Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Fungi (Basel) ; 1(2): 277-292, 2015 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29376912

ABSTRACT

Candida glabrata is mostly good, but, at times, it is an opportunistic pathogen. Previously known as Torulopsis glabrata, it enjoyed a good reputation and was even present in starter cultures. Its haploid genome and lack of mating made it an attractive challenge for yeast genetics studies. However, more recently it has become better known due to its character as an emerging cause of candidiasis, and for its resistance to multidrugs that are employed for candidiasis treatment. While now classified as Candida glabrata, it is still not a good fit and tends to stand alone as a very unique yeast. In terms of sequence, it is dissimilar to other Candida yeast and most similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 30(9): 2034-8, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22795414

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 5% of all US emergency department (ED) visits are for chest pain, and coagulation testing is frequently utilized as part of the ED evaluation. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of routine coagulation testing of patients with chest pain in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients evaluated for chest pain in a community ED between August 1, 2010, and October 31, 2010. Charts were reviewed to determine the number and results of coagulation studies ordered, the number of coagulation studies that were appropriately ordered, and the number of patients requiring a therapeutic intervention or change in clinical plan (withholding of antiplatelet/anticoagulant, delayed procedure, or treatment with fresh frozen plasma or vitamin K) based on an unexpected coagulopathy. We considered it appropriate to order coagulation studies on patients with cirrhosis, known/suspected coagulopathy, active bleeding, use of warfarin, or ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Of the 740 patients included, 406 (55%) had coagulation studies ordered. Of those 406, 327 (81%) patients with coagulation studies ordered had no indications for testing. One of the 327 patients (0.31%; 95% confidence interval, 0.05%-1.7%) tested without indication had a clinically significant coagulopathy (internationalized normalization ratio >1.5, partial thromboplastin time >50 seconds), but none (0%; 95% confidence interval, 0%-1.2%) of the patients with coagulation testing performed without indication required a therapeutic intervention or change in clinical plan. The cost of coagulation testing in these 327 patients was $16780. CONCLUSIONS: Coagulation testing on chest pain patients in the ED is not cost-effective and should not be routinely performed.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Tests/economics , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Chest Pain/blood , Chest Pain/etiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , International Normalized Ratio/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Partial Thromboplastin Time/economics , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...