Curcumin and enalapril ameliorate renal failure by antagonizing inflammation in 5/6 nephrectomized rats: role of phospholipase and cyclooxygenase.

Previously, we showed that curcumin prevents chronic kidney disease (CKD) development in ⅚ nephrectomized (Nx) rats when given within 1 wk after Nx (Ghosh SS, Massey HD, Krieg R, Fazelbhoy ZA, Ghosh S, Sica DA, Fakhry I, Gehr TW. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F1146-F1157, 2009). To better mimic the scenario for renal disease in humans, we began curcumin and enalapril therapy when proteinuria was already established. We hypothesized that curcumin, by blocking the inflammatory mediators TNF-α and IL-1ß, could also reduce cyclooxygenase (COX) and phospholipase expression in the kidney. Nx animals were divided into untreated Nx, curcumin-treated, and enalapril-treated groups. Curcumin (75 mg/kg) and enalapril (10 mg/kg) were administered for 10 wk. Renal dysfunction in the Nx group, as evidenced by elevated blood urea nitrogen, plasma creatinine, proteinuria, segmental sclerosis, and tubular dilatation, was comparably reduced by curcumin and enalapril, with only enalapril significantly lowering blood pressure. Compared with controls, Nx animals had higher plasma/kidney TNF-α and IL-1ß, which were reduced by curcumin and enalapril treatment. Nx animals had significantly elevated kidney levels of cytosolic PLA(2), calcium-independent intracellular PLA(2), COX 1, and COX 2, which were comparably reduced by curcumin and enalapril. Studies in mesangial cells and macrophages were carried out to establish that the in vivo increase in PLA(2) and COX were mediated by TNF-α and IL-1ß and that curcumin, by antagonizing the cytokines, could significantly reduce both PLA(2) and COX. We conclude that curcumin ameliorates CKD by blocking inflammatory signals even if it is given at a later stage of the disease.

Curcumin ameliorates renal failure in 5/6 nephrectomized rats: role of inflammation.

TNF-alpha and NF-kappaB play important roles in the development of inflammation in chronic renal failure (CRF). In hepatic cells, curcumin is shown to antagonize TNF-alpha-elicited NF-kappaB activation. In this study, we hypothesized that if inflammation plays a key role in renal failure then curcumin should be effective in improving CRF. The effectiveness of curcumin was compared with enalapril, a compound known to ameliorate human and experimental CRF. Investigation was conducted in Sprague-Dawley rats where CRF was induced by 5/6 nephrectomy (Nx). The Nx animals were divided into untreated (Nx), curcumin-treated (curcumin), and enalapril-treated (enalapril) groups. Sham-operated animals served as a control. Renal dysfunction in the Nx group, as evidenced by elevated blood urea nitrogen, plasma creatinine, proteinuria, segmental sclerosis, and tubular dilatation, was significantly reduced by curcumin and enalapril treatment. However, only enalapril significantly improved blood pressure. Compared with the control, the Nx animals had significantly higher plasma and kidney TNF-alpha, which was associated with NF-kappaB activation and macrophage infiltration in the kidney. These changes were effectively antagonized by curcumin and enalapril treatment. The decline in the anti-inflammatory peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) seen in Nx animals was also counteracted by curcumin and enalapril. Studies in mesangial cells were carried out to further establish that the anti-inflammatory effect of curcumin in vivo was mediated essentially by antagonizing TNF-alpha. Curcumin dose dependently antagonized the TNF-alpha-mediated decrease in PPARgamma and blocked transactivation of NF-kappaB and repression of PPARgamma, indicating that the anti-inflamatory property of curcumin may be responsible for alleviating CRF in Nx animals.

Thrombin generation time is a novel parameter for monitoring enoxaparin therapy in patients with end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who receive enoxaparin are at increased risk for adverse bleeding episodes. This phenomenon appears to occur despite judicious monitoring of antifactor Xa (aFXa) activity. Better monitoring parameters are needed to quantify the anticoagulant effects of enoxaparin in the ESRD population. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the utility of using thrombin generation time (TGT), platelet contractile force (PCF) and clot elastic modulus (CEM) to monitor the degree of anticoagulation in ESRD subjects, and to compare these results to aFXa activity, the current gold-standard monitoring parameter. METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers without renal dysfunction and eight ESRD subjects were enrolled into this study. Subjects received a single dose of enoxaparin 1 mg kg(-1) subcutaneously, and blood samples were obtained for the determination of aFXa activity, TGT, PCF and CEM at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 h postdose. RESULTS: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12-h aFXa activity concentrations were not different between groups. However, the corresponding TGT at 8 and 12 h was significantly prolonged in the ESRD group (P = 0.04, and P = 0.008, respectively). The 4-h peak TGT trended toward significance (P = 0.06). There were no differences in PCF or CEM across time. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the parameter aFXa activity is a poor predictor of the anticoagulant effect of enoxaparin in patients with ESRD. Thrombin generation time appears to be more sensitive to the antithrombotic effects of enoxaparin in this population. Further large-scale trials are needed to corroborate these data.

Antifactor Xa activity correlates to thrombin generation time, platelet contractile force and clot elastic modulus following ex vivo enoxaparin exposure in patients with and without renal dysfunction.

Antifactor Xa activity is the gold standard monitoring parameter for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) derivatives. It is frequently measured in high-risk populations, such as patients with renal dysfunction. Despite antifactor Xa monitoring, however, bleeding in renal dysfunction patients receiving LMWH remains a problem. This study determined the relationship between antifactor Xa activity and three novel coagulation monitoring parameters: thrombin generation time (TGT), platelet contractile force (PCF) and clot elastic modulus (CEM). This study also assessed the effect of renal dysfunction on these relationships. This was an ex vivo pharmacodynamic study of the relationship between antifactor Xa activity and TGT, PCF and CEM in subjects both with and without renal dysfunction. Thirty subjects completed this study (10 controls, 10 chronic kidney disease subjects, and 10 end-stage renal disease subjects receiving hemodialysis). Blood samples obtained from participants were spiked with increasing enoxaparin concentrations (0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 3.0 IU mL(-1)). Samples were analyzed for TGT, PCF and CEM. The relationship between antifactor Xa activity and TGT, PCF and CEM was determined by Pearson's correlation. The effect of renal dysfunction on the relationship between antifactor Xa activity and TGT, PCF and CEM was determined by analysis of covariance. There is strong correlation between antifactor Xa activity and TGT, CEM and PCF. The presence of renal dysfunction significantly prolongs the TGT, and decreases the CEM relative to controls. These results suggest that patients with renal dysfunction have a greater pharmacodynamic response to LMWH, independent of the pharmacokinetics of LMWH.

Direct vasodilators and their role in hypertension management: minoxidil.

Minoxidil is a direct vasodilator that has been in use for over two decades. It is used primarily to reduce blood pressure in hypertensives who have been poorly controlled on various multidrug regimens. Although minoxidil is extremely effective, its usefulness is limited by its tendency to increase the pulse rate and to trigger salt and water retention. The latter may be incapacitating in some patients. Therefore, minoxidil is typically administered with both a diuretic and an agent that can control the pulse rate, such as a beta blocker. Minoxidil has several other side effects that may limit its use, including hypertrichosis, aggravation of myocardial ischemia and/or left ventricular hypertrophy, and (infrequently) pericardial effusions. If a patient's hypertensive pattern is sufficiently severe to warrant contemplation of minoxidil therapy, referring the patient to a hypertension specialist should be strongly considered. (c) 2001 by LeJacq Communications, Inc.

The pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous enoxaparin in end-stage renal disease.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and determine if dosage reduction is necessary to maintain antifactor Xa activity concentrations within the therapeutic range. DESIGN: Prospective, single-dose pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: University-affiliated general clinical research center. PATIENTS: Eight nonthrombosed patients with ESRD requiring hemodialysis. INTERVENTION: All subjects received a single dose of enoxaparin sodium 1 mg/kg subcutaneously and had serial plasma antifactor Xa activity concentrations measured over 24 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin were determined from plasma antifactor Xa activity concentrations, and various multiple-dose regimens were simulated. After administration of the drug, total body clearance was 14.6 ml/minute and there was a 2-fold prolongation in antifactor Xa activity half-life compared with values reported in healthy subjects. All other pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those in healthy subjects and patients with chronic renal insufficiency. An accumulation ratio of 1.6 was estimated for a dosing interval of every 12 hours based on single-dose pharmacokinetics. When various therapeutic regimens were simulated to predict average steady-state antifactor Xa activity, standard enoxaparin dosages of 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours and 1.5 mg/kg every 24 hours resulted in average steady-state concentrations within the therapeutic range. CONCLUSIONS: Based on antifactor Xa activity, ESRD has little effect on the pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin, and dosing adjustments are unnecessary.

Disposition and safety of omapatrilat in subjects with renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: Omapatrilat, a vasopeptidase inhibitor, preserves natriuretic peptides and inhibits the renin angiotensin aldosterone system by simultaneously inhibiting neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme. METHODS: Oral omapatrilat, 10 mg/d, was administered for 8 to 9 days to three groups of eight subjects with varying degrees of renal function (CLCR values, normal > or = 80; mild to moderate impairment < 80 to > or = 30; severe impairment < 30 mL/min/1.73 mL2) and to six subjects undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Omapatrilat and its metabolites (phenylmercaptopropionic acid, S-methylomapatrilat, S-methylphenylmercaptopropionic acid, and cyclic S-oxide-omapatrilat) were quantified in plasma by a validated liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method. The model, Cmax or AUC(0-T) = intercept + slope x CLCR, was tested for a possible linear correlation between Cmax (peak plasma concentrations) or AUC(0-T) (area under plasma concentration versus time curve) and CLCR. RESULTS: For omapatrilat and its inactive metabolites, phenylmercaptopropionic acid, S-methylomapatrilat, and S-methylphenylmercaptopropionic acid, the median times to peak plasma concentrations (tmax) were 1.5 to 2, 2 to 3, 2.5 to 3.5, and 7 to 10 hours, respectively, and were independent of renal function. After Cmax attainment, plasma concentrations declined rapidly to about 10% of Cmax values. Cyclic S-oxide-omapatrilat, a potentially active metabolite, was undetectable at all sampling time points. Hemodialysis did not decrease circulating levels of omapatrilat. There was minimal accumulation of omapatrilat and phenylmercaptopropionic acid and moderate accumulation of the S-methylated metabolites. For omapatrilat and S-methylphenylmercaptopropionic acid, neither Cmax nor AUC(0-T) was CLCR dependent. However, AUC(0-T) for phenylmercaptopropionic acid and both the Cmax and AUC(0-T) for S-methylomapatrilat were CLCR dependent. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of omapatrilat, the only clinically relevant active compound studied, was independent of CLCR. For patients with reduced renal function, adjusting initial omapatrilat dose is not suggested. Hemodialysis did not significantly contribute to the clearance of omapatrilat. The long-term pharmacodynamic response to omapatrilat will dictate dose-adjustment needs.

Chronically increased intra-abdominal pressure produces systemic hypertension in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: Determine if increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) alone can cause systemic hypertension in a chronic canine model. DESIGN: Evaluate effects of increase in IAP with progressive inflation and deflation of an intra-abdominal balloon on systemic blood pressure in experimental and control animals. SUBJECTS: Male dogs weighing 15-25 kg underwent placement of an intra-abdominal balloon which was progressively inflated on a weekly basis in the experimental animals (5) over 4 weeks to 25 mmHg above baseline and kept there for an additional 2 weeks before gradual deflation over 2 weeks. Control animals (5) had the balloon placed but not inflated. Pain was controlled with osmotic analgesic pumps. MEASUREMENTS: The animals were anesthetized, blood pressure (BP) measured and blood drawn for plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone, atrial naturetic peptide (ANP), catecholamines, and serum sodium (Na). A right heart catheter was inserted for measuring cardiac output (CO) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) at baseline, week 5 (maximal IAP) and week 7 (after balloon deflation). The animals were weighed and urinary bladder pressures recorded weekly before and after abdominal balloon inflation. RESULTS: Systolic (122+/-3 to 155+/-5 mmHg, P<0.05) and diastolic (82+/-4 mmHg to 107+/-7 mmHg, P<0.05) BP rose at 5 weeks at 25 mmHg IAP>baseline and returned to control with balloon deflation. Both systolic and diastolic BP rose (P<0.05) above control animals BP at 15 mmHg IAP at 2 weeks and remained elevated until abdominal decompression, at week 7. There were no significant changes in net animal weight, PRA, aldosterone, ANF, catecholamines, Na, CO or PAOP. CONCLUSION: Increased IAP from progressively inflating an intra-abdominal balloon in dogs was associated with significant increases in systolic and diastolic BP that resolved with balloon deflation. Increased IAP may be a cause for systemic hypertension in central obesity and pre-eclampsia.

Cost-effectiveness of sevelamer versus calcium carbonate plus atorvastatin to reduce LDL in patients with chronic renal insufficiency with dyslipidemia and hyperphosphatemia.

We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare costs and clinical outcomes of sevelamer versus calcium carbonate plus atorvastatin for treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. The model was from the third-party payer perspective. Efficacy and adverse event rates for each regimen were obtained from published clinical trials. Drug costs were based on average wholesale prices; monitoring costs were based on Medicare reimbursement rates. Our model suggests that the combination of calcium carbonate plus atorvastatin is substantially more cost-effective than sevelamer in reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in these patients. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to assess if 25% and 50% price reductions in sevelamer affected overall cost-effectiveness results. A 50% sevelamer price reduction was less expensive than combination therapy but remained less cost-effective. A two-way sensitivity analysis on the probability that a patient achieves the goal of a 35% LDL reduction resulted in calcium carbonate plus atorvastatin remaining more cost-effective. Further cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to corroborate our data.

Pharmacokinetics and blood pressure response of losartan in end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Losartan is a selective angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist currently employed in the management of essential hypertension. This compound is in common use in populations with renal failure and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan in patients with ESRD in order to establish administration guidelines. METHODS: Patients were administered losartan 100 mg/day for 7 days, and after the seventh and final dose pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for both losartan and its active metabolite E-3174. During the study, the haemodialytic clearances of losartan and E-3174 were measured during a standard 4-hour dialysis session. Neurohumoral and biochemical changes were assessed during losartan administration. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174 in haemodialysis patients did not alter to a clinically significant level. Losartan administration was accompanied by a decline in plasma aldosterone level as well as by an increase in plasma renin activity. Losartan administration resulted in a decline in plasma uric acid level, despite the fact that the study participants had no residual renal function. Losartan and E-3174 were not dialysable. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174 are minimally altered in ESRD; thus, dosage adjustment is not required in the presence of advanced dialysis-dependent renal failure. In addition, postdialysis supplementation is not required for losartan because of the negligible dialysability of losartan and E-3174.

Risk-benefit ratio of angiotensin antagonists versus ACE inhibitors in end-stage renal disease.

The effective treatment of hypertension is an extremely important consideration in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Virtually any drug class--with the possible exception of diuretics--can be used to treat hypertension in the patient with ESRD. Despite there being such a wide range of treatment options, drugs which interrupt the renin-angiotensin axis are generally suggested as agents of choice in this population, even though the evidence in support of their preferential use is quite scanty. ACE inhibitors, and more recently angiotensin antagonists, are the 2 drug classes most commonly employed to alter renin-angiotensin axis activity and therefore produce blood pressure control. ACE inhibitor use in patients with ESRD can sometimes prove an exacting proposition. ACE inhibitors are variably dialysed, with compounds such as catopril, enalapril, lisinopril and perindopril undergoing substantial cross-dialyser clearance during a standard dialysis session. This phenomenon makes the selection of a dose and the timing of administration for an ACE inhibitor a complex issue in patients with ESRD. Furthermore, ACE inhibitors are recognised as having a range of nonpressor effects that are pertinent to patients with ESRD. Such effects include their ability to decrease thirst drive and to decrease erythropoiesis. In addition, ACE inhibitors have a unique adverse effect profile. As is the case with their use in patients without renal failure, use of ACE inhibitors in patients with ESRD can be accompanied by cough and less frequently by angioneurotic oedema. In the ESRD population, ACE inhibitor use is also accompanied by so-called anaphylactoid dialyser reactions. Angiotensin antagonists are similar to ACE inhibitors in their mechanism of blood pressure lowering. Angiotensin antagonists are not dialysable and therefore can be distinguished from a number of the ACE inhibitors. In addition, the adverse effect profile for angiotensin antagonists is remarkably bland, with cough and angioneurotic oedema rarely, if ever, occurring. In patients with ESRD, angiotensin antagonists are also not associated with the anaphylactoid dialyser reactions which occur with ACE inhibitors. The nonpressor effects of angiotensin antagonists--such as an influence on thirst drive and erythropoiesis--have not been explored in nearly the depth, as they have been with ACE inhibitors. Although ACE inhibitors have not been compared directly to angiotensin antagonists in patients with ESRD, angiotensin antagonists possess a number of pharmacokinetic and adverse effect characteristics, which would favour their use in this population.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan and its active metabolite, E-3174, were studied in 8 stable, hypertensive continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. Following a 1-week washout period, subjects received 100 mg of losartan orally for 7 days. On Days 1 and 7, hemodynamic and hormonal responses were determined, as were PK parameters on Day 7. Peritoneal equilibration testing was performed pre-Day 1 and on Day 7. AUC0-24 and t1/2 for losartan and E-3174 were 95 +/- 49.9 micrograms.min/mL and 176 +/- 82.1 micrograms.min/mL and 172.5 +/- 86.7 minutes and 628 +/- 575 minutes, respectively. These values are similar to those of normal subjects and subjects on hemodialysis. Peritoneal clearance of losartan and E-3174 was negligible. All subjects demonstrated a substantial reduction in blood pressure with at least a 10 mmHg drop in diastolic BP. Plasma renin activity (PRA) values increased, but aldosterone, endothelin, norepinephrine, and epinephrine values did not change following 7 days of losartan. Losartan was well tolerated in all study subjects.

Effect of increased renal venous pressure on renal function.

OBJECTIVE: Acute renal failure is seen with the acute abdominal compartment syndrome (AACS). Although the cause of acute renal failure in AACS may be multifactorial, renal vein compression alone has not been investigated. This study evaluated the effects of elevated renal vein pressure (RVP) on renal function. METHODS: Two groups of swine (18-22 kg) were studied after left nephrectomy and placement of a renal artery flow probe to measure renal artery blood flow, renal vein catheter, and ureteral cannula. Two hours were allowed for equilibration and an inulin infusion was begun to calculate inulin clearance for measurement of glomerular filtration rate. Group 1 animals (n = 4) had RVP elevated by 30 mm Hg for 2 hours with renal vein constriction. RVP was then returned to baseline for 1 hour. In group 2 (n = 4), the RVP was not elevated. The cardiac index (2.9 +/- 0.5 L/min/m2) and mean arterial pressure (101 +/- 9 mm Hg) remained stable. Plasma renin activity and serum aldosterone were measured every 60 minutes. RESULTS: Elevation of RVP (0-30 mm Hg above baseline) in the experimental group showed a significant decrease in renal artery blood flow index (2.7 to 1.5 mL/min per g) and glomerular filtration rate (26 to 8 mL/min) compared with control. In addition, there was significant elevation of plasma serum aldosterone (14 to 25 microng/dL) and plasma renin activity (2.6 to 9.5 microng/mL per h) as well as urinary protein leak in the experimental animals compared with control. These changes were partially or completely reversible as RVP returned toward baseline. CONCLUSION: Elevated RVP alone leads to decreased renal artery blood flow and glomerular filtration rate and increased plasma renin activity, serum aldosterone, and urinary protein leak. These changes are consistent with the renal pathophysiology seen in AACS, morbid obesity, and preeclampsia. The changes are partially or completely reversed by decreasing renal venous pressure as occurs with abdominal decompression for AACS.

The pharmacokinetics of carvedilol and its metabolites after single and multiple dose oral administration in patients with hypertension and renal insufficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Carvedilol, a chiral compound possessing nonselective beta- and alpha1-blocking activity, is used for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure (CHF). The enantiomers of carvedilol exhibit similar alpha1-blocking activity; only S-carvedilol possesses beta-blocking activity. Carvedilol is primarily hepatically metabolized, with less than 2% of the dose excreted renally as unchanged drug. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of carvedilol, R-carvedilol, and S-carvedilol were studied in hypertensive patients (control; n = 13) versus patients with hypertension and advanced renal insufficiency not yet on dialysis [GFR < or = 30 ml x min(-1) (CRI, chronic renal insufficiency), n = 12] following single (12.5 mg, Day 1) and multiple (25 mg once daily, Days 2 9) dosing. RESULTS: Mean with (SD) AUC(0-24h) (ng x h x ml(-1)) for carvedilol was 220 (120) and 618 (335) in CRI compared with 165 (83.5) and 413 (247) in controls on Days 1 and 9, respectively, primarily due to higher R-carvedilol concentrations. Mean with (SD) Cmax (ng x ml(-1)) for carvedilol were 53.4 (31.4) and 128 (63.3) in CRI compared with 46.7 (23.3) and 104 (58.9) in controls on Days 1 and 9, respectively. The difference in group mean values was characterized by considerable overlap in individual AUC(0-24h) and Cmax values between groups. There was no apparent difference in mean terminal elimination half-life for carvedilol between groups on each study day. Less than 1% of the dose was excreted in urine as unchanged carvedilol in both groups. Blood pressure and heart rate declined in both groups to a similar degree. CONCLUSION: Compared with controls, average AUC(0-24 h) values for carvedilol were approximately 40% and 50% higher on study Days 1 and 9 in patients with renal insufficiency, primarily due to higher R-carvedilol concentrations with only a small change (<20%) in S-carvedilol concentrations, the isomer possessing beta-blocking activity. These changes in pharmacokinetics are modest in view of the large interindividual variability. Carvedilol was well tolerated in both groups. Although the present study cannot provide a final conclusion, based on the results of the present study, no changes in dosing recommendations for carvedilol are warranted in patients with moderate/severe renal insufficiency.

Replacement of amino acid and protein losses with 1.1% amino acid peritoneal dialysis solution.

OBJECTIVE: Losses of nutrients into dialysate may contribute to malnutrition. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are reported to lose 3-4 g/day of amino acids (AAs) and 4-15 g/day of proteins. The extent to which one exchange with a 1.1% AA dialysis solution (Nutrineal, Baxter, Deerfield, IL, U.S.A.) offsets these losses was investigated in a 3-day inpatient study in 20 PD patients. DESIGN: Simple, open-label, cross-over study on consecutive days in a clinical research unit. On day 1 all patients were given a peritoneal equilibration test (PET). On day 2 they received 1.5% dextrose Dianeal (Baxter) as the first exchange of the day and their usual regimen thereafter. On day 3, the first exchange of the day was the 1.1% AA solution in place of 1.5% Dianeal and the usual PD regimen thereafter. On days 2 and 3 all dialysate effluent was collected and analyzed for AAs and proteins. Patients were maintained on a constant diet. RESULTS: Losses of AAs and total proteins on day 2 were 3.4 +/- 0.9 g and 5.8 +/- 2.4 g, respectively, totaling 9.2 +/- 2.7 g. The net uptake of AAs on day 3 was 17.6 +/- 2.6 g (80 +/- 12% of the 22 g infused). Mean gains of AAs on day 3 exceeded losses of proteins and AAs on day 2, p < 0.001. Losses of total proteins, but not losses of AAs, and the net absorption of AAs from the dialysis solution were correlated directly with peritoneal membrane transport characteristics, obtained from the PET. CONCLUSION: Daily losses of AAs and proteins into dialysate are more than offset by gains of AAs absorbed from one exchange with 1.1% AA-based dialysis solution. Net gains of AAs exceeded losses of proteins and AAs in all patients studied. The difference was relatively constant across a wide range of membrane transport types. Net AA gains were approximately two times the total AA and protein losses.

The pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: The single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor pravastatin and its two metabolites, SQ 31,906 and SQ 31,945, were evaluated in 12 hemodialysis patients. A single 20-mg i.v. dose was employed, followed by daily oral dosing of 20 mg over four hemodialysis intervals. RESULTS: No statistical differences in the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin or SQ 31,906 were evident when comparing the first and last days of oral dosing with pravastatin. The pharmacokinetic parameters of pravastatin and SQ 31,906 were similar to those of healthy volunteers. SQ 31,945, the inactive polar metabolite, did accumulate in dialysis patients, as evidenced by an accumulation index of 1.7 +/- 1.0. Although metabolic clearance is the predominant mode of elimination of pravastatin, hemodialysis clearances of pravastatin, SQ 31,906 and SQ 31,945 will contribute to total body clearance since dialytic clearance ranged from 40 to 80 ml.min-1. CONCLUSION: Pravastatin can be safely administered in the usual dosages to subjects with renal failure on hemodialysis and no change in dosing is necessary.

The pharmacokinetics of irbesartan in renal failure and maintenance hemodialysis.

PURPOSE: An open-label, multiple-dose, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan in subjects with varying degrees of renal function. METHODS: Forty subjects were divided into four treatment groups on the basis of 24-hour creatinine clearance (CLCR): normal renal function (> 75 ml/min/1.73 m2), mild to moderate renal impairment (30 to 74 ml/min/1.73 m2), severe renal impairment (< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2), and maintenance hemodialysis. Subjects received 100 mg irbesartan daily for 8 days (or 300 mg daily for 9 days for the hemodialysis group). Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 24 hours after the first and last of eight successive daily doses. In addition, arterial and venous blood samples were collected during two hemodialysis sessions from subjects requiring maintenance hemodialysis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant linear relationship between CLCR and maximum plasma concentrations, dose-adjusted area under the plasma concentration time curve values on days 1 or 8, or any other pharmacokinetic parameters among the renal function groups studied. There was no indication of drug accumulation with repetitive dosing. In the subjects receiving hemodialysis, arterial-venous concentration differences for irbesartan were negligible, suggesting that this compound is not cleared through hemodialysis. In addition, irbesartan was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Based on pharmacokinetic parameters, no starting dose adjustment is necessary in subjects with mild to severe renal impairment, inclusive of hemodialysis. Subjects with volume depletion may have an exaggerated response to an initial dose of irbesartan and, under such circumstances, volume depletion should be corrected or a lower starting dose of irbesartan should be considered.

Simple high-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of losartan and E-3174 metabolite in human plasma, urine and dialysate.

A simple high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was developed for the determination of losartan and its E-3174 metabolite in human plasma, urine and dialysate. For plasma, a gradient mobile phase consisting of 25 mM potassium phosphate and acetonitrile pH 2.2 was used with a phenyl analytical column and fluorescence detection. For urine and dialysate, an isocratic mobile phase consisting of 25 mM potassium phosphate and acetonitrile (60:40, v/v) pH 2.2 was used. The method demonstrated linearity from 10 to 1000 ng/ml with a detection limit of 1 ng/ml for losartan and E-3174 using 10 microl of prepared plasma, urine or dialysate. The method was utilized in a study evaluating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of losartan in patients with kidney failure undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

Diuretic combinations in refractory oedema states: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships.

Diuretic resistance is encountered in a number of disease states, such as chronic renal failure, nephrotic syndrome, congestive heart failure (CHF) and cirrhosis. Diuretic stratagems which produce sequential nephron segment blockade, and thus a synergistic diuretic response, are frequently necessary and are regularly employed in these conditions. Pharmacokinetic determinants of diuretic response, including dose administered, absolute bioavailability, and tubular transport capacity and transport rate, are reviewed here. Pharmacodynamic factors are perhaps more important to overall response, and often result in modification of the dose-response relationship; these are also reviewed here. Stratagems used to maximise the diuretic response to loop diuretics include correcting abnormal haemodynamic parameters, utilising larger doses or constant intravenous infusions, and using albumin as a vehicle to deliver the loop diuretic to the site of tubular secretion. If these measures fail, then diuretic combinations are useful. Perhaps the most effective is the combination of metolazone (a thiazide-type diuretic) and a loop diuretic. The rationale for and use of various diuretic combinations, with particular emphasis on the metolazone-loop diuretic combination, is reviewed here and applied to the major disease states associated with diuretic resistance.

Colloid infusions reduce glomerular filtration in resuscitated burn victims.

OBJECTIVE: Colloids are used clinically to minimize edema yet may have detrimental consequences on glomerular filtration. The purpose of this study is to assess the renal and hormonal effects of colloid supplementation in the fluid resuscitation of burn victims. DESIGN: Analytic cohort study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Immediately following their 24 hour post-burn fluid resuscitation with Ringer's lactate, six burn patients (% total body surface area burn 30-57%) were given primed, continuous infusions of inulin and p-aminohippuric acid for 6 hours. Albumin (25% solution, 3 mL/kg/h) was given for the final 4 hours of study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Albumin infusion increased plasma volume by 37%; however, glomerular filtration rate decreased by 32% (p < 0.05). There was no significant change in urine output, sodium excretion, or effective renal plasma flow. Plasma volume expansion with albumin normalized elevated basal levels of aldosterone and plasma renin activity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate that despite substantially increasing plasma volume, colloid infusions reduce glomerular filtration and may limit any associated diuresis. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that hormonal regulation of blood volume remains intact after moderate burn injury.