ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Adiposity rebound (AR) is defined as the nadir or the inflexion point of body mass index (BMI) percentiles between the age of 3 and 7 years. An early rebound is seen as a risk of obesity and, thus, AR is considered as a suitable time period for prevention. As BMI does not reflect body composition, we aimed to examine the rebounds of fat mass index (FMI) and fat-free mass index (FFMI) together with BMI. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Cross-sectional data of 19 264 children aged 3-11 years were pooled from three German studies (Kiel Obesity Prevention Study, the project 'Better diet. More exercise. KINDERLEICHT-REGIONS' and regular examinations of Jena children). Height and weight were measured. Fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were obtained from bioelectrical impedance analysis and analysed using a population-specific algorithm. Percentiles of BMI, FMI and FFMI were constructed by the LMS method. RESULTS: Both BMI and FMI percentiles showed a rebound, whereas FFMI percentiles steadily increased with age. On P90, FMI rebound was about 1.6-1.8 years later compared with that of BMI, that is, at ages 4.2 years (BMI) and 5.8 years (FMI) in boys and at 4.2 years (BMI) and 6.0 years (FMI) in girls. At AR, the slope of the BMI-P90 was explained by increases in FFMI rather than FMI. By contrast, at FMI rebound, the slope of BMI was strongly related to FMI. CONCLUSIONS: BMI rebound does not equal the rebound of FM. At AR, the slope in BMI is determined by the increase in FFMI. AR should be defined as FMI rebound rather than BMI rebound.
Subject(s)
Adiposity/physiology , Body Mass Index , Obesity/epidemiology , Overweight/epidemiology , Body Height , Body Weight , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Weight Gain , White PeopleABSTRACT
The Kiel Obesity Prevention Study (KOPS) has been performed since 1996. Examinations were performed at age 6, 10 and 14 years. In addition, birth weight as well as height and weight at age 2 years were collected retrospectively. For the study 4,997, 1,671 and 748 children were recruited at baseline (at age 6 years) as well as at 4 and 8-year follow-up, respectively. In this paper we will analyze and discuss (i) the important time period for preventive measures, (ii) effect sizes needed for successful interventions and (iii) suitable approaches for preventive measures. The main results were: (i) at age 6 years persistence of overweight was 69% while at younger ages persistence was 21% only. Thus, school entry was shown to be an important period for preventive measures. (ii) Interventions have to reduce energy balance by 140 kcal/day to prevent overweight (e.g. a reduction of energy intake). (iii) Prevention programs should involve the family and focus on increasing physical activity.
