COVID-19 Prevention and Mitigation Decision-Making Processes While Navigating Chronic Disease Care: Perspectives of Black Adults with Heart Failure and Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure and diabetes are comorbidities that disproportionately contribute to high morbidity and mortality among Blacks. Further compounding the racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 health outcomes, Blacks with cardiometabolic diseases are at high risk of experiencing serious complications or mortality from COVID-19. This study aimed to assess how Blacks with heart failure and diabetes navigated chronic care management during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A mixed methods study including in-depth interviews and surveys with adults diagnosed with heart failure and diabetes (n = 17) was conducted in 2021-2022. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Participants reported that while the pandemic initially caused delays in access to health services, shifts to telemedicine allowed for continued care despite preferences for in-person appointments. Various sources of information were used in different ways to make decisions on how to best reduce health risks due to COVID-19, but individuals and institutions affiliated with science and medicine, or who promoted information from these sources, were considered to be the most trusted sources of information among those who relied on outside guidance when making health-related decisions. Individuals' self-awareness of their own high-risk status and perceived control over their exposure levels to the virus informed what COVID-19 prevention and mitigation strategies people used. CONCLUSION: Information backed by scientific data was an important health communication tool that alongside other factors, such as fear of mortality due to COVID-19, encouraged individuals to get vaccinated and adopt other COVID-19 prevention and mitigation behaviors.

Reduction of the Adult Epilepsy Self-Management Measure Instrument (AESMMI).

Managing one's own symptoms, medications, treatments, lifestyle, and psychological and social aspects of chronic disease is known as self-management. The Institute of Medicine has identified three categories of epilepsy self-management, including medication management, behavior management, and emotional support. Overall, there has been limited research of interventions measuring epilepsy self-management behaviors. The present study aimed to develop an abbreviated version of the full, previously published, Adult Epilepsy Self-Management Measurement Instrument (AESMMI) using confirmatory factor analysis. Data come from a cross-sectional survey of people with epilepsy. The sample included adults with epilepsy (n = 422), who reported that a clinician diagnosed them with epilepsy or a seizure disorder. We ran confirmatory factor analyses in testing the abbreviated scale. The scale was reduced using a theory-driven data-informed approach. The full AESMMI length was reduced by 40% (from 65 to 38 items) with an overall internal consistency of 0.912. The abbreviated AESMMI retained the 11 subdomains, with Cronbach's alphas from 0.535 to 0.878. This reduced item scale can be useful for assessing self-management behaviors for people with epilepsy or measuring outcomes in self-management research.

Epilepsy self-management behaviors among African Americans with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Although self-management practices are heavily studied in the general population of adults with epilepsy, African American people with epilepsy (PWE) have been understudied. Improving understanding about epilepsy self-management among African Americans is warrantedbecause of the significantly greater mortality rates among this population compared withPWE from other racial/ethnic groups. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Adult Epilepsy Self-Management Measurement Instrument (AESMMI) for Black/African American adults and describe their self-management behaviors. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional survey of self-identified Black/African American adults who reported that a health provider diagnosed them as having epilepsy or a seizure disorder. Participants completed a cross-sectional survey between spring 2017 and fall 2018. The survey measured self-management behaviors (65-itemAESMMI), quality of life, depression, seizure severity, epilepsy history, and demographics. We ran descriptive analyses, computed scales, and ran reliability statistics for the AESMMI. Correlations were run between total AESMMI score and depression symptoms and quality of life to assess construct validity. RESULTS: Generally, participants (N = 114) were male (58.6%), from urban/suburban settings (90.5%), at least high school graduates (86.4%), and of lowerincome (90.3%). Their ages ranged from 19 to 64 years with a mean age of 53 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.9). Participants had general (72.8%) and focal seizures (55.3%) primarily. Many were diagnosed at a young age (M = 10.9), were on antiepileptic medications (91.2%), and had seen a primary care doctor (68.4%) or general neurologist for treatment (54.4%). Sixty percent had visited a neurologist in the past year. African American participants had a low score on quality of life (Quality of Life in Epilepsy [QOLIE], M = 1.86) and low depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-8], M = 3.13). Participants reported conducting self-management behaviors in the following domains more frequently: proactivity (M = 4.11), medication adherence (M = 3.92), healthcare communications (M = 3.91), and social support (M = 3.90). In contrast, they performed self-management behaviors related to treatment (M = 3.34), stress management (M = 3.56), and safety (M = 3.58) less frequently. The overall reliability of the AESMMI was 0.88. Adult Epilepsy Self-Management Measurement Instrument score was correlated with quality of life (r = 0.151). CONCLUSION: Findings are clinically relevant as knowing patients'self-management behaviors enables healthcare clinicians to support and encourage adults to improve the management of their epilepsy. Services or interventions related to coping with stress, safety, and adherence with treatment and medication may be warranted for African Americans with epilepsy.