The Use of the Suboccipital Transtentorial Approach to the Posterior Inferior Incisural Space.

Objective To describe our experience with the microsurgical technique of the suboccipital transtentorial (SOTT) approach in the removal of posterior fossa lesions located in the posterior incisural space. Method Between 2002 and 2020 we reviewed all patients who underwent microsurgical resection of lesions of the posterior incisural space at the Department of Neurosurgery, Essex Neuroscience Centre, London, England (eight patients, male to female 3:5, mean age: 51, range 35-69). We describe the preoperative symptoms, radiological findings, surgical techniques, histology and postoperative outcomes in this cohort of patients. Results Eight patients with tumours located in the posterior incisural space underwent surgery during the study period including four meningiomas (50%), two haemangioblastomas (25%), one metastasis (13%) and one giant prolactinoma (13%). Gross or near total resection was achieved in six patients (75%): the giant prolactinoma could not be radically removed and one of the meningiomas required a small fragment to be left in place to protect the Vein of Galen. No patient developed a visual field deficit due to occipital lobe retraction. One patient developed a temporary trochlear nerve palsy (13%). Five patients had mild disability (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) = 5), and four had moderate disability (GOS = 4). Conclusion In our series, the SOTT approach provided excellent access for all cases of tumours in the posterior incisural space. The tumour's size and relationship to the deep venous system contributed to the choice of approach and in one patient who had previously undergone surgery via the supracerebellar route, the SOTT approach enabled the avoidance of gliotic scar tissue. Success is dependent on careful case selection, though from our series of 8 patients, we conclude that this approach allows safe access to the posterior incisural space, with acceptable outcomes with regard to postoperative disability and cranial nerve palsy. As such, the approach should be in the armamentarium of any neurosurgeon who regularly deals with posterior fossa pathology.

SRS for Cavernous Malformations: Myths and Realities.

The optimal management of cavernous malformations (CMs) remains controversial. Over the past decade, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has gained wider acceptance in the management of CMs, especially in those with deep location, eloquence, and where surgery is of high risk. Unlike arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), there is no imaging surrogate endpoint to confirm CM obliteration. Clinical response to SRS can only be gauged by a reduction in long-term CM hemorrhage rates. There is concern that the long-term benefits of SRS and the reduced rehemorrhage rate after a latency period of 2 years may only be a reflection of natural history. Of further concern is the development of adverse radiation effects (AREs), which were significant in the early experimental studies. The lessons learnt from that era have led to the progressive development of well-defined, lower marginal dose treatment protocols that have reported less toxicity (5%-7%) and consequently reduced morbidity. Currently, there is at least Class II, Level B evidence for use of SRS in solitary CMs with previous symptomatic hemorrhage in eloquent areas with high surgical risk. Recent prospective cohort studies observing untreated brainstem and thalamic CMs report significantly higher hemorrhage rates and neurological sequelae than the rates reported from contemporary pooled large natural history meta-analyses. Furthermore, this strengthens our recommendation for early proactive SRS in symptomatic deep-seated CMs due to the higher morbidity associated with observation and microsurgery. The key to successful outcomes for any surgical intervention is patient selection. We hope that our precis on contemporary SRS techniques in the management of CMs will assist this process.

Stereotactic diffusion tensor imaging tractography for Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

OBJECTIVE The integration of modern neuroimaging into treatment planning has increased the therapeutic potential and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery. The authors report their method of integrating stereotactic diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography into conventional treatment planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of this technique and to address some of the technical limitations of previously reported techniques. METHODS Twenty patients who underwent GKRS composed the study cohort. They consisted of 1 initial test case (a patient with a vestibular schwannoma), 5 patients with arteriovenous malformations, 9 patients with cerebral metastases, 1 patient with parasagittal meningioma, and 4 patients with vestibular schwannoma. DT images were obtained at the time of standard GKRS protocol MRI (T1 and T2 weighted) for treatment, with the patient's head secured by a Leksell stereotactic frame. All studies were performed using a 1.5-T magnet with a single-channel head coil. DTI was performed with diffusion gradients in 32 directions and coregistered with the volumetric T1-weighted study. DTI postprocessing by means of commercially available software allowed tensor computation and the creation of directionally encoded color-, apparent diffusion coefficient-, and fractional anisotropy-mapped sequences. In addition, the software allowed visualized critical tracts to be exported as a structural volume and integrated into GammaPlan as an "organ at risk" during shot planning. Combined images were transferred to GammaPlan and integrated into treatment planning. RESULTS Stereotactic DT images were successfully acquired in all patients, with generation of correct directionally encoded color images. Tract generation with the software was straightforward and reproducible, particularly for axial tracts such as the optic radiation and the arcuate fasciculus. Corticospinal tract visualization was hampered by some artifacts from the base of the stereotactic frame, but this was overcome by a combination of frame/MRI volume adjustment and DTI seeding parameters. Coregistration of the DTI series with the T1-weighted treatment volume at the time of imaging was essential for the generation of correct tensor data. All patients with the exception of the vestibular schwannoma cases had treatment pathology in the vicinity of eloquent tracts and/or the cortex. No new neurological deficits due to radiation were recorded at the short-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Recent reports in the medical literature have suggested that white matter tracts (particularly the optic radiation and arcuate fasciculus) are more vulnerable to radiation during stereotactic radiosurgery than previously thought. Integration of stereotactic tractography into GKRS represents a promising tool for preventing GKRS complications by reduction in radiation doses to functional organs at risk, including critical cortical areas and subcortical white matter tracts.