Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Tapentadol Oral Solution for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acute Pain in Children Aged 2 to <7 Years.

Background: This prospective, open-label trial was conducted to fulfil a post-approval commitment made to the competent authorities to extend the indication of the strong opioid analgesic tapentadol hydrochloride oral solution (OS) to the pediatric population. Patients and Methods: The trial assessed the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of tapentadol, tapentadol-O-glucuronide and tapentadol-O-sulfate after administration of multiple doses of tapentadol OS (1.25 mg tapentadol/kg bodyweight every 4 h for up to 72 h) in children aged 2 to <7 years after a painful event that produces acute pain requiring treatment with a strong analgesic. The obtained PK data were integrated into a previously developed population PK (popPK) model based on single-dose data and then a model-based PK evaluation was performed. The primary trial endpoint was the area under the concentration-time curve at steady state for the dosing interval (AUCτ,ss) for tapentadol. Results: Ten children received tapentadol OS; all completed the trial. Multiple administrations of the trial medication resulted in tapentadol serum concentrations within the concentration range predicted by the previously developed popPK model. The estimated model-based AUCτ,ss values for tapentadol ranged from 142 to 321 h•ng/mL. They were within the predicted exposure range with no higher than expected accumulation for the employed dosing regimen and also within the targeted steady state exposure range observed in adults receiving multiple doses of immediate release tapentadol 50 to 100 mg. The treatment regimen was safe and well tolerated. Conclusion: The findings confirm the linear and predictable PK profile of tapentadol hydrochloride. The good agreement between the observed data and the model predictions shows the value of modelling and simulations in the planning and analysis of pediatric clinical trials and the ability to utilize the established PK models to predict multiple dose exposure.

Optimizing study design in LPS challenge studies for quantifying drug induced inhibition of TNFα response: Did we miss the prime time?

In this work we evaluate the study design of LPS challenge experiments used for quantification of drug induced inhibition of TNFα response and provide general guidelines of how to improve the study design. Analysis of model simulated data, using a recently published TNFα turnover model, as well as the optimal design tool PopED have been used to find the optimal values of three key study design variables - time delay between drug and LPS administration, LPS dose, and sampling time points - that in turn could make the resulting TNFα response data more informative. Our findings suggest that the current rule of thumb for choosing the time delay should be reconsidered, and that the placement of the measurements after maximal TNFα response are crucial for the quality of the experiment. Furthermore, a literature study summarizing a wide range of published LPS challenge studies is provided, giving a broader perspective of how LPS challenge studies are usually conducted both in a preclinical and clinical setting.

Second-generation TNFα turnover model for improved analysis of test compound interventions in LPS challenge studies.

This study presents a non-linear mixed effects model describing tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) release after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) provocations in absence or presence of anti-inflammatory test compounds. Inter-occasion variability and the pharmacokinetics of two test compounds have been added to this second-generation model, and the goal is to produce a framework of how to model TNFα response in LPS challenge studies in vivo and demonstrate its general applicability regardless of occasion or type of test compound. Model improvements based on experimental data were successfully implemented and provided a robust model for TNFα response after LPS provocation, as well as reliable estimates of the median pharmacodynamic parameters. The two test compounds, Test Compound A and roflumilast, showed 81.1% and 74.9% partial reduction of TNFα response, respectively, and the potency of Test Compound A was estimated to 0.166 µmol/L. Comparing this study with previously published work reveals that our model leads to biologically reasonable output, handles complex data pooled from different studies, and highlights the importance of accurately distinguishing the stimulatory effect of LPS from the inhibitory effect of the test compound.

Oxycodone Effect on Pupil Constriction in Recreational Opioid Users: A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Meta-Analysis Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding the effect of oxycodone pharmacokinetics (PK) on µ-opioid receptor binding benefits from an integrated approach to compiling the results of multiple studies. The current pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model analysis brings together various studies to support the interpretation of newly collected PK/PD data, putting the new results into the perspective of the full concentration-effect curve. METHODS: A two-step modeling approach was applied to characterize the PK of oxycodone and its PK/PD relationship for the pupil diameter as a biomarker for µ-opioid receptor binding in recreational opioid users. First, a model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was used to quantify the state-of-the-art knowledge from seven published studies, each of which contained part of the data needed for full characterization. Subsequently, the estimated parameters with uncertainty from the MBMA were used as prior information for a model developed on newly collected clinical data after intranasal administration in a clinical abuse potential trial. RESULTS: The inclusion of intravenous data in the MBMA showed that the PK of oxycodone can be described by a two-compartmental model, and allowed for the estimation of absolute bioavailability after intranasal and oral administration. A hysteresis loop was observed when plotting plasma concentrations and pupil constriction, which was approximated using an effect compartment. The totality of literature data enabled the identification of a Hill equation for the drug effect. The model with prior information fitted successfully to the newly collected data, where most parameter estimates had their confidence intervals overlapping with the prior distribution. The new data led to a slightly lower intranasal absorption rate constant, explaining the longer apparent half-life of oxycodone in the newly collected data. The PK/PD model parameters were confirmed by the new data, leading to the following estimates: half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 26.5 ng/mL, maximum pupil restriction of 66.0% from baseline, and a Hill factor of 1.05. CONCLUSIONS: The new data confirmed the PK profile and the PK/PD relationship identified using the MBMA, resulting in similar parameter estimates except for the intranasal absorption rate constant. The latter was lower than in the MBMA and explained the slightly longer apparent half-life of oxycodone in the newly collected data.

Correction to: Clinical Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Cebranopadol, a Novel First-in-Class Analgesic.

For each simulation, PK profiles from 1000 subjects were simulated based on a titration scheme.

Clinical Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Cebranopadol, a Novel First-in-Class Analgesic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cebranopadol is a novel first-in-class analgesic acting as a nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonist with central analgesic activity. It is currently in clinical development for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. This trial focuses on the clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of cebranopadol after oral single- and multiple-dose administration. METHODS: The basic PK properties of cebranopadol were assessed by means of noncompartmental methods in six phase I clinical trials in healthy subjects and patients. A population PK analysis included two further phase I and six phase II clinical trials. RESULTS: After oral administration of the immediate-release (IR) formulation, cebranopadol is characterized by a late time to reach maximum plasma concentration [C max] (4-6 h), a long half-value duration [HVD] (14-15 h), and a terminal phase half-life in the range of 62-96 h. After multiple once-daily dosing in patients, an operational half-life (the dosing interval resulting in an accumulation factor [AF] of 2) of 24 h was found to be the relevant factor to describe the multiple-dose PKs of cebranopadol. The time to reach steady state was approximately 2 weeks, the AF was approximately 2, and peak-trough fluctuation (PTF) was low (70-80%). Dose proportionality at steady state was shown for a broad dose range of cebranopadol 200-1600 µg. A two-compartment disposition model with two lagged transition compartments and a first-order elimination process best describes cebranopadol data in healthy subjects and patients after single- and multiple-dose administration. CONCLUSIONS: Cebranopadol formulated as an IR product can be used as a once-daily formulation; it reaches C max after only 4-6 h, and has a long HVD and a low PTF. Therefore, from a PK perspective, cebranopadol is an attractive treatment option for patients with chronic pain.

Cebranopadol: a novel potent analgesic nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid receptor agonist.

Cebranopadol (trans-6'-fluoro-4',9'-dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4-phenyl-spiro[cyclohexane-1,1'(3'H)-pyrano[3,4-b]indol]-4-amine) is a novel analgesic nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) and opioid receptor agonist [Ki (nM)/EC50 (nM)/relative efficacy (%): human NOP receptor 0.9/13.0/89; human mu-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor 0.7/1.2/104; human kappa-opioid peptide receptor 2.6/17/67; human delta-opioid peptide receptor 18/110/105]. Cebranopadol exhibits highly potent and efficacious antinociceptive and antihypersensitive effects in several rat models of acute and chronic pain (tail-flick, rheumatoid arthritis, bone cancer, spinal nerve ligation, diabetic neuropathy) with ED50 values of 0.5-5.6 µg/kg after intravenous and 25.1 µg/kg after oral administration. In comparison with selective MOP receptor agonists, cebranopadol was more potent in models of chronic neuropathic than acute nociceptive pain. Cebranopadol's duration of action is long (up to 7 hours after intravenous 12 µg/kg; >9 hours after oral 55 µg/kg in the rat tail-flick test). The antihypersensitive activity of cebranopadol in the spinal nerve ligation model was partially reversed by pretreatment with the selective NOP receptor antagonist J-113397[1-[(3R,4R)-1-cyclooctylmethyl-3-hydroxymethyl-4-piperidyl]-3-ethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one] or the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, indicating that both NOP and opioid receptor agonism are involved in this activity. Development of analgesic tolerance in the chronic constriction injury model was clearly delayed compared with that from an equianalgesic dose of morphine (complete tolerance on day 26 versus day 11, respectively). Unlike morphine, cebranopadol did not disrupt motor coordination and respiration at doses within and exceeding the analgesic dose range. Cebranopadol, by its combination of agonism at NOP and opioid receptors, affords highly potent and efficacious analgesia in various pain models with a favorable side effect profile.