Aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in the ninth decade of life.

Due to demographic changes in average life expectancy, the age of patients undergoing cardiac surgery is increasing. We have reviewed the short- and long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in patients over 80 years of age. From 1 January 1995 until 30 June 1999, 114 patients (83 women and 31 men, 80-89 years of age, 82.8+/-2.4 years) with symptomatic aortic valve disease underwent aortic valve replacement. Of these patients, 54% (group A) received isolated valve replacement and 46% (group B) underwent myocardial revascularization as well. The perioperative mortality rate was 4.8% for group A and 7.7% for group B. The 30-day hospital mortality rate was 4.8% for group A and 15.4% for group B. The follow-up time ranged between 3 months and 63 months (32+/-15 months). None of the patients had to be reoperated for prosthetic valve dysfunction or endocarditis. Bleeding complications due to anticoagulation therapy were not observed. Of the 15 deaths during the follow-up period, seven (47%) were cardiac in nature and two (13%) were related to stroke. Actuarial survival rates for group A were 90%, 84%, and 76% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, and for group B were 75%, 71%, and 68%. One year after the operation, permanent nursing care was not required by 100% of patients in group A (2 years, 98%; 3 years, 95%) and by 100% of patients in group B (2 years, 95%; 3 years, 91%). At a 1-year interval after the operation, 98% of patients in group A had not been hospitalized as a result of cardiac disorders (2 years, 98%; 3 years, 95%). The rates for group B were 90%, 85%, and 85%. Compared with younger age groups, aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older is associated with a distinctly increased mortality and morbidity. However, our data suggest that, considering the poor prognosis of conservative therapy of symptomatic aortic valve disease, functional status as well as life expectancy in this age group seem to be positively influenced by aortic valve replacement.

[Short and long term results of aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older]. / Kurz- und Langzeitergebnisse des Aortenklappenersatzes bei 80- und über 80-Jährigen.

BACKGROUND: Due to demographic changes in average life expectancy the age of patients undergoing cardiac surgery is increasing as well. We have reviewed the short- and long-term outcome in patients over 80 years of age after aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary grafting. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From 1.1.1995 until 31.12.1999, 126 patients (93 women, 33 men between 80 and 89 years, 82.8 +/- 2.4) underwent aortic valve replacement. 64 patients (group A) received isolated valve replacement, 62 (group B) underwent myocardial revascularization as well. RESULTS: The 30-day hospital mortality rate was 6.3% for group A and 14.5% for group B. The follow-up time ranged between 3 and 63 months (32 +/- 16). None of the patients had to be reoperated for prosthetic valve dysfunction or endocarditis. Bleeding complications due to anticoagulation therapy were observed by one patient from group A 3 years after the operation. Of the 15 deaths during the follow-up period seven (47%) were cardiac in nature and two (13%) related to stroke. Acturial survival rates for group A were 89%, 85% and 77% at 1, 2 and 3 years, and for group B 76%, 72% and 70%. Permanent nursing care was not required 1 year after the operation by 100% of patients in group A (2 years: 98%, 3 years 95%) and by 100% of patients in group B (2 years: 93%, 3 years: 90%). At an interval of 1 year after the operation 96% of patients in group A had not been hospitalized as a result of cardiac disorders (2 years: 96%, 3 years: 94%). The rates for group B were 88%, 81% and 75%. CONCLUSION: Compared with younger age groups, aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older is associated with a distinctly increased mortality and morbidity. However, our data suggest that considering the poor prognosis of conservative therapy of symptomatic aortic valve disease, functional status as well as life expectancy in this age group seem to be positively influenced by aortic valve replacement.

[Aortic valve replacement in 80- and over 80-year-old patients. Short-term and long-term results]. / Aortenklappenersatz bei 80- und über 80-jährigen. Kurz- und Langzeitergebnisse.

Due to demographic changes in average life expectancy, the age of patients undergoing cardiac surgery is increasing as well. We have reviewed the short- and long-term outcome in patients over 80 years of age after aortic valve replacement. From 01 Jan 1995 until 31 Dec 1998, 105 patients (76 women, 29 men between 80 and 89 years, median: 83) underwent aortic valve replacement. 42% presented with aortic stenosis, 58% with combined valve disease with leading stenosis. 53% (group A) received isolated valve replacement, 47% (group B) underwent myocardial revascularization as well. The in-hospital mortality rate was 8.9% for group A and 14.3% for group B. The follow-up time ranged between 10 and 243 weeks (median: 112 weeks). None of the patients had to be reoperated for prosthetic valve dysfunction or endocarditis. Bleeding complications due to anticoagulant therapy were not observed. Of the 11 deaths during the follow-up period, 5 (45%) were cardiac in nature and 2 (18%) related to stroke. Actuarial survival rates for group A were 98, 95 and 88% at 1, 2 and 3 years, and for group B 92, 84 and 84%, respectively. Permanent nursing care was not required 1 year after the operation by 98% of patients in group A (2 years: 95%, 3 years: 88%) and by 100% of patients in group B (2 years: 95%, 3 years: 88%). At an interval of 1 year after the operation 98% of patients in group A had not been hospitalized as a result of cardiac disorders (2 years: 98%, 3 years: 94%). The rates for group B were 90, 82 and 82%. Compared with younger age groups, aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older is associated with a distinctly increased mortality and morbidity. However, our data suggest that considering the poor prognosis of conservative therapy of symptomatic aortic valve disease, the functional status as well as life expectancy in this age group seems to be positively influenced by aortic valve replacement.