Prepregnancy Risk Factors for Preterm Birth and the Role of Maternal Nativity in a Low-Income, Hispanic Population.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess potential prepregnancy risk factors for preterm birth in a low-income, Hispanic population in Southern California. Additionally, the study assessed whether the prevalence of preterm birth and any associations between risk factors and preterm birth differed between U.S.- and foreign-born mothers. METHODS: The study sample included 1174 mothers participating in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) within 1 year postpartum, including an augment sample of mothers who delivered preterm. Maternal sociodemographic traits, prepregnancy health-related characteristics and behaviors, and birth outcomes were collected by telephone survey. Odds ratios for associations between risk factors and preterm birth were estimated by logistic regression with sampling weights. Effect measure modification of any association by maternal nativity was also assessed using interaction terms. RESULTS: After adjustment for confounding, significant prepregnancy risk factors for preterm birth included maternal age ≥35 years (OR 2.00; 95 % CI 1.04, 3.84) compared to age 18-24 years, and experience of a financially stressful life event among U.S.-born, but not foreign-born, women (OR 2.61; 95 % CI 1.43, 4.77). The weighted prevalence of preterm birth was 15.1 % and did not significantly differ by maternal nativity (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Further investigation with large, prospective studies is needed to better understand the risk factors for and disparities in preterm birth among the growing Hispanic population in the U.S. so that women who are at risk prepregnancy can be identified and provided risk-specific services.

The effectiveness of assessment and referral on immunization coverage in the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children.

BACKGROUND: The use of immunization assessment and referral (A/R) in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) has been shown to produce dramatic improvements in vaccination coverage when coupled with parental incentive; however, data are lacking to support the use of A/R alone. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of A/R in increasing immunization coverage among WIC participants. DESIGN: Participating WIC centers were assigned to1 of 3 interventions that delivered A/R of varying frequency or a control group. SETTING: Twenty of the largest Public Health Foundation Enterprises-WIC centers in Los Angeles County. PARTICIPANTS: Children continuously enrolled in participating WIC centers from 6 to 24 months of age. INTERVENTION: Assessment of child's vaccination status followed by referral to a health care provider for those lacking indicated vaccinations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Up-to-date (UTD) status at 24 months of age for all recommended vaccines. RESULTS: Baseline coverage rates were similar among all study sites (overall, 77% UTD). After the study period, compared with the controls (88% UTD), we found no differences in immunization coverage among WIC centers that administered A/R at every visit (every 2 months) to all children (90% UTD; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.94), every 6 months to all children (89% UTD; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.62-1.56), or every visit to children found to be behind at 8 months of age (89% UTD; OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.48-1.68). CONCLUSION: In this urban population of WIC children with high baseline immunization coverage, A/R was not effective in increasing immunization coverage.