Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 16(8): 748-56, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24762094

ABSTRACT

AIMS: AWARD-5 was an adaptive, seamless, double-blind study comparing dulaglutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, with placebo at 26 weeks and sitagliptin up to 104 weeks. The study also included a dose-finding portion whose results are presented here. METHODS: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients on metformin were randomized 3 : 1 : 1 to seven dulaglutide doses, sitagliptin (100 mg), or placebo. A Bayesian algorithm was used for randomization and dose selection. Patients were adaptively randomized to dulaglutide doses using available data on the basis of a clinical utility index (CUI) of glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) versus sitagliptin at 52 weeks and weight, pulse rate (PR) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) versus placebo at 26 weeks. The algorithm randomly assigned patients until two doses were selected. RESULTS: Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was determined to be the optimal dose. Dulaglutide 0.75 mg met criteria for the second dose. Dulaglutide 1.5 mg showed the greatest Bayesian mean change from baseline (95% credible interval) in HbA1c versus sitagliptin at 52 weeks -0.63 (-0.98 to -0.20)%. Dulaglutide 2.0 mg showed the greatest placebo-adjusted mean change in weight [-1.99 (-2.88 to -1.20) kg] and in PR [0.78 (-2.10 to 3.80) bpm]. Dulaglutide 1.5 mg showed the greatest placebo-adjusted mean change in DBP [-0.62 (-3.40 to 2.30) mmHg]. CONCLUSIONS: The Bayesian algorithm allowed for an efficient exploration of a large number of doses and selected dulaglutide doses of 1.5 and 0.75 mg for further investigation in this trial.


Subject(s)
Anti-Obesity Agents/administration & dosage , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Glucagon-Like Peptides/analogs & derivatives , Hyperglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/administration & dosage , Metformin/therapeutic use , Receptors, Glucagon/agonists , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Obesity Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diet, Diabetic , Diet, Reducing , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Exercise , Female , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor , Glucagon-Like Peptides/administration & dosage , Glucagon-Like Peptides/adverse effects , Glucagon-Like Peptides/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/therapeutic use , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Middle Aged , Overweight/complications , Overweight/drug therapy , Overweight/therapy , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/adverse effects , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use , Young Adult
2.
J Immunol Methods ; 113(1): 123-35, 1988 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3049821

ABSTRACT

A new method has been characterized for the use of viable target cells as the solid phase for screening of hybridoma supernatants in a cell concentration fluorescence immunoassay (CCFIA). Briefly, the specific target antigen on the cells is bound by the monoclonal antibodies and revealed by use of a fluoresceinated second antibody. Separation of free from bound antibody is accomplished by filtration in the 0.2 micron filter-bottom wells of specialized assay plates. Processing is automated in a Pandex screen machine, resulting in numerical fluorescence values for each well. This method is rapid (under 1 h per 96-well plate), highly sensitive (down to 0.2 ng/ml) and sparing of target cells (0.3-2.5 X 10(4) cells per assay well). It has been applied to 37 different varieties of human solid tumor cells, as well as to human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The cells used as targets for the characterization of this method were still capable of attachment and growth when recovered post-assay. This method was compared with a viable cell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method, showing similar sensitivity and greatly shortened assay time. Comparison of the results from this method with those obtained from flow cytometric analysis performed on viable cells showed close correlation, whereas a lower correlation was seen with immunohistochemical methods using acetone-fixed cells. Development of this method made it possible to rapidly screen many thousands of hybridoma supernatants and successfully select those which were specific for surface antigens on viable cells.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/analysis , Cell-Free System , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Hybridomas/analysis , Subcellular Fractions , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Animals , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line , Cell Survival , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Flow Cytometry , Fluoresceins , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Immunohistochemistry , Mice , Polystyrenes , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...