[Endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal non-variceal bleeding]. / Terapia endoscopica del sanguinamento non varicoso del tratto digestivo superiore.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic hemostasis is the method of choice for the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. This retrospective study was carried out to evaluate its effectiveness in routine endoscopic practice. METHODS: The records of all patients with gastrointestinal bleeding undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS) at the Endoscopy Center of Ferrara in the last year were retrospectively evaluated. For each patient with peptic lesions, the following data were recorded: demographic characteristics, use of NSAIDs, co-morbidity, hemodynamic conditions, blood transfusions before EGDS, time between onset of symptoms and EGDS, endoscopic findings, method of endoscopic haemostasis carried out, Rockall score and outcome. If re-bleeding occurred, the data concerning the second therapeutic intervention were recorded as well. RESULTS: Seventy-six males and 45 females (age 34-92 years) entered the study. In 22% of cases no co-morbidity was present. Active bleeding was observed in 38% of cases, features consistent with recent bleeding in 54% of cases, and no sign of bleeding in 6.6% of cases. Peptic ulcer was observed in 89% of cases. Hemostasis was carried out in 81 patients (76 had adrenalin infiltration, 2 had argon plasma coagulator [APC], and 3 had both treatments); 26 patients had re-bleeding. The probability of re-bleeding was related to female gender (p<0.05; OR: 3.74), time between onset of symptoms and EGDS >24 hours (p<0.01; OR: 8.67), and presence of non-ulcer peptic pathology (p<0.05; OR: 0.15). Seven re-bleeding patients underwent surgery, 19 had endoscopic treatment. In 11 of these patients second hemostasis was resolutive, 8 bled again. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding peptic lesions is effective also in routine clinical practice. Adrenalin infiltration is safe, easy to perform, cheap and repeatable, and in our opinion it should be considered the technique of first choice in endoscopic hemostasis.

Appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a hospital-based study.

Aims of this study were to evaluate: (1) whether upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is used appropriately according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines in a hospital setting and (2) whether there is any relationship between appropriateness of UGE and the presence of lesions detected by endoscopy. Indications and endoscopic findings for 734 consecutive UGE performed in 697 inpatients were retrospectively evaluated using ASGE and BSG guidelines to determine appropriateness of referrals. UGE showing endoscopic findings that had direct therapeutic or prognostic consequences were classified as "positive"; the other UGEs were classified as "negative." In all, 46% of UGEs were "positive," 54% "negative," and 61.7% and 23.2% of UGEs were inappropriate according to ASGE and BSG guidelines, respectively (P < 0.001). The probability of finding a positive endoscopy was significantly higher in UGE rated as appropriate than in those rated as inappropriate on the basis of ASGE guidelines (P < 0.001), but not on the basis of BSG guidelines. Endoscopies rated as inappropriate according to ASGE and BSG criteria showed a positive finding in 37.3% and 42.3% of cases, respectively (not significant difference). Multivariate analysis showed that the positive finding is directly related to age (P < 0.05), male gender (P < 0.001), prior UGE (P < 0.05), hematemesis (P < 0.001), and inversely related with upper abdominal pain (P < 0.01) and dyspepsia (P < 0.05). In hospitalized patients, UGE is frequently used for inappropriate indications, according to both ASGE and BSG guidelines. However, the actual clinical usefulness of appropriateness criteria, such as those proposed by ASGE and BSG, is questionable, as their strict observance could lead to missing a large number of significant endoscopic findings.

Short-term low-dose triple therapy with azithromycin, metronidazole and lansoprazole appears highly effective for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Although the OCN (omeprazole, clarithromycin and nitroimidazoles) short-term low-dose regimens are regarded as 'the standard' in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, azithromycin is a new-generation, acid-stable macrolide which may prove particularly useful for a new short-term low-dose triple therapy regimen. OBJECTIVE: To further improve OCN eradication treatments by reducing both the number of pills and the total cost. METHODS: A new short-term low-dose triple therapy (LAM) using lansoprazole 30 mg once a day for 1 week, azithromycin 500 mg once a day for 3 days, and metronidazole 250 mg twice a day for the same 3 days, was administrated to 60 patients presenting with H. pylori-positive gastritis with or without peptic ulcer, and compared with the classic 'Bazzoli regimen' (OCT: omeprazole, clarithromycin, tinidazole) in 60 matched patients. H. pylori infection before and after therapy was evaluated by a rapid urease test, conventional histology and toluidine-stained semi-thin sections. Three biopsies from the corpus and three from the antrum were taken during endoscopical examination before and 7-8 weeks after discontinuation of the treatment. Patient compliance, drug tolerance and drug costs were also taken into consideration. RESULTS: H. pylori infection was eradicated 7-8 weeks after treatment in 56 of the 60 patients in the LAM group (93.3%), and in 52 of the 57 patients in the OCT group who completed the treatment (91.2%), with no statistical difference. When gastric or duodenal ulceration was present, ulcer healing was observed in all cases. CONCLUSION: The new proposed short-term low-dose triple therapy (LAM) appears to be as effective as the OCT for the eradication of H. pylori infection. The new treatment, however, seems to have advantages in terms of drug tolerance, patient compliance and therapy cost.

Ultrastructural damage of gastric epithelium in patients taking NSAIDs.

As far as concerns ultrastructural lesions in the gastric epithelium following NSAIDs, a review has been made of existing data and ideas for future research concerning the ultrastructural field are advanced. Specific ultrastructural damage of the gastric epithelial cells has been recognized in patients taking NSAIDs: this pattern of damage appears characterized by a proliferative phenomen of "desquamation" of contiguous epithelial cells. Studies in animal models indicate that the first-level of epithelial damage involves a mitochondrial derangement and an alteration of tight junctions and cytoskeletal. The length of time of local drug action on the gastric mucosa could be the reason for the characteristic morphological presentation seen in vivo. If ulcers are the result of an imbalance between cell necrosis and cell regeneration, the high progression speed of cell necrosis to contiguous cells should play a basic role in the genesis of ulcers.