Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pathology ; 55(6): 818-826, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37414616

ABSTRACT

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chromosome microarray is well established for investigation of children with intellectual deficit/development delay and prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformation but has also emerged for uniparental disomy (UPD) genotyping. Despite published guidelines on clinical indications for testing there are no laboratory guidelines published for performing SNP microarray UPD genotyping. We evaluated SNP microarray UPD genotyping using Illumina beadchips on family trios/duos within a clinical cohort (n=98) and then explored our findings in a post-study audit (n=123). UPD occurred in 18.6% and 19.5% cases, respectively, with chromosome 15 most frequent (62.5% and 25.0%). UPD was predominantly maternal in origin (87.5% and 79.2%), highest in suspected genomic imprinting disorder cases (56.3% and 41.7%) but absent amongst children of translocation carriers. We assessed regions of homozygosity among UPD cases. The smallest interstitial and terminal regions were 2.5 Mb and 9.3 Mb, respectively. We found regions of homozygosity confounded genotyping in a consanguineous case with UPD15 and another with segmental UPD due to non-informative probes. In a unique case with chromosome 15q UPD mosaicism, we established the detection limit of mosaicism as ∼5%. From the benefits and pitfalls identified in this study, we propose a testing model and recommendations for UPD genotyping by SNP microarray.


Subject(s)
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Uniparental Disomy , Child , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Uniparental Disomy/diagnosis , Uniparental Disomy/genetics , Genotype , Genomic Imprinting , Chromosomes
2.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 17(1): 350, 2022 09 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36085161

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Children's interstitial and diffuse lung disease (chILD) is a complex heterogeneous group of lung disorders. Gene panel approaches have a reported diagnostic yield of ~ 12%. No data currently exist using trio exome sequencing as the standard diagnostic modality. We assessed the diagnostic utility of using trio exome sequencing in chILD. We prospectively enrolled children meeting specified clinical criteria between 2016 and 2020 from 16 Australian hospitals. Exome sequencing was performed with analysis of an initial gene panel followed by trio exome analysis. A subset of critically ill infants underwent ultra-rapid trio exome sequencing as first-line test. RESULTS: 36 patients [median (range) age 0.34 years (0.02-11.46); 11F] were recruited from multiple States and Territories. Five patients had clinically significant likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants (RARB, RPL15, CTCF, RFXANK, TBX4) and one patient had a variant of uncertain significance (VIP) suspected to contribute to their clinical phenotype, with VIP being a novel gene candidate. CONCLUSIONS: Trio exomes (6/36; 16.7%) had a better diagnostic rate than gene panel (1/36; 2.8%), due to the ability to consider a broader range of underlying conditions. However, the aetiology of chILD in most cases remained undetermined, likely reflecting the interplay between low penetrant genetic and environmental factors.


Subject(s)
Exome , Lung Diseases , Australia , Exome/genetics , Hospitals , Humans , Exome Sequencing
3.
Hum Mutat ; 42(9): 1173-1183, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34101287

ABSTRACT

Congenital cataracts are one of the major causes of childhood-onset blindness around the world. Genetic diagnosis provides benefits through avoidance of unnecessary tests, surveillance of extraocular features, and genetic family information. In this study, we demonstrate the value of genome sequencing in improving diagnostic yield in congenital cataract patients and families. We applied genome sequencing to investigate 20 probands with congenital cataracts. We examined the added value of genome sequencing across a total cohort of 52 probands, including 14 unable to be diagnosed using previous microarray and exome or panel-based approaches. Although exome or genome sequencing would have detected the variants in 35/52 (67%) of the cases, specific advantages of genome sequencing led to additional diagnoses in 10% (5/52) of the overall cohort, and we achieved an overall diagnostic rate of 77% (40/52). Specific benefits of genome sequencing were due to detection of small copy number variants (2), indels in repetitive regions (2) or single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in GC-rich regions (1), not detectable on the previous microarray, exome sequencing, or panel-based approaches. In other cases, SNVs were identified in cataract disease genes, including those newly identified since our previous study. This study highlights the additional yield of genome sequencing in congenital cataracts.


Subject(s)
Cataract , Exome , Cataract/diagnosis , Cataract/genetics , Chromosome Mapping , DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics , Exome/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Exome Sequencing
4.
NPJ Genom Med ; 6(1): 20, 2021 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33664247

ABSTRACT

Genetic testing in nephrology clinical practice has moved rapidly from a rare specialized test to routine practice both in pediatric and adult nephrology. However, clear information pertaining to the likely outcome of testing is still missing. Here we describe the experience of the accredited Australia and New Zealand Renal Gene Panels clinical service, reporting on sequencing for 552 individuals from 542 families with suspected kidney disease in Australia and New Zealand. An increasing number of referrals have been processed since service inception with an overall diagnostic rate of 35%. The likelihood of identifying a causative variant varies according to both age at referral and gene panel. Although results from high throughput genetic testing have been primarily for diagnostic purposes, they will increasingly play an important role in directing treatment, genetic counseling, and family planning.

5.
Genet Med ; 22(10): 1623-1632, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32499604

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Ocular anterior segment disorders (ASDs) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous, and genetic diagnosis often remains elusive. In this study, we demonstrate the value of a combined analysis protocol using phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree structure data to achieve a genetic conclusion. METHODS: We utilized a combination of chromosome microarray, exome sequencing, and genome sequencing with structural variant and trio analysis to investigate a cohort of 41 predominantly sporadic cases. RESULTS: We identified likely causative variants in 54% (22/41) of cases, including 51% (19/37) of sporadic cases and 75% (3/4) of cases initially referred as familial ASD. Two-thirds of sporadic cases were found to have heterozygous variants, which in most cases were de novo. Approximately one-third (7/22) of genetic diagnoses were found in rarely reported or recently identified ASD genes including PXDN, GJA8, COL4A1, ITPR1, CPAMD8, as well as the new phenotypic association of Axenfeld-Rieger anomaly with a homozygous ADAMTS17 variant. The remainder of the variants were in key ASD genes including FOXC1, PITX2, CYP1B1, FOXE3, and PAX6. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the benefit of detailed phenotypic, genomic, variant, and segregation analysis to uncover some of the previously "hidden" heritable answers in several rarely reported and newly identified ocular ASD-related disease genes.


Subject(s)
Eye Abnormalities , Eye Diseases, Hereditary , ADAMTS Proteins , Anterior Eye Segment , Cytochrome P-450 CYP1B1/genetics , Eye Abnormalities/diagnosis , Eye Abnormalities/genetics , Eye Diseases, Hereditary/diagnosis , Eye Diseases, Hereditary/genetics , Forkhead Transcription Factors/genetics , Humans , Mutation , Pedigree
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...