ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Before the "era" of optimal stent deployment, very few data concerning multiple stents in a single coronary artery showed restenosis rates up to 60%. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 6-month outcome of patients receiving multiple Palmaz-Schatz stents (> or =2 stents) in a single coronary artery compared to those receiving single stents. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-eight patients having multiple stents were compared to 174 patients receiving single stents during a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Repeat target lesion revascularization (RTLR), either repeat PTCA or CABG, was 10.4% in the single-stent group, 22.6% in the two-stent group, and 23.1% in the > or =2 stent group (p = 0.001, single versus 2 or > or =2 stents). There was not a significant difference between single stent and multiple stent groups in myocardial infarction and death during 6-month follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed multiple stents, diabetes mellitus, and type C lesion to be predictors of RTLR. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of two or more stents was associated with a significantly higher RTLR compared with single stent placement. The optimal approach to diffuse coronary artery disease remains to be defined.
Subject(s)
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Coronary Restenosis/therapy , Stents/adverse effects , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Coronary Artery Bypass , Coronary Restenosis/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Reoperation , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
A novel skin dose monitor was used to measure radiation incident on maximal X-ray exposed skin during 135 diagnostic and 65 interventional coronary procedures. For the diagnostic studies (n = 135), mean skin dose was 180 +/- 64 mGy; for PTCA (n = 35), it was 1021 +/- 674 mGy, single stents (n = 25) 1529 +/- 601 mGy, and multiple stents with rotational atherectomy (n = 5) 2496 +/- 1028 mGy. The dose independently increased with more cine runs, more fluoroscopy, and greater patient weight. Physicians should consider the potential for adverse radiation exposure when planning coronary interventional cases and deciding on the X-ray mode and angles used.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Atherectomy, Coronary , Cardiac Catheterization , Environmental Exposure , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Cineangiography , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Linear Models , SkinABSTRACT
An 82-year-old woman undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty experienced perforation of the terminal portion of the left anterior descending coronary artery caused by guidewire trauma. The coronary artery perforation was successfully closed using a vascular occlusion system consisting of individual thrombogenic coils delivered to the site. Coronary artery perforation (CAP) during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has been reported to occur in less than 1% of cases. The incidence seems to be higher with the new interventional devices, e.g., DCA, TEC, and laser CAP may result in pericardial hemorrhage and cardiac tamponade or a coronary artery fistula to either the left or right ventricle. The management of CAP may include prolonged balloon inflations, reversal of anticoagulation, pericardiocentesis, and emergency surgery. Proximal perforations sometimes can be managed with vein covered stents. We describe another option in the treatment of distal CAP using a vascular occlusion system.
