Clinical Characteristics of 96 Patients Presenting With Hematogenous Spinal Osteomyelitis- a Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To report clinical characteristics and course of care for patients diagnosed with hematogenous spinal osteomyelitis (HVO). METHODS: Medical records of patients presenting to two tertiary care centers with HVO were reviewed. RESULTS: 96 consecutive patients with HVO were identified. Mean follow-up was 8.9 months. Most infections occurred in the lumbar region (50.0%). Of the cultures taken, MRSA accounted for 9%; MSSA, 26%; Streptococcus species, 12%; other gram-positive bacteria, 23%; gram-negative, 17%; fungal, 2.6%; and 11.5% of cultures returned no growth. 57 patients underwent surgery. Of these, 79% of the patients had undergone a trial of empiric antibiotics (cefepime and vancomycin) of the day prior to surgery. 44% underwent secondary surgeries, typically due to a heavy wound burden of necrotic tissue and pus. Postoperative antibiotics were prescribed to all patients. 51.6% of the patients were prescribed antibiotic therapy >6 months. Overall mortality rate was 3.8%. Major cause of all deaths was septic shock. Post-infection sequelae occurred in 47.4% of patients. The most common sequelae were persistent or new sites of infection, sepsis, and abscess. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes, hypertension, and renal failure appear to increase the risk of post-infection sequelae and death. While non-operative management was attempted in nearly 47%, ultimately 73% had surgery. This high rate may reflect our population of patients hospitalized in a tertiary care center. Available data suggests that patients presenting with hematogenous osteomyelitis be followed closely as failure of non-operative management, and resulting morbidity, was high.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptom State in Orthopaedic Spine Surgery: A Review.

¼: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) are both metrics at interpreting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). ¼: MCID values tend to vary significantly depending on the baseline pain and function in both acute and chronic symptom states while PASS thresholds are more stable. ¼: MCID values are more easily attainable than PASS thresholds. ¼: Although PASS is more relevant to the patient, it should continue to be used in tandem with MCID when interpreting PROM data.

Bridging the Cervicothoracic Junction During Multi-Level Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review seeks to compare fusion, reoperation and complication rates, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time between multi-level instrumented fusions with LIVs (lowest instrumented vertebra) in the cervical spine and those that extend into the thoracic spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies address the question of whether to extend a long-segment, posterior cervical fusions, performed for degenerative disease, into the upper thoracic spine. Recommendations for appropriate LIV continue to vary. METHODS: A comprehensive computerized literature search through multiple electronic databases without date limits up until April 3rd, 2020 using combinations of key search terms and sets of inclusion/exclusion criteria was performed. RESULTS: Our comprehensive literature search yielded 3852 studies. Of these, 8 articles consisting of 1162 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In 61.2% of the patients, the fusion did not cross the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) (cervical LIV, CLV). In the remaining 38.8%, the fusion extended into the upper thoracic spine (thoracic LIV, TLV). Overall, mean patient age was 62.5 years (range: 58.8-66.1 years). Our direct analysis showed that odds of fusion were not statistically different between the CLV and TLV groups (OR: .648, 95% CI: .336-1.252, P = .197). Similarly, odds of reoperation (OR: 0.726, 95% CI: 0.493-1.068, P = .104) and complication rates were similar between the 2 groups (OR: 1.214, 95% CI: 0.0.750-1.965, P = .430). Standardized mean difference (SMD) for the blood loss (SMD: .728, 95% CI: 0.554-.901, P = .000) and operative (SMD: 0.653, 95% CI: .479-.826, P = .000) differed significantly between the 2 groups. The indirect analysis showed similar fusion (Effect Size (ES)TLV: .892, 95% CI: .840-.928 vs ESCLV:0.894, 95% CI:0.849-.926); reoperation rate (ESTLV:0.112, 95% CI: 0.075-.164 vs ESCLV: .125, 95% CI: .071-.211) and complication rates (ESTLV: .108, 95% CI: .074-.154 vs ESCLV:0.081, 95% CI: .040-.156). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that fusion, complication, and reoperation rates did not differ significantly between patients in whom multi-level posterior fusions ended in the cervical spine vs those of which was extended into the thoracic spine. The mean blood loss, operative time and length of stay were significantly lower in patients with CLV at C6 or C7, compared to their counterparts. These data suggest that, absent focal, C7-T1 pathology, extension of long, posterior cervical fusions into the thoracic spine may not be necessary.

Quality and Accuracy of Cervical Radiculopathy-specific Information on the Internet: A Cross-sectional Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the quality and accuracy of the content surrounding cervical radiculopathy available on the internet. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Those experiencing cervical radiculopathy and their families are increasingly browsing the worldwide web for medical information. As the information offered is likely to influence their health care choices, spine care providers must understand the quality and accuracy of that information. METHODS: Independent searches were conducted on the three most commonly accessed search engines (Google, Yahoo, and Bing) using the keyword "cervical radiculopathy." The searches were performed on June 28th, 2019. The top 50 sites from each search engines were reviewed. The websites were evaluated using quality, accuracy and usability markers. RESULTS: Seventy-seven unique websites were analyzed; 54.5% were physician or medical group professional sites, 20.8% as non-physician, 10.4% as unidentified, 7.8% as academics, and 6.5% were commercial. Accuracy ranged from <25% to >75% were recorded with a mean accuracy of 3.5 signifying 50% to 75% agreement. Overall, website categories had a significant effect on Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) score, content quality, accuracy, total summary scores, distraction index, reading ease, and grade level (P  < 0.05). Academic sites had the highest mean quality content, accuracy and total summary scores. Four of the top five websites with the highest total summary scores were physician driven. On average, Health on the Net code (HONcode) certified websites had lower grade level readability with greater reading ease and higher DISCERN and JAMA scores than uncertified sites (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite the wide number of sources available, the quality, accuracy, pertinence, and intelligibility of the information remains highly variable. Clinicians treating patients with cervical radiculopathy should direct them to verifiable sites with regulated information and, where possible, contribute high- quality information to those sites.Level of Evidence: 4.

Social media as a new source of medical information and support: analysis of scoliosis-specific information.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: It has never been easier for patients to obtain information about and to connect with others with a given health issue. Frequently, patients turn to social media. There, more information and emotional support from individuals with similar experiences should empower patients, contributing to a better functional and overall outcome. Unfortunately, social media often contains biased reports and misinformation. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the footprint of AIS (adolescent idiopathic scoliosis) on the top four social media platforms. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. METHODS: Independent searches were conducted across four major social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn) using the keywords "scoliosis" and "#scoliosis" for Instagram. The top 50 posts from each platform were evaluated based on the overall tone of the post (positive, negative, neutral); who made the post (business, patient, family/friend, hospital/physician); the intent of the postcy (advertisement, educate the viewer about scoliosis/disease process/treatments, raise awareness, provide support to patients and their family/friends, promote research); the credentials of the poster [MD, clinician (non-MD), non-clinician, unknown]; the type of media used in the post (text only, picture, video, multiple) and if the post had an external link and what content the link provided (academic, hospital/physician, health news outlet, alternative treatment, personal blog, business, other). RESULTS: 196 unique postings were analyzed for the various content criteria. Across all four platforms, the majority of posts were made by a non-clinician (42.8%) representing a business (49.3%), with the intent to educate (32.3%) using a neutral tone (52.5%). Pictures (61%) were the most common media, and 56.3% of all posts contained external links. Often, those links lead to sites promoting alternative treatments (28.8%). In comparison to the overall analysis, Instagram deviated from the patterns the most. Instagram was the only platform with a predominantly positive tone (62%). Here, 71% of the postings came from an actual patient with the intent to describe their experience or daily life with scoliosis (36%). Instagram had the lowest rate of external links (39%) and most of those lead to another person's Instagram account or a personal blog (47%). Hospital and physician groups had the highest presence on YouTube (35%), but the highest MD authorship was on Facebook (28%). CONCLUSION: Social media can be a powerful tool to disseminate information and create supportive communities for patients with chronic conditions. Healthcare providers and educators are underutilizing these outlets to reach our patients and help provide them the information and support networks they need.

The Co-Pilot Project: An International Neurosurgical Collaboration in Ukraine.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide a thorough description of the efforts and outcomes of the Co-Pilot Project in Ukraine, which facilitates neurosurgical collaboration between American and Ukrainian physicians. METHODS: The Co-Pilot Project, which operates under its parent nonprofit organization, Razom, organized multiple trips for American physicians to Ukraine. Activities included consulting in clinic, assisting with neurosurgical operations, and providing didactic lectures. Further efforts have included coordinating training opportunities for Ukrainian surgeons. We retrospectively reviewed all operations performed by Ukrainian partner physicians alongside American co-pilot physicians across Ukraine since August 2016. RESULTS: Teams of Ukrainian and American physicians operated on 78 patients (24 children and 54 adults) for a total of 84 procedures in 5 different cities (Kyiv, Lutsk, Lviv, Odessa, and Stryi) of Ukraine. Operations were classified into the following categories: adult brain tumors (n = 39), adult spine tumors (n = 1), epilepsy (n = 9), pain (n = 2), pediatric brain tumors (n = 11), vascular/endovascular (n = 10), and miscellaneous (n = 12). Four illustrative cases are described in detail. Of the patients with brain tumors, 43.5% (20/46) had giant tumors, and gross total resection or near-total resection was achieved in 78.3% (36/46). CONCLUSIONS: Profound disparities in neurosurgical care exist globally, which has led to the formation of collaborative relationships between physicians from various countries. We hope that the work of the Co-Pilot Project in Ukraine can serve as a template for effective international neurosurgical collaboration in other low-to-middle-income countries.

Is it safe to stop at C7 during multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion? - multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Despite a number of studies addressing the anatomical and biomechanical challenges of long segment, posterior cervical fusion surgery, recommendations for appropriate caudal "end level" vary widely. PURPOSE: Compare revision rates, patient reported outcomes and radiographic outcomes in patients in whom 3+ level posterior fusions ended in the cervical spine versus those in whom the fusion was extended into the thoracic spine. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), cervical lordosis, C2-C7 sagittal plumbline, T1 slope, and revision rate. METHODS: We assembled a radiographic and clinical database of patients that had undergone three or more level posterior cervical fusions for degenerative disease from January 2013 to May 2015 at one of four busy spine centers. Only those patients with at least 2 years of postoperative (postop) follow-up were included. Patients were divided into two groups: group I (fusion ending at C6 or C7) and group II (fusion extending into the thoracic spine). All radiographic measurements (cervical lordosis, T1 slope, and C2-C7 sagittal plumbline) were performed by an independent experienced clinical researcher. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-four patient cases were reviewed and sorted into the two outlined groups, Group I (n=168) and Group II (n=96). Demographically, mean age, percentage of females, non-smokers and anterior support were greater in Group II than in Groups I (p<.05). Mean estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time (OR) and length of hospital stay (LOS) were significantly higher in Group II (p<.05). Rate of revision was not clinically or statistically significantly different (p>.05) between Group I (11.1%) and Group II (9.4%). The majority of the revision surgeries occurred between 2 to 5 years postop. A greater number of subjacent degeneration/spondylolisthesis events were noted in Group I compared with Group II (3.6% vs. 1.2%). There were significant improvements in mean clinical outcomes (ie, VAS and ODI) at two years postop in both groups, but there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (p>.05). Mean cervical lordosis at 2 years postop improved in all groups (12.8° vs. 14.1°); however, there was no significant statistical difference in change for mean cervical lordosis (2 weeks vs. 2 year postop) between the two groups. Similary, there were no significant statistical differences in change for mean C2-C7 sagittal plumbline and T1 slope (2 weeks vs. 2 year postop) between the two groups(p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Caudal end level did not significantly affect revision rates, patient reported outcomes or radiographic outcomes. Higher EBL, OR, and LOS in group II suggest that, absent focal C7-T1 pathology, extension of posterior cervical fusions into the thoracic spine may not be necessary. Extension of posterior cervical fusions into the thoracic spine may be recommended for higher risk patients with limitations to strong C7 bone anchorage. In others, it is safe to stop at C7.

Preoperative patient-reported outcome score thresholds predict the likelihood of reaching MCID with surgical correction of adult spinal deformity.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Preoperative (pre-op) identification of patients likely to achieve a clinically meaningful improvement following surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) is critical, especially given the substantial cost and comorbidity associated with surgery. Even though pain is a known indication for surgical ASD correction, we are not aware of established thresholds for baseline pain and function to guide which patients have a higher likelihood of improvement with corrective surgery. PURPOSE: We aimed to establish pre-op patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) thresholds to identify patients likely to improve by at least one minimum clinically important difference (MCID) with surgery for ASD. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE: We reviewed 172 adult patients' charts who underwent corrective surgery for spinal deformity. OUTCOME MEASURES: Included measures were the Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22). Our primary outcome of interest was improvement by at least one MCID on the ODI and SRS-22 at 2 years after surgery. METHODS: As part of usual care, the VAS, ODI, and SRS-22 were collected pre-op and re-administered at 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. MCIDs were calculated using a distribution-based method. Determining significant predictors of MCID at two years was accomplished by Firth bias corrected logistic regression models. Significance of predictors was determined by Profile Likelihood Chi-square. We performed a Youden analysis to determine thresholds for the strongest pre-op predictors. RESULTS: At year two, 118 patients (83%) reached MCID for the SRS and 127 (75%) for the ODI. Lower pre-op SRS overall, lower pre-op SRS pain, and higher pre-op SRS function predicted a higher likelihood of reaching MCID on the overall SRS (p < 0.05). Higher pre-op ODI, lower SRS pain and self-image, and higher SRS overall predicted a higher likelihood of reaching MCID on the ODI (p < 0.05). An ODI threshold of 29 predicted reaching MCID with a sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 0.64 (AUC = 0.7813). An SRS threshold of 3.89 predicted reaching MCID with a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.68 (AUC = 0.8024). CONCLUSIONS: We identified useful thresholds for ODI and SRS-22 with acceptable predictive ability for improvement with surgery for ASD. Pre-op ODI, SRS, and multiple SRS subscores are predictive of meaningful improvement on the ODI and/or SRS at 2 years following corrective surgery for spinal deformity. These results highlight the usefulness of PROMs in pre-op shared decision-making.

Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients and their families are increasingly turning to the internet for medical information. Most of these patients believe the information to be accurate and reliable. However, the quality and accuracy of that information on the internet is variable and unregulated. Accurate and applicable information may align patients' expectations and improve satisfaction and overall outcomes. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the quality and accuracy of scoliosis-related information available on the internet. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. METHODS: Independent searches were conducted on the three most commonly accessed search engines (Google, Yahoo and Bing) using the keyword "scoliosis". The top 30 sites from each search engine were reviewed. Each website was categorized as per its authorship and sourcing. Each site was then evaluated for accuracy, readability and with quality-assurance markers such as Health on the Net code (HONcode), DISCERN, Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) systems. The accuracy of the website was assessed by two fellowship-trained spine specialists. Website accuracy was rated on a scale of 1-4 based on the level of agreement with the information presented. Websites with greater than 75% agreement were rated 4. Finally, the sites were evaluated with a validated website distraction index and assessed for mobile friendliness. RESULTS: 42 unique websites were analyzed. 31% of the sites were categorized as academic (13 academic, 9 healthcare system, 12 health news outlets and 8 unspecified) and had the highest rate of physician authorship (54%). Accuracy ranged from less than 25% to more than 75% were recorded with a mean accuracy of 3 signifying 50-75% agreement. Academic sites had the highest scoliosis specific accuracy score (P < 0.05). Overall, average readability was at a 12th grade reading level. More than 90% of the sites were mobile friendly. Approximately 71% of the websites did not have HONcode certification, although health news outlets had the highest rate of certification (67%). There was a significant effect of HONcode certification on DISCERN, JAMA, grade level and reading ease. On average, HONcode certified websites had lower grade level readability with greater reading ease and higher DISCERN and JAMA scores than un-certified sites (p < 0.05). On average, health news outlets had the highest DISCERN, JAMA, and reading ease scores and were written at the lowest grade reading level but had the highest level of distraction (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For the iGeneration and their care-givers, the internet remains the most popular source of health-related and medical information. Despite the wide number of sources available, the quality, accuracy, pertinence and intelligibility of the information remains highly variable. As clinicians, we should direct patients to verifiable sites with regulated information and, where possible, contribute high quality information to those sites.

Relationship Between Preoperative Plasma Fibrinogen Concentration, Perioperative Bleeding, and Transfusions in Elective Adult Spinal Deformity Correction.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate the relationship between preoperative (preop) fibrinogen, bleeding, and transfusion requirements in adult spinal deformity corrections. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Blood loss after major spinal reconstruction increases the risks and costs of surgery. Preoperative fibrinogen levels may predict intra- and postoperative blood loss. METHODS: Data were collected from clinic charts and hospital medical records of all 142 of a single surgeon's consecutive adult spine patients undergoing 7 or more levels deformity correction surgeries from January 2011 to December 2014. t tests were used to compare perioperative variables between patients with total blood loss in the upper quartile (≥1,000 mL) and the remaining patients. Similarly, patients receiving >2 units of packed red cells (PRCs) were compared with others. Analysis of variance was used to compare the blood loss between the patients' groups (quartiles) based on their preoperative fibrinogen concentration. RESULTS: Mean total blood loss was 847.9 (±543.6) mL. Overall, mean preoperative fibrinogen concentration was 254.8 (±82.9) mg/dL. Patients with lower fibrinogen concentration (<193 mg/dL) experienced significantly higher blood loss than those with higher concentrations (p < .05). Patients with transfusion >2 units PRC had significantly greater number of spinal levels treated, higher mean operative time, total blood loss and lower mean preoperative fibrinogen than those transfused 2 or fewer units PRC (p < .05). Total blood loss correlated significantly with preoperative fibrinogen concentration (r = -0.51, p < .05). All the thromboelastography (TEG) variables (G, K, and Angle) correlated significantly with preoperative fibrinogen (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort undergoing correction of adult spinal deformity, patients with preoperative fibrinogen level lower than 193 mg/dL had significantly higher bleeding than their counterparts. Perioperative transfusion requirements correlated moderately both with the blood loss and preoperative fibrinogen concentration. Incorporation of preoperative fibrinogen allows better prediction of total perioperative blood loss and may therefore guide the treatment team in use of ameliorating therapies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Should long-segment cervical fusions be routinely carried into the thoracic spine? A multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although recommendations for caudal "end level" in posterior cervical reconstruction remain highly variable, the benefits of routine extension of posterior cervical fusions into the thoracic spine remain unclear. PURPOSE: We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients in whom posterior fusions ended in the cervical spine versus those in whom the fusion was extended into the thoracic spine. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A multicenter retrospective analysis of prospectively followed patients was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 177 adult spine patients undergoing three or more levels of posterior cervical fusions for degenerative disease from January 2008 to May 2013 comprised the patient sample. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cervical lordosis, C2-C7 sagittal plumbline, T1 slope, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), rate of pseudarthrosis, length of hospital stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), and operating room [OR] time were the outcome measures. METHODS: We assembled a multicenter (four sites) radiographic and clinical database of patients who had undergone three or more levels of posterior cervical fusions for degenerative disease from January 2008 to May 2013 with at least 2 years of postoperative (post-op) follow-ups. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (fusion ending in the cervical spine) and group 2 (fusion extending into the thoracic spine). All radiographic measurements were performed by an independent experienced clinical researcher. RESULTS: Group 1 and Group 2 had 104 and 73 patients, respectively. Mean EBL for Group 2 was significantly higher than Group 1. Mean OR time and LOS were comparatively higher for Group 2 than Group 1 but were not statistically significant (p>.05). Mean cervical lordosis improved postoperatively in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in change or maintenance of mean cervical lordosis (2 weeks vs. 2 years post-op) between the two groups (p>.05). Similarly, the change in mean C2-C7 sagittal plumbline and T1 slope was not statistically significantly different between the two groups or with follow-up(p>.05). Clinically, significant improvements in VAS and ODI were noted in both groups from preop to final follow-up, but the difference between groups was not statistically significant. Although the rate of pseudarthrosis was significantly higher in Group 1 (21.2%) than in Group 2 (10.96%), there were no statistically significant differences in adjacent segment degeneration or revision surgery rates between the groups. CONCLUSION: Both groups had similar clinical and radiographic outcomes. Extension of a posterior cervical fusion into the thoracic spine leads to lower pseudarthrosis rate, whereas stopping in the cervical spine yields lower EBL, OR time, and LOS, demonstrating that there are different benefits for each approach. However, although the optimal end-level remains debatable, there are scenarios in which upper thoracic extension should be considered. At this point, we recommend extension of surgery in smokers and other patients at increased risk for pseudarthrosis as well as in patients with anatomical limitations to strong C7 bone anchorage.

Is Preoperative Fibrinogen Testing Associated With Total Blood Loss in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Correction?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate the potential association between preoperative fibrinogen, bleeding, and transfusion requirements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) corrections. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Blood loss after major spinal reconstruction increases the risks and costs of surgery. Preoperative fibrinogen levels may predict intra- and postoperative blood loss. METHODS: Data were collected from clinic charts and hospital medical records of all 110 of a single surgeon's consecutive AIS patients undergoing greater than three-level deformity correction surgeries from January 2011 to December 2013. Pearson test was used to investigate the correlation between bleeding and clinical variables, with level of significance set at α = 0.05. RESULTS: Mean total bleeding volume was 488 (±356) mL. Overall, mean preoperative fibrinogen concentration was 188.6 ± 32.8 mg/dL. Preoperative platelet counts, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) did not correlate significantly with preoperative fibrinogen concentration (p > .05). Both packed red cells (PRC) and packed red blood cells (PRBC) correlated significantly with preoperative fibrinogen (p < .05). The correlation between PRC and preoperative fibrinogen was -0.042. There was a negative correlation between PRBC and preoperative fibrinogen (r = -0.46). Overall mean thromboelastography (TEG) values were within normal range in both males and females and both had comparable TEG parameter values. All the TEG variables (G, K, and Angle) correlated significantly with preoperative fibrinogen (p < .05) but not with total blood volume (p > .05). The correlation coefficient between these TEG variables and preoperative fibrinogen were 0.51, 0.59, and 0.54, respectively. The total bleeding volume and % estimated blood volume correlated significantly with both PRC (r = 0.352, r = 0.376; p < .05) and PRBC (r = 0.621, r = 0.614; p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort undergoing correction of AIS, preoperative fibrinogen levels exhibited a significant negative logarithmic correlation with total blood loss. TEG variables also correlated significantly with preoperative fibrinogen levels. Efforts should be made to incorporate this measure in perioperative blood management program for AIS corrections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Instrumented fusion in a 12-month-old with atlanto-occipital dislocation: case report and literature review of infant occipitocervical fusion.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation in very young children is challenging and lacks a consensus management strategy. DISCUSSION: We review the literature on infantile occipitocervical (OC) fusion is appraised and technical considerations are organized for ease of reference. Surgical decisions such as graft type and instrumentation details are summarized, along with the use of bone morphogenic protein and post-operative orthoses. ILLUSTRATIVE CASE: We present the case of a 12-month-old who underwent instrumented occipitocervical (OC) fusion in the setting of traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD). CONCLUSION: Occipitocervical (OC) arthrodesis is obtainable in very young infants and children. Surgical approaches are variable and use a combination of autologous grafting and creative screw and/or wire constructs. The heterogeneity of pathologic etiology leading to OC fusion makes it difficult to make definitive recommendations for surgical management.

Lumbar Microdiscectomy.

In most patients, the radiculopathy associated with lumbar disc herniation resolves nonoperatively. For patients in whom nonsurgical management has failed, microdiscectomy can be considered. Today, an operating microscope is preferred because of the collinear light and magnification offered. Alternatively, loupes and a headlight may be employed. The major steps of the procedure are (1) making a 2-cm vertical incision and then developing the corridor to the lamina subperiosteally or by using serial dilation techniques; (2) confirming the level of surgery radiographically prior to incision and once the lamina has been reached and then detaching the lateral attachments of the flavum; (3) making a small laminotomy, resecting any superior facet osteophytes, then mobilizing the compressed traversing nerve root, and, in some cases, making a small annulotomy; and (4) removing loose disc fragments and performing wound closure. Most outcomes reports after microdiscectomy have been favorable for radicular symptoms. Associated back pain typically decreased as well. Common complications include recurrent disc herniation or disc herniation at another level, wound infections, and durotomy with spinal headache.

Posterior cervical laminoplasty in the North American Population: A minimum of two year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of expansile cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy has been validated in the literature. To date, however, the majority of large, long-term data in the literature have originated in Japan. Few studies have originated from North America that include follow up greater than one year, and none of these includes a single surgeon's experience. This paper presents the retrospective results of a single surgeon with an average follow up of 47 months in a large population of North American patients. METHODS: A single surgeon's series of 80 consecutive patients who underwent expansile open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy was reviewed. The severity of disability was graded using the Nurick Functional Disability Score and the Miami Upper Extremity Function (MUEF) score. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, six months postoperatively, and at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively. All examinations were performed by a single physician. MRI scans of the cervical spine were obtained at four months postoperatively in all patients. Radiographs were used to evaluate postoperative lordosis. RESULTS: Average length of follow up was 47 months. Nurick scores improved from an average of 2.3 preoperatively to postoperative scores of 1.5 (p>.05) at six months and 1.4 (p>.05) at two years. MUEF scores also improved at both the six month and two year intervals. All patients had improved canal diameter on post-operative MRI scan evaluation obtained four months post-operatively. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that laminoplasty is a safe and effective treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in the North American population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case Series Level IV.

Feasibility of rigid upper cervical instrumentation in children: tomographic analysis of children aged 2-6.

STUDY DESIGN: Tomographic analysis of occipitocervical (OC) instability in children aged between 2 and 6 years. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of screw placement in various bone anchors in the OC region in young children. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of rigid stabilization in the pediatric patients is gradually increasing. No study has comprehensively assessed the suitability of bony anatomy of the OC region for screw placement, especially in younger children. METHODS: A total of 50 patients (2-6 y, 10 each) who underwent skull and cervical CT scanning were randomly queried using an x-ray database. Screw placement was considered feasible if there was at least 0.5 mm of bone around a 3.5 mm screw through its trajectory. When the bony channel measured 3.5-4.0 mm, placement was considered possible, but difficult. RESULTS: Statistically, most measures were similar from the right to left sides. External occipital protuberance thickness increased from a mean value of 8.60 mm to a mean value of 10.73 mm. The mean C1 lateral mass length and width varied from 15.26 to 16.67 mm (P=0.056) and 7.34 to 8.58 mm (P=0.0005), respectively, with age. The mean C2 pedicle width and length varied from 3.85 to 4.18 and 17.11 to 19.8 mm, respectively, with age. The mean C2 laminar screw length increased from 20.4 to 22.66 mm with age (P<0.001). C2 lamina widths did not vary much by age. The mean C1-C2 transarticular path length and height increased from 26.7 to 33.6 mm and 2.58 to 3.09 mm, respectively, with age. The width was less directly variable by age (2.68-3.09 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Standard 3.5 mm screws can be used for OC and upper cervical instabilities in children aged between 2 and 6 years. Some anchor points appeared safer compared with others. The occipital keel, C1 lateral mass, and C2 laminae offered adequate space for screw placement in almost all cases. C2 pedicles offered adequate space in 49 sides and barely adequate space in 25 pedicles. Transarticular screws could be safely placed in only 4 of 100 sides. Close radiographic assessment of the vertebral artery course and bony architecture are recommended before surgery in pediatric patients with OC and upper cervical instability.

Cervical stenosis in adults undergoing thoracolumbar deformity surgery: incidence, treatment, and complications: clinical article.

OBJECT: The goals of this study were to determine the incidence of occult cervical stenosis in patients over 50 years old with thoracolumbar deformity and to assess the risk of progressive cervical myelopathy after complex thoracolumbar reconstruction in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with cervical stenosis. METHODS: Charts and cervical imaging for patients who were over 50 years old when they had undergone thoracolumbar deformity surgery between 2005 and 2008 were reviewed. Patients with primary neurological disorders were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (56 women and 17 men) met the study inclusion criteria. The minimum follow-up time was 2 years. Fifty-eight percent of patients (42 of 73) had cervical stenosis on advanced imaging. Thirty-three patients had mild or moderate stenosis; only 3 of these patients had clinical myelopathy. Nine patients (12%) had critical cervical stenosis, as determined from imaging; among these patients, 3 had moderate or severe myelopathy. Patients with noncritical stenosis and no or mild myelopathy underwent thoracolumbar reconstruction without any postoperative progression of myelopathy. Patients with critical stenosis and/or moderate or severe myelopathy were offered cervical decompression prior to thoracolumbar reconstruction; those who accepted this offer did not have progression of myelopathy. One patient underwent thoracolumbar reconstruction first despite critical cervical stenosis. At 20 months, her cervical myelopathy had progressed, and she ultimately required cervical decompression. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical stenosis, even critical stenosis in some cases, was seen in more than one-half of the patients. Most presented without obvious cervical complaints. In those with mild to moderate stenosis and no or mild myelopathy, lengthy thoracolumbar reconstruction procedures were not associated with progression of the myelopathy. The authors recommend that all adults with thoracolumbar deformity undergo a detailed upper- and lower-extremity neurological examination prior to major thoracolumbar reconstruction.

Anterior Dual Rod Versus Posterior Pedicle Fixation Surgery for the Surgical Treatment in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Multicenter, Matched Case Analysis of 42 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter matched case analysis. OBJECTIVE: Compare patients with Lenke 5C scoliosis surgically treated with anterior spinal fusion with dual rod instrumentation and anterior column support versus posterior release and pedicle screw instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment of single, structural, lumbar and thoracolumbar curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been the subject of some debate. Previous papers directly comparing these approaches are problematic because of heterogeneity of the groups, nonrandomized protocols, and surgeon bias and variation of instrumentation (upper instrumented vertebrae and lower instrumented vertebrae) in relation to the defined Cobb angle (upper end vertebra and lower end vertebrae). This report sought to remedy these flaws by analyzing a database of Lenke 5C AIS and performing matched cases. METHODS: We analyzed 96 patients with Lenke 5C AIS curves based on radiographic and clinical data at 3 institutions, surgically treated between 2001 and 2005 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Case matched criteria (age within 1 year, sex, curve within 5°, lower end vertebrae, and lower instrumented vertebrae) yielded 21 matched patient pairs. We evaluated and compared multiple clinical and radiographic parameters. RESULTS: We observed no significant statistical differences between groups in any preoperative clinical or radiographic parameters. At final follow-up, the major curve measured 8° (83%) in the posterior spinal fusion group, compared with 13° (72%) in the anterior spinal fusion group (p = .002). Estimated blood loss was similar in both groups. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the posterior spinal fusion group. There were no differences in radiographic complications, such as proximal junctional kyphosis. CONCLUSIONS: At a minimum of 2 years' follow-up in a multicenter, matched case analysis, adolescents with Lenke 5C curves demonstrated statistically significantly better curve correction and shorter hospital stays when treated with a posterior release with pedicle screw instrumented fusion compared with an anterior instrumented fusion with dual rods for similar patient populations.

Epidural hematoma and intraoperative hemorrhage in a spine trauma patient on Pradaxa (dabigatran).

STUDY DESIGN: The authors present a case report of a 72-year-old man who presented with back pain and lower extremity weakness after a fall from his roof. OBJECTIVE: Use of dabigatran (Pradaxa), a new oral anticoagulant, is rapidly increasing. Spine specialists should aware of this medication's place for the management of patients with spine pathology. In particular, we intend to report on the emergent treatment of a patient with spinal trauma and epidural hematoma with cord compression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Dabigatran (Pradaxa) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration to decrease stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Unlike warfarin, dabigatran does not require international normalized ratio monitoring. On the contrary, it is difficult to reverse in patients requiring emergent surgical intervention. METHODS.: This is a retrospective review of a patient treated at our institution. RESULTS: The patient presented with burst fractures at the T7 and T12 levels. Cord compression was noted at both levels, and was worse at T12. Canal stenosis resulted from both retropulsed bone and epidural hematoma. The patient exhibited bilateral lower extremity numbness and weakness, ASIA C. The patient was taken urgently to the operating room for cord decompression and planned operative stabilization. The treating team used a number of recommended "reversal" agents with little effect on the severe intraoperative hemorrhage. Failure to control the bleeding required interruption of the procedure after the canal decompression. The patient was taken back to the operating room 7 days later for an instrumented posterior spinal fusion. CONCLUSION: As dabigatran (Pradaxa) has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration, many spine specialists are not familiar with this agent. Many of the reversal agents (e.g., vitamin K and protamine), useful for other classes of anticoagulants, have no impact on Pradaxa. Similarly, prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin times have limited utility in estimating the patient's true clotting status. The purpose of this case report is to alert spine specialists to this drug and its implications on spine care. The drug's pharmacokinetics, clinical assessment of clotting status, and reversal options are discussed.

Comparison of surgical treatment in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior dual rod versus posterior pedicle fixation surgery: a comparison of two practices.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter analysis of 2 groups of patients surgically treated for Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVE: Compare patients with Lenke 5C scoliosis surgically treated with anterior spinal fusion with dual rod instrumentation and anterior column support with patients surgically treated with posterior release and pedicle screw instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment of single, structural, lumbar, and thoracolumbar curves in patients with AIS has been the subject of some debate. Advocates of the anterior approach assert that their technique spares posterior musculature and may save distal fusion levels, and that with dual rods and anterior column support the issues with nonunion and kyphosis have been obviated. Advocates of the posterior approach assert that with the change to posterior pedicle screw based instrumentation that correction and levels are equivalent, and the posterior approach avoids the issues with nonunion and kyphosis. This report directly compares the results of posterior versus anterior instrumented fusions in the operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic Lenke 5C curves. METHODS: We analyzed 62 patients with Lenke 5C based on radiographic and clinical data at 2 institutions: 31 patients treated with posterior, pedicle-screw instrumented fusions at 1 institution (group PSF); and 31 patients with anterior, dual-rod instrumented fusions at another institution (group ASF). Multiple clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The mean age, preoperative major curve magnitude, and preoperative lowest instrumented vertebral (LIV) tilt were similar in both groups (age: PSF = 15.5 years, ASF = 15.6 years; curve size: PSF = 50.3 degrees +/- 7.0 degrees , ASF = 49.0 degrees +/- 6.6 degrees ; LIV tilt: PSF = 27.5 degrees +/- 6.5 degrees , ASF = 27.8 degrees +/- 6.2 degrees ). After surgery, the major curve corrected to an average of 6.3 degrees +/- 3.2 degrees (87.6% +/- 5.8%) in the PSF group, compared with 12.1 degrees +/- 7.4 degrees (75.7% +/- 14.8%) in the ASF group (P < 0.01). At final follow-up, the major curve measured 8.0 degrees +/- 3.0 degrees (84.2% +/- 5.8% correction) in the PSF group, compared with 15.9 degrees +/- 9.0 degrees (66.6% +/- 17.9%) in the ASF group (P = 0.01). This represented a loss of correction of 1.7 degrees +/- 1.9 degrees (3.4% +/- 3.7%) in the PSF group, and 3.8 degrees +/- 4.2 degrees (9.4% +/- 10.7%) in the ASF group (P = 0.028). The LIV tilt decreased to 4.1 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees after surgery in the PSF group, and 4.5 degrees +/- 3.7 degrees in the ASF group. At final follow-up, the LIV tilt was 5.1 degrees +/- 3.5 degrees in the PSF group, and 4.5 degrees +/- 3.7 degrees in the ASF group. EBL was identical in both groups, and length of hospital stay was significantly (P < 0.01) shorter in the PSF group (4.8 vs. 6.1 days). There were no complications in either group which extended hospital stay or required an unplanned second surgery. CONCLUSION: At a minimum of 2-year follow-up, adolescents with Lenke 5C curves demonstrated statistically significantly better curve correction, less loss of correction over time, and shorter hospital stays when treated with a posterior release with pedicle screw instrumented fusion compared with an anterior instrumented fusion with dual rods for similar patient populations.