Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 171(5): 1108-15, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24909920

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema (HE) is a common occupational skin disease. Tobacco smoking is known to be associated with adverse cutaneous effects. However, its influence on the prognosis of occupational HE has not yet been studied. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate relations between smoking status, severity and prognosis of occupational HE in patients taking part in an interdisciplinary tertiary individual prevention programme (TIP). METHODS: In a prospective, multicentre, cohort study 1608 patients with occupational HE taking part in a TIP were recruited and followed up for 3 years. The clinical and self-reported outcome data of smokers and nonsmokers were compared. RESULTS: Nonsmokers and smokers were equally distributed. During the TIP, the average self-reported daily cigarette consumption and the severity of HE decreased significantly (P < 0·01). However, at all time points HE was significantly more severe in smokers than in nonsmokers. This association was not dependent on the self-reported number of cigarettes smoked daily. Smokers had significantly more days of absence from work due to occupational HE than nonsmokers in the year before the TIP (P < 0·01) and in the following year (P = 0·02). After the TIP, smokers reported significantly more often that they had to give up their occupation (P = 0·02) than nonsmokers. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of occupational HE is increased in smokers. Tobacco smoking is associated with a higher number of days of absence from work and with not staying in the workforce owing to occupational HE. Thus, smoking confers a worse prognosis and interferes with the outcome of prevention programmes.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Eczema/etiology , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Smoking/adverse effects , Absenteeism , Administration, Cutaneous , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adult , Dermatitis, Occupational/drug therapy , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Eczema/drug therapy , Female , Hand Dermatoses/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Tobacco Products/statistics & numerical data
2.
Skin Res Technol ; 20(2): 239-45, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24003846

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Skin cleansers for occupational use are manufactured for different types and degrees of soiling without common, legally binding requirements for product testing. This leads to different, manufacturer-specific test methods and a lack of comparable information on skin cleansing products. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this investigation was to validate a newly developed standardized automated cleansing device (ACiD) for in vivo evaluation of industrial skin cleansers. METHODS: Two ACiD were tested regarding the intra- and inter-device specific reproducibility of test results. RESULTS: Skin cleansing process carried out by the three independent washing modules which constitute an ACiD-unit and two separate ACiD-units led to highly comparable results. There was no significant difference between the washing modules or between the two separate ACiD-units detected. Only different parameter settings resulted in significantly different detergency. CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and inter-device specific test results of an in vivo model of skin cleansing using the automated cleansing device (ACiD) were reproducible. The long-term aim is a standardized classification of occupational skin cleansing products comparing their skin cleansing effectiveness in relation to their skin irritancy. This might then provide the basis for a rational specific product selection by consumers and may be used as a tool for future product development by manufacturers.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Contact/etiology , Detergents/adverse effects , Hair/drug effects , Skin Tests/instrumentation , Skin Tests/standards , Technology, Pharmaceutical/instrumentation , Adult , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Germany , Guidelines as Topic , Hair/chemistry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Robotics/instrumentation , Robotics/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Technology, Pharmaceutical/standards
3.
Skin Res Technol ; 20(2): 228-38, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24138130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To date, there are no legally binding requirements concerning product testing in cosmetics. This leads to various manufacturer-specific test methods and absent transparent information on skin cleansing products. A standardized in vivo test procedure for assessment of cleansing efficacy and corresponding barrier impairment by the cleaning process is needed, especially in the occupational context where repeated hand washing procedures may be performed at short intervals. METHODS: For the standardization of the cleansing procedure, an Automated Cleansing Device (ACiD) was designed and evaluated. Different smooth washing surfaces of the equipment for ACiD (incl. goat hair, felt, felt covered with nitrile caps) were evaluated regarding their skin compatibility. RESULTS: ACiD allows an automated, fully standardized skin washing procedure. Felt covered with nitrile as washing surface of the rotating washing units leads to a homogenous cleansing result and does not cause detectable skin irritation, neither clinically nor as assessed by skin bioengineering methods (transepidermal water loss, chromametry). CONCLUSIONS: Automated Cleansing Device may be useful for standardized evaluation of the cleansing effectiveness and parallel assessment of the corresponding irritancy potential of industrial skin cleansers. This will allow objectifying efficacy and safety of industrial skin cleansers, thus enabling market transparency and facilitating rational choice of products.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics/chemistry , Detergents/chemistry , Hair/drug effects , Skin Tests/instrumentation , Skin Tests/standards , Technology, Pharmaceutical/instrumentation , Technology, Pharmaceutical/standards , Animals , Cosmetics/administration & dosage , Cosmetics/analysis , Detergents/analysis , Detergents/pharmacology , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Germany , Goats , Guidelines as Topic , Hair/chemistry , Robotics/instrumentation , Robotics/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...