Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 144
Filter
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 300: 196-201, 2024 Jul 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39025040

ABSTRACT

The mechanisms underlying pain in cases of endometriosis or chronic pelvic pain are complex, often involving various types of pain; mainly nociceptive pain, central sensitization, and neuropathic pain. Our main objective was to examine the prevalence of neuropathic pain in women with symptomatic endometriosis, and secondary, to explore the factors associated with this type of pain and to assess the prevalence of a positive PPSC score and a history of sexual violence within this population. This study is a retrospective, comparative, single-center cohort study conducted from September 2019 to January 2023. The presence of neuropathic pain was confirmed by a positive DN4 score, defined as greater than or equal to 4. The association with the following variables was studied: age, BMI, marital status, smoking, alcohol and drugs consumption, age at menarche, gestity, parity, duration of exposure to endometriosis, MRI locations, laparoscopy for endometriosis and post-laparoscopy r-ASRM classification, hormone treatment, associated symptoms, VAS, associated pathologies, infertility consultation, Pain Center consultation, EPH-5 score, positive PPSC score (≥5), and history of sexual violence. The prevalence of neuropathic pain was 44.1%. Younger age, being in a relationship, having a high EPH-5 score and undergoing laparoscopy for endometriosis are associated with neuropathic pain independently of other variables. Our study underscores the persistent high prevalence of neuropathic pain in endometriosis cases, emphasizing the importance of actively screening for it. Identifying neuropathic pain could prompt referrals to pain specialists, integrating it into a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach.

2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 50(9): 108482, 2024 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901290

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Vulvar cancer is a rare pathology affecting mainly elderly women. This study aims to evaluate the impact of age on tumor size in vulvar cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study carried out between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2020, in patients operated on for vulvar cancer. Univariate analysis was performed according to patients' age ≥ or <65 years. Factors associated with tumor size found to be significant according to age were then included in a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: Of the 382 patients included, there were 133 patients aged <65 years and 249 ≥ 65 years. Radical total vulvectomy surgeries were more frequently performed in women ≥65 years (n = 72 (28.9 %) versus n = 20 (15 %); p = 0.004). The median histological tumor size and interquartile range was 20 mm [13-29] in the <65 years and 30 mm [15-42] in patients ≥65 years (p = 0.001). Multiple linear regression showed that age ≥65 years had a regression coefficient of 7.15 95 % CI [2.32; 11.99] (p = 0.004), constituting a risk factor for larger histological tumour size. Patients aged ≥65 years old had a higher early complication rate (n = 150 (62 %) versus n = 56 (42.7 %), p = 0.001). They also had a greater risk of recurrence (HR = 1.89 (95%CI (1.24-2.89)), p = 0.003) with a worse overall survival (HR = 5.64 (95%CI (1.70-18.68)), p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Age is a risk factor for larger tumor size, leading to more radical surgery and a greater risk of complications in already fragile patients, with a greater risk of recurrence and an impact on overall survival.

3.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 52(10): 102684, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37866776

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Uterine infertility (UI) is defined as the complete absence of a uterus (absolute uterine infertility or AUI) or the presence of a non functional uterus (non-absolute uterine infertility or NAUI). The exact prevalence of uterine infertility is currently unknown. Our aim was to assess the number of French women concerned by Uterine Infertility according to a recent literature review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have previously conducted a systematic review of the literature on UI and its various causes in the world. Based on these study and demographic data of 2022 from INSEE (Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques), we attempted to estimate the number of women under 40 years of age in France affected by potential UI using direct standardization. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Based on the estimation from INSEE data, approximately 2066 women of childbearing age would have MRKH syndrome in France, 380 the Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome and 3700 had an haemostasis hysterectomy in France. We did not find data on the prevalence of hysterectomies before the age of 40 in France. For the following pathologies: uterine malformations, radiation uterus, synechiae, myomas and adenomyosis there was a huge amount of missing data, which does not allow us to estimate the number of potentially infertile patients. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of UI is poorly known. UI probably concerns several thousand patients in France. The creation of a UI registry would make enable to assess the number of patients potentially eligible for adoption, uterus transplantation or even surrogacy.


Subject(s)
Infertility, Female , Urogenital Abnormalities , Male , Humans , Female , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , Infertility, Female/etiology , Prevalence , Uterus/abnormalities , France/epidemiology
4.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 52(7): 102621, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37301478

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Safety of the uterine manipulator (UM) within endometrial cancer (EC) surgery is being questioned. Its use might be one of the issues for potential tumor dissemination during the procedure, especially in the case of uterine perforation (UP). No prospective data on this surgical complication, nor on the oncological consequences exist. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of UP while using UM when performing surgery for EC and the impact of UP on the choice of adjuvant treatment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-center cohort study from November 2018 to February 2022, considering all EC cases surgically treated by a minimally invasive approach with the help of a UM. Demographic, preoperative, postoperative and adjuvant treatment corresponding to the included patients were collected and comparatively analyzed according to the absence or presence of a UP. RESULTS: Of the 82 patients included in the study, 9 UPs (11%) occurred during surgery. There was no significant difference in demographics and disease characteristics at diagnosis that may have induced UP. The type of UM used or the approach (laparoscopic vs. robotic) did not influence the occurrence of UP (p = 0.44). No positive peritoneal cytology was found post hysterectomy. There was a statistically significantly higher rate of lymph-vascular space invasion within the perforation group, 67% vs. 25% in the no perforation group, p = 0.02. Two out of nine (22%) adjuvant therapies were changed because of UP. The median follow-up time for patients was 7.6 months (range 0.5-33.1 months). No recurrence was found in the UP group. CONCLUSION: Our study found a uterine perforation rate of 11%. This information needs to be further integrated to consider the usefulness of MU for EC surgery.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms , Uterine Perforation , Female , Humans , Uterine Perforation/epidemiology , Uterine Perforation/etiology , Cohort Studies , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Hysterectomy/methods , Peritoneum/pathology
5.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 51(9): 393-399, 2023 09.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37295716

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of simulation among French Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs. METHODS: A survey was conducted with all 28 French residency program directors. The questionnaire covered equipment and human resources, training programs, types of simulation tools and time spent. RESULTS: Of the cities hosting a residency program, 93% (26/28) responded regarding equipment and human resources, and 75% (21/28) responded regarding training program details. All respondents declared having at least one structure dedicated to simulation. A formal training program was reported by 81% (21/26) of cities. This training program was mandatory in 73% of the cases. There was a median number of seven senior trainers involved, three of whom had received a specific training in medical education. Most of declared simulation activities concerned technical skills in obstetrics and surgery. Simulations to practice breaking bad news were offered by 62% (13/21) of cities. The median number of half-days spent annually on simulation training was 55 (IQR: 38-83). CONCLUSION: Simulation training is now widely available among French residency programs. There remains heterogeneity between centers regarding equipment, time spent and content of simulation curricula. The French College of Teachers of Gynecology and Obstetrics has proposed a roadmap for the content of simulation-based training based on the results of this survey. An inventory of all existing "train the trainers" simulation programs in France is also provided.


Subject(s)
Gynecology , Internship and Residency , Obstetrics , Simulation Training , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Obstetrics/education , Gynecology/education , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 305(4): 1105-1113, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35113234

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing perioperative results of robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) in the context of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). METHODS: This retrospective French multicentric study included all patients with DIE who underwent surgical treatment managed by RAL (Da Vinci® System). From November 2008 to June 2019, patients were included in a single European database, in Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, with Society of European Robotic Gynecological Surgery collaboration. Patients had different DIE sites as follows: gynecological, urological, or digestive, or combinations of these. Surgical procedures and perioperative complications were evaluated. To assess complications, patients were divided into the following four groups according to surgical procedure and DIE site: gynecological only; gynecological and urological; gynecological and digestive; and gynecological, urological, and digestive. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients treated at one of eight health-care facilities from November 2008 to June 2019 were included. Median operative time was 245 min (IQR 186-320), surgeon console time was 138 ± 75 min and estimated blood loss was 70.0 mL ± 107 mL. Among this patient sample, 42.1% had a multidisciplinary surgical approach with a digestive or urology surgeon in addition to gynecology surgeon (25.5% and 16.6% of cases, respectively). Among those with intraoperative complications (n = 25, 5.4%) were primarily conversion to laparotomy (n = 6, 2.0%), transfusion (n = 2, 0.6%), and organ wounds (n = 8, 1.7%). Overall, 5.6% had severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ Grade 3). CONCLUSION: This is among the largest published series addressing RAL for DIE. Interest in this procedure appears promising, with no observed increases in blood loss or in peri- or post-operative complications. DIE laparoscopic surgery can require complex surgical procedures performed by multidisciplinary surgical teams. Thus, it may be one of the best candidates for RAL within gynecology surgery.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Endometriosis/complications , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 51(1): 102234, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34571197

ABSTRACT

Native tissue cystocele repair has been the cornerstone of prolapse surgery, especially since the learned societies warned clinicians and patients about serious mesh related complications and recommend a vaginal route without prosthesis in first intention. Surgical techniques mainly consist in anterior colporraphy, vaginal patch plastron and para vaginal repair. However, in case of vaginal patch plastron, the vagina left in contact with the bladder is a material of much better quality than colporraphy alone. The multiplication of native tissues, generating post-operative fibrosis, associated with anchorage on a strong ligamentous structure, allows to expect better outcomes compared to anterior colporraphy. Indeed, vaginal plastron corrects median cystoceles with a vaginal strip as well as lateral cystoceles thanks to bilateral paravaginal suspension. Thereby, vaginal patch plastron appears to be a good compromise between the 3 autologous techniques with median and paralateral repair We aimed to describe the surgical technique of the vaginal patch plastron for vaginal native tissue repair for cystocele.


Subject(s)
Cystocele/surgery , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Surgical Mesh/standards , Adult , Cystocele/complications , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Prosthesis Implantation/trends
8.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 49(11): 805-815, 2021 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34520857

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To draw up recommendations on the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures during surgery for other indications. DESIGN: A consensus panel of 19 experts was convened. A formal conflict of interest policy was established at the onset of the process and applied throughout. The entire study was performed independently without funding from pharmaceutical companies or medical device manufacturers. The panel applied the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system to evaluate the quality of evidence on which the recommendations were based. The authors were advised against making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence. Some recommendations were ungraded. METHODS: The panel studied 22 key questions on seven prophylactic procedures: 1) salpingectomy, 2) fimbriectomy, 3) salpingo-oophorectomy, 4) ablation of peritoneal endometriosis, 5) adhesiolysis, 6) endometrial excision or ablation, and 7) cervical ablation. RESULTS: The literature search and application of the GRADE system resulted in 34 recommendations. Six were supported by high-quality evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 28 by low-quality evidence (GRADE 2+/-). Recommendations on two questions were left ungraded due to a lack of evidence in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: A high level of consensus was achieved among the experts regarding the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures. The ensuing recommendations should result in improved current practice.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Gynecology , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Salpingectomy , Salpingo-oophorectomy
9.
Prog Urol ; 31(7): 439-443, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33867213

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In a menopausal woman scheduled for curative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by sacral colpopexy (SC), the question of concomitant hysterectomy is frequently considered by the surgeon. The risk of endometrial cancer (EC) exists in this population, and increases with age and body mass index. The French college of gynecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF) decided to issue good practice guidelines on subtotal hysterectomy (SH) for postmenopausal women scheduled for SC for POP. METHODS: The CNGOF has decided to adopt the AGREE II and GRADE systems for grading scientific evidence. Each recommendation for practice was allocated a grade, which depends on the quality of evidence (QE) (clinical practice guidelines). RESULTS: The prevalence of occult endometrial cancer (EC) found on pathological analysis after SH in this context (concomitant SH associated with SC) is low (<1%) (QE: high). Few studies have assessed the value of preoperative uterine exploration. Performing SH during SC is associated with its own risks, which may diminish the potential "carcinological prevention benefit". Uterine morcellation, performed by laparoscopy or a robot-assisted procedure, is associated with a low risk (<0.6%) of dissemination of an unknown sarcoma/EC (QE: moderate) A risk of dissemination of parasitic myomas (<0.5%) is also possible (QE: moderate). CONCLUSION: It is not recommended to perform a subtotal hysterectomy associated with sacral colpopexy for the sole purpose of reducing the occurrence of endometrial cancer (Recommendation: STRONG [GRADE 1-]; the level of evidence was considered to be low and the risk-benefit balance was considered not to be favorable).


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/prevention & control , Hysterectomy/methods , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Prophylactic Surgical Procedures/methods , Endometrial Neoplasms/etiology , Female , Humans , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/complications , Risk Factors , Sacrum , Vagina
10.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 49(3): 193-203, 2021 03.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32916317

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to summarize the development of UT on worldwide and to develop the new questions posed by this technique in 2020. METHODS: According to the PRISMA model, via Pubmed, we searched for publications containing the keywords: uterus transplantation; UT and cryopreservation from 2000 to 2020. RESULTS: At least 76 UTx have been carried out around the world and 19 healthy babies were born. The main indication remains the uterine agenesis (MRKH Syndrome>85% cases) then the history of hysterectomy (hemorrhage of the delivery or cervical cancer) and the non-functional uterus (Asherman's syndrome, diffuse adenomyosis). The 2 types of donors (living and deceased) are developed representing respectively 75% and 25% of the TU; the success rate in terms of return of rules is better in the living donor group and is 79% vs 68% in the deceased donor group. The choice of donor type must take into account the constraints of both procedures. Surgical complications (grade III) for the donor are estimated to be 14% mainly represented by ureter wounds. Technical simplifications concerning the venous return of the graft but also the carrying out of robot-assisted surgery would reduce the operating time for the donor and facilitate the collection process. CONCLUSION: TU is a complementary alternative to GPA and adoption allowing patients to be surrogates, legal and biological of the baby. An extension of the indications to patients with non absolute uterine infertility is in the process of democratization.


Subject(s)
46, XX Disorders of Sex Development , Infertility, Female , Female , Humans , Living Donors , Mullerian Ducts , Uterus/transplantation
11.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 256: 492-501, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33262005

ABSTRACT

It is recommended to classify Borderline Ovarian Tumors (BOTs) according to the WHO classification. Transvaginal and suprapubic ultrasonography are recommended for the analysis of an ovarian mass (Grade A). In case of an undetermined ovarian lesion on ultrasonography, it is recommended to perform a pelvic MRI (Grade A) with a score for malignancy (ADNEX MR/O-RADS) (Grade C) included in the report and to formulate a histological hypothesis (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended to characterize a tumor suspected of being BOT (Grade C). It is recommended to evaluate serum levels of HE4 and CA125 and to use the ROMA score for the diagnosis of indeterminate ovarian mass on imaging (grade A). If there is a suspicion of a mucinous BOT on imaging, serum levels of CA 19-9 may be proposed (Grade C). For Early Stages (ES) of BOT, if surgery without risk of tumor rupture is possible, laparoscopy with protected extraction is recommended over laparotomy (Grade C). For treatment of a bilateral serous ES BOT with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, bilateral cystectomy is recommended where possible (Grade B). For mucinous BOTs with a treatment strategy of fertility and/or endocrine function preservation, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended (grade C). For mucinous BOTs treated by initial cystectomy, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended (grade C). For serous or mucinous ES BOTs, routine hysterectomy is not recommended (Grade C). For ES BOTs, lymphadenectomy is not recommended (Grade C). For ES BOTs, appendectomy is recommended only in case of a macroscopically pathological appendix (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended in cases of serous BOTs with micropapillary architecture and an incomplete abdominal cavity inspection during initial surgery (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended for mucinous BOTs after initial cystectomy or in cases where the appendix was not examined (Grade C). If restaging surgery is decided for ES BOTs, the following procedures should be performed: peritoneal washing (grade C), omentectomy (grade B), complete exploration of the abdominal cavity with peritoneal biopsies (grade C), visualization of the appendix and appendectomy in case of a pathological macroscopic appearance (grade C) as well as unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in case of a mucinous BOT initially treated by cystectomy (grade C). In advanced stages (AS) of BOT, it is not recommended to perform a lymphadenectomy as a routine procedure (Grade C). For AS BOT in a patient with a desire to fall pregnant, conservative treatment involving preservation of the uterus and all or part of the ovary may be proposed (Grade C). Restaging surgery aimed at removing all lesions, not performed initially, is recommended for AS BOTs (Grade C). After treatment, follow-up for a duration greater than 5 years is recommended due to the median recurrence time of BOTs (Grade B). It is recommended that a systematic clinical examination be carried out during follow-up of a treated BOT (Grade B). If the determination of tumor markers is normal preoperatively, the routine dosage of tumor markers in BOT follow-up is not recommended (Grade C). In case of an initial elevation in serum CA 125 levels, it is recommended to monitor CA 125 during follow up (Grade B). In case of conservative treatment, it is recommended to use transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound during follow up of a treated BOT (Grade B). In the event of a BOT recurrence in a woman of childbearing age, a second conservative treatment may be proposed (Grade C). A consultation with a physician specialized in Assisted Reproductive Technique (ART) should be offered in the case of BOTs in women of childbearing age (Grade C). When possible, a conservative surgical strategy is recommended to preserve fertility in women of childbearing age (Grade C). In the case of optimally treated BOT, there is no evidence to contraindicate the use of ART. The use of hormonal contraception after serous or mucinous BOT is not contraindicated (Grade C). After management of mucinous BOT, for women under 45 years, given the benefit of Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular and bone risks, and the lack of hormone sensitivity of mucinous BOTs, it is recommended to offer HRT (Grade C). Over 45 years of age, HRT can be prescribed in case of a climacteric syndrome after individual benefit to risk assessment (Grade C).


Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms , Physicians , CA-125 Antigen , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery
12.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 256: 412-418, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33296755

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic and prognostic characteristics of borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) detected during pregnancy, and to establish an inventory of French practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multi-centre case study of 14 patients treated for BOTs, diagnosed during pregnancy between 2005 and 2017, in five French pelvic cancerology expert centres, including data on clinical characteristics, histological tumour characteristics, surgical procedure, adjuvant treatments, follow-up and fertility. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 29.3 [standard deviation (SD) 6.2] years. Most BOTs were diagnosed on ultrasonography in the first trimester (85.7 %), and most of these cases (78.5 %) also underwent magnetic resonance imaging to confirm the diagnosis (true positives 54.5 %). Most patients underwent surgery during pregnancy (57 %), with complete staging surgery in two cases (14.3 %). Laparoscopy was performed more frequently than other procedures (50 %), and unilateral adnexectomy was more common than cystectomy (57.5 %). Tumour size influenced the surgical approach significantly (mean size 7.5 cm for laparoscopy, 11.9 cm for laparoconversion, 14 cm for primary laparotomy; P = 0.08), but the type of resection did not. Most patients were initially diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA (92.8 %) tumours, but many were upstaged after complete restaging surgery (57.1 %). Most BOTs were serous (50 %), two cases had a micropapillary component (28.5 %), and one case had a micro-invasive implant. BOTs were bilateral in two cases (14.2 %). Mean follow-up was 31.4 (SD 14.8) months. Recurrent lesions occurred in two patients (14.2 %) and no deaths have been recorded to date among the study population. CONCLUSION: BOTs remain rare, but this study - despite its small sample size - supports the hypothesis that BOTs during pregnancy have potentially aggressive characteristics.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Ovarian Neoplasms , Child , Cystectomy , Female , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
13.
Trials ; 21(1): 624, 2020 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32641096

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Native tissue cystocele repair has been the cornerstone of prolapse surgery, especially since the learned societies warned clinicians and patients about serious mesh-related complications. Surgical techniques mainly consist in anterior colporraphy and vaginal patch plastron. However, success rates of native tissue cystocele repair are heterogeneous, depending on the design of studies and definition of outcomes. To date, high-quality data comparing vaginal native tissue procedures are still lacking. METHODS: Herein we aimed to describe the design of the first randomized controlled trial (TAPP) comparing anterior colporraphy (plication of the muscularis and adventitial layers of the vaginal wall) and vaginal patch plastron (bladder support anchored on the tendinous arch of the pelvic fascia by lateral sutures) techniques. Our aim is to assess the effectiveness of vaginal native tissue repair at 1 year for cystocele with a combined definition of success-anatomic and functional. The primary endpoint will be the success rate 1 year after surgery with a composite of objective and subjective measures (Aa and Ba points < 0 from POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) and a negative answer to question 3 of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and no need for additional treatment). DISCUSSION: A prospective study has found a success rate at 35% for anterior colporraphy based on a combined definition, both anatomic and functional, as recently recommended. However, the definition of anatomic was strict (POP-Q< 2), while it seems that the best definition of anatomic success is "no prolapse among the hymen", that is to say Aa and Ba points from the POP-Q classification < 0. We hypothesize that vaginal patch plastron will have a better anatomic and functional success comparatively to anterior colporraphy because native tissue is added, as it corrects both median and lateral cystoceles thanks to bilateral paravaginal suspension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CHU LIMOGES is the sponsor of this research (n°87RI18_0013). This research is supported by the French Department of Health (PHRC 2018-A03476-49) and will be conducted with the support of DGOS (PHRC interregional - GIRCI SOHO). The study protocol was approved by the Human Subjects Protection Review Board (Comité de Protection des Personnes) on May 16, 2019. The trial is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry ( NCT03875989 ).


Subject(s)
Pelvic Floor/surgery , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Vagina/surgery , Female , France , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 49(7): 101730, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32234354

ABSTRACT

The main difficulty of ovarian tissue autograft (OTA) is to preserve as many follicles as possible because the ovarian tissue undergoes warm ischemia during grafting until revascularisation, resulting in significant follicular loss. We describe a two-stage grafting technique to stimulate new vascularisation in order to enhance the revascularization process to reduce the ischemic injuries. Furthermore we performed ovarian patchwork in the laboratory and then grafting with robotic laparoscopy to facilitate surgery and increase precision. This technique is used in the DATOR study with promising results, such as a 40% delivery rate.


Subject(s)
Ovary/transplantation , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Autografts , Cryopreservation , Female , Fertility Preservation , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Pregnancy , Primary Ovarian Insufficiency/etiology , Primary Ovarian Insufficiency/surgery
15.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 48(5): 444-447, 2020 05.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32222433

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Recommendations for the management of patients with gynecological cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic period. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Recommendations based on the consensus conference model. RESULTS: In the case of a COVID-19 positive patient, surgical management should be postponed for at least 15 days. For cervical cancer, the place of surgery must be re-evaluated in relation to radiotherapy and Radio-Chemotherapy-Concomitant and the value of lymph node staging surgeries must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. For advanced ovarian cancers, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy should be favored even if primary cytoreduction surgery could be envisaged. It is lawful not to offer hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy during a COVID-19 pandemic. In the case of patients who must undergo interval surgery, it is possible to continue the chemotherapy and to offer surgery after 6 cycles of chemotherapy. For early stage endometrial cancer, in case of low and intermediate preoperative ESMO risk, hysterectomy with bilateral annexectomy associated with a sentinel lymph node procedure should be favored. It is possible to consider postponing surgery for 1 to 2 months in low-risk endometrial cancers (FIGO Ia stage on MRI and grade 1-2 endometrioid cancer on endometrial biopsy). For high ESMO risk, it ispossible to favor the MSKCC algorithm (combining PET-CT and sentinel lymph node biopsy) in order to omit pelvic and lumbar-aortic lymphadenectomies. CONCLUSION: During COVID-19 pandemic, patients suffering from cancer should not lose life chance, while limiting the risks associated with the virus.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Female , France , Genital Neoplasms, Female/complications , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , Societies, Medical
16.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 48(3): 314-321, 2020 03.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004781

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations for the diagnosis and management of the recurrence of Borderline Ovarian Tumour (BOT). METHODS: Literature review by consulting Pubmed, Medline and Cochrane databases. RESULTS: In the case of BOT, most of recurrences are a new BOT without invasive contingent (LE2). In the case of bilateral BOT, bilateral cystectomy is associated with a shorter recurrence time compared to unilateral oophorectomy and contralateral cystectomy (LE2). In recurrent serous BOT, cysts are usually fluid thin-walled with vegetation, corresponding in the IOTA classification to a solid unilocular cyst (LE2). A size of the cyst less than 20mm is not a sufficient to eliminate the diagnosis of recurrent serous BOT (LE2). Recurrence of mucinous BOT predominantly appears as multilocular or as solid multilocular cysts (LE4). In the case of ovarian preservation, recurrences are most often observed on the preserved ovary(s) (LE2). Non-invasive peritoneal recurrence after initial radical treatment including bilateral hysterectomy and adnexectomy is possible, mainly in patients initially diagnosed with stage II or III BOT with non-invasive peritoneal implant (LE3). Most BOT recurrences are asymptomatic, but clinical examination may allow diagnosis of recurrence (LE2). The normality of the CA 125 dosage does not rule out the diagnosis of recurrent BOT (LE2). A second conservative treatment in the event of recurrence of BOT entails the risk of new recurrence (LE2) with no impact on survival (LE4). Totalization of the adnexectomy in case of recurrence of BOT reduces the risk of new recurrence (LE2). Conservative treatment does not increase the risk of recurrence with non-invasive peritoneal implants (LE4). Conservative treatment may be offered after a first non-invasive recurrence in young women who wish to preserve their fertility (gradeC). In the absence of infiltrating tumor, chemotherapy is not indicated. The only cases for which chemotherapy can be considered are those for which there is an infiltrative component in addition to TFO.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Conservative Treatment , Drug Therapy , Female , France , Humans , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Ovariectomy/methods , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Peritoneal Neoplasms/therapy
17.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 48(3): 223-235, 2020 03.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004780

ABSTRACT

This work was carried out under the aegis of the CNGOF (Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français) and proposes guidelines based on the evidence available in the literature. The objective was to define the diagnostic and surgical management strategy, the fertility preservation and surveillance strategy in Borderline Ovarian Tumor (BOT). No screening modality can be proposed in the general population. An expert pathological review is recommended in case of doubt concerning the borderline nature, the histological subtype, the invasive nature of the implant, for all micropapillary/cribriform serous BOT or in the presence of peritoneal implants, and for all mucinous or clear cell tumors (grade C). Macroscopic MRI analysis should be performed to differentiate the different subtypes of BOT: serous, seromucinous and mucinous (intestinal type) (grade C). If preoperative biomarkers are normal, follow up of biomarkers is not recommended (grade C). In cases of bilateral early serous BOT with a desire to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, it is recommended to perform a bilateral cystectomy if possible (grade B). In case of early mucinous BOT, with a desire to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, it is recommended to perform a unilateral adnexectomy (grade C). Secondary surgical staging is recommended in case of serous BOT with micropapillary appearance and uncomplete inspection of the abdominal cavity during initial surgery (grade C). For early-stage serous or mucinous BOT, it is not recommended to perform a systematic hysterectomy (grade C). Follow up after BOT must be pursued for more than 5 years (grade B). Conservative treatment involving at least the conservation of the uterus and a fragment of the ovary in a patient wishing to conceive may be proposed in advanced stages of BOT (grade C). A new surgical treatment that preserves fertility after a first non-invasive recurrence may be proposed in women of childbearing age (grade C). It is recommended to offer a specialized consultation for Reproductive Medicine when diagnosing BOT in a woman of childbearing age. Hormonal contraceptive use after serous or mucinous BOT is not contraindicated (grade C).


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/surgery , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Female , Fertility Preservation , France , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Hysterectomy/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neoplasm Staging , Ovariectomy/methods
18.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 48(3): 248-259, 2020 03.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004784

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide clinical practice guidelines from the French college of obstetrics and gynecology (CNGOF) based on the best evidence available, concerning epidemiology of recurrence, the risk or relapse and the follow-up in case of borderline ovarian tumor after primary management, and evaluation of completion surgery after fertility sparing surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: English and French review of literature from 2000 to 2019 based on publications from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, with keywords borderline ovarian tumor, low malignant potential, recurrence, relapse, follow-up, completion surgery. From 2000 up to this day, 448 references have been found, from which only 175 were screened for this work. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Overall risk of recurrence with Borderline Ovarian Tumour (BOT) may vary from 2 to 24% with a 10-years overall survival>94% and risk of invasive recurrence between 0.5 to 3.8%. Age<40 years (level of evidence 3), advanced initial FIGO stage (LE3), fertility sparing surgery (LE2), residual disease after initial surgery for serous BOT (LE2), implants (invasive or not) (LE2) are risk factors of recurrence. In case of conservative treatment, serous BOT had a higher risk of relapse than mucinous BOT (LE2). Lymphatic involvement (LE3) and use of mini invasive surgery (LE2) are not associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Scores or Nomograms could be useful to assess the risk of recurrence and then to inform patients about this risk (gradeC). In case of serous BOT, completion surgery is not recommended, after conservative treatment and fulfillment of parental project (grade B). It isn't possible to suggest a recommendation about completion surgery for mucinous BOT. There is not any data to advise a frequency of follow-up and use of paraclinic tools in general case of BOT. Follow-up of treated BOT must be achieved beyond 5 years (grade B). A systematic clinical examination is recommended during follow-up (grade B), after treatment of BOT. In case of elevation of CA-125 at diagnosis use of CA-125 serum level is recommended during follow-up of treated BOT (grade B). When a conservative treatment (preservation of ovarian pieces and uterus) of BOT is performed, endovaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography is recommended during follow-up (grade B). There isn't any sufficient data to advise a frequency of these examinations (clinical examination, ultrasound and CA-125) in case of treated BOT. CONCLUSION: Risk of relapse after surgical treatment of BOT depends on patients' characteristics, type of BOT (histological features) and modalities of initial treatment. Scores and nomogram are useful tools to assess risk of relapse. Follow-up must be performed beyond 5 years and in case of peculiar situations, use of paraclinic evaluations is recommended.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , CA-125 Antigen/blood , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Female , Fertility Preservation/methods , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Humans , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
19.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 48(2): 167-173, 2020 02.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31923643

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: FullPIERS score (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) is built in order to predict maternal outcomes among women with preeclampsia. Our objective is to assess external validity of this score among a population of French women. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted for all patients with pre-eclampsia (severe or not) admitted to a tertiary hospital center. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to determine accuracy of the model at 48 hours and 7 days after admittance and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: In total, 276 patients meet inclusions criterion. Among them, 217 were included and 61 (28 %) had one or more complication. Only 8 patients had two complications at two different moments (one at 48 hours and one at 7 days). The FullPiers score predicted maternels events at 48 hours with an area under the curve at 0.80 (IC95 % [0.74-0.85]). At 4.2 cut off, the sensitivity was 71 % and specifity 88 %. At 7 days, the area under the curve was 0.74 (IC95 % [0.67-0.79]), admiting a cutoff point for FullPIERS probability of 3.4, sensitivity was 59 % and specificity 85 %. CONCLUSIONS: Our study show utility of FullPIERS score in french maternity. This model might be a useful tool for predicting complications in women with pre-eclampsia. Using of this score in clinical practice might help improving optimization of patient's care.


Subject(s)
Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/physiopathology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Area Under Curve , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Pregnancy , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
20.
Trials ; 21(1): 51, 2020 Jan 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31915047

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Labor is induced in over 20% of women in France. Prostaglandins, especially intravaginal dinoprostone (Propess®), are widely used to initiate cervical ripening. If labor does not start within 24 h, there is uncertainty about whether to administer a second dinoprostone pessary or to use oxytocin to induce labor in order to achieve a vaginal delivery. METHODS: RE-DINO is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized superiority trial with two parallel arms running in six French hospitals. A total of 360 patients ≥ 18 years of age at > 37 weeks of gestation who exhibit unfavorable cervical conditions (Bishop score < 6) 24 h after placement of the first Propess®, with fetuses in cephalic presentation, will be included. Patients with premature membrane rupture, uterine scars, or multiple pregnancies will be excluded. Our principal objective is to determine whether placement of a second Propess® (followed by oxytocin [Syntocinon®], if necessary) in women for whom the first Propess® failed to induce cervical ripening increases the vaginal delivery rate compared to direct oxytocin injection. The vaginal delivery rate is therefore the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes are the induction failure rates and maternofetal morbidity and mortality. DISCUSSION: This study may help in determining the optimal way to induce labor after failure of a first Propess®, an unresolved problem to date. This trial explores the effectiveness and safety of placing a second Propess® and may contribute to development of an obstetric consensus. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on 2 September 2016 at clinicaltrials.gov (identification number NCT02888041).


Subject(s)
Dinoprostone/administration & dosage , Labor, Induced , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Oxytocin/administration & dosage , Administration, Intravaginal , Adult , Cervical Ripening/drug effects , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Equivalence Trials as Topic , Female , France , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retreatment/methods , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...