Effect of gender on postoperative outcomes and hospital stays after coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Compared to men, women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting appear to have a higher morbidity and mortality, particularly in the perioperative period. This study was designed to answer the questions of whether such differences in clinical outcomes between men and women still exist with improvements in surgical techniques and determine whether it is gender or associated comorbid conditions in women that lead to higher morbidity. METHODS: An analysis of a single center's contemporary experience (1994 to 1997) of 1,743 consecutive patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed. Only reoperations were excluded. Data were collected prospectively and presented as mean +/- standard deviation (p<0.05). RESULTS: Women represented 30.0% of patients. Compared with men, women were older (68.4 versus 63.8 years; p<0.05), and had more urgent surgical interventions (70.0% versus 56.7%; p<0.05), a higher incidence of diabetes (42.1% versus 26.7%; p<0.05), hypertension (82.0% versus 73.9%; p<0.05), lower body surface area (1.73+/-0.18 m2 versus 2.03+/-0.19 m2; p<0.05), and hematocrit (31.7%+/-3.9% versus 36.2%+/-3.9%; p<0.05). Ejection fraction, incidence of previous myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left main (LM) disease, renal insufficiency, extent of coronary disease, and preoperative intraaortic balloon pump were similar. Women received fewer arterial grafts (91.0% versus 95.5%; p<0.05) and distal anastomoses (3.31+/-0.88 versus 3.49+/-0.94 p<0.05). Despite these differences, there were no statistical differences in the incidence of postoperative death (1.5% versus 1.0%), myocardial infarction (0.6% versus 0.6%), or cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack (1.1% versus 0.4%) between men and women. Women had a higher inotropic support (10.2% versus 4.4%; p<0.05) and longer hospital stays (7.3+/-5.7 days versus 6.3+/-4.2 days; p<0.05). Using multivariate analysis, female gender was not an independent predictor of death or postoperative complications but was a predictor of length of hospital stay, use of arterial grafts, and extent of coronary revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for differences in their risk variables, the incidences of death, perioperative myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident/ transient ischemic attack after coronary artery bypass grafting in women and men were not statistically significant. Perioperative complications are related to comorbid risk factors but not to female gender itself. Further studies are warranted.

Heparin-bonded circuits improve clinical outcomes in emergency coronary artery bypass grafting.

Compared to patients undergoing elective or urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), those undergoing emergency CABG (EM-CABG) have a higher morbidity and mortality. The use of heparin-bonded circuits (HBC) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in nonemergent CABG patients. It is not known, however, whether the improved hemostasis and attenuation of the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass, conferred by HBC, can overcome the high incidence of comorbid risk factors in (EM-CABG) patients and improve their outcomes. A retrospective analysis of 206 consecutive patients undergoing EM-CABG over 4 years (1993-1997) at one institution was performed. Eighty-one patients were treated with conventional non-heparin-bonded circuits (NHBC) with full anticoagulation protocol (FAP, activated clotting time [ACT] > 480 sec); 125 patients were treated with HBC and a lower anticoagulation protocol (LAP, ACT > 280 seconds). Outcomes and results were collected prospectively and are presented as mean +/- SD. Preoperative risk profiles were similar in both treatment groups. Postoperatively, compared with the NHBC group, patients treated with HBC/LAP required fewer homologous donor units (4.1 +/- 10.7 vs 8.2 +/- 13.6 units, p = 0.005), were less likely to require inotropic support (18.6% vs 38.3%, p = 0.005), and had a lower incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI, 3.2% vs 12.3%, p = 0.04) and pulmonary complications (4.0% vs 12.3%, p = 0.04). The use of HBC/LAP resulted in a decreased incidence of postoperative complications (12.8% vs 28.4%, p = 0.01, odds ratio 0.37 with 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.76). This resulted in a shorter duration of ventilatory support (30.5 +/- 54.0 vs 72.8 +/- 16.7 hours, p = 0.009), ICU stay (38.2 +/- 36.5 vs 91.5 +/- 68.7 hours, p = 0.009), hospital stay (8.0 +/- 7.1 vs 11.0 +/- 8.9 days, p = 0.008), and therefore cost. In conclusion, the use of HBC/LAP in EM-CABG resulted in a reduction of homologous transfusion and postoperative complications associated with decreased hospital stays and cost.