Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Endourol ; 35(6): 937-943, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32013581

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Although laparoscopic urachal excision in children has been well reported, there are limited data on a robot-assisted surgery (RAS) approach. The hidden incision endoscopic surgery (HIdES) technique is an established method of eliminating visible scars following a number of RAS urologic procedures. We report our experience of using a robotic approach to treat urachal anomalies in children, and we present the first description of utilizing the HIdES port configuration for this procedure. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed pediatric patients who underwent resection of a urachal remnant at our institution from 2013 to 2018. Surgical techniques were either the traditional open approach (OA) or RAS. HIdES trocar placement configuration was employed in all robotic cases. Patient demographics, perioperative data, pathology reports, and outcomes were abstracted and compared. Results: Twenty-three patients underwent a urachal remnant resection in the study period (RAS: 14 patients vs OA: 9 patients). RAS patients were older (8.5 vs 2.0 years, p = 0.031) and weighed more than OA patients (36.1 vs 13.9 kg, p = 0.063). Median operative time for RAS was longer than OA operative time (136 vs 33 minutes, p < 0.01). Fewer RAS patients were outpatient compared with OA (7.1% vs 66.7%, p < 0.01), but with a median length of stay of 1 day (0-1 day). Two patients (14.3%) in the RAS group experienced postoperative complications within 1 week of the procedure compared with 1 (11.1%) in the OA group. There was no significant difference in blood loss, postoperative narcotic requirements, or duration of follow-up between both groups. Conclusion: RAS is a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for urachal anomalies. Complete excision can be achieved by using HIdES port configuration, allowing for excellent cosmetic outcomes that are superior to traditional surgical scars without limitation to essential surgical ergonomics.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Robotics , Urachus , Child , Humans , Operative Time , Retrospective Studies , Urachus/surgery
2.
J Urol ; 199(5): 1188-1195, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29225057

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Recent NCCN® (National Comprehensive Cancer Network®) Guidelines® show that patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4/Grade Group 2 but otherwise favorable features are active surveillance candidates. However, little is known about the long-term outcomes compared to that in men in the low risk Gleason score 6/Grade Group 1 group. We sought to clarify the risk of adverse features and oncologic outcomes in surgically treated, favorable Grade Group 2 vs 1 cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried our prospectively maintained radical prostatectomy database for all 8,095 patients with biopsy Grade Group 1 or 2 prostate cancer who otherwise fulfilled the NCCN low risk definition of prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml and cT2a or less, and who underwent radical prostatectomy from 1987 to 2014. Multivariable logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare pathological and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Organ confined disease was present in 93.9% and 82.6% of Grade Group 1 and favorable intermediate risk Grade Group 2 cases while seminal vesicle invasion was noted in 1.7% and 4.7%, and nodal disease was noted in 0.3% and 1.8%, respectively (all p <0.0001). On multivariable logistic regression biopsy proven Grade Group 2 disease was associated with a threefold greater risk of nonorgan confined disease (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.7-5.7, p <0.001). The incidence of late treatment (more than 90 days from surgery) in Grade Group 1 vs 2 was 3.1% vs 8.5% for hormonal therapy and 6.0% vs 12.2% for radiation (p <0.001). In the Grade Group 1 vs 2 cohorts the 10-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 88.9% vs 81.2% and the 10-year systemic progression-free survival rate was 99% vs 96.5% (each p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Men at favorable risk with Grade Group 2 disease who are considering active surveillance should be informed of the risks of harboring adverse pathological features which impact secondary therapies and an increased risk of cancer progression.


Subject(s)
Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Watchful Waiting/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Male , Medical Oncology/standards , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Prostate/pathology , Prostate/surgery , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Risk Assessment , Seminal Vesicles/pathology , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate
3.
Eur Urol ; 72(3): 442-447, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27574819

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: According to a recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines update, patients with Gleason score (GS) 3 + 4 prostate cancer (PCa) and "favorable intermediate-risk" (FIR) characteristics might be offered active surveillance (AS). However, the risk of unfavorable disease features and its prediction in this subset of patients is not completely understood. OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk of unfavorable disease and potential predictors of adverse outcomes among GS 3 + 4 FIR PCa patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included patients with biopsy GS 3 + 4 and otherwise fulfilling the NCCN low-risk definition (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] <10 ng/ml, cT2a or lower) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) from 2006 to 2014 at a single institution. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Complete information on PSA, PSA density (PSAD), clinical stage, percentage of positive cores, percentage of maximum surface specimen involvement, and RP pathology were available. GS upgrade and downgrade, non-organ-confined and non-specimen-confined disease, unfavorable disease (pT3-T4 and/or pN1 and/or a pGS ≥4 + 3) were the outcomes. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 156 patients (13.1%) experienced GS upgrade; 201 (16.9%) were downgraded. Overall, 205 men (17.2%) harbored non-organ-confined disease, and 295 (24.8%) had unfavorable disease. Age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.06), percentage surface involvement (OR: 1.01), and PSAD (OR: 1.83) were the only significant predictors of upgrade. Age (OR: 1.05), clinical stage (OR: 1.74), percentage of positive cores >50% (OR 1.57), percentage of surface area (OR: 1.02), and perineural invasion (OR: 1.89) were significant predictors of unfavorable disease at RP. The retrospective design is a limitation. CONCLUSIONS: AS is a possible option for a subset of men with FIR GS 3 + 4. However, clinical models alone have a limited role in GS upgrade prediction, and alternative tools warrant further investigation. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 at biopsy, low prostate-specific antigen, and low stage might consider the option of active surveillance, but the use of clinical information alone might be not adequate for thorough risk-adapted counseling.


Subject(s)
Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Watchful Waiting , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Chi-Square Distribution , Clinical Decision-Making , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Kallikreins/blood , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Minnesota , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Odds Ratio , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors
4.
Urology ; 100: 45-52, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27720775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze bleeding-related complications among patients on long-term anticoagulation (AC) undergoing ureteroscopy (URS). Current American Urological Association/International Consultation on Urological Diseases guidelines state that it is safe to continue AC in routine URS; however, these recommendations are based on small case series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were 4799 identified URS procedures performed at our institution between June 2009 and February 2016. Records were then retrospectively reviewed to confirm AC use and identify periprocedural complications. Anticoagulant agents evaluated included warfarin, enoxaparin, and non-vitamin K antagonists (ie, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apibaxan). Patients were excluded if they were taking a concurrent antiplatelet (AP) agent or if additional non-URS procedures were performed. RESULTS: Of the 4799 URS procedures, 272 (5.6%) were done on patients taking chronic AC. Of these, 193 (71%) held AC, 53 (19%) were bridged with enoxaparin, and 26 (10%) continued AC. The median age was 70.2 years and the majority of patients (64.2%) underwent a stone procedure with a stone-free rate of 73%. The overall bleeding-related complication rate was 8.1% whereas the significant bleeding-related event rate was 5.9%. Patients continuing AC had the highest significant bleeding-related event rate at 15.4% compared to 9% and 3% for those bridged with enoxaparin and those who held, respectively (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Continuation or bridging of AC may increase the risk of perioperative bleeding. The risks and benefits of proceeding with URS on AC must be weighed carefully. Pending external validation, this information may be used for patient counseling and risk stratification.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Ureteral Diseases/surgery , Ureteroscopy/adverse effects , Aged , Drug Administration Schedule , Enoxaparin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Warfarin/therapeutic use
5.
J Endourol ; 30(10): 1073-1078, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27461936

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines state that continuing anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents in routine ureteroscopy (URS) is safe and without increased risk of complications. However, these recommendations are based on small case series; thus, we sought to analyze bleeding-related complications among patients on antiplatelet therapy (APT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 4799 URS procedures performed at our institution between June 2009 and February 2016 were identified. Records were then retrospectively reviewed to confirm APT use and to identify periprocedural complications. Antiplatelet agents evaluated included aspirin (low dose and full dose) and P2Y12 receptor antagonists (clopidogrel, prasugugrel, ticagrelor). Patients were excluded if they were taking a concurrent anticoagulant agent or if additional non-URS procedures were performed. RESULTS: Of 4799 URS procedures, 314 (6.5%) were performed on patients taking APT, of which 234 (74.5%) held APT, 63 (20.1%) continued APT, and 17 (5.4%) continued dual APT. The mean age was 70.1 years, and the majority of patients (69.6%) underwent a stone procedure with a stone-free rate of 80.2%. The overall bleeding-related complication rate was 1.9%, whereas the significant bleeding-related event rate was 1.6% and this did not differ among the groups (p = 0.3). The power to detect a 3% difference in bleeding between the groups was 0.95. CONCLUSIONS: Continuing APT in patients on chronic therapy does not appear to pose an increased risk of bleeding-related complications. Our findings support the current AUA guidelines as they relate to APT.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Platelets/drug effects , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Ureteroscopy/adverse effects , Adenosine/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Clopidogrel , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Ticagrelor , Ticlopidine/analogs & derivatives , Ticlopidine/therapeutic use , Ureteroscopy/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...