ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Patients with Down Syndrome (DS) showed multiple comorbidities, including thyroid disorders, obesity, and metabolic derangement. Different thyroid hormone (THs) patterns and sensitivity to thyroid hormone indices (STHI) seem to be associated with metabolic disorders. The study's aim was to evaluate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) in pediatric patients affected by DS, taking into consideration the relationship between the metabolic parameters, THs and STHI. METHODS: We enlisted 50 euthyroid patients with DS (9.03 ± 4.46). Clinical parameters, TSH, FT3, FT4 and the presence of MS were recorded. Indexes of peripheral sensitivity (FT3/FT4 ratio) and central sensitivity (TSH index, TSHI; TSH T4 resistance index, TT4RI; TSH T3 resistance index, TT3RI) were also detected. Thirty healthy subjects were included as a control group. RESULTS: MS was detected in 12% of the subjects with DS. FT3, FT4, and TSH levels were higher in DS than in the control group (p < 0.01); higher levels of FT3/FT4 ratio, TSHI and TT3RI and lower TT4RI values (p < 0.01) were also detected. A significant correlation was detected between FT3 and fasting blood glucose (FBG) (R = 0.46), triglyceride (TG) (r = 0.37), total (r = 0.55) and high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (r = - 0.38), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (r = - 0.4); FT3/FT4 ratio and waist circumference (WC) (r = 0.36); TSHI and total (r = 0.30) and HDL cholesterol (r = - 0.31); TT4RI and HDL cholesterol (r = - 0.31); TT3RI and total (r = 0.39) and HDL cholesterol (r = - 032). CONCLUSION: We confirmed a higher MS prevalence in children with DS compared to the control group. A significant association between THs, STHI, and the glucose and lipid metabolism parameters was detected supporting their role in metabolic alterations related to the DS.
Subject(s)
Down Syndrome , Metabolic Syndrome , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Metabolic Syndrome/diagnosis , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Thyroid Gland , Thyroxine , Triiodothyronine , Cholesterol, HDL , Down Syndrome/complications , Down Syndrome/epidemiology , Thyrotropin , Thyroid HormonesABSTRACT
AIM: Little is known about endothelial function in adolescents with type 1 diabetes, and we evaluated endothelial dysfunction, using reactive hyperaemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT). METHODS: This prospective, observational, 1-year study focused on 73 adolescents with type 1 diabetes, using multiple daily injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. The subjects were assessed using RH-PAT, body mass index, blood pressure, fasting lipid profile, glycated haemoglobin, insulin requirements and hours of physical exercise per week. RESULTS: Endothelial dysfunction was observed in 56 patients (76.7%), with lower mean RH-PAT scores (1.26 ± 0.22 versus 2.24 ± 0.48, p < 0.0001) and higher glycated haemoglobin values at baseline (8.27 ± 1.24% versus 7.37 ± 0.54%, p = 0.006) and as a mean of the whole period since diagnosis (8.25 ± 1.22% versus 7.72 ± 0.82%, p = 0.034). A higher percentage of patients with endothelial dysfunction showed abnormal cardiac autonomic tests (p = 0.02) and were more sedentary, exercising <4 hours a week, than patients with normal endothelial function. After follow-up in 64/73 patients, we observed endothelial dysfunction in 81.8% of patients, despite a modest improvement in glycated haemoglobin. CONCLUSION: Adolescents with type 1 diabetes displayed evidence of endothelial dysfunction. Good metabolic control (glycated haemoglobin ≤7.5%, 58 mmol/mol) and regular physical activity of at least 4 h a week might be protective.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/physiopathology , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Adolescent , Carotid Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnostic imaging , Endothelium, Vascular/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Hyperemia/etiology , Male , Manometry , Prospective Studies , Pulse Wave Analysis , Ultrasonography , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIMS: To evaluate the long-lasting immunogenicity and safety of a pandemic vaccine co-administered with a seasonal influenza vaccine in young subjects with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Eighty patients (mean age: 16.7 ± 5.5 years, disease duration: 10.2 ± 4.7 years) were randomly assigned to receive a single or a double dose (1 month apart) of MF59-adjuvanted influenza A(H1N1) vaccine, simultaneously with a single dose of a virosome-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine for the 2009-2010 season. RESULTS: One month after immunization, the rate of seroconversion to 2009 pandemic A(H1N1) was 92.5% with an overall 100% proportion of vaccinees with protective antibody titres (≥ 1:40). No significant differences were observed between vaccinees who received the one-dose or the two-dose schedule. Seasonal vaccine induced a significant increase of both seroprotection rates and antibody levels. Local adverse events at the injection site of pandemic and seasonal vaccines were reported by 66.3% and 50% of subjects, respectively. Solicited systemic adverse events, mainly mild in intensity, were reported by 26.7% of vaccinees. No subjects had an influenza-like illness during the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: One injection of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) MF59-adjuvanted vaccine is immunogenic and safe in young patients with Type 1 diabetes who are at increased risk of influenza morbidities. Pandemic vaccine can be safely co-administered with seasonal influenza vaccine.
