Patient-provided e-support in reduced intensity obesity treatment: The INSPIRE randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: There are two types of patient supporters, peers (two individuals initiating health behavior change who support one another) and mentors (a previously successful patient who supports incoming patients). Social comparison theory suggests that peers and mentors may elicit social comparison processes (patients may compare their progress to that of their peer/mentor), and these social comparisons could impact treatment outcomes. This randomized controlled trial is the first to examine the differential impact of peers and mentors on obesity treatment outcomes and social comparison processes when added to reduced intensity treatment. METHOD: Participants (N = 278) were randomly assigned to reduced intensity behavioral weight loss treatment alone (rBWL), rBWL plus peer e-support (rBWL + Peer), or rBWL plus mentor e-support (rBWL + Mentor). rBWL involved periodic group sessions that decreased over time; when group sessions decreased, intensity of peer/mentor e-support increased. Weight and social comparison processes were assessed throughout the 12-month intervention. RESULTS: There was a significant treatment effect; when group sessions became less frequent and peer/mentor e-support became more frequent, rBWL + Peer had significantly greater weight loss than rBWL alone, and rBWL + Mentor was not significantly different from the other two. Social comparison processes differed by treatment arm; rBWL + Peer participants tended to report more lateral social comparisons ("my weight loss progress is 'similar' to my peer's"), whereas rBWL + Mentor participants reported more upward comparisons ("my weight loss progress is 'worse than' my mentor's"). Upward comparisons were associated with poorer weight loss outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Peer e-support may be an effective, low-cost, sustainable method for improving longer-term weight loss outcomes in reduced intensity obesity treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Weight Change 2 Years After Termination of the Intensive Lifestyle Intervention in the Look AHEAD Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated weight changes after cessation of the 10-year intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) in the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) study. It was hypothesized that ILI participants would be more likely to gain weight during the 2-year observational period following termination of weight-loss-maintenance counseling than would participants in the diabetes support and education (DSE) control group. METHODS: Look AHEAD was a randomized controlled trial that compared the effects of ILI and DSE on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in participants with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes. Look AHEAD was converted to an observational study in September 2012. RESULTS: Two years after the end of the intervention (EOI), ILI and DSE participants lost a mean (SE) of 1.2 (0.2) kg and 1.8 (0.2) kg, respectively (P = 0.003). In addition, 31% of ILI and 23.9% of DSE participants gained ≥ 2% (P < 0.001) of EOI weight, whereas 36.3% and 45.9% of the respective groups lost ≥ 2% of EOI weight (P = 0.001). Two years after the EOI, ILI participants reported greater use of weight-control behaviors than DSE participants. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups lost weight during the 2-year follow-up period, but more ILI than DSE participants gained ≥ 2% of EOI weight. Further understanding is needed of factors that affected long-term weight change in both groups.