Repurposing alpelisib, an anti-cancer drug, for the treatment of severe TIE2-mutated venous malformations: Preliminary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic data.

Extensive venous malformations involving limbs severely impact quality of life, mostly due to chronic pain and functional limitations. But patients can also display coagulopathy with associated risks of life-threatening thromboembolism and bleeding. Available pharmacological treatments (e.g., sirolimus) are not universally effective. Novel therapies are urgently needed for patients with treatment-resistant venous malformations. We report three patients with TIE-2 receptor mutations treated with alpelisib for 6 months (daily dosing: 50 mg for children weighing <50 kg and 100 mg for those >50 kg). Pain was controlled, gait improved, size of the abnormal venous network decreased, and coagulopathy dramatically improved. Drug exposure was highly variable, suggesting that alpelisib dosing should be individualized to patient's characteristics and guided by therapeutic drug monitoring.

Pharmacokinetics of Tobramycin Administered at the Beginning of Intermittent Hemodialysis Session (ESRD Study).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is a renewed interest in the successful use of aminoglycosides due to increasing resistance in gram-negative infections. Few studies to date have examined the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intradialytic infusions of tobramycin. This study sought to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of intradialytically administered tobramycin in infected patients receiving chronic intermittent hemodialysis and to determine whether it is possible to achieve favorable PK targets. DESIGN SETTING PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: In this prospective pharmacokinetic study, a single dose (5 mg/kg) of tobramycin was administered intradialytically to 11 noncritically ill patients undergoing chronic intermittent hemodialysis. Blood samples were collected at selected time to determine tobramycin serum concentrations. The PK analysis was performed using Phoenix™ NLME. The efficacy exposure outcome for nonsevere gram-negative infections sensitive to tobramycin with a minimum inhibitory concentration ≤1 were maximum concentration (Cmax ≥ 10 mg/L) and area under the curve (AUC24 h > 30 mg⋅h/L). For toxicity, the goal was to identify plasma trough concentrations <2 mg/L. RESULTS: Tobramycin disposition was best described by a one-compartment model using a total clearance composed of the systemic clearance and a transitory hemodialysis clearance. Tobramycin mean (SD) Cmax, trough levels, and AUC24h were 13.1 (1.3) mg/L, 1.32 (0.47) mg/L, and 61 (23) mg⋅h/L, respectively. Monte Carlo simulation run with 1000 virtual patients showed that a 5 mg/kg dose of tobramycin administered intradialytically can outperformed the usual low-dose postdialysis dosing (80% meeting all targets versus <1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A single high dose of tobramycin can achieve favorable PK outcome when administered using intradialytic infusions in hemodialysis patients. This practical dosing regimen may represent an effective and safer alternative to the usual dosing in the treatment of nonsevere gram-negative infections.

CONTEXTE ET OBJECTIFS: La résistance croissante des infections à Gram négatif suscite un regain d'intérêt pour l'utilisation efficace des aminoglycosides. À ce jour, peu d'études ont examiné la pharmacocinétique (PK) des infusions intradialytiques de tobramycine. La présente étude a tenté de caractériser le profil pharmacocinétique de la tobramycine administrée par infusion intradialytique chez des patients malades recevant des traitements intermittents d'hémodialyse de façon chronique. L'étude visait également à déterminer s'il est possible d'atteindre des objectifs de pharmacocinétique favorables. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Pour cette étude de pharmacocinétique prospective, une dose unique (5 mg/kg) de tobramycine a été administrée par infusion intradialytique à onze patients suivant des traitements d'hémodialyse intermittente de façon chronique ne nécessitant pas une admission aux soins intensifs. Des échantillons de sang ont été prélevés à des moments précis afin de mesurer les concentrations sériques de tobramycine. L'analyse de la PK a été effectuée à l'aide du PhoenixMC NLME. Les issues d'exposition d'efficacité avec une concentration minimale inhibitrice inférieure ou égale à 1 pour les infections à Gram négatifs non graves sensibles à la tobramycine étaient la concentration maximum (Cmax: ≥10 mg/L) et la surface sous la courbe (SSC24h: >30 mg⋅h/L). Quant à la toxicité, l'objectif était l'observation de concentrations plasmatiques inférieures à 2 mg/L. RÉSULTATS: La disponibilité de la tobramycine a été mieux décrite par un modèle à un compartiment utilisant une clairance totale composée de la clairance systémique et de la clairance transitoire de l'hémodialyse. La Cmax moyenne, la concentration minimale et la SSC24h de la tobramycine (écart-type) s'établissaient respectivement à 13,1 (1,3) mg/L, à 1,32 (0,47) mg/L et à 61 (23) mg⋅h/L. Une simulation de Monte Carlo réalisée avec 1 000 patients virtuels a montré qu'une dose unique de 5 mg/kg de tobramycine administrée par infusion intradialytique surpasse la faible dose normalement administrée après la dialyse (80 % des objectifs atteints pour la dose unique contre moins de 1 %, respectivement). CONCLUSIONS: Une dose unique élevée de tobramycine permet d'atteindre des paramètres pharmacocinétiques favorables si elle est administrée par infusion intradialytique chez les patients hémodialysés. Ce schéma posologique peut représenter une solution de remplacement efficace et plus sûre au dosage normalement administré pour le traitement des infections à Gram négatifs non graves.

Acute Right Ventricular Failure in Cardiac Surgery During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Separation: A Retrospective Case Series of 12 Years' Experience With Intratracheal Milrinone Administration.

OBJECTIVE: To report the authors' 12 years of experience with intratracheal milrinone administration and to assess the efficacy and limitations of intratracheal milrinone bolus administration for the treatment of unexpected acute right ventricular (RV) failure in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-six patients (4.6%) undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Endotracheal tube administration of milrinone (5-mg bolus) after unexpected acute RV failure during separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) weaning. RV failure was defined as the simultaneous presence of all of the following criteria: (1) hemodynamic instability or difficult separation from CPB with associated elevated central venous pressure or abnormal RV pressure waveform, (2) >20% reduction of RV fractional area change from baseline evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography, and (3) anatomical visualization of impaired or absent RV wall motion by direct intraoperative visual inspection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intratracheal milrinone administration was found to improve RV failure in 109 patients (61.9%) whereas RV failure persisted in 67 patients (38.1%). Using a multiple logistic regression model, severely decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (<35% v >50%) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-11.3; p = 0.012), longer CPB time (adjusted OR 1.014; CI 1.01-1.02; p = 0.001) and elevated postoperative fluid balance (adjusted OR 1.39; CI 1.1-1.8; p = 0.02) were found to be significant predictors of persistent RV failure. CONCLUSION: Intratracheal instillation of milrinone was associated with clinical improvement of RV failure occurring during separation from CPB in almost two-thirds of patients. Factors limiting its therapeutic efficacy include severe left ventricular dysfunction, increased fluid balance, and long CPB time.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Nebulized and Intratracheal Milrinone in a Swine Model of Hypercapnia Pulmonary Hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: Milrinone pulmonary administration is used currently for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Several methods are available: simple jet nebulization, vibrating mesh nebulization, intratracheal instillation, and intratracheal atomization. The aim of this study was to explore the concentration-effect relationship of milrinone for each of these methods. DESIGN: Observational open-label pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics cohort study. SETTING: Single-center, hospital animal laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve swine. INTERVENTIONS: After hypercapnia pulmonary hypertension, swine were administered equivalent inhaled milrinone doses of 15 or 50 µg/kg through simple jet nebulization, vibrating mesh nebulization, intratracheal instillation, and intratracheal atomization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood and urine samples were taken up to 360 minutes postadministration. The ratio of mean systemic arterial pressure to mean pulmonary arterial pressure was monitored continuously. Right heart echographies were taken before and after hypercapnia and after drug administration. Mean elimination half-lives were similar for the 4 administrations. Mean percent changes in the ratio were of 37 (60%), 18 (31%), 17 (36%), and 20 (20%), for simple jet nebulization, vibrating mesh nebulization, intratracheal instillation, and intratracheal atomization, respectively. Mean maximum plasma concentrations for intratracheal administrations were reached at 8 and 45 min for atomization and instillation, respectively. Significant increases in right atrial diameter and right ventricular end-diastolic area were witnessed during pulmonary hypertension as well as a return to baseline values after milrinone administration. CONCLUSIONS: The intratracheal methods, particularly intratracheal atomization, showed less hemodynamic effect than nebulizations and, in the case of intratracheal instillation, unpredictable drug exposure. Nebulization methods on the other hand, especially simple jet nebulization, suggest better efficacy and sensitivity but are less fit for emergency situations.

Use of nebulized milrinone in cardiac surgery; Comparison of vibrating mesh and simple jet nebulizers.

Cardiopulmonary bypass triggers an ischemia-reperfusion injury with endothelial dysfunction in the pulmonary circulation which can result in pulmonary hypertension. Inhaled milrinone reduces this reperfusion phenomenon and two methods commonly available for administering it are simple jet and vibrating mesh nebulizations. However, neither their generated milrinone particle size profiles, nor their ability to aid endothelial relaxation have been compared. Simple jet and vibrating mesh particle size distributions of milrinone were verified through cascade impaction and their efficacy was tested on a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) swine model. Post-nebulizations, animals underwent 90 min of CPB, followed by 60 min of reperfusion and lung excision. Pulmonary arterial endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine and bradykinin were then performed on pulmonary vasculature rings and were subsequently modeled as inhibitory Emax functions. In vitro studies showed lower emitted and inhaled doses from the simple jet nebulizer and its particle size distribution indicated upper and middle airway targeting. During in vivo studies, milrinone pre-treated, unlike saline groups maintained baseline pulmonary pressures up to 30 min post-CPB. Ex vivo studies showed better endothelial relaxation of arteries from the two milrinone groups over those from the control group in an administration/pathway-dependent manner, favoring simple jet administration.

Intratracheal Milrinone Bolus Administration During Acute Right Ventricular Dysfunction After Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate intratracheal milrinone (tMil) administration for rapid treatment of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction as a novel route after cardiopulmonary bypass. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Single-center study. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 7 patients undergoing cardiac surgery who exhibited acute RV dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: After difficult weaning caused by cardiopulmonary bypass-induced acute RV dysfunction, milrinone was administered as a 5-mg bolus inside the endotracheal tube. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: RV function improvement, as indicated by decreasing pulmonary artery pressure and changes of RV waveforms, was observed in all 7 patients. Adverse effects of tMil included dynamic RV outflow tract obstruction (2 patients) and a decrease in systemic mean arterial pressure (1 patient). CONCLUSIONS: tMil may be an effective, rapid, and easily applicable therapeutic alternative to inhaled milrinone for the treatment of acute RV failure during cardiac surgery. However, sufficiently powered clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

A multicentre randomized-controlled trial of inhaled milrinone in high-risk cardiac surgical patients.

PURPOSE: Inhaled milrinone (iMil) has been used for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) but its efficacy, safety, and prophylactic effects in facilitating separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and preventing right ventricular (RV) dysfunction have not yet been evaluated in a clinical trial. The purpose of this study was to investigate if iMil administered before CPB would be superior to placebo in facilitating separation from CPB. METHODS: High-risk cardiac surgical patients with PH were randomized to receive iMil or placebo after the induction of anesthesia and before CPB. Hemodynamic parameters and RV function were evaluated by means of pulmonary artery catheterization and transesophageal echocardiography. The groups were compared for the primary outcome of the level of difficulty in weaning from CPB. Among the secondary outcomes examined were the reduction in the severity of PH, the incidence of RV failure, and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients randomized, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) EuroSCORE II was 8.0 (2.6), and the baseline mean (SD) systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) was 53 (9) mmHg. The use of iMil was associated with increases in cardiac output (P = 0.03) and a reduction in SPAP (P = 0.04) with no systemic hypotension. Nevertheless, there was no difference in the combined incidence of difficult or complex separation from CPB between the iMil and control groups (30% vs 28%, respectively; absolute difference, 2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -14 to 18; P = 0.78). There was also no difference in RV failure between the iMil and control groups (15% vs 14%, respectively; difference, 1%; 95% CI, -13 to 12; P = 0.94). Mortality was increased in patients with RV failure vs those without (22% vs 2%, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In high-risk cardiac surgery patients with PH, the prophylactic use of iMil was associated with favourable hemodynamic effects that did not translate into improvement of clinically relevant endpoints. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT00819377.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La milrinone inhalée est utilisée pour traiter l'hypertension pulmonaire (HP) mais son efficacité, son innocuité et ses effets prophylactiques pour faciliter le sevrage de la circulation extracorporelle (CEC) et prévenir la dysfonction ventriculaire droite (VD) n'ont pas encore été évalués dans le cadre d'une étude clinique. L'objectif de cette étude était d'examiner si la milrinone inhalée avant la CEC serait supérieure à un placebo pour faciliter le sevrage de la CEC. MéTHODE: Des patients de chirurgie cardiaque à risque élevé et souffrant d'HP ont été randomisés à recevoir de la milrinone inhalée ou un placebo après l'induction de l'anesthésie et avant la CEC. Les paramètres hémodynamiques et la fonction VD ont été évalués à l'aide d'un cathéter de l'artère pulmonaire et d'une échocardiographie transœsophagienne. Les groupes ont été comparés selon notre critère d'évaluation principal, soit le niveau de difficulté du sevrage de la CEC. Parmi les critères d'évaluation secondaires examinés figuraient la réduction de la gravité de l'HP, l'incidence d'insuffisance cardiaque droite et la mortalité. RéSULTATS: Au total, 124 patients ont été randomisés. Le score EuroSCORE II moyen (écart type [ÉT]) était de 8,0 (2,6), et la pression systolique de l'artère pulmonaire moyenne de base (ÉT) était de 53 (9) mmHg. L'utilisation de milrinone inhalée a été associée à des augmentations du débit cardiaque (P = 0,03) et à une réduction de la pression systolique de l'artère pulmonaire (P = 0,04) sans hypotension systémique. Toutefois, aucune différence n'a été observée dans l'incidence combinée de sevrage difficile ou complexe de la CEC entre le groupe milrinone inhalée et le groupe témoin (30 % vs 28 %, respectivement; différence absolue, 2 %; intervalle de confiance [IC] 95 %, −14 à 18; P = 0,78). Aucune différence n'a été observée non plus en matière d'insuffisance cardiaque droite entre le groupe milrinone inhalée et le groupe témoin (15 % vs 14 %, respectivement; différence, 1 %; IC 95 %, −13 à 12; P = 0,94). La mortalité était augmentée chez les patients avec insuffisance cardiaque droite (22 % vs 2 %, respectivement; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Chez les patients de chirurgie cardiaque à risque élevé atteints de HP, l'utilisation prophylactique de milrinone inhalée a été associée à des effets hémodynamiques favorables qui ne se sont pas traduits en améliorations des critères pertinents d'un point de vue clinique. Cette étude a été enregistrée au ClinicalTrials.gov; identifiant : NCT00819377.

A specific and sensitive HPLC-MS/MS micromethod for milrinone plasma levels determination after inhalation in cardiac patients.

BACKGROUND: Milrinone administered through inhalation is an emerging method aimed at specifically reducing pulmonary hypertension without affecting systemic pressures. Its administration has been shown to be useful both in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. These populations are prone to receive many concomitant medications and/or blood sampling may require a low volume quantification method. To address these issues in view of pharmacokinetic studies, this article aims to develop and validate a specific and sensitive analytical assay using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detection for the quantification of milrinone plasma concentrations after inhalation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Plasma samples (50 µL) were extracted using ethyl acetate. Milrinone was separated on a C18 analytical column at 50°C. The mobile phase consisted of methanol and 10 mM ammonium acetate (45:55 vol/vol). The electrospray was operated in the negative ionization mode and monitored the following mass transitions: m/z 212.1 → 140.0 at 36 eV for milrinone and m/z 252.1 → 156.1 at 32 eV for olprinone. RESULTS: Calibration curves followed a quadratic regression in the concentration range of 0.3125-640 ng/mL. The lower limit of quantification is 0.3125 ng/mL and is based on a low plasma volume of 50 µL. Mean drug recovery and accuracy were ≥72.3% and 96.0%, respectively. Intraday and interday precision coefficient of variation (%) was ≤7.4% and ≤11.5%, respectively. The specificity allowed milrinone quantification in the multidrug administration conditions of cardiopulmonary bypass. CONCLUSIONS: This validated micromethod proved to be highly sensitive and specific while using a low volume of plasma. Its low volume and its lower limit of quantification indicate that this approach is suitable for further characterization of milrinone pharmacokinetics in both adults (inhalation) and neonates.

High-performance liquid chromatography assay using ultraviolet detection for urinary quantification of milrinone concentrations in cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

An analytical assay using liquid-liquid extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection was developed for the quantification of total (conjugated and unconjugated) urinary concentrations of milrinone after the inhalation of a 5 mg dose in 15 cardiac patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Urine samples (700 µL) were extracted with ethyl-acetate and subsequently underwent acid back-extraction before and after deconjugation by mild acid hydrolysis. Milrinone was separated on a strong cation exchange analytical column. The mobile phase consisted of a constant mixture of acetonitrile:tetrahydrofurane-NaH2 PO4 buffer (40:60 v/v, pH 3.0). Thirteen calibration curves were linear in the concentration range of 31.25-4000 ng/mL, using olprinone as the internal standard (r(2) range 0.9911-0.9999, n = 13). Mean milrinone recovery and accuracy were respectively 85.2 ± 3.1% and ≥93%. Intra- and inter-day precisions (coefficients of variation) were ≤5% and ≤8%, respectively. Over a 24 h collection period, the cumulative urinary milrinone recovered from 15 patients was 26.1 ± 7.7% of the nominal 5 mg dose administered. The relative amount of milrinone glucuronic acid conjugate was negligible in the urine of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass This method proved to be reliable, specific and accurate to determine the cumulative amount of total milrinone recovered in urine after inhalation.