Daclizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody to the interleukin 2 receptor (CD25), for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, dose ranging trial.

BACKGROUND: An uncontrolled pilot study demonstrated that daclizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody to the interleukin 2 receptor (CD25), might be effective for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of daclizumab induction therapy in patients with active ulcerative colitis. A total of 159 patients with moderate ulcerative colitis were randomised to receive induction therapy with daclizumab 1 mg/kg intravenously at weeks 0 and 4, or 2 mg/kg intravenously at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6, or placebo. The primary end point was induction of remission at week 8. Remission was defined as a Mayo score of 0 on both endoscopy and rectal bleeding components and a score of 0 or 1 on stool frequency and physician's global assessment components. Response was defined as a decrease from baseline in the Mayo score of at least 3 points. RESULTS: Two per cent of patients receiving daclizumab 1 mg/kg (p = 0.11 v placebo) and 7% of patients receiving 2 mg/kg (p = 0.73) were in remission at week 8, compared with 10% of those who received placebo. Response occurred at week 8 in 25% of patients receiving daclizumab 1 mg/kg (p = 0.04) and in 33% of patients receiving 2 mg/kg (p = 0.30) versus 44% of those receiving placebo. Daclizumab was well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events in daclizumab treated patients compared with placebo treated patients were nasopharyngitis (14.6%) and pyrexia (10.7%). CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate ulcerative colitis who are treated with daclizumab are not more likely to be in remission or response at eight weeks than patients treated with placebo.

Effects of a motilin receptor agonist (ABT-229) on upper gastrointestinal symptoms in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Erythromycin, a motilin agonist, is a potent prokinetic. ABT-229 is a specific motilin agonist that dose dependently accelerates gastric emptying. Dyspepsia and gastroparesis are common problems in type 1 diabetes mellitus. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ABT-229 in symptomatic diabetic patients with and without delayed gastric emptying. METHODS: Patients with type 1 diabetes and postprandial symptoms were randomised (n=270). Based on a validated C(13) octanoic acid breath test, patients were assigned to either the delayed or normal gastric emptying strata. Patients received one of four doses of ABT-229 (1.25, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg twice daily before breakfast and dinner) or placebo for four weeks following a two week baseline. A self report questionnaire measured symptoms on visual analogue scales; the primary outcome was assessment of change in the total upper abdominal symptom severity score (range 0-800 mm) from baseline to the final visit. RESULTS: The treatment arms were similar regarding baseline characteristics. There was symptom improvement on placebo and a similar level of improvement on active therapy for the upper abdominal discomfort severity score (mean change from baseline -169, -101, -155, -143, and -138 mm for placebo, and 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg ABT-229, respectively, at four weeks by intent to treat). The results were not significantly different in those with and without delayed gastric emptying. The severity of bloating, postprandial nausea, epigastric discomfort, heartburn, and acid regurgitation worsened dose dependently in a greater number of patients receiving ABT-229 than placebo. Overall, 63% of patients on placebo reported a good or excellent global response, and this was not different from the active treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The motilin agonist ABT-229 was not efficacious in the relief of postprandial symptoms in diabetes mellitus in the presence or absence of delayed gastric emptying.

Prevention of pancreatitis in patients with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis: a prospective nonblinded randomized study using endoscopic stents.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Currently there is no available therapy to prevent attacks of acute pancreatitis in patients with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis (IRP). This randomized, nonblinded prospective, controlled trial was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stents in preventing attacks of pancreatitis in IRP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 5-year period 34 patients met the diagnostic criteria for IRP. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups; 19 patients (14 women, 5 men, mean age 44) to the pancreatic stent group; and 15 patients (10 women, five men, mean age 47) to the control group. The stent group received three stents over a period of 1 year and the control group had selective pancreatograms but no stent. Mean follow-up was 33 months (range 13-77) and 35 months (range 10-78) in the stent and control groups, respectively. Episodes of pancreatitis, frequency and intensity of pain requiring emergency room visits, and hospitalizations were recorded. RESULTS: Recurrence of pancreatitis occurred in eight out of 15 patients (53%) in the control group, but in only two our of 19 patients (11%) in the stent group (P<0.02). Two patients in the control group who had recurrences of pancreatitis crossed over to stent therapy and had no further pancreatitis thereafter. Six patients each, 32% and 40% in the stent and control groups respectively, continued to have pancreatic type pain. In the study period 17 stents were occluded and 14 migrated out. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that pancreatic duct stenting may prevent recurrent attacks of pancreatitis in IRP patients. Intermittent pancreatic duct sphincter dysfunction or relative outlet obstruction may be the underlying cause for the recurrent attacks of pancreatitis.

Clinical presentation and short-term outcome of endoscopic therapy of patients with symptomatic incomplete pancreas divisum.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of incomplete pancreas divisum (IPD) has not been fully described. In this study we report the clinical presentation and results of endoscopic treatment of the 32 (0.6%) patients with IPD seen at our center over a 10-year period. METHODS: The study population consisted of 24 women and 8 men (mean age 42 years, range 13 to 82 years). Ten (31%) patients presented with acute recurrent pancreatitis, 5 (16%) with chronic pancreatitis, and 3 (9%) with pancreatic type pain. Detailed history, laboratory tests, US, CT, and ERCP excluded other etiologies for their symptoms. The remaining 14 (44%) presented with biliary problems. The 18 symptomatic patients with IPD were treated as follows: 8 received dorsal duct stents, 3 underwent minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy and dorsal duct stent placement, 4 had minor papilla dilatation only, and 3 had ventral duct stents placed. RESULTS: Patients were then followed for recurrence of pancreatitis and pancreatic-type pain. Mean follow-up was 15.5 months (range 3 to 30 months). Six (60%) of the patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis and 4 (80%) with chronic pancreatitis benefitted from the endoscopic therapy. However, only 1 (33%) of the patients with pancreatic-type pain benefitted. CONCLUSION: The clinical presentation and response to endoscopic therapy of patients with ICP appeared to be similar to that of patients with complete pancreas divisum.

The role of surveillance endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in preventing episodic cholangitis in patients with recurrent common bile duct stones.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Approximately 2-7% of patients who have undergone previous removal of bile duct stones have recurrence often presenting as ascending cholangitis. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence, clinical presentation, and objective findings in this group of patients. Additionally, the effect of surveillance endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in preventing cholangitis, was studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two thousand and ninety-six patients who underwent ERCP for cholelithiasis were studied with 45 of these patients being identified as having recurrent common bile duct stones. Of the 45, 13 had two or more recurrences without having any obvious predisposing factors. The mean age of the 13 patients was 57 years. The characteristics of 13 patients were reviewed, including sphincterotomy size, liver function tests, and contrast drainage time. RESULTS: All 13 patients with recurrent stones presented with ascending cholangitis. Stones were found to be soft, brown and accompanied by a large amount of sludge. The common bile duct in all 13 patients was noted to be dilated and had notable, widely patent sphincterotomes. There was significant delayed drainage in 77% of these patients. Yearly surveillance ERCPs were performed in the 13 patients, the incidence of acute cholangitis episodes per patient decreased from 2 to 0.6 with a four-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: In a subgroup of patients with multiple common bile duct stone recurrences, annual surveillance ERCP with stone removal decreases the incidence of recurrent episodes of ascending cholangitis as well as its associated morbidity and mortality.

Endoscopic therapy for benign bile duct strictures.

Endoscopic therapy was attempted in 25 patients with benign strictures of the bile duct. In 23 patients, treatment involved endoscopic balloon dilation of the stricture zone or balloon dilation plus endoprosthesis placement. In 22 of 25 patients (88%), there was benefit from the endoscopic treatment. In 20 of 23 patients, there was significant radiographic improvement (p less than 0.001) in the diameter of their stricture following endoscopic therapy. All patients with elevated liver enzymes demonstrated rapid improvement following treatment. There was no significant morbidity or mortality associated with endoscopic treatment of benign biliary tract strictures. Follow-up study (mean, 4 +/- 0.3 years) discloses no recurrence of symptoms or elevated enzymes indicative of recurrent strictures. The treatment of benign bile duct strictures by a combination therapy of balloon dilation and stent placement provides a safe and effective treatment modality and an alternative to operative intervention.