Endotoxin interactions with lipopolysaccharide-responsive cells.

Recent work has identified two proteins that work together to enable many cell types to respond to endotoxin. These two proteins, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding protein (LBP) and CD14, also participate in cellular internalization of endotoxin, which may occur independently of cellular activation. Current work with antibodies to LBP and CD14 as well as "knockout" mice in the context of LPS-initiated endotoxic shock suggests that inhibition of this pathway could be therapeutically useful. These observations point to the need to identify new molecules that mediate LPS-initiated transmembrane signaling and internalization of LPS-protein complexes.

Roles for LBP and soluble CD14 in cellular uptake of LPS.

Roles for LBP and CD14 in the LPS dependent activation of a wide variety of cells have been established. In the work described here, we describe roles for these proteins in the binding and uptake of LPS by cells which express membrane CD14 and those which do not. Surprisingly, cell activation and LPS uptake appear to be independent phenomena with different protein requirements.

Characterization of the structure and function of a new mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38beta).

Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascades represent one of the major signal systems used by eukaryotic cells to transduce extracellular signals into cellular responses. Four MAP kinase subgroups have been identified in humans: ERK, JNK (SAPK), ERK5 (BMK), and p38. Here we characterize a new MAP kinase, p38beta. p38beta is a 372-amino acid protein most closely related to p38. It contains a TGY dual phosphorylation site, which is required for its kinase activity. Like p38, p38beta is activated by proinflammatory cytokines and environmental stress. A comparison of events associated with the activation of p38beta and p38 revealed differences, most notably in the preferred activation of p38beta by MAP kinase kinase 6 (MKK6), whereas p38 was activated nearly equally by MKK3, MKK4, and MKK6. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo experiments showed a strong substrate preference by p38beta for activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2). Enhancement of ATF2-dependent gene expression by p38beta was approximately20-fold greater than that of p38 and other MAP kinases tested. The data reported here suggest that while closely related, p38beta and p38 may be regulated by differing mechanisms and may exert their actions on separate downstream targets.

Lipopolysaccharide binding protein-mediated complexation of lipopolysaccharide with soluble CD14.

Endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide; LPS) activates a wide variety of host defense mechanisms. In mammals LPS binding protein (LBP) and CD14 interact with LPS to mediate cellular activation. Using sucrose density gradients and a fluorescent endotoxin derivative we have investigated the mechanism of LPS binding to LBP and the soluble form of CD14 (sCD14). LPS binds to LBP to form two types of complex; at low ratios of LPS to LBP complexes with one molecule of LBP and 1-2 molecules of LPS predominate, while at high ratios of LPS to LBP a large aggregate of LBP and LPS predominates. Complexes of LPS with sCD14 do not form large aggregates, consisting of only 1-2 LPS bound to a single sCD14 even at high multiples of LPS to sCD14. LBP catalyzes LPS binding to sCD14. Catalysis by LBP apparently occurs because LBP provides a pathway for LPS to bind to sCD14 which avoids the necessity for LPS monomers in aqueous solution. The dissociation constants for LPS.LBP and LPS.sCD14 complexes were determined to be 3.5 x 10(-9) and 29 x 10(-9) M, respectively. These numbers suggest that when LBP and sCD14 are present at roughly equal concentrations as they are in normal human plasma and compete for limited LPS, the LPS will predominantly associate with LBP.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) signal transduction and clearance. Dual roles for LPS binding protein and membrane CD14.

Under physiological conditions, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activation of cells involves the LPS binding protein (LBP) and either membrane or soluble CD14. We find LPS forms a ternary complex with LBP and membrane CD14 (mCD14). Subsequent to complex formation and distinct from signal transduction, LBP and LPS internalize. Internalization can be separated from signal transduction with the anti-LBP antibody 18G4 and the anti-CD14 antibody 18E12. 18G4 inhibits LBP binding to mCD14 without blocking signal transduction or LPS transfer to soluble CD14; 18E12 inhibits signal transduction without affecting LPS binding and uptake. These data show that while LPS signal transduction and LPS clearance utilize both LBP and mCD14, the pathways bifurcate after LPS binding to mCD14.

Assembly of an MCP receptor, CheW, and kinase CheA complex in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway.

We examined the binding interactions of the methylation-dependent chemotaxis receptors Tsr and Tar with the chemotaxis-specific protein kinase CheA and the coupling factor CheW. Receptor directly bound CheW, but receptor-CheA binding was dependent upon the presence of CheW. These observations in combination with our previous identification of a CheW-CheA complex suggest that CheW physically links the kinase to the receptor. The ternary complex of receptor, CheW, and CheA is both kinetically and thermodynamically stable at physiological concentrations. Stability is not significantly altered by changes associated with attractant or repellent binding to the receptor. Such binding greatly modulates the kinase activity of CheA. Our results demonstrate that modulation of the kinase activity does not require association-dissociation of the ternary complex. This suggests that the receptor signal is transduced through conformational changes in the ternary complex rather than through changes in the association of the kinase CheA with receptor and/or CheW.

Signal transduction in bacteria: CheW forms a reversible complex with the protein kinase CheA.

An essential step in the signal transduction pathway of Escherichia coli is the control of the protein kinase activity of CheA by the chemotaxis receptor proteins. This control requires the participation of the CheW protein. Although the biochemical nature of the coupling between the receptors and the kinase is unknown, it is likely that CheW interacts with the receptors and with CheA. In this communication, we report direct measurement of a physical interaction between CheW and CheA. We utilized the equilibrium column chromatography method of Hummel and Dreyer to show that CheW and CheA exhibit reversible binding with the stoichiometry of two CheW monomers per CheA dimer. CheW was found to exist as monomers and CheA was found to exist as dimers by equilibrium analytical ultracentrifugation. The dissociation constant for the CheW-CheA interaction (in 160 mM KCl/5 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4 at 4 degrees C) was determined to be in the physiologically relevant range of 17 microM. No evidence for cooperativity in the association of CheW with CheA was found.