Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Vet Microbiol ; 287: 109924, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38007921

ABSTRACT

Due to possible cross-contamination of animal feedstuff with antibiotics, food-producing animals may be exposed to undesirable low concentrations of antimicrobials. These sub-therapeutic levels of antibiotics can lead to the selection of resistant bacteria in the animal gut. The goal of this study was to assess, through analysis of the faeces of treated and control pigs, the risk of resistant E. coli being selected after daily exposure for three weeks to feed contaminated with oxytetracycline at 1% of the therapeutic dose. Liquid Chromatography coupled to tandem Mass Spectrometry was used to determine the oxytetracycline concentrations in faecal samples. In the treated group, concentrations were in the range of 4481.9 - 8671.2 µg/kg. In the control group, these concentrations were either below the method's limit of quantification or up to 60.5 µg/kg. After a transient increase in resistance in both groups, microbiological analysis showed that the treated group had a significantly higher oxytetracycline resistance rate by the end of the study than the control group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the treated animals were found to select co-resistances to nalidixic acid and ampicillin. Finally, at tolerated antibiotic contamination levels of feed, the treated group had a higher proportion of multidrug-resistant isolates at the end of the study than the control one (p < 0.05). The present study demonstrates that, at the tolerated contamination rates, both antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistant bacteria can be selected and evidenced in the gut microbiota.


Subject(s)
Oxytetracycline , Swine , Animals , Oxytetracycline/pharmacology , Escherichia coli , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Animal Feed/analysis
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36194447

ABSTRACT

Cross-contamination between medicated and non-medicated feed can occur during production, processing, transport or storage of animal feed. This may lead to the presence of low concentrations of antibiotics in supposedly drug-free feed for food production animals, which potentially could also harm consumers due to residues. In addition, consumption of sub-therapeutic concentrations of antibiotics may increase the risk of emergence of resistant bacteria. In this study, LC-MS/MS methods were developed to quantify four antibiotics (sulfadimethoxine, oxytetracycline, trimethoprim and amoxicillin) in several pig matrices, i.e. plasma, muscle, liver, kidneys and faeces. All methods were validated using the accuracy profile, except for amoxicillin in faeces, for which extraction could not be optimised for low concentrations. These methods were then applied as part of an animal study during which several pigs received contaminated feed at a concentration corresponding to 2% of therapeutic dose, in order to evaluate the risk of the presence of residues in animal faeces and tissues. The results showed that sulfadimethoxine is well absorbed and accumulates in the muscle, kidneys and liver, where concentrations were higher than the maximum residue limits (MRLs) authorised in EU legislation. Conversely, oxytetracycline was mostly found in faeces as its oral absorption is very low. Trimethoprim concentrations were slightly higher than the tolerated MRL in the kidneys, but they were below this level in the other tissues. Finally, amoxicillin concentrations remained below the lower limit of quantification of the methods in all matrices.


Subject(s)
Drug Residues , Oxytetracycline , Swine , Animals , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Sulfadimethoxine/analysis , Oxytetracycline/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Animal Feed/analysis , Trimethoprim/analysis , Amoxicillin/analysis , Drug Residues/analysis
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34043498

ABSTRACT

Cross-contamination of animal feed with antibiotics may occur during manufacturing in feed mills, because shared production lines can be used for medicated and non-medicated feed, but may also occur during transport, storage and at the farm level. This is a major issue in the current context where antimicrobial usage must be controlled in order to maintain their effectiveness. A LC-MS/MS method was developed for the determination of colistin, bacitracin A and virginiamycin M1 in feed for pigs, poultry and rabbits at concentrations similar to those encountered in cross-contamination. After investigating various issues related to colistin behaviour and matrix effects, we successfully validated this method according to the requirements of European regulations in terms of linearity, trueness, precision, limit of quantification and limit of decision. Trueness ranged 88.6-107.8% and precision ranged 12.6-21.2%. We then applied this method to the analysis of medicated pig feed to check the performance of the method on "real" samples of medicated feed. We subsequently analysed non-medicated pig, and rabbit feed samples, collected directly on farms, to check the rate of cross-contamination. No samples were contaminated by colistin, bacitracin, or virginiamycin.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Bacitracin/analysis , Colistin/analysis , Food Contamination/analysis , Streptogramin A/analysis , Animals , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Food Analysis , Molecular Conformation , Poultry , Rabbits , Swine , Tandem Mass Spectrometry
4.
J Agric Food Chem ; 68(34): 9033-9042, 2020 Aug 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32790357

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial cross-contamination of animal feed may occur during feed manufacturing, because shared production lines can be used for the production of medicated and nonmedicated feeds, and also during feed transport, storage at the farm level, and usage. This is a major issue in the current context in which antimicrobial usage must be controlled to maintain their effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to assess the antimicrobial cross-contamination rate of feed at the farm level. Here, we optimized a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of 11 antimicrobials in feed for pigs, poultry, and rabbits, which were strategically chosen. The method was validated according to European regulations in terms of mass spectrometry identification criteria and quantification criteria (linearity, trueness, precision, limit of quantification, and limit of decision). The results were in compliance with these regulations except for doxycycline, which may be quantified with higher uncertainty. This method was applied to the analysis of 192 nonmedicated pig, poultry, and rabbit feed samples that were collected directly from farms to assess antimicrobials animal exposure. Cross-contamination rates were relatively high with 44% of the samples being contaminated at a concentration above the quantification limit of 0.125 mg/kg and 15% of the samples being contaminated above 1 mg/kg. This result suggests that the current regulations and feed processing recommendations need to be improved, taking into account the risks arising from these contaminations.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Food Contamination/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Animals , Farms , Poultry , Rabbits , Swine
5.
J Chromatogr A ; 1599: 161-171, 2019 Aug 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31014576

ABSTRACT

Cephalosporins are of particular importance in human medicine and should be reserved for second-line curative treatment in the veterinary field to avoid any emerging antimicrobial resistance. Due to misuse of ceftiofur in the poultry sector in France, it is now recommended to completely stop using cephalosporins in this sector. Methods currently used for the control of veterinary practices are mostly based on liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry in a targeted mode, including parent compounds and any major metabolites. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relevance of untargeted metabolomic approaches to highlight a possible exposure of laying hens to cephalosporins using a predictive model including selected treatment biomarkers. An experimentation carried out on living animals involved the administration of cefquinome and ceftiofur. Three biological matrices-droppings, eggs and liver-were investigated. Metabolites were extracted and analysed by liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry in a full scan mode. Metabolites impacted by the treatment were selected by using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Predictive models built from the potential biomarkers selected in the "droppings" matrix were validated and able to classify "treated" and "control" hens. PLS-DA and logistic regression models were compared and both models gave satisfactory results in terms of prediction. Results were of less interest for other matrices in which only biomarkers of exposure to cefquinome were detected.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , Cephalosporins/analysis , Chickens , Chromatography, Liquid , Illicit Drugs/analysis , Mass Spectrometry , Substance Abuse Detection/veterinary , Animals , Cephalosporins/metabolism , Feces/chemistry , Female , France , Humans , Liver/chemistry , Models, Statistical , Ovum/chemistry , Veterinary Drugs/analysis
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27585601

ABSTRACT

An approach is described to validate a fast and simple targeted screening method for antibiotic analysis in meat and aquaculture products by LC-MS/MS. The strategy of validation was applied for a panel of 75 antibiotics belonging to different families, i.e., penicillins, cephalosporins, sulfonamides, macrolides, quinolones and phenicols. The samples were extracted once with acetonitrile, concentrated by evaporation and injected into the LC-MS/MS system. The approach chosen for the validation was based on the Community Reference Laboratory (CRL) guidelines for the validation of screening qualitative methods. The aim of the validation was to prove sufficient sensitivity of the method to detect all the targeted antibiotics at the level of interest, generally the maximum residue limit (MRL). A robustness study was also performed to test the influence of different factors. The validation showed that the method is valid to detect and identify 73 antibiotics of the 75 antibiotics studied in meat and aquaculture products at the validation levels.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Chromatography, Liquid/standards , Drug Residues/analysis , Food Contamination/analysis , Meat/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/standards , Animals , Aquaculture , Cattle , Cephalosporins/analysis , Goats , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Macrolides/analysis , Muscles/chemistry , Penicillins/analysis , Poultry , Quinolones/analysis , Salmon , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sheep , Sulfonamides/analysis , Swine
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26773882

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a method to reveal the illegal use of chloramphenicol (CAP) in animals intended for human consumption based on the detection of free CAP and chloramphenicol-glucuronide (CAP-glu) in urine. It details the different steps of the method, including hydrolysis of CAP-glu, extraction and cleanup with molecularly imprinted polymers and detection by LC-MS/MS, as well as the validation design. The efficiency of chloramphenicol release during the hydrolysis step and the stability of CAP-glu in urine samples stored at -20°C were also investigated. These verifications were important to ensure the method's suitability for checking CAP misuse in veterinary medicine. Validation results were fully compliant with the qualitative and quantitative criteria required by European regulations. Intraday relative standard deviations were all below 7.5%, while interday relative standard deviations were below 6.9%. Recoveries lay between 93.3 and 104.6%. Purification appears very effective since no matrix effect was demonstrated. CAP-glu was found to be stable for at least 3 months, and the mean recovery following deconjugation was assessed to be 79.4%. The decision limits (CCa) were all found to be lower than 0.1µg/kg.


Subject(s)
Chloramphenicol/analogs & derivatives , Chloramphenicol/urine , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Animals , Chloramphenicol/chemistry , Drug Stability , Linear Models , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine
8.
J AOAC Int ; 98(3): 649-657, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26025009

ABSTRACT

Aquaculture has been the fastest growing animal production industry for the past four decades, and almost half of the fish eaten in the world are now farmed fish. To prevent diseases in this more intensive aquaculture farming, use of therapeutic chemicals has become a basic choice. The monitoring of malachite green, a triphenylmethane dye and one of the oldest and widely used chemicals in fish production, has gained more interest since the mid 1990s when this substance was finally proven to be toxic enough to be prohibited in seafood products destined for human consumption. The enforcement of the European Union (EU) regulation of this banned substance along with some other triphenylmethane dye congeners and their metabolites in its domestic production and in seafood imports was undertaken through the National Residue Monitoring Plans implemented in nearly all of the 28 EU member states. The reliability of the overall European monitoring of this dye contamination in aquaculture products was assessed by using the results of proficiency testing (PT) studies provided by the EU Reference Laboratory (EU-RL) in charge of the network of the EU National Reference Laboratories (NRLs). The proficiency of each NRL providing analytical support services for regulating dye residues was carefully checked during three PT rounds. In the process, the analytical methods developed and validated for this purpose have gradually been improved and extended over the last two decades.


Subject(s)
Aquaculture/legislation & jurisprudence , Coloring Agents/analysis , Food Safety , Laboratories/standards , Seafood/analysis , Trityl Compounds/analysis , Animals , European Union , Humans , Legislation, Food , Reproducibility of Results
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25905498

ABSTRACT

Chlortetracycline (CTC) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic used in veterinary medicine for pulmonary or digestive infections and having a regulatory maximum residue limit (MRL) necessitating an official analytical control method. The purpose of this study was to clarify the identification of different forms of CTC observed in standard solution, in spiked muscle samples and in naturally incurred muscle samples of pigs analysed by LC-MS/MS and to demonstrate the in vivo formation of 6-iso-chlortetracycline and 4-epi-6-iso-CTC as a metabolite of CTC and 4-epi-CTC in muscle. The six following forms were identified, all being isobaric with a protonated molecule at m/z 479 (precursor ion): the keto-enol forms of CTC and the keto-enol forms of 4-epi-chlortetracycline (4-epi-CTC), 6-iso-chlortetracycline (6-iso-CTC) and 4-epi-6-iso-chlortetracycline (4-epi-6-iso-CTC). The 6-iso-CTC and 4-epi-6-iso-CTC were observed only in incurred pig samples so were identified for the first time as metabolites of CTC and 4-epi-CTC. Identification of the different forms was obtained by comparing incurred muscle samples with standard solutions and with spiked samples. Then the differences between the features of the chromatograms obtained by LC-TQ-MS and the fragmentation study of the different forms of CTC obtained by LC-Q-TOF-MS helped us to support this identification. The extraction steps and the LC-MS/MS conditions developed to analyse muscle tissue samples are described. This clarification concerning the rigorous identification of chromatographic peaks allowed us to evaluate the relevance of our monitoring method with regard to the regulations in place in the European Union and could be of help to laboratories involved in official control of antibiotic residues in food of animal origin. Additional results are also presented highlighting the transformation of the CTC when prepared in a mixture with other antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Chlortetracycline/analogs & derivatives , Drug Residues/chemistry , Food Analysis , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/metabolism , Chlortetracycline/administration & dosage , Chlortetracycline/chemistry , Molecular Structure , Muscle, Skeletal/chemistry , Swine
10.
J AOAC Int ; 96(2): 471-80, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23767376

ABSTRACT

This study was performed in order to determine the stability of antibiotics belonging to eight families in solution or biological matrix. Knowledge of the stability of antibiotics has to be demonstrated during method development or validation. The stability of stock standard solutions of 53 antibiotics was assessed after determining the appropriate conditions of dissolution and storage. The stability of the same 53 antibiotics after addition to negative control cow milk or pork muscle tissue stored at -18 and -70 degrees C was also assessed. Our concern was to obtain information concerning the stability of antibiotic residues in fortified biological matrixes in order to make easier the implementation of a routine screening method for antibiotic residues within the framework of the French monitoring program. Antibiotic solutions and fortified samples were analyzed using an LC/MS/MS method previously validated for screening purposes and for which it was checked that all pertinent criteria to obtain interpretable stability results were fulfilled. The design for testing the stability of antibiotics in solutions and matrix samples is described, as well as the rules of decision that were observed. Term periods for the stability study ranged from 1 month to 1 year, depending on the class of compounds. The results presented in this article will be useful and time-saving for many reference and field laboratories because LC/MS/MS methods are more and more commonly used for screening purposes.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Drug Stability , Freezing , Solutions/chemistry
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19680855

ABSTRACT

Premi Test contains viable spores of a strain of Bacillus stearothermophilus which is sensitive to antimicrobial residues, such as beta-lactams, tetracyclines, macrolides and sulphonamides. The growth of the strain is inhibited by the presence of antimicrobial residues in muscle tissue samples. Premi Test was validated according to AFNOR rules (French Association for Normalisation). The AFNOR validation was based on the comparison of reference methods (French Official method, i.e. four plate test (FPT) and the STAR protocol (five plate test)) with the alternative method (Premi Test). A preliminary study was conducted in an expert laboratory (Community Reference Laboratory, CRL) on both spiked and incurred samples (field samples). Several method performance criteria (sensitivity, specificity, relative accuracy) were estimated and are discussed, in addition to detection capabilities. Adequate agreement was found between the alternative method and the reference methods. However, Premi Test was more sensitive to beta-lactams and sulphonamides than the FPT. Subsequently, a collaborative study with 11 laboratories was organised by the CRL. Blank and spiked meat juice samples were sent to participants. The expert laboratory (CRL) statistically analysed the results. It was concluded that Premi Test could be used for the routine determination of antimicrobial residues in muscle of different animal origin with acceptable analytical performance. The detection capabilities of Premi Test for beta-lactams (amoxicillin, ceftiofur), one macrolide (tylosin) and tetracycline were at the level of the respective maximum residue limits (MRL) in muscle samples or even lower.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Drug Residues/analysis , Food Contamination/analysis , Meat/analysis , Animals , Biological Assay/methods , Biological Assay/veterinary , Cattle , Chickens , Food Analysis/methods , Muscle, Skeletal/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Sus scrofa
12.
Food Addit Contam ; 22(3): 221-3, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16021791

ABSTRACT

Two interlaboratory studies were organized in 2002-2003 in order to check the proficiency of laboratories in confirming the presence of sulfonamide residues in muscle and milk. These studies involved 25 EU National Reference Laboratories (NRLs) from 21 different European Countries in charge of statutory monitoring of antimicrobial residues in food of animal origin at a national level. The study was conducted according to international and national guidelines by the Community Reference Laboratory (CRL) in charge of antimicrobial substances. Four different test matrices of sheep muscle and four different test matrices of bovine milk containing different sulfonamide substances were prepared and sent to the participants. Each participant was asked to use his own routine confirmatory method and to analyse each sample in triplicate within a period of about six weeks during which the stability of the materials was checked by the organizer. The sulfonamide content of each material was determined by calculating the robust means of all the results and the deviation of the results from the assigned values was assessed by calculating Z-scores. Overall, results were satisfactory, particularly considering that it was the first proficiency test dealing with sulfonamides organised by the Community Reference Laboratory.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/analysis , Milk/chemistry , Muscle, Skeletal/chemistry , Sulfonamides/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Chemistry Techniques, Analytical/methods , Drug Residues/analysis , Europe , Food Contamination/analysis , Laboratories , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sulfadiazine/analysis , Sulfadoxine/analysis , Sulfamethazine/analysis , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...