Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vision Res ; 40(15): 2025-36, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10828469

ABSTRACT

We investigated the extent to which motion repulsion and binocular motion rivalry depend on the distance between moving elements. The stimuli consisted of two sets of spatially intermingled, finite-life random dots that moved across each other. The distance between the dots moving in different directions was manipulated by spatially pairing the dot trajectories with various precisions. Data from experiment 1 indicated that motion repulsion occurred reliably only when the average distance between orthogonally moving elements was at least 21.0 arc min. When the dots were precisely paired, a single global direction intermediate to the two actual directions was perceived. This result suggests that, at a relatively small spatial scale, interaction between different directions favors motion attraction or coherence, while interaction at a somewhat larger scale generates motion repulsion. Similarly, data from experiment 2 indicated that binocular motion rivalry was significantly diminished by spatially pairing the dots, which moved in opposite directions in the two eyes. This supports the recent proposal that rivalry occurs at or after the stage of binocular convergence, since monocular cells could not have directly responded to our interocular pairing manipulation. Together, these findings suggest that the neural mechanisms underlying motion perception are highly sensitive to the fine spatial relationship between moving elements.


Subject(s)
Distance Perception/physiology , Motion Perception/physiology , Convergence, Ocular/physiology , Humans , Vision, Binocular/physiology
2.
Vision Res ; 39(22): 3692-701, 1999 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10746139

ABSTRACT

Two experiments were conducted to determine the extent to which perceptual learning transfers between orientation and direction discrimination. Naive observers were trained to discriminate orientation differences between two single-line stimuli, and direction differences between two single-moving-dot stimuli. In the first experiment, observers practiced the orientation and direction tasks along orthogonal axes in the fronto-parallel plane. In the second experiment, a different group of observers practiced both tasks along a single axis. Perceptual learning was observed on both tasks in both experiments. Under the same-axis condition, the observers' orientation sensitivity was found to be significantly elevated after the direction training, indicating a transfer of learning from direction to orientation. There was no evidence of transfer in any other cases tested. In addition, the rate of learning on the orientation task was much higher than the rate on the direction task. The implications of these findings on the neural mechanisms subserving orientation and direction discrimination are discussed.


Subject(s)
Learning , Visual Perception , Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Humans , Space Perception/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology
3.
Vision Res ; 38(9): 1223-31, 1998 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9666990

ABSTRACT

We recently reported a new motion illusion where dots in expanding random dot patterns appear to move faster than those in rotation patterns despite having the same physical speed distributions. In the current paper, we compared expansion and rotation motion to translational motion and found that the perceived dot speed in translation patterns was between that of expansion and rotation. We also explored contraction motion and found subjects perceived dots in contracting patterns as moving slightly faster than those in expanding patterns and much faster than those in rotating patterns. Finally, we found that stimulus presentation order in a trial plays an important role in determining the magnitude of the speed illusion--the effect is greater when the subjectively faster stimulus is viewed second (e.g., expansion after rotation). The dependence on stimulus order is greatest when comparing complex motion patterns with large subjective speed differences. This phenomenon is unlikely to be explained in terms of channel fatigue or adaptation.


Subject(s)
Motion Perception/physiology , Optical Illusions/physiology , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Humans , Psychometrics , Psychophysics , Rotation , Time Factors
4.
Cereb Cortex ; 7(8): 749-57, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9408039

ABSTRACT

The superior temporal sulcus (STS) of the macaque monkey contains multiple visual areas. Many neurons within these regions respond selectively to motion direction and to more complex motion patterns, such as expansion, contraction and rotation. Single-unit recording and optical recording studies in MT/MST suggest that cells with similar tuning properties are clustered into columns extending through multiple cortical layers. In this study, we used a double-label 2-deoxyglucose technique in awake, behaving macaque monkeys to clarify this functional organization. This technique allowed us to label, in a single animal, two populations of neurons responding to two different visual stimuli. In one monkey we compared expansion with contraction; in a second monkey we compared expansion with clockwise rotation. Within the STS we found a patchy arrangement of cortical columns with alternating stimulus selectivity: columns of neurons preferring expansion versus contraction were more widely separated than those selective for expansion versus rotation. This mosaic of interdigitating columns on the floor and posterior bank of the STS included area MT and some neighboring regions of cortex, perhaps including area MST.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Deoxyglucose/pharmacokinetics , Eye Movements/physiology , Motion Perception/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Temporal Lobe/physiology , Animals , Autoradiography , Carbon Radioisotopes , Macaca mulatta , Male , Rotation , Tritium
5.
Vision Res ; 36(20): 3281-92, 1996 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8944287

ABSTRACT

Using random dot stimuli well controlled for dot speed, we found that the moving features in expanding patterns appear to move faster than those in rotating patterns. The illusion is well correlated with the strength of the global motion signal. For example, in displays where the number of motion directions defining the patterns is reduced, the magnitude of the illusion decreases. Similarly, the strength of the effect diminishes as dot density is reduced. In patterns where only wedge-shaped segments of the stimuli are left exposed, the difference in perceived speed increases with the angular size of the wedge. Stimulus placement relative to the fixation point has little effect on the persistence of this phenomenon-expansion patterns appear to contain elements of greater speed, independent of stimulus eccentricity. These results argue against a local explanation for this perceptual illusion, suggesting that the global motion pattern of the stimulus, per se, is responsible.


Subject(s)
Motion Perception/physiology , Optical Illusions/physiology , Humans , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Psychophysics , Rotation , Time Factors
6.
J Neurosci ; 16(15): 4716-32, 1996 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8764659

ABSTRACT

Several groups have proposed that area MSTd of the macaque monkey has a role in processing optical flow information used in the analysis of self motion, based on its neurons' selectivity for large-field motion patterns such as expansion, contraction, and rotation. It has also been suggested that this cortical region may be important in analyzing the complex motions of objects. More generally, MSTd could be involved in the generic function of complex motion pattern representation, with its cells responsible for integrating local motion signals sent forward from area MT into a more unified representation. If MSTd is extracting generic motion pattern signals, it would be important that the preferred tuning of MSTd neurons not depend on the particular features and cues that allow these motions to be represented. To test this idea, we examined the diversity of stimulus features and cues over which MSTd cells can extract information about motion patterns such as expansion, contraction, rotation, and spirals. The different classes of stimuli included: coherently moving random dot patterns, solid squares, outlines of squares, a square aperture moving in front of an underlying stationary pattern of random dots, a square composed entirely of flicker, and a square of nonFourier motion. When a unit was tuned with respect to motion pattern producing the most vigorous response in a neuron was nearly the same for each class. Although preferred tuning was invariant, the magnitude and width of the tuning curves often varied between classes. Thus, MSTd is form/cue invariant for complex motions, making it an appropriate candidate for analysis of object motion as well as motion introduced by observer translation.


Subject(s)
Motion , Visual Cortex/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology , Animals , Cues , Macaca mulatta , Photic Stimulation , Visual Pathways/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...