ABSTRACT
The delivery of high-quality HIV care in rural settings is a global challenge. Despite the successful expansion of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Africa, viral load (VL) monitoring and ART adherence are poor, especially in rural communities. This article describes a case study of an ART program in the deeply rural Eastern Cape of South Africa. The Zithulele ART Program initiated five innovations over time: (1) establishing district hospital as the logistical hub for all ART care in a rural district, (2) primary care clinic delivery of prepackaged ART and chronic medications for people living with HIV (PLH), (3) establishing central record keeping, (4) incentivizing VL monitoring, and (5) providing hospital-based outpatient care for complex cases. Using a pharmacy database, on-time VL monitoring and viral suppression were evaluated for 882 PLH initiating ART in the Zithulele catchment area in 2013. Among PLH initiating ART, 12.5% (n = 110) were lost to follow-up, 7.7% (n = 68) transferred out of the region, 10.2% (n = 90) left the program and came back at a later date, and 4.0% (n = 35) died. Of the on-treatment population, 82.9% (n = 480/579) had VL testing within 7 months and 92.6% (n = 536/579) by 1 year. Viral suppression was achieved in 85.2% of those tested (n = 457/536), or 78.9% (n = 457/579) overall. The program's VL testing and suppression rates appear about twice as high as national data and data from other rural centers in South Africa, despite fewer resources than other programs. Simple system innovations can ensure high rates of VL testing and suppression, even in rural health facilities.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Rural Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Community Health Centers , Female , HIV Infections/virology , HIV Seropositivity/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Program Evaluation , South Africa/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Viral LoadABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The implementation of a triage system is a vital step in improving the functioning and patient flow of the emergency centre in a rural district hospital. The South African Triage Scale (SATS) is a well validated and reliable tool used widely in South Africa and other low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to assess the validity of the SATS in a rural district hospital context. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. All patients presenting to the Zithulele Hospital emergency centre from 1 October 2015 to 31 December 2015 were triaged using the SATS system, routinely collected data was used to determine the correlation between assigned acuity and outcome to determine rates of under- and over-triage. Patient demographics were collected and waiting times were compared to existing standards of the SATS tool. RESULTS: Of the 4002 patients presenting to the emergency centre during the study period, 2% were triaged as emergency patients, 15% as very urgent, 38% as urgent and 45% as routine. The assigned acuities correlate well with outcome (fâ¯=â¯0.37; pâ¯<â¯0.0001) and an acceptable rate of over-triage (49%) and under-triage (9%) was found. Waiting time targets were poorly achieved with only 49% of emergency, 23% very urgent, 46% urgent and 69% routine patients seen within ideal target times. DISCUSSION: The SATS is a valid tool to implement in a rural district emergency centre. Strict waiting time goals may not be achievable in this setting without structural and resource allocation changes to allow for improvements in the surge capacity of staff to manage urgent and emergency patients.
