two observers was 5.55 and 6.56 min. Adherence to applicable criteria was 55% and justified non-adherence was 22.3%. Non-adherence was predominantly evident for prescription of anticoagulation in concurrent atrial fibrillation (36.4%), thiazide diuretics ± angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors for hypertension (26.8%) and dipyridamole at the recommended dose (24.0%). Conclusion Application of MAT-CVA indicated good overall adherence and identified gaps in clinical performance which may be targeted to enhance drug therapy optimisation.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/prevention & control , Medication Errors/trends , Medication Systems/trends , Secondary Prevention/methods , Secondary Prevention/trends , Stroke/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Ischemia/diagnosis , Female , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Systems/standards , Middle Aged , Secondary Prevention/standards , Stroke/diagnosis
5.
Pharm Pract (Granada) ; 15(4): 1021, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29317917

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent in older persons and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Assessing appropriateness of drug therapy in AF may be facilitated by application of medication assessment tools (MATs). OBJECTIVE: To develop, psychometrically evaluate and apply an innovative MAT for the long-term management of AF with particular relevance to older persons. METHODS: Key recommendations from clinical practice guidelines for the long-term management of AF were selected and review criteria defining appropriate drug therapy were constructed as a 'qualifying statement' followed by a 'standard'. The developed MAT was given the designation MAT-AF. An application guide was compiled where justifications for non-adherence were specified. Content validity was tested by an expert group using a three-round Delphi process. Inter- and intra-observer reliability testing was conducted with agreement expressed by Cohen's kappa and application time measured to assess feasibility. MAT-AF was applied to 150 patients with a diagnosis of AF admitted to a rehabilitation hospital. RESULTS: MAT-AF consists of 15 criteria sectioned into antithrombotic, rate control and rhythm control therapy. Content validity was demonstrated for all criteria. Reliability was confirmed with kappa values of 0.84 and 0.91 for inter- and intra-observer agreements. Mean application time for the two observers was 3.9 and 2.4 minutes, which decreased significantly in the second application conducted after a four-week interval (p<0.001). Overall adherence to applicable criteria was 59.8%. Non-adherence was evident for prescription of anticoagulation in patients with a CHA2DS2VASc score ≥1 (29.5%). Monitoring of laboratory parameters for digoxin was suboptimal. Ophthalmic and pulmonary monitoring and patient counselling regarding amiodarone therapy could not be assessed since relevant records were not readily available. CONCLUSION: MAT-AF application highlighted key aspects which need to be addressed to improve patient care.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...