ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate anatomic and functional outcomes at 1-year following trocar-guided transvaginal prolapse repair using a partially absorbable mesh. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicentre cohort study at 11 international sites. One hundred twenty-seven patients with pelvic organ prolapse stage ≥ III had surgery and were evaluated at 3 months and 1-year postsurgery compared with baseline. Instruments of measurements: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7, Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire-12, and Patients Global Impression of Change. RESULTS: Anatomic success, defined as prolapse stage ≤ I in the treated vaginal compartments, was 77.4% (95% confidence interval, 69.0-84.4%). Significant improvements in bother, quality of life, and sexual function were detected at 3 months and 1 year compared with baseline. At 1-year after surgery, 86.2% of patients indicated their prolapse situation to be "much better." Mesh exposure rate was 10.2% and rate of de novo dyspareunia 2% at 1 year. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate improved anatomic support, associated with excellent functional improvements, without apparent safety concerns.
Subject(s)
Surgical Instruments , Surgical Mesh , Uterine Prolapse/surgery , Dyspareunia/etiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes after standardized transvaginal prolapse repair with nonanchored mesh and a vaginal support device. STUDY DESIGN: Postoperative vaginal support was assessed by pelvic organ prolapse quantitative examination after repair of symptomatic stage II/III prolapse. Validated questionnaires assessed pelvic symptoms and sexual function. Visual analog scales quantified experience with the vaginal support device. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six women received the planned surgery; 95.6% of the women returned for the 1-year assessment: 76.9% of the cases were stage 0/I; however, in 86.9% of the cases, the leading vaginal edge was above the hymen. Pelvic symptoms, quality of life, and sexual function improved significantly from baseline (P < .05). Median visual analog scale scores for vaginal support device awareness and discomfort were 2.6 and 1.2, respectively (0 = none; 10 = worst possible). CONCLUSION: Vaginal support, pelvic symptoms, and sexual function improved at 1 year, compared with baseline, after trocar-free prolapse repair with nonanchored mesh and a vaginal support device.
