Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Sleep Med ; 121: 210-218, 2024 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004011

ABSTRACT

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are associated with sleep difficulties in breast cancer (BC) patients. Sleep is known to favor memory consolidation through the occurrence of specific oscillations, i.e., slow waves (SW) and sleep spindles, allowing a dialogue between prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus. Interestingly, neuroimaging studies in BC patients have consistently shown structural and functional modifications in these two brain regions. With the aim to evaluate sleep oscillations related to memory consolidation during AIs, we collected polysomnography data in BC patients treated (AI+, n = 17) or not (AI-, n = 17) with AIs compared to healthy controls (HC, n = 21). None of the patients had received chemotherapy and radiotherapy was finished since at least 6 months, that limit the confounding effects of other treatments than AIs. Fast and slow spindles were detected during sleep stage 2 at centro-parietal and frontal electrodes respectively. SW were detected at frontal electrodes during stage 3. Here, we show lower frontal SW densities in AI + patients compared to HC. These results concord with previous reports about frontal cortical alterations in cancer following AIs administration. Moreover, AI + patients tended to have lower spindle density at C4 electrode. Regression analyses showed that, in both patient groups, spindle density at C4 electrode explained a large variance of memory performances. Slow spindle characteristics did not differ between groups and sleep oscillations characteristics of AI- patients did not differ significantly from those of both AI + patients and HC. Overall, our results add to the compelling evidence of the systemic effects of AIs previously reported in animals, with deleterious effects on cortical activity during sleep and associated memory consolidation in the current study. There is thus a need to further investigate sleep modifications during AIs administration. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these findings and investigation in other cancers on this topic should be conducted.

2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 2557, 2022 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35169245

ABSTRACT

Complaints of sleep disturbance are prevalent among breast cancer (BC) patients and are predictors of quality of life. Still, electrophysiological measures of sleep are missing in patients, which prevents from understanding the pathophysiological consequences of cancer and its past treatments. Using polysomnography, sleep can be investigated in terms of macro- (e.g. awakenings, sleep stages) and micro- (i.e. cortical activity) structure. We aimed to characterize sleep complaints, and macro- and microstructure in 33 BC survivors untreated by chemotherapy and that had finished radiotherapy since at least 6 months (i.e. out of the acute effects of radiotherapy) compared to 21 healthy controls (HC). Compared to HC, BC patients had a larger number of awakenings (p = 0.008); and lower Delta power (p < 0.001), related to sleep deepening and homeostasis; greater both Alpha (p = 0.002) and Beta power (p < 0.001), related to arousal during deep sleep; and lower Theta power (p = 0.004), related to emotion regulation during dream sleep. Here we show that patients have increased cortical activity related to arousal and lower activity related to sleep homeostasis compared to controls. These results give additional insights in sleep pathophysiology of BC survivors and suggest sleep homeostasis disruption in non-advanced stages of BC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/complications , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology , Aged , Cancer Survivors , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Sleep
3.
Cancer Radiother ; 25(6-7): 545-549, 2021 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34175224

ABSTRACT

Considering intracranial tumours, only few indications of protontherapy, such as chordoma, chondrosarcoma or uveal melanoma, are uniformly approved in the world. Other indications, excluding paediatric pathologies, are still debated. The aim of this article is to describe the rationale for the use of protonbeam irradiation for meningioma, pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma, paraganglioma, glioma, and schwannoma, and to inform the radiation oncologists if prospective studies or randomized studies are opened for inclusions. This article deals only with indications for adults.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Meningeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Meningioma/radiotherapy , Pituitary Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adenoma/radiotherapy , Adult , Chordoma/radiotherapy , Craniopharyngioma/radiotherapy , Glioma/radiotherapy , Humans , Meningeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Meningioma/diagnostic imaging , Neurilemmoma/radiotherapy , Paraganglioma/radiotherapy , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy Dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
4.
Cancer Radiother ; 23(8): 860-866, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31677901

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy are standard treatments for brain metastases when they are small in size (at the most 3cm in diameter) and limited in number, in patients with controlled extracerebral disease and a good performance status. Large inoperable brain metastases usually undergo hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy while haemorrhagic brain metastases have often been contraindicated for both stereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess a six 6Gy-fractions hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy scheme in use at our institution for haemorrhagic brain metastases, large brain metastases (size greater than 15cm3) or brain metastases located next to critical structures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with brain metastases treated with the 6×6Gy scheme since 2012 to 2016 were included. Haemorrhagic brain metastases were defined by usual criteria on CT scan and MRI. Efficacy, acute and late toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients presenting 92 brain metastases were included (32 haemorrhagic brain metastases). Median follow up was 10.1 months. One-year local control rate for haemorrhagic brain metastases, large brain metastases, or brain metastases next to critical structures were 90.7%, 73% and 86.7% respectively. Corresponding overall survival rates were 61.2%, 32% and 37.8%, respectively. Haemorrhagic complications occurred in 5.3% of patients (N=5), including two cases of brain metastases with pretreatment haemorrhagic signal. Tolerance was good with only one grade 3 acute toxicity. CONCLUSION: The 6×6Gy hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy scheme seems to yield quite good results in patients with haemorrhagic brain metastases, which must be confirmed in a prospective way.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Cerebral Hemorrhage/radiotherapy , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Radiosurgery/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Cerebral Hemorrhage/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Radiosurgery/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Tumor Burden
5.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 13666, 2018 09 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30209337

ABSTRACT

We evaluated efficacy and tolerance of hypofractionated stereotactic radiation treatment (hFSRT) in the management of intracranial meningiomas. Between December 2008 and June 2016, 126 patients with 136 intracranial meningiomas were treated with robotic hFSRT. hFSRT was performed as primary irradiation and as a salvage option for the local recurrence after prior radiotherapy. The median prescription dose was 25 Gy (12-40) with a median number of fractions of 5 (3-10). After a median follow-up of 20.3 months (range 1-77 months), the 24-months local control (LC) rate was 81% in the primary hFSRT group and 39% after hFSRT in the re-irradiation group (p=0.002). The clinical control rate of symptoms in the overall population was 95% (95% CI: 89-98%). Progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall population at 24 months was 70% (95% CI: 60%-79%). In the primary hFSRT group, PFS was significantly lower with the most hypofractionated schedules of 21-23 Gy in 3 fractions vs. 25-40 Gy in 5-10 fractions: 62% vs. 92% (p = 0.0006). The incidence of radionecrosis at 24 months was significantly lower in the primary hFSRT group, at 2% vs. 20% in the re-irradiation hFSRT group (p = 0.002).


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Meningioma/radiotherapy , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Radiosurgery/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Progression-Free Survival , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Young Adult
7.
Ann Oncol ; 25(12): 2351-2356, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25274615

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BMs) are associated with a poor prognosis. Standard treatment comprises whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). As neo-angiogenesis is crucial in BM growth, combining angiogenesis inhibitors such as bevacizumab with radiotherapy is of interest. We aimed to identify the optimal regimen of bevacizumab combined with WBRT for BM for phase II evaluation and provide preliminary efficacy data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicentre single-arm phase I study with a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, patients with unresectable BM from solid tumours received three cycles of bevacizumab at escalating doses [5, 10 and 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks at dose levels (DL) 0, 1 and 2, respectively] and WBRT (30 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks) administered from day 15. DL3 consisted of bevacizumab 15 mg/kg with WBRT from day 15 in 30 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks. Safety was evaluated using NCI-CTCAE version 3. BM response (RECIST 1.1) was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging at 6 weeks and 3 months after WBRT. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated, of whom 13 had breast cancer. There were no DLTs. Grade 1-2 in-field and out-field toxicities occurred for five and nine patients across all DLs, respectively, including three and six patients (including one patient with both, so eight patients overall) of nine patients in DL3. One patient experienced BM progression during treatment (DL0). At the 3-month post-treatment assessment, 10 patients showed a BM response: one of three treated at DL0, one of three at DL1, two of three at DL2 and six of seven at DL3, including one complete response. BM progression occurred in five patients, resulting in two deaths. The remaining patient died from extracranial disease progression. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab combined with WBRT appears to be a tolerable treatment of BM. DL3 warrants further efficacy evaluation based on the favourable safety/efficacy balance. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01332929.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab , Brain/radiation effects , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...