ABSTRACT
Introducción Las caídas deterioran la calidad de vida de los ancianos y el miedo a estas ha demostrado ser un factor de riesgo independiente para fragilidad, por lo que es prioritario disponer de herramientas para su evaluación. La escala ShortFalls Efficacy Scale-International (FES)-I, versión corta (siete ítems) de la escala FES-I (16 ítems), evalúa el miedo a caer (MC). El objetivo de este estudio es validar la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años y analizar la relación entre el miedo a las caídas, el riesgo de las mismas y la fragilidad. Material y métodos Se trata de un estudio observacional transversal. La muestra consistió en 227 sujetos (50,7% varones; edad media 75,8 años). La ubicación fue en el norte de España. Las variables empleadas fueron sociodemográficas, clínicas, pruebas de ejecución Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) y Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), FES-I y Short FES-I. Se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas: validez y fiabilidad. Resultados La escala Short FES-I muestra excelentes consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach = 0,90, coeficiente correlación intraclase = 0,89) y reproducibilidad test-retest (Rho Spearman = 0,76). Tiene una elevada validez de criterio concomitante analizada por su correlación con FES-I (Rho Spearman = 0,90). La validez de constructo discriminante ha sido confirmada tanto para SPPB como TUG. Short FES-I presenta buena capacidad de clasificación de fragilidad (definida por SPPB) con área bajo la curva [AUC] = 0,715; como punto de corte se propone un valor Short FES-I>8 para miedo moderado/alto de caídas. Conclusiones La escala Short FES-I es un buen instrumento para estudiar el miedo a las caídas en población española mayor de 70 años y es válida para su uso clínico y en investigación. (AU)
Introduction Falls deteriorate the quality of life of the elderly and the fear of falling has been shown to be an independent risk factor for frailty, so having tools for its evaluation is a priority. The short FES-I scale, short version (7 items) of the FES-I scale (16 items), assesses fear of falling. The objective of this study is to validate the short FES-I scale in the Spanish population over 70 years and to analyze the relationship between fear of falling, risk of falls and frailty. Material and methods Cross-sectional observational study. Sample: 227 subjects (50.7% male; mean age 75.8 years). Setting: northern Spain. Variables: sociodemographic, clinical, short physical performance battery (SPPB) and timed up and go test (TUG) execution tests, FES-I and short FES-I. Analysis of psychometric properties: validity and reliability. Results The short FES-I scale shows excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89) and testretest reliability (rho Spearman = 0.76). It has a high concomitant criterion validity analyzed by its correlation with FES-I (rho Spearman = 0.90). The discriminant construct validity has been confirmed for both SPPB and TUG. Short FES-I presents good capacity for frailty classification (defined by SPPB) with AUC = 0.715. As a cut-off point, a short FES-I value > 8 is proposed for moderate/high fear of falling. Conclusions The short FES-I scale is a good instrument to study fear of falling in the Spanish population over 70 years and is valid for clinical and research use. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Accidental Falls , Fear , Frailty , Cross-Sectional Studies , Validation Studies as Topic , SpainABSTRACT
Introducción Las caídas deterioran la calidad de vida de los ancianos y el miedo a estas ha demostrado ser un factor de riesgo independiente para fragilidad, por lo que es prioritario disponer de herramientas para su evaluación. La escala ShortFalls Efficacy Scale-International (FES)-I, versión corta (siete ítems) de la escala FES-I (16 ítems), evalúa el miedo a caer (MC). El objetivo de este estudio es validar la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años y analizar la relación entre el miedo a las caídas, el riesgo de las mismas y la fragilidad. Material y métodos Se trata de un estudio observacional transversal. La muestra consistió en 227 sujetos (50,7% varones; edad media 75,8 años). La ubicación fue en el norte de España. Las variables empleadas fueron sociodemográficas, clínicas, pruebas de ejecución Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) y Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), FES-I y Short FES-I. Se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas: validez y fiabilidad. Resultados La escala Short FES-I muestra excelentes consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach = 0,90, coeficiente correlación intraclase = 0,89) y reproducibilidad test-retest (Rho Spearman = 0,76). Tiene una elevada validez de criterio concomitante analizada por su correlación con FES-I (Rho Spearman = 0,90). La validez de constructo discriminante ha sido confirmada tanto para SPPB como TUG. Short FES-I presenta buena capacidad de clasificación de fragilidad (definida por SPPB) con área bajo la curva [AUC] = 0,715; como punto de corte se propone un valor Short FES-I>8 para miedo moderado/alto de caídas. Conclusiones La escala Short FES-I es un buen instrumento para estudiar el miedo a las caídas en población española mayor de 70 años y es válida para su uso clínico y en investigación. (AU)
Introduction Falls deteriorate the quality of life of the elderly and the fear of falling has been shown to be an independent risk factor for frailty, so having tools for its evaluation is a priority. The short FES-I scale, short version (7 items) of the FES-I scale (16 items), assesses fear of falling. The objective of this study is to validate the short FES-I scale in the Spanish population over 70 years and to analyze the relationship between fear of falling, risk of falls and frailty. Material and methods Cross-sectional observational study. Sample: 227 subjects (50.7% male; mean age 75.8 years). Setting: northern Spain. Variables: sociodemographic, clinical, short physical performance battery (SPPB) and timed up and go test (TUG) execution tests, FES-I and short FES-I. Analysis of psychometric properties: validity and reliability. Results The short FES-I scale shows excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89) and testretest reliability (rho Spearman = 0.76). It has a high concomitant criterion validity analyzed by its correlation with FES-I (rho Spearman = 0.90). The discriminant construct validity has been confirmed for both SPPB and TUG. Short FES-I presents good capacity for frailty classification (defined by SPPB) with AUC = 0.715. As a cut-off point, a short FES-I value > 8 is proposed for moderate/high fear of falling. Conclusions The short FES-I scale is a good instrument to study fear of falling in the Spanish population over 70 years and is valid for clinical and research use. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Accidental Falls , Fear , Frailty , Cross-Sectional Studies , Validation Studies as Topic , SpainABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Falls deteriorate the quality of life of the elderly and the fear of falling has been shown to be an independent risk factor for frailty, so having tools for its evaluation is a priority. The short FES-I scale, short version (7 items) of the FES-I scale (16 items), assesses fear of falling. The objective of this study is to validate the short FES-I scale in the Spanish population over 70 years and to analyze the relationship between fear of falling, risk of falls and frailty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study. SAMPLE: 227 subjects (50.7% male; mean age 75.8 years). SETTING: northern Spain. VARIABLES: sociodemographic, clinical, short physical performance battery (SPPB) and timed up and go test (TUG) execution tests, FES-I and short FES-I. Analysis of psychometric properties: validity and reliability. RESULTS: The short FES-I scale shows excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89) and test-retest reliability (rho Spearman = 0.76). It has a high concomitant criterion validity analyzed by its correlation with FES-I (rho Spearman = 0.90). The discriminant construct validity has been confirmed for both SPPB and TUG. Short FES-I presents good capacity for frailty classification (defined by SPPB) with AUC = 0.715. As a cut-off point, a short FES-I value > 8 is proposed for moderate/high fear of falling. CONCLUSIONS: The short FES-I scale is a good instrument to study fear of falling in the Spanish population over 70 years and is valid for clinical and research use.
Subject(s)
Fear , Frailty , Humans , Male , Aged , Female , Postural Balance , Accidental Falls , Reproducibility of Results , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time and Motion Studies , PsychometricsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Our previous study has shown that vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is an effective technique to reduce falls in elderly patients. It would be interesting to establish patients' clinical characteristics in which vestibular rehabilitation is expected to be more effective. AIMS: Evaluate factors that could modify rehabilitation outcomes in elderly patients with previous falls. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients randomized to one of the intervention group (computerized dynamic posturography-CDP-training, optokinetic stimulus or exercise at home) and with previous falls were analyzed. Patients were assessed with objective outcome measures (sensorial organization test and limits of stability-LOS-of CDP, modified timed up and go test-TUG-and number of falls) and with subjective outcome measures (dizziness handicap inventory and Short falls efficacy scale-international-Short FES-I) during a 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: In the logistic regression model, a worse score in the maximum excursion (MXM), and a shorter time in the TUG significantly associated with a reduction > 50% of falls. Also, association with a higher score in the Short FES-I was close to a statistical significance. There was no statistical significance association with other covariables. DISCUSSION: In patients with reduced limits of stability, VR seems to be more effective and they should be encouraged to perform it. But on the other hand, patients with longer time in the TUG show worse outcomes and may benefit more with gait training. CONCLUSIONS: VR in elderly people with previous falls is effective regardless of their age and gender.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Exercise Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Postural Balance , Time and Motion Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Accidental falls, especially for the elderly, are a major health issue. Balance disorders are one of their main causes. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) has proven to be useful in improving balance of elderly patients with instability. Its major handicap is probably its cost, which has prevented its generalisation. So, we have designed a clinical trial with posturographic VR, to assess the optimum number of sessions necessary for a substantial improvement and to compare computerised dynamic posturography (CDP) (visual feedback) and mobile posturography (vibrotactile feedback). METHODS: Design: randomized controlled trial. It is an experimental study, single-center, open, randomized (balanced blocks of patients) in four branches in parallel, in 220 elderly patients with high risk of falls; follow-up period: twelve months. SETTING: Department of Otorhinolaryngology of a tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: people over 65 years, fulfilling two or more of the following requirements: a) at least one fall in the last twelve months. b) take at least 16 s or require some support in perform the "timed up and go" test. c) a percentage of average balance in the sensory organization test (SOT) of the CDP < 68%. d) at least one fall in any of the conditions in SOT-CDP. e) a score in Vertiguard's gSBDT > 60%. INTERVENTION: Four differents protocols of vestibular rehabilitation (randomization of the patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The percentage of average balance in the SOT-CDP. Secondary measures: time and supports in the "timed up and go" test, scores of the CDP and Vertiguard, and rate of falls. DISCUSSION: Posturographic VR has been proven to be useful for improving balance and reducing the number of falls among the aged. However, its elevated cost has limited its use. It is possible to implement two strategies that improve the cost-benefit of posturography. The first involves optimising the number of rehabilitation sessions; the second is based on the use of cheaper posturography systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03034655. Registered on 25 January 2017.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/economics , Cost Savings/economics , Exercise/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Touch/physiology , Vibration/therapeutic use , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Wearable Electronic Devices/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Our previous study had shown the effectiveness of vestibular rehabilitation (VR) in improving balance in elderly patients, assessed immediately afterwards. AIMS: The main goal of the present study is to consider whether this improvement in balance assessment turns out in a reduction of the number of falls. METHODS: 139 elderly patients with high risk of falls were included and randomized to one of the following study arms: computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) training, optokinetic stimulus, exercises at home or control group. Patients were assessed with objective outcome measures (sensorial organization test and limits of stability of CDP, number of falls and number of hospital admissions due to falls) and subjective outcome measures (dizziness handicap inventory and short falls efficacy scale-international) during a 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Average number of falls significantly declined from 10.96 (before VR) to 3.03 (12-month follow-up) in the intervention group (p < 0.001); meanwhile, in the control group, the average number of falls changed from 3.36 to 2.61 during a 12-month follow-up period (p = 0.166). DISCUSSION: The present study provides evidence that VR can decisively improve balance in elderly patients with instability, which can lead in turn to a significant reduction of falls. CONCLUSION: We recommend performing VR in any older person with high risk of falls.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Exercise Therapy/methods , Postural Balance , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Physical Therapy Modalities , Vestibular Function TestsABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Kidney Function Tests/statistics & numerical data , Glomerular Filtration Rate/physiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Diseases Registries/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Balance becomes more precarious with age, and even without pathological disorders, the physiological decline in balance that occurs with age is a factor that also favors falls. So the aim of the present study is to assess the short-term effectiveness of three different methods of vestibular rehabilitation, compared to a control group, in improving balance in elderly patients with postural instability. 139 elderly patients with high risk of falls were included and randomized to one of the following study arms: computer dynamic posturography (CDP) training, optokinetic stimulus, exercises at home, or control group. Patients were assessed with objective and subjective outcome measures. The individuals that trained using CDP improved significantly more than the control group on the average balance score (p < 0.001) and reducing the number of falls in the sensorial organization test (p < 0.001). In addition, the analysis showed a statistically significant effect in the limits of stability only with the CDP training in comparison with the control group (p < 0.001). In our present study, supervised and customized exercises with CDP were more effective than the control group in the posturographic short-term assessment. An increased age did not affect the potential for improvement after training. So we conclude that elderly patients with high risk of falling should begin vestibular rehabilitation as soon as possible in order to avoid the potential harm of falls, mainly injuries and psychological consequences due to fear of falling again.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Exercise Therapy/methods , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Aged , Female , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Therapy Modalities , Postural Balance/physiology , Risk Assessment , Vestibular Function Tests/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the equilibriometric differences between 2 populations of elderly patients (young elderly and very elderly) with instability induced solely by age. METHODS: Cross-sectional study, with 2 study groups classified according to patient age (cut-points in twenty-fifth and seventy-fifth percentiles of the age of the sample). POPULATION: 64 patients aged 65 years or more. Two groups of 32 subjects were established: group A (people 65 years of age or older but less than 72.6, twenty-fifth percentile) and group B (patients 82.5 years, seventh-fifth percentile, or older). Main analyzed variables: timed up-and-go test, sensory organization test of the computerized dynamic posturography, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) questionnaires. Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney test were used. RESULTS: The older patients obtain poorer scores in the equilibriometric tests but not in all of them. In the sensory organization test, the older patients make poorer use of visual and vestibular information; they also require more time and steps for the timed up-and-go. With regards to the questionnaires, fear of falling is greater (higher Short FES-I scores) but not subjective perception of disability (DHI scores without differences). CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to establish aged subgroups of elderly patients with instability, adapting therapeutic strategies.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Aging , Dizziness/physiopathology , Postural Balance , Sensation Disorders/physiopathology , Vestibular Diseases/physiopathology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Fear of falling (FOF) is a common problem among the elderly. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether there is a correlation between FOF, estimated via the short FES-I test, and objective evaluation of balance in a group of elderly patients with age-related instability. The balance of 139 subjects of more than 65 years of age is evaluated by the timed up and go test and the computerised dynamic posturography (CDP). Different groups of elderly patients were established according to the number of falls in the previous 12 months, and the correlation with short FES-I test scores was evaluated. Based on the results, ROC curves were calculated. The short FES-I test presents a good capacity to distinguish between subjects with ≤ 3 falls/year and subjects with ≥ 4 falls/year (AUC 0.719, 95%CI 0.627-0.810). A test score of 14.5 is the best cut-off point (74% sensitivity, 51% specificity). Using this cut-off point, the study sample comprises two groups: subjects with test scores of 7-14 vs 15-28, with the first group obtaining best results with statistical significance (Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney test) in most of the balance tests. The short FES-I is an excellent instrument that measures FOF in the elderly, and it is correlated with their number of falls both in real life and on the CDP. It is simple and fast, and so can be considered an extraordinary screening test relative to real risk of falls in the elderly.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Aging/physiology , Fear/psychology , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Postural Balance , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Psychometrics/methods , Psychometrics/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to assess whether obesity affects balance in elderly patients with postural instability. STUDY DESIGN: It is a case-control study, with cases defined by BMI ≥30 kg/m(2), and developed in a third level university hospital. METHODS: We included 135 patients aged 65 years old or more who presented postural instability. Balance assessment was through the sensory organisation test (SOT), limits of stability (LOS) and rhythmic weight shift (RWS) of computerised dynamic posturography (CDP) and the modified timed up-and-go (TUG) test. The patients also completed the Dizziness Handicap Inventory and short Falls Efficacy Scale-International questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients with obesity took longer to perform the modified TUG and required more steps. Also these patients had poorer scores in the subjective tests. In the CDP there were no significant differences in the SOT nor the LOS, and only there was a statistical significant difference in the anterior-posterior directional control of the RWS. Obese patients have a higher risk of fallings compared to non-obese patients. CONCLUSION: In essence, our results indicate that obesity interferes in the balance of elderly patients with postural instability, putting them at a greater risk of fallings, performing worse dynamic tasks and feeling more disabled. Although continued education on training balance may be useful in older population, since the obese group shows more rate of fallers, rehabilitation programmes focus on dynamic tasks in these patients could be useful to reduce their fall risk and improve their quality of life.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Obesity , Postural Balance , Quality of Life , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Female , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/physiopathology , Obesity/psychology , Patient Education as Topic , Physical Therapy Modalities , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Spain/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The purpose of the study was to evaluate self-perceived handicap in patients with definite Menière's disease (MD). A cross-sectional study was conducted. To examine the self-perception of disability, participants completed a DHI (Dizziness Handicap Inventory). Parameters compared with DHI scores: sex, age, unilateral/bilateral affectation, time elapsed since the onset of symptoms, pure-tone average (PTA), stages of MD, audiometric change (last 6 months), PTA in low frequencies (PTAl) and audiometric change in PTAl, subjective perception of fluctuating hearing threshold, tinnitus between attacks, number of vertiginous episodes (last 6 months), time elapsed since last attack, subjective perception of instability intercrises and Tumarkin attacks. 90 patients were included; they completed a total of 104 questionnaires. DHI scores ranged from 2 to 100 (average: 47.08, SD 24.45). In 29 cases (27.9 %) the disability perception was mild, in 43 (41.3 %) moderate, and in 32 (30.8 %) severe. Correlation between disability perception and some vestibular symptoms was found: number of typical attacks (last 6 months), time elapsed since last attack, instability intercrises and Tumarkin attacks. No relationship was found with the rest of variables. Disability perception in patients with MD depends primarily on vestibular symptoms (particularly, instability and frequency of attacks). So, we suggest to design a new staging system of MD taking into account both auditory criteria and also vestibular symptoms.
Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Ear, Inner/physiopathology , Meniere Disease/rehabilitation , Perception , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Meniere Disease/physiopathology , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain the incidence of and the risk factors associated with morbidity in laparoscopy performed on patients with cervical cancer and endometrial cancer. METHODS: This was an observational study of a cohort of 128 women, 89 with endometrial cancer and 39 with cervical cancer from January 2000 to December 2011. We used the Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Complications were found in 44 patients (34.4%). After a multivariate analysis, among the risk factors associated with the presence of complications as the only type of surgery was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.043), more frequent in the most complex procedures such as Wertheim operation, trachelectomy, and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Type of surgery (p = 0.003) and tumour type (p = 0.003) were risk factors associated with conversion to laparotomy. It was more frequent among the most complex procedures and cervical cancer cases. Regarding the need for transfusion, significant differences were observed in terms of surgery duration (p < 0.001), more frequent in longer surgery. CONCLUSION: Morbidity in laparoscopic surgical oncology is related to the surgery complexity, where the basal characteristics of the patient are not a factor of influence in the development of complications.
ABSTRACT
MAIN OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effectiveness of vestibular rehabilitation (VR) to improve the balance in older people, assessed immediately afterwards. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: (a) To verify the maintenance of improvement of the balance achieved in the medium term (6-12 months). (b) To consider whether this improvement results in a reduction in the number of falls. (c) To compare among themselves the effectiveness of three different methods of VR in improving balance and to explore whether there are differences to achieve a reduction in the number of falls. DESIGN: Experimental study, single-centre, open, randomised (balanced blocks of patients) in four branches in parallel, in 220 elderly patients (over 64 years) with high risk of falls and a follow-up period of 12 months. SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology of the University Hospital of Santiago. PARTICIPANTS: People over 64 years, fulfilling one of the following requirements: (a) At least one fall in the last year. (b) Take at least 16 s or require some support in perform the test "timed up and go". (c) A percentage of average balance in the sensory organisation test (SOT) in the dynamic posturography (CDP) <68%. (d) At least one fall in any of the conditions in the SOT of CDP. INTERVENTION: Three different protocols of VR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The percentage of average balance in the SOT in CDP. Secondary measures: time and supports in the test of "timed up and go", scores of the dynamic posturography and SwayStar system, and rate of falls.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Physical Therapy Modalities , Postural Balance , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Male , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome , Vestibular Diseases/diagnosis , Vestibular Function Tests/methodsABSTRACT
Oral squamous cell carcinoma is the most common neoplasia of the mouth. Downregulation of p16(INK4a) (a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor) has been reported for mouth cancer and it is believed that its inactivation is an early event in oral carcinogenesis. The goal of this article is to quantitatively report expression of p16(INK4a) and the state of methylation in oral squamous cell carcinoma, and evaluate its relationship with the clinical and prognostic factors, in addition to setting out a multivariate model that predicts survival. The mean expression of p16(INK4a) was 7.70 (SD=14.07) (F=0.894; P=0.449). According to the semiquantitative analysis, there were statistically significant differences, where 19 cases were negative (<2 %), 11 at initial stages, and 8 at advanced stages (χ(2)=6.016; P<0.05). The methylation of p16(INK4a) was not associated with any of the clinical or pathologic variables. Kaplan-Meier curve showed a better survival for patients in initial stages (40.72 mo) compared to those in advanced stages (28.6 mo) (P<0.01). Survival was also reduced in a statistically significant manner in patients with any degree of dysplasia in the adjacent margin (P<0.05). During univariate Cox regression analysis, it was observed that individuals with relapse had a higher risk (almost 9 times higher) [P<0.001; hazard ratio=8.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.18-19.02]. During the Cox multivariate analysis for each unit of decrease in p16(INK4a), the risk increased by 1.06) (P<0.05; hazard ratio=0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-1.00). p16(INK4a) expression is reduced with advancing tumor stage and its gene silencing is associated with an increased risk of death.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/biosynthesis , Down-Regulation , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Mouth Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , DNA Methylation , DNA, Neoplasm/metabolism , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/metabolism , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Although peri-implant bone loss is one of the parameters included in the criteria for determining implant success, its prevention is of vital importance. The goal of this article is to assess the factors that affect peri-implant bone loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, longitudinal, retrospective study was conducted in 148 partially edentulous patients rehabilitated with implants and with a follow-up period of 5 years or more. A total of 585 implants were included in the study. Radiographic peri-implant bone loss was compared with radiographic periodontal bone loss, and other characteristics such as prosthesis design, hygiene, and implant size were studied as potential peri-implant bone loss modification factors. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, a statistically significant relationship between peri-implant bone loss and gender (P < 0.05), implant system (P < 0.01), reason for extraction (P < 0.05), splinting (P < 0.0001), and distance between the implant platform and the horizontal component of the prosthesis (P < 0.0001) were observed. In multivariate analysis, the relationship between this peri-implant loss and gender (P < 0.05), implant system (P < 0.05), splinting (P < 0.001), and the aforementioned distance (P < 0.01) remains. CONCLUSIONS: The distance implant platform-horizontal component of the prosthesis has the greatest effect on peri-implant bone loss This distance must be >3.3 mm and <6 mm, above this range, it no longer influences in peri-implant bone loss and favors the appearance of embrasures and the buildup of bacterial plaque.
Subject(s)
Bone Resorption , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth, Edentulous/therapy , Radiography, Dental , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
To assess whether a subjective questionnaire that measures the disability caused by balance disorders in daily life activities is correlated to objective assessment of balance in elderly patients with age-related instability. We included 37 subjects aged 65 years or more who presented balance disorders induced solely by age. Balance assessment was through the sensory organisation test and limits of stability of computerised dynamic posturography, the SwayStar system and the modified timed up and go test. The patients also completed the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) questionnaire. The SwayStar balance control index (BCI) was most significantly correlated to the DHI score and the score of its different scales. When we divided the patients into subgroups according to DHI score, we only found statistically significant differences in the BCI and number of falls. In our population of elderly patients with instability, there is practically no correlation between the DHI and the static balance assessment. However, there is greater correlation with the BCI, which could show that dynamic balance is perceived as more disabling for these patients. In this case, when designing a rehabilitation protocol we should focus more on dynamic activities such as gait.
Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Accidental Falls , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Dizziness/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine whether clinical and instrumental examination of balance can predict the risk of falls in elderly patients with instability. STUDY DESIGN: It is a case control study, with cases defined by falls in the last year, developed in a third level university hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy patients aged 65 years or more who met at least one of the following inclusion criteria: (a) at least one fall in the last year; (b) spend more than 15s during the timed up and go test (TUG); (c) a score of less than 68% average balance in the sensory organisation test (SOT) of the computerised dynamic posturography (CDP); or (d) at least one fall in the CDP-SOT. INTERVENTION: TUG test, CDP-SOT, CDP centre of gravity balancing (CG) and limits of stability (LOS), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) test and short FES-I test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of steps and time (TUG), average balance and use of sensorial information (CDP-SOT), speed and directional control (CDP-CG and LOS), DHI score and short FES-I score. RESULTS: Comparing subjects without falls (non-fallers) vs subjects with at least one fall (fallers) in the last year, fallers obtain worse scores than non-fallers in condition 2 (p=0.043) and use of somatosensory information (p=0.039). Comparing subjects with five falls or less (non-multiple-fallers) vs subjects with more than five falls (multiple-fallers), multiple-fallers obtain worse scores than non-multiple-fallers in overall balance (p=0.023), condition 6 (p=0.036), directional control (swaying (p=0.006) and LOS (p=0.023)) and short FES-I score (p=0.007). CONCLUSION: The three most useful parameters for identifying unstable elderly patients at particularly high risk of repeated falls are mean balance in the CDP SOT, directional control of CDP LOS and short FES-I score.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Forecasting , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Postural Balance/physiologyABSTRACT
Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are currently considered a diagnostic tool for studying the vestibular system, specifically the saccule and inferior vestibular nerve. This prospective study aimed at evaluating the impact of patient position and type of acoustic stimulus on VEMPs results using 60 healthy subjects who underwent otoscopy, pure tone audiometry and VEMPs in different conditions affecting their position and the type of acoustic stimulus. Corrected amplitude is significantly greater when the patient is seated and latency difference and amplitude asymmetry do not change with either patient position or type of stimulus. The results obtained in different test conditions are not comparable. Being seated is the most appropriate position for the test.
